Nepotpuni monizam u ustavnom poretku Republike Srbije, zašto je a posteriori potvrđivanje međunarodnih ugovora loše rešenje?:
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
Veröffentlicht: |
Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina]
Fondacija Centar za javno pravo
2015
|
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | BSB01 |
Beschreibung: | The article examines the problem of relationship between the norms of international law and the domestic legal order of the Republic of Serbia. The text of the Constitution of the Republic of Serbia suggests a form of monism - which understands the international and domestic norms as parts of a single and comprehensive legal order - however, without permiting an automatic incorporation of concluded treaties into domestic law. The Constitutional Court of Serbia is authorized by the Constitution to assess the constitutionality of treaties and, therefore, to decide on their future application in the domestic legal order. However, as a consequence of the Court's decision, a treaty which had already been producing domestic legal effects, can - if it is estimated to be unconstitutional - be deprived its legal effects sometimes long after its application in the domestic legal order had started. This might produce a dilemma between the unchallenged respect of the constitutional norms on one side, and the effectuation in good faith of the international obligations on the other. In order for those two imperatives to be reconciled, the article suggests modifications of the relevant norms of the Constitution of the Republic of Serbia, aiming at the establishment of the preventive (early) control of the treaties' constitutionality |
Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 17) |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV048261277 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 220609s2015 |||| o||u| ||||||srp d | ||
035 | |a (ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol575283 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)1334032532 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV048261277 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
041 | 0 | |a srp | |
049 | |a DE-12 | ||
084 | |a OST |q DE-12 |2 fid | ||
100 | 1 | |a Mikić, Vladimir |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Nepotpuni monizam u ustavnom poretku Republike Srbije, zašto je a posteriori potvrđivanje međunarodnih ugovora loše rešenje? |c Vladimir Mikić |
264 | 1 | |a Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina] |b Fondacija Centar za javno pravo |c 2015 | |
264 | 2 | |a Frankfurt M. |b CEEOL |c 2015 | |
300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 17) | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a The article examines the problem of relationship between the norms of international law and the domestic legal order of the Republic of Serbia. The text of the Constitution of the Republic of Serbia suggests a form of monism - which understands the international and domestic norms as parts of a single and comprehensive legal order - however, without permiting an automatic incorporation of concluded treaties into domestic law. The Constitutional Court of Serbia is authorized by the Constitution to assess the constitutionality of treaties and, therefore, to decide on their future application in the domestic legal order. However, as a consequence of the Court's decision, a treaty which had already been producing domestic legal effects, can - if it is estimated to be unconstitutional - be deprived its legal effects sometimes long after its application in the domestic legal order had started. This might produce a dilemma between the unchallenged respect of the constitutional norms on one side, and the effectuation in good faith of the international obligations on the other. In order for those two imperatives to be reconciled, the article suggests modifications of the relevant norms of the Constitution of the Republic of Serbia, aiming at the establishment of the preventive (early) control of the treaties' constitutionality | ||
650 | 4 | |a Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence | |
650 | 4 | |a Constitutional Law | |
650 | 4 | |a International Law | |
650 | 4 | |a Public Law | |
650 | 4 | |a Evaluation research | |
650 | 4 | |a EU-Legislation | |
912 | |a ZDB-45-CGR | ||
940 | 1 | |n oe | |
940 | 1 | |q BSB_OE_CEEOL | |
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033641480 | ||
966 | e | |u https://www.ceeol.com/search/gray-literature-detail?id=575283 |l BSB01 |p ZDB-45-CGR |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804184064543948800 |
---|---|
adam_txt | |
any_adam_object | |
any_adam_object_boolean | |
author | Mikić, Vladimir |
author_facet | Mikić, Vladimir |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Mikić, Vladimir |
author_variant | v m vm |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV048261277 |
collection | ZDB-45-CGR |
ctrlnum | (ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol575283 (OCoLC)1334032532 (DE-599)BVBBV048261277 |
format | Electronic eBook |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02691nmm a2200409zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV048261277</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220609s2015 |||| o||u| ||||||srp d</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol575283</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1334032532</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV048261277</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">srp</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OST</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mikić, Vladimir</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Nepotpuni monizam u ustavnom poretku Republike Srbije, zašto je a posteriori potvrđivanje međunarodnih ugovora loše rešenje?</subfield><subfield code="c">Vladimir Mikić</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina]</subfield><subfield code="b">Fondacija Centar za javno pravo</subfield><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Frankfurt M.</subfield><subfield code="b">CEEOL</subfield><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 17)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The article examines the problem of relationship between the norms of international law and the domestic legal order of the Republic of Serbia. The text of the Constitution of the Republic of Serbia suggests a form of monism - which understands the international and domestic norms as parts of a single and comprehensive legal order - however, without permiting an automatic incorporation of concluded treaties into domestic law. The Constitutional Court of Serbia is authorized by the Constitution to assess the constitutionality of treaties and, therefore, to decide on their future application in the domestic legal order. However, as a consequence of the Court's decision, a treaty which had already been producing domestic legal effects, can - if it is estimated to be unconstitutional - be deprived its legal effects sometimes long after its application in the domestic legal order had started. This might produce a dilemma between the unchallenged respect of the constitutional norms on one side, and the effectuation in good faith of the international obligations on the other. In order for those two imperatives to be reconciled, the article suggests modifications of the relevant norms of the Constitution of the Republic of Serbia, aiming at the establishment of the preventive (early) control of the treaties' constitutionality</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Constitutional Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">International Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Public Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Evaluation research</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">EU-Legislation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-45-CGR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">BSB_OE_CEEOL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033641480</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://www.ceeol.com/search/gray-literature-detail?id=575283</subfield><subfield code="l">BSB01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-45-CGR</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | DE-604.BV048261277 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
index_date | 2024-07-03T19:59:34Z |
indexdate | 2024-07-10T09:33:24Z |
institution | BVB |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033641480 |
oclc_num | 1334032532 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-12 |
owner_facet | DE-12 |
physical | 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 17) |
psigel | ZDB-45-CGR BSB_OE_CEEOL |
publishDate | 2015 |
publishDateSearch | 2015 |
publishDateSort | 2015 |
publisher | Fondacija Centar za javno pravo |
record_format | marc |
spelling | Mikić, Vladimir Verfasser aut Nepotpuni monizam u ustavnom poretku Republike Srbije, zašto je a posteriori potvrđivanje međunarodnih ugovora loše rešenje? Vladimir Mikić Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina] Fondacija Centar za javno pravo 2015 Frankfurt M. CEEOL 2015 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 17) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier The article examines the problem of relationship between the norms of international law and the domestic legal order of the Republic of Serbia. The text of the Constitution of the Republic of Serbia suggests a form of monism - which understands the international and domestic norms as parts of a single and comprehensive legal order - however, without permiting an automatic incorporation of concluded treaties into domestic law. The Constitutional Court of Serbia is authorized by the Constitution to assess the constitutionality of treaties and, therefore, to decide on their future application in the domestic legal order. However, as a consequence of the Court's decision, a treaty which had already been producing domestic legal effects, can - if it is estimated to be unconstitutional - be deprived its legal effects sometimes long after its application in the domestic legal order had started. This might produce a dilemma between the unchallenged respect of the constitutional norms on one side, and the effectuation in good faith of the international obligations on the other. In order for those two imperatives to be reconciled, the article suggests modifications of the relevant norms of the Constitution of the Republic of Serbia, aiming at the establishment of the preventive (early) control of the treaties' constitutionality Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence Constitutional Law International Law Public Law Evaluation research EU-Legislation |
spellingShingle | Mikić, Vladimir Nepotpuni monizam u ustavnom poretku Republike Srbije, zašto je a posteriori potvrđivanje međunarodnih ugovora loše rešenje? Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence Constitutional Law International Law Public Law Evaluation research EU-Legislation |
title | Nepotpuni monizam u ustavnom poretku Republike Srbije, zašto je a posteriori potvrđivanje međunarodnih ugovora loše rešenje? |
title_auth | Nepotpuni monizam u ustavnom poretku Republike Srbije, zašto je a posteriori potvrđivanje međunarodnih ugovora loše rešenje? |
title_exact_search | Nepotpuni monizam u ustavnom poretku Republike Srbije, zašto je a posteriori potvrđivanje međunarodnih ugovora loše rešenje? |
title_exact_search_txtP | Nepotpuni monizam u ustavnom poretku Republike Srbije, zašto je a posteriori potvrđivanje međunarodnih ugovora loše rešenje? |
title_full | Nepotpuni monizam u ustavnom poretku Republike Srbije, zašto je a posteriori potvrđivanje međunarodnih ugovora loše rešenje? Vladimir Mikić |
title_fullStr | Nepotpuni monizam u ustavnom poretku Republike Srbije, zašto je a posteriori potvrđivanje međunarodnih ugovora loše rešenje? Vladimir Mikić |
title_full_unstemmed | Nepotpuni monizam u ustavnom poretku Republike Srbije, zašto je a posteriori potvrđivanje međunarodnih ugovora loše rešenje? Vladimir Mikić |
title_short | Nepotpuni monizam u ustavnom poretku Republike Srbije, zašto je a posteriori potvrđivanje međunarodnih ugovora loše rešenje? |
title_sort | nepotpuni monizam u ustavnom poretku republike srbije zasto je a posteriori potvrdivanje medunarodnih ugovora lose resenje |
topic | Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence Constitutional Law International Law Public Law Evaluation research EU-Legislation |
topic_facet | Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence Constitutional Law International Law Public Law Evaluation research EU-Legislation |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mikicvladimir nepotpunimonizamuustavnomporetkurepublikesrbijezastojeaposterioripotvrđivanjemeđunarodnihugovoraloseresenje |