Tužilaštva u političkom sporazumu SDP/SNSD, Nezavisno ili političko pravosuđe?:
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
Sprache: | Bosnian |
Veröffentlicht: |
Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina]
Fondacija Centar za javno pravo
2013
|
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | BSB01 |
Beschreibung: | The Agreement between SDP and SNSD on programmatic/project cooperation in legislative and executive branch of government suggest changes in the process of appointment of prosecutors at all levels in BiH. Namely, the Agreement foresees, among other issues, that all chief prosecutors should be appointed by 14 different legislative bodies (State, entities, cantons and Brčko District of BiH), while other prosecutors should be appointed by respective chief prosecutors. This raised serious issues related to maintenance of prosecutor's independence since such proposal reduces significantly the role that the High Judicial and Prosecutorial Council has in relation to this issue. The author argues that international standards related to the independence of prosecutors differ from those related to independence of judges and that it is permissible that legislator or even executive level can appoint prosecutors. However, author notes a tendency both in the region and in other countries to form independent prosecutorial councils that will have an important role in the process of appointment of prosecutors. Also, there is a need for institutional safeguards against unacceptable outside interference in particular cases that have to be in place. Based on international standards and practice in some other countries, and taking into account the identified problems with the prosecutorial service in BiH, author argues that only State, Entity and Brčko District Chief Prosecutors should be appointed by the legislator - BiH Parliamentary Assembly. However, all deputies, Chief Prosecutors at cantonal levels, and all other prosecutors should be appointed by the Prosecutorial Chamber of the HJCP that should be established. Author also suggest a model of appointment that could be used to develop a process that would make prosecutor services at all levels more effective and accountable, but that will at the same time guarantee autonomy of the prosecutor's offices and independence of individual prosecutors |
Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 15) |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV048261612 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 220609s2013 |||| o||u| ||||||bos d | ||
035 | |a (ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol574263 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)1334036797 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV048261612 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
041 | 0 | |a bos | |
049 | |a DE-12 | ||
084 | |a OST |q DE-12 |2 fid | ||
100 | 1 | |a Sali-Terzić, Sevima |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Tužilaštva u političkom sporazumu SDP/SNSD, Nezavisno ili političko pravosuđe? |c Sevima Sali-Terzić |
264 | 1 | |a Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina] |b Fondacija Centar za javno pravo |c 2013 | |
264 | 2 | |a Frankfurt M. |b CEEOL |c 2013 | |
300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 15) | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a The Agreement between SDP and SNSD on programmatic/project cooperation in legislative and executive branch of government suggest changes in the process of appointment of prosecutors at all levels in BiH. Namely, the Agreement foresees, among other issues, that all chief prosecutors should be appointed by 14 different legislative bodies (State, entities, cantons and Brčko District of BiH), while other prosecutors should be appointed by respective chief prosecutors. This raised serious issues related to maintenance of prosecutor's independence since such proposal reduces significantly the role that the High Judicial and Prosecutorial Council has in relation to this issue. The author argues that international standards related to the independence of prosecutors differ from those related to independence of judges and that it is permissible that legislator or even executive level can appoint prosecutors. | ||
500 | |a However, author notes a tendency both in the region and in other countries to form independent prosecutorial councils that will have an important role in the process of appointment of prosecutors. Also, there is a need for institutional safeguards against unacceptable outside interference in particular cases that have to be in place. Based on international standards and practice in some other countries, and taking into account the identified problems with the prosecutorial service in BiH, author argues that only State, Entity and Brčko District Chief Prosecutors should be appointed by the legislator - BiH Parliamentary Assembly. However, all deputies, Chief Prosecutors at cantonal levels, and all other prosecutors should be appointed by the Prosecutorial Chamber of the HJCP that should be established. | ||
500 | |a Author also suggest a model of appointment that could be used to develop a process that would make prosecutor services at all levels more effective and accountable, but that will at the same time guarantee autonomy of the prosecutor's offices and independence of individual prosecutors | ||
650 | 4 | |a Politics | |
650 | 4 | |a Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence | |
650 | 4 | |a Constitutional Law | |
650 | 4 | |a Public Law | |
650 | 4 | |a Evaluation research | |
650 | 4 | |a Corruption - Transparency - Anti-Corruption | |
912 | |a ZDB-45-CGR | ||
940 | 1 | |n oe | |
940 | 1 | |q BSB_OE_CEEOL | |
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033641815 | ||
966 | e | |u https://www.ceeol.com/search/gray-literature-detail?id=574263 |l BSB01 |p ZDB-45-CGR |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804184065087111168 |
---|---|
adam_txt | |
any_adam_object | |
any_adam_object_boolean | |
author | Sali-Terzić, Sevima |
author_facet | Sali-Terzić, Sevima |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Sali-Terzić, Sevima |
author_variant | s s t sst |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV048261612 |
collection | ZDB-45-CGR |
ctrlnum | (ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol574263 (OCoLC)1334036797 (DE-599)BVBBV048261612 |
format | Electronic eBook |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03381nmm a2200433zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV048261612</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220609s2013 |||| o||u| ||||||bos d</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol574263</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1334036797</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV048261612</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">bos</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OST</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sali-Terzić, Sevima</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Tužilaštva u političkom sporazumu SDP/SNSD, Nezavisno ili političko pravosuđe?</subfield><subfield code="c">Sevima Sali-Terzić</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina]</subfield><subfield code="b">Fondacija Centar za javno pravo</subfield><subfield code="c">2013</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Frankfurt M.</subfield><subfield code="b">CEEOL</subfield><subfield code="c">2013</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 15)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The Agreement between SDP and SNSD on programmatic/project cooperation in legislative and executive branch of government suggest changes in the process of appointment of prosecutors at all levels in BiH. Namely, the Agreement foresees, among other issues, that all chief prosecutors should be appointed by 14 different legislative bodies (State, entities, cantons and Brčko District of BiH), while other prosecutors should be appointed by respective chief prosecutors. This raised serious issues related to maintenance of prosecutor's independence since such proposal reduces significantly the role that the High Judicial and Prosecutorial Council has in relation to this issue. The author argues that international standards related to the independence of prosecutors differ from those related to independence of judges and that it is permissible that legislator or even executive level can appoint prosecutors. </subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">However, author notes a tendency both in the region and in other countries to form independent prosecutorial councils that will have an important role in the process of appointment of prosecutors. Also, there is a need for institutional safeguards against unacceptable outside interference in particular cases that have to be in place. Based on international standards and practice in some other countries, and taking into account the identified problems with the prosecutorial service in BiH, author argues that only State, Entity and Brčko District Chief Prosecutors should be appointed by the legislator - BiH Parliamentary Assembly. However, all deputies, Chief Prosecutors at cantonal levels, and all other prosecutors should be appointed by the Prosecutorial Chamber of the HJCP that should be established. </subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Author also suggest a model of appointment that could be used to develop a process that would make prosecutor services at all levels more effective and accountable, but that will at the same time guarantee autonomy of the prosecutor's offices and independence of individual prosecutors</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Politics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Constitutional Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Public Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Evaluation research</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Corruption - Transparency - Anti-Corruption</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-45-CGR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">BSB_OE_CEEOL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033641815</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://www.ceeol.com/search/gray-literature-detail?id=574263</subfield><subfield code="l">BSB01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-45-CGR</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | DE-604.BV048261612 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
index_date | 2024-07-03T19:59:34Z |
indexdate | 2024-07-10T09:33:24Z |
institution | BVB |
language | Bosnian |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033641815 |
oclc_num | 1334036797 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-12 |
owner_facet | DE-12 |
physical | 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 15) |
psigel | ZDB-45-CGR BSB_OE_CEEOL |
publishDate | 2013 |
publishDateSearch | 2013 |
publishDateSort | 2013 |
publisher | Fondacija Centar za javno pravo |
record_format | marc |
spelling | Sali-Terzić, Sevima Verfasser aut Tužilaštva u političkom sporazumu SDP/SNSD, Nezavisno ili političko pravosuđe? Sevima Sali-Terzić Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina] Fondacija Centar za javno pravo 2013 Frankfurt M. CEEOL 2013 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 15) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier The Agreement between SDP and SNSD on programmatic/project cooperation in legislative and executive branch of government suggest changes in the process of appointment of prosecutors at all levels in BiH. Namely, the Agreement foresees, among other issues, that all chief prosecutors should be appointed by 14 different legislative bodies (State, entities, cantons and Brčko District of BiH), while other prosecutors should be appointed by respective chief prosecutors. This raised serious issues related to maintenance of prosecutor's independence since such proposal reduces significantly the role that the High Judicial and Prosecutorial Council has in relation to this issue. The author argues that international standards related to the independence of prosecutors differ from those related to independence of judges and that it is permissible that legislator or even executive level can appoint prosecutors. However, author notes a tendency both in the region and in other countries to form independent prosecutorial councils that will have an important role in the process of appointment of prosecutors. Also, there is a need for institutional safeguards against unacceptable outside interference in particular cases that have to be in place. Based on international standards and practice in some other countries, and taking into account the identified problems with the prosecutorial service in BiH, author argues that only State, Entity and Brčko District Chief Prosecutors should be appointed by the legislator - BiH Parliamentary Assembly. However, all deputies, Chief Prosecutors at cantonal levels, and all other prosecutors should be appointed by the Prosecutorial Chamber of the HJCP that should be established. Author also suggest a model of appointment that could be used to develop a process that would make prosecutor services at all levels more effective and accountable, but that will at the same time guarantee autonomy of the prosecutor's offices and independence of individual prosecutors Politics Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence Constitutional Law Public Law Evaluation research Corruption - Transparency - Anti-Corruption |
spellingShingle | Sali-Terzić, Sevima Tužilaštva u političkom sporazumu SDP/SNSD, Nezavisno ili političko pravosuđe? Politics Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence Constitutional Law Public Law Evaluation research Corruption - Transparency - Anti-Corruption |
title | Tužilaštva u političkom sporazumu SDP/SNSD, Nezavisno ili političko pravosuđe? |
title_auth | Tužilaštva u političkom sporazumu SDP/SNSD, Nezavisno ili političko pravosuđe? |
title_exact_search | Tužilaštva u političkom sporazumu SDP/SNSD, Nezavisno ili političko pravosuđe? |
title_exact_search_txtP | Tužilaštva u političkom sporazumu SDP/SNSD, Nezavisno ili političko pravosuđe? |
title_full | Tužilaštva u političkom sporazumu SDP/SNSD, Nezavisno ili političko pravosuđe? Sevima Sali-Terzić |
title_fullStr | Tužilaštva u političkom sporazumu SDP/SNSD, Nezavisno ili političko pravosuđe? Sevima Sali-Terzić |
title_full_unstemmed | Tužilaštva u političkom sporazumu SDP/SNSD, Nezavisno ili političko pravosuđe? Sevima Sali-Terzić |
title_short | Tužilaštva u političkom sporazumu SDP/SNSD, Nezavisno ili političko pravosuđe? |
title_sort | tuzilastva u politickom sporazumu sdp snsd nezavisno ili politicko pravosude |
topic | Politics Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence Constitutional Law Public Law Evaluation research Corruption - Transparency - Anti-Corruption |
topic_facet | Politics Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence Constitutional Law Public Law Evaluation research Corruption - Transparency - Anti-Corruption |
work_keys_str_mv | AT saliterzicsevima tuzilastvaupolitickomsporazumusdpsnsdnezavisnoilipolitickopravosuđe |