Ustavna rigidnost i aporije revizione vlasti u Republici Srbiji:
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
Veröffentlicht: |
Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina]
Fondacija Centar za javno pravo
2017
|
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | BSB01 |
Beschreibung: | Although not characteristic of post-socialist states, Serbia is distinguished by strong constitutional rigidity. Aside from the adoption of the new Constitution in 2006, there have been no attempts made to revise the constitution since the first post-socialist constitution from 1990. The author aims to identify the reasons for constitutional rigidity in the first part of this paper. In the authors' opinion, there are five relevant factors: the unresolved statehood issue, the primarily protective function of the Serbian post-socialist constitutions, authoritarian constitutional tradition, explicit formal rigidness of the constitution; and informal amendments to the constitution. The second part of the paper deals with the theory of rational amendment procedure in transitional societies. In the third part, the author analyses the amendment procedure as foreseen by the 2006 Constitution and identifies its shortcomings. The main flaw being that the framers of the constitution did not rationally utilize the escalating amendment rules, because the majority of the constitutional provisions are amended by way of the more difficult proceedings, which involve voting in a citizen's referendum. The basic conclusion of this paper is that the amendment procedure must be changed, for the escalating system to be maintained, but for constitutional matter to be established logically and precisely as to which would be amended using the general and which, the more difficult amendment procedure and to clearly identify the fundamental core, or better said identity of the constitution |
Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 18) |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV048261209 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 220609s2017 |||| o||u| ||||||srp d | ||
035 | |a (ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol570623 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)1334045179 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV048261209 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
041 | 0 | |a srp | |
049 | |a DE-12 | ||
084 | |a OST |q DE-12 |2 fid | ||
100 | 1 | |a Simović, Darko |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Ustavna rigidnost i aporije revizione vlasti u Republici Srbiji |c Darko Simović |
264 | 1 | |a Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina] |b Fondacija Centar za javno pravo |c 2017 | |
264 | 2 | |a Frankfurt M. |b CEEOL |c 2017 | |
300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 18) | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Although not characteristic of post-socialist states, Serbia is distinguished by strong constitutional rigidity. Aside from the adoption of the new Constitution in 2006, there have been no attempts made to revise the constitution since the first post-socialist constitution from 1990. The author aims to identify the reasons for constitutional rigidity in the first part of this paper. In the authors' opinion, there are five relevant factors: the unresolved statehood issue, the primarily protective function of the Serbian post-socialist constitutions, authoritarian constitutional tradition, explicit formal rigidness of the constitution; and informal amendments to the constitution. The second part of the paper deals with the theory of rational amendment procedure in transitional societies. In the third part, the author analyses the amendment procedure as foreseen by the 2006 Constitution and identifies its shortcomings. The main flaw being that the framers of the constitution did not rationally utilize the escalating amendment rules, because the majority of the constitutional provisions are amended by way of the more difficult proceedings, which involve voting in a citizen's referendum. The basic conclusion of this paper is that the amendment procedure must be changed, for the escalating system to be maintained, but for constitutional matter to be established logically and precisely as to which would be amended using the general and which, the more difficult amendment procedure and to clearly identify the fundamental core, or better said identity of the constitution | ||
650 | 4 | |a Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence | |
650 | 4 | |a Constitutional Law | |
650 | 4 | |a Public Law | |
650 | 4 | |a Evaluation research | |
912 | |a ZDB-45-CGR | ||
940 | 1 | |n oe | |
940 | 1 | |q BSB_OE_CEEOL | |
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033641412 | ||
966 | e | |u https://www.ceeol.com/search/gray-literature-detail?id=570623 |l BSB01 |p ZDB-45-CGR |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804184064457965568 |
---|---|
adam_txt | |
any_adam_object | |
any_adam_object_boolean | |
author | Simović, Darko |
author_facet | Simović, Darko |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Simović, Darko |
author_variant | d s ds |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV048261209 |
collection | ZDB-45-CGR |
ctrlnum | (ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol570623 (OCoLC)1334045179 (DE-599)BVBBV048261209 |
format | Electronic eBook |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02807nmm a2200385zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV048261209</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220609s2017 |||| o||u| ||||||srp d</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol570623</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1334045179</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV048261209</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">srp</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OST</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Simović, Darko</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Ustavna rigidnost i aporije revizione vlasti u Republici Srbiji</subfield><subfield code="c">Darko Simović</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina]</subfield><subfield code="b">Fondacija Centar za javno pravo</subfield><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Frankfurt M.</subfield><subfield code="b">CEEOL</subfield><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 18)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Although not characteristic of post-socialist states, Serbia is distinguished by strong constitutional rigidity. Aside from the adoption of the new Constitution in 2006, there have been no attempts made to revise the constitution since the first post-socialist constitution from 1990. The author aims to identify the reasons for constitutional rigidity in the first part of this paper. In the authors' opinion, there are five relevant factors: the unresolved statehood issue, the primarily protective function of the Serbian post-socialist constitutions, authoritarian constitutional tradition, explicit formal rigidness of the constitution; and informal amendments to the constitution. The second part of the paper deals with the theory of rational amendment procedure in transitional societies. In the third part, the author analyses the amendment procedure as foreseen by the 2006 Constitution and identifies its shortcomings. The main flaw being that the framers of the constitution did not rationally utilize the escalating amendment rules, because the majority of the constitutional provisions are amended by way of the more difficult proceedings, which involve voting in a citizen's referendum. The basic conclusion of this paper is that the amendment procedure must be changed, for the escalating system to be maintained, but for constitutional matter to be established logically and precisely as to which would be amended using the general and which, the more difficult amendment procedure and to clearly identify the fundamental core, or better said identity of the constitution</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Constitutional Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Public Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Evaluation research</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-45-CGR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">BSB_OE_CEEOL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033641412</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://www.ceeol.com/search/gray-literature-detail?id=570623</subfield><subfield code="l">BSB01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-45-CGR</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | DE-604.BV048261209 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
index_date | 2024-07-03T19:59:34Z |
indexdate | 2024-07-10T09:33:24Z |
institution | BVB |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033641412 |
oclc_num | 1334045179 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-12 |
owner_facet | DE-12 |
physical | 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 18) |
psigel | ZDB-45-CGR BSB_OE_CEEOL |
publishDate | 2017 |
publishDateSearch | 2017 |
publishDateSort | 2017 |
publisher | Fondacija Centar za javno pravo |
record_format | marc |
spelling | Simović, Darko Verfasser aut Ustavna rigidnost i aporije revizione vlasti u Republici Srbiji Darko Simović Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina] Fondacija Centar za javno pravo 2017 Frankfurt M. CEEOL 2017 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 18) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Although not characteristic of post-socialist states, Serbia is distinguished by strong constitutional rigidity. Aside from the adoption of the new Constitution in 2006, there have been no attempts made to revise the constitution since the first post-socialist constitution from 1990. The author aims to identify the reasons for constitutional rigidity in the first part of this paper. In the authors' opinion, there are five relevant factors: the unresolved statehood issue, the primarily protective function of the Serbian post-socialist constitutions, authoritarian constitutional tradition, explicit formal rigidness of the constitution; and informal amendments to the constitution. The second part of the paper deals with the theory of rational amendment procedure in transitional societies. In the third part, the author analyses the amendment procedure as foreseen by the 2006 Constitution and identifies its shortcomings. The main flaw being that the framers of the constitution did not rationally utilize the escalating amendment rules, because the majority of the constitutional provisions are amended by way of the more difficult proceedings, which involve voting in a citizen's referendum. The basic conclusion of this paper is that the amendment procedure must be changed, for the escalating system to be maintained, but for constitutional matter to be established logically and precisely as to which would be amended using the general and which, the more difficult amendment procedure and to clearly identify the fundamental core, or better said identity of the constitution Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence Constitutional Law Public Law Evaluation research |
spellingShingle | Simović, Darko Ustavna rigidnost i aporije revizione vlasti u Republici Srbiji Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence Constitutional Law Public Law Evaluation research |
title | Ustavna rigidnost i aporije revizione vlasti u Republici Srbiji |
title_auth | Ustavna rigidnost i aporije revizione vlasti u Republici Srbiji |
title_exact_search | Ustavna rigidnost i aporije revizione vlasti u Republici Srbiji |
title_exact_search_txtP | Ustavna rigidnost i aporije revizione vlasti u Republici Srbiji |
title_full | Ustavna rigidnost i aporije revizione vlasti u Republici Srbiji Darko Simović |
title_fullStr | Ustavna rigidnost i aporije revizione vlasti u Republici Srbiji Darko Simović |
title_full_unstemmed | Ustavna rigidnost i aporije revizione vlasti u Republici Srbiji Darko Simović |
title_short | Ustavna rigidnost i aporije revizione vlasti u Republici Srbiji |
title_sort | ustavna rigidnost i aporije revizione vlasti u republici srbiji |
topic | Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence Constitutional Law Public Law Evaluation research |
topic_facet | Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence Constitutional Law Public Law Evaluation research |
work_keys_str_mv | AT simovicdarko ustavnarigidnostiaporijerevizionevlastiurepublicisrbiji |