Vrhovni sud BiH - između politike i prava:
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | Croatian |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina]
Fondacija Centar za javno pravo
2011
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | BSB01 |
| Beschreibung: | According to the Dayton Agreement the regular judiciary in BiH is within the jurisdiction of theEntities. Entity judicial systems are autonomous and conceptually well-rounded. The state levelhas an effective functioning judicial system designed in a form of a Prosecutor's Office and theCourt of BiH. It is not clear what jurisdiction could the Supreme Court in BiH have within theexisting concept.This concept of a state judicial system lacks an independent Appellate Court and that can beconsidered the most serious problem of the judicial system today. Possible jurisprudenceproblems in the current system are dealt with through joint sessions held by the Supreme Courtsof the Entities and Brčko District Appellate Court.Establishment of the Supreme Court would require a completely new configuration ofjurisdiction. This would involve redesigning the organizational and other laws at all levels and anew round of comprehensive judicial sector reforms.The judicial system is currently in cycle of reform undertaken in accordance with the existingconcept. A new reform cycle could affect the effectiveness of that reform. At this point it couldthreaten the achieved efficiency level.The system that underwent reform needs to be stabilized through patient harmonization of entitylaws and building of the best professional and ethical standards in order to create goodconditions for a new reform |
| Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 9) |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV048261394 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220609s2011 |||| o||u| ||||||hrv d | ||
| 035 | |a (ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol572864 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1334027892 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV048261394 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a hrv | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 | ||
| 084 | |a OST |q DE-12 |2 fid | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Perić, Branko |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Vrhovni sud BiH - između politike i prava |c Branko Perić |
| 264 | 1 | |a Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina] |b Fondacija Centar za javno pravo |c 2011 | |
| 264 | 2 | |a Frankfurt M. |b CEEOL |c 2011 | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 9) | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a According to the Dayton Agreement the regular judiciary in BiH is within the jurisdiction of theEntities. Entity judicial systems are autonomous and conceptually well-rounded. The state levelhas an effective functioning judicial system designed in a form of a Prosecutor's Office and theCourt of BiH. It is not clear what jurisdiction could the Supreme Court in BiH have within theexisting concept.This concept of a state judicial system lacks an independent Appellate Court and that can beconsidered the most serious problem of the judicial system today. Possible jurisprudenceproblems in the current system are dealt with through joint sessions held by the Supreme Courtsof the Entities and Brčko District Appellate Court.Establishment of the Supreme Court would require a completely new configuration ofjurisdiction. This would involve redesigning the organizational and other laws at all levels and anew round of comprehensive judicial sector reforms.The judicial system is currently in cycle of reform undertaken in accordance with the existingconcept. A new reform cycle could affect the effectiveness of that reform. At this point it couldthreaten the achieved efficiency level.The system that underwent reform needs to be stabilized through patient harmonization of entitylaws and building of the best professional and ethical standards in order to create goodconditions for a new reform | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Politics | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Constitutional Law | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Public Law | |
| 912 | |a ZDB-45-CGR | ||
| 940 | 1 | |n oe | |
| 940 | 1 | |q BSB_OE_CEEOL | |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033641597 | ||
| 966 | e | |u https://www.ceeol.com/search/gray-literature-detail?id=572864 |l BSB01 |p ZDB-45-CGR |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804184064721158144 |
|---|---|
| adam_txt | |
| any_adam_object | |
| any_adam_object_boolean | |
| author | Perić, Branko |
| author_facet | Perić, Branko |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Perić, Branko |
| author_variant | b p bp |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV048261394 |
| collection | ZDB-45-CGR |
| ctrlnum | (ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol572864 (OCoLC)1334027892 (DE-599)BVBBV048261394 |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02580nmm a2200385zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV048261394</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220609s2011 |||| o||u| ||||||hrv d</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol572864</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1334027892</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV048261394</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">hrv</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OST</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Perić, Branko</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Vrhovni sud BiH - između politike i prava</subfield><subfield code="c">Branko Perić</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina]</subfield><subfield code="b">Fondacija Centar za javno pravo</subfield><subfield code="c">2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Frankfurt M.</subfield><subfield code="b">CEEOL</subfield><subfield code="c">2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 9)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">According to the Dayton Agreement the regular judiciary in BiH is within the jurisdiction of theEntities. Entity judicial systems are autonomous and conceptually well-rounded. The state levelhas an effective functioning judicial system designed in a form of a Prosecutor's Office and theCourt of BiH. It is not clear what jurisdiction could the Supreme Court in BiH have within theexisting concept.This concept of a state judicial system lacks an independent Appellate Court and that can beconsidered the most serious problem of the judicial system today. Possible jurisprudenceproblems in the current system are dealt with through joint sessions held by the Supreme Courtsof the Entities and Brčko District Appellate Court.Establishment of the Supreme Court would require a completely new configuration ofjurisdiction. This would involve redesigning the organizational and other laws at all levels and anew round of comprehensive judicial sector reforms.The judicial system is currently in cycle of reform undertaken in accordance with the existingconcept. A new reform cycle could affect the effectiveness of that reform. At this point it couldthreaten the achieved efficiency level.The system that underwent reform needs to be stabilized through patient harmonization of entitylaws and building of the best professional and ethical standards in order to create goodconditions for a new reform</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Politics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Constitutional Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Public Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-45-CGR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">BSB_OE_CEEOL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033641597</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://www.ceeol.com/search/gray-literature-detail?id=572864</subfield><subfield code="l">BSB01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-45-CGR</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV048261394 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T19:59:34Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T09:33:24Z |
| institution | BVB |
| language | Croatian |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033641597 |
| oclc_num | 1334027892 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 |
| physical | 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 9) |
| psigel | ZDB-45-CGR BSB_OE_CEEOL |
| publishDate | 2011 |
| publishDateSearch | 2011 |
| publishDateSort | 2011 |
| publisher | Fondacija Centar za javno pravo |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Perić, Branko Verfasser aut Vrhovni sud BiH - između politike i prava Branko Perić Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina] Fondacija Centar za javno pravo 2011 Frankfurt M. CEEOL 2011 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 9) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier According to the Dayton Agreement the regular judiciary in BiH is within the jurisdiction of theEntities. Entity judicial systems are autonomous and conceptually well-rounded. The state levelhas an effective functioning judicial system designed in a form of a Prosecutor's Office and theCourt of BiH. It is not clear what jurisdiction could the Supreme Court in BiH have within theexisting concept.This concept of a state judicial system lacks an independent Appellate Court and that can beconsidered the most serious problem of the judicial system today. Possible jurisprudenceproblems in the current system are dealt with through joint sessions held by the Supreme Courtsof the Entities and Brčko District Appellate Court.Establishment of the Supreme Court would require a completely new configuration ofjurisdiction. This would involve redesigning the organizational and other laws at all levels and anew round of comprehensive judicial sector reforms.The judicial system is currently in cycle of reform undertaken in accordance with the existingconcept. A new reform cycle could affect the effectiveness of that reform. At this point it couldthreaten the achieved efficiency level.The system that underwent reform needs to be stabilized through patient harmonization of entitylaws and building of the best professional and ethical standards in order to create goodconditions for a new reform Politics Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence Constitutional Law Public Law |
| spellingShingle | Perić, Branko Vrhovni sud BiH - između politike i prava Politics Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence Constitutional Law Public Law |
| title | Vrhovni sud BiH - između politike i prava |
| title_auth | Vrhovni sud BiH - između politike i prava |
| title_exact_search | Vrhovni sud BiH - između politike i prava |
| title_exact_search_txtP | Vrhovni sud BiH - između politike i prava |
| title_full | Vrhovni sud BiH - između politike i prava Branko Perić |
| title_fullStr | Vrhovni sud BiH - između politike i prava Branko Perić |
| title_full_unstemmed | Vrhovni sud BiH - između politike i prava Branko Perić |
| title_short | Vrhovni sud BiH - između politike i prava |
| title_sort | vrhovni sud bih izmedu politike i prava |
| topic | Politics Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence Constitutional Law Public Law |
| topic_facet | Politics Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence Constitutional Law Public Law |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT pericbranko vrhovnisudbihizmeđupolitikeiprava |