Vrhovni sud BiH, Odgovor na probleme ili samo još jedan projekat u kontinuiranim reformama pravosuđa:
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | Bosnian |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina]
Fondacija Centar za javno pravo
2011
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | BSB01 |
| Beschreibung: | The question if BiH needs one Supreme Court at the State level is a complex issue that involves much more consideration than just the mere creation of another court. This complexity derives not from various general arguments 'for' and 'against' its creation that tend to be more political rather than legal. It derives from variety of legal issues, primarily the constitutional bases for the creation of such Court, its jurisdiction, position within the legal BiH system, relation to other Entity courts including Supreme Courts and with the Court of BiH, etc. Also, the discussion should involve strategic issues of the further constitutional development and judicial reform. Is the creation of the BiH Supreme Court crucial for the further judicial reform and for the achievement of a more functional State? Or, is it more important to resolve some other, more difficult problems that judiciary faces in BiH, such as: huge backlog, trial in reasonable time, failures in the implementation of the Judicial Reform Strategy, continuing political pressures, lack of human and material resources, etc.? Author argues that in order to find the best solution it is important to carefully consider all the various questions and issues and not just to view the creation of the BiH Supreme Court as yet another project within judicial or constitutional reform |
| Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 13) |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV048261403 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220609s2011 |||| o||u| ||||||bos d | ||
| 035 | |a (ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol572850 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1334054128 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV048261403 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a bos | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 | ||
| 084 | |a OST |q DE-12 |2 fid | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Sali-Terzić, Sevima |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Vrhovni sud BiH, Odgovor na probleme ili samo još jedan projekat u kontinuiranim reformama pravosuđa |c Sevima Sali-Terzić |
| 264 | 1 | |a Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina] |b Fondacija Centar za javno pravo |c 2011 | |
| 264 | 2 | |a Frankfurt M. |b CEEOL |c 2011 | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 13) | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a The question if BiH needs one Supreme Court at the State level is a complex issue that involves much more consideration than just the mere creation of another court. This complexity derives not from various general arguments 'for' and 'against' its creation that tend to be more political rather than legal. It derives from variety of legal issues, primarily the constitutional bases for the creation of such Court, its jurisdiction, position within the legal BiH system, relation to other Entity courts including Supreme Courts and with the Court of BiH, etc. Also, the discussion should involve strategic issues of the further constitutional development and judicial reform. Is the creation of the BiH Supreme Court crucial for the further judicial reform and for the achievement of a more functional State? Or, is it more important to resolve some other, more difficult problems that judiciary faces in BiH, such as: huge backlog, trial in reasonable time, failures in the implementation of the Judicial Reform Strategy, continuing political pressures, lack of human and material resources, etc.? Author argues that in order to find the best solution it is important to carefully consider all the various questions and issues and not just to view the creation of the BiH Supreme Court as yet another project within judicial or constitutional reform | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Constitutional Law | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Public Law | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Evaluation research | |
| 912 | |a ZDB-45-CGR | ||
| 940 | 1 | |n oe | |
| 940 | 1 | |q BSB_OE_CEEOL | |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033641606 | ||
| 966 | e | |u https://www.ceeol.com/search/gray-literature-detail?id=572850 |l BSB01 |p ZDB-45-CGR |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804184064731643904 |
|---|---|
| adam_txt | |
| any_adam_object | |
| any_adam_object_boolean | |
| author | Sali-Terzić, Sevima |
| author_facet | Sali-Terzić, Sevima |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Sali-Terzić, Sevima |
| author_variant | s s t sst |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV048261403 |
| collection | ZDB-45-CGR |
| ctrlnum | (ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol572850 (OCoLC)1334054128 (DE-599)BVBBV048261403 |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02619nmm a2200385zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV048261403</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220609s2011 |||| o||u| ||||||bos d</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol572850</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1334054128</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV048261403</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">bos</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OST</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sali-Terzić, Sevima</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Vrhovni sud BiH, Odgovor na probleme ili samo još jedan projekat u kontinuiranim reformama pravosuđa</subfield><subfield code="c">Sevima Sali-Terzić</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina]</subfield><subfield code="b">Fondacija Centar za javno pravo</subfield><subfield code="c">2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Frankfurt M.</subfield><subfield code="b">CEEOL</subfield><subfield code="c">2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 13)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The question if BiH needs one Supreme Court at the State level is a complex issue that involves much more consideration than just the mere creation of another court. This complexity derives not from various general arguments 'for' and 'against' its creation that tend to be more political rather than legal. It derives from variety of legal issues, primarily the constitutional bases for the creation of such Court, its jurisdiction, position within the legal BiH system, relation to other Entity courts including Supreme Courts and with the Court of BiH, etc. Also, the discussion should involve strategic issues of the further constitutional development and judicial reform. Is the creation of the BiH Supreme Court crucial for the further judicial reform and for the achievement of a more functional State? Or, is it more important to resolve some other, more difficult problems that judiciary faces in BiH, such as: huge backlog, trial in reasonable time, failures in the implementation of the Judicial Reform Strategy, continuing political pressures, lack of human and material resources, etc.? Author argues that in order to find the best solution it is important to carefully consider all the various questions and issues and not just to view the creation of the BiH Supreme Court as yet another project within judicial or constitutional reform</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Constitutional Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Public Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Evaluation research</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-45-CGR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">BSB_OE_CEEOL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033641606</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://www.ceeol.com/search/gray-literature-detail?id=572850</subfield><subfield code="l">BSB01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-45-CGR</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV048261403 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T19:59:34Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T09:33:24Z |
| institution | BVB |
| language | Bosnian |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033641606 |
| oclc_num | 1334054128 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 |
| physical | 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 13) |
| psigel | ZDB-45-CGR BSB_OE_CEEOL |
| publishDate | 2011 |
| publishDateSearch | 2011 |
| publishDateSort | 2011 |
| publisher | Fondacija Centar za javno pravo |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Sali-Terzić, Sevima Verfasser aut Vrhovni sud BiH, Odgovor na probleme ili samo još jedan projekat u kontinuiranim reformama pravosuđa Sevima Sali-Terzić Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina] Fondacija Centar za javno pravo 2011 Frankfurt M. CEEOL 2011 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 13) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier The question if BiH needs one Supreme Court at the State level is a complex issue that involves much more consideration than just the mere creation of another court. This complexity derives not from various general arguments 'for' and 'against' its creation that tend to be more political rather than legal. It derives from variety of legal issues, primarily the constitutional bases for the creation of such Court, its jurisdiction, position within the legal BiH system, relation to other Entity courts including Supreme Courts and with the Court of BiH, etc. Also, the discussion should involve strategic issues of the further constitutional development and judicial reform. Is the creation of the BiH Supreme Court crucial for the further judicial reform and for the achievement of a more functional State? Or, is it more important to resolve some other, more difficult problems that judiciary faces in BiH, such as: huge backlog, trial in reasonable time, failures in the implementation of the Judicial Reform Strategy, continuing political pressures, lack of human and material resources, etc.? Author argues that in order to find the best solution it is important to carefully consider all the various questions and issues and not just to view the creation of the BiH Supreme Court as yet another project within judicial or constitutional reform Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence Constitutional Law Public Law Evaluation research |
| spellingShingle | Sali-Terzić, Sevima Vrhovni sud BiH, Odgovor na probleme ili samo još jedan projekat u kontinuiranim reformama pravosuđa Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence Constitutional Law Public Law Evaluation research |
| title | Vrhovni sud BiH, Odgovor na probleme ili samo još jedan projekat u kontinuiranim reformama pravosuđa |
| title_auth | Vrhovni sud BiH, Odgovor na probleme ili samo još jedan projekat u kontinuiranim reformama pravosuđa |
| title_exact_search | Vrhovni sud BiH, Odgovor na probleme ili samo još jedan projekat u kontinuiranim reformama pravosuđa |
| title_exact_search_txtP | Vrhovni sud BiH, Odgovor na probleme ili samo još jedan projekat u kontinuiranim reformama pravosuđa |
| title_full | Vrhovni sud BiH, Odgovor na probleme ili samo još jedan projekat u kontinuiranim reformama pravosuđa Sevima Sali-Terzić |
| title_fullStr | Vrhovni sud BiH, Odgovor na probleme ili samo još jedan projekat u kontinuiranim reformama pravosuđa Sevima Sali-Terzić |
| title_full_unstemmed | Vrhovni sud BiH, Odgovor na probleme ili samo još jedan projekat u kontinuiranim reformama pravosuđa Sevima Sali-Terzić |
| title_short | Vrhovni sud BiH, Odgovor na probleme ili samo još jedan projekat u kontinuiranim reformama pravosuđa |
| title_sort | vrhovni sud bih odgovor na probleme ili samo jos jedan projekat u kontinuiranim reformama pravosuda |
| topic | Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence Constitutional Law Public Law Evaluation research |
| topic_facet | Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence Constitutional Law Public Law Evaluation research |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT saliterzicsevima vrhovnisudbihodgovornaproblemeilisamojosjedanprojekatukontinuiranimreformamapravosuđa |