Mogućnosti intervencije ombudsmana u upravnim postupcima na primjeru Zakona o slobodi pristupa informacijama:
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | Bosnian |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina]
Fondacija Centar za javno pravo
2017
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | BSB01 |
| Beschreibung: | In this paper authors are considering the potential of the Ombudsman's intervention in the Administrative Procedure, which is the basic procedure related to the work of Public administration. Existing legislation provides significant opportunities for Ombudsman to intervene in Administrative Procedure, as well as in Administrative Dispute, as a continuation of the Administrative Procedure. Analysis has been carried out in the area of Freedom of access to information, while the Freedom of Access to Information Act specifically emphasizes the role of the Ombudsman and due to the fact that this freedom is realized in Special Administrative Procedure. The Annual Report on results of the activities of the Institution of Human Rights Ombudsman of Bosnia and Herzegovina for 2016 was taken as the basis for the analysis. Data from aforementioned report compared to the legally regulated potentials led to the conclusion that the Ombudsman does not have significant influence on Administrative Procedures. The Ombudsmen does not use all the available remedies in the area of Freedom of access to information and in this cases it almost never acts as a party in the first instance and second instance of Administrative Procedure nor as the Plaintiff in an Administrative Dispute. Also, the Ombudsman's recommendations are rarely addressed to the second instance bodies or to the Court before termination of the (second instance or judicial) procedure. Timely issued recommendations (although by legal nature not binding) could be helpful in making legitimate and fair decisions by the power of their arguments. Also, it was found that there is not a satisfactory level of cooperation between Ombudsmen and Public Bodies, which challenges the effectiveness and efficiency of the Ombudsman in the area of Freedom of access to information. This requires appropriate measures which can lead to effective protection of the mentioned right. Improvement of the legal framework, cooperation and mutual respect are key factors |
| Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 16) |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV048261184 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220609s2017 |||| o||u| ||||||bos d | ||
| 035 | |a (ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol571239 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1334021143 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV048261184 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a bos | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 | ||
| 084 | |a OST |q DE-12 |2 fid | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Mehmedović, Emir |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Mogućnosti intervencije ombudsmana u upravnim postupcima na primjeru Zakona o slobodi pristupa informacijama |
| 264 | 1 | |a Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina] |b Fondacija Centar za javno pravo |c 2017 | |
| 264 | 2 | |a Frankfurt M. |b CEEOL |c 2017 | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 16) | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a In this paper authors are considering the potential of the Ombudsman's intervention in the Administrative Procedure, which is the basic procedure related to the work of Public administration. Existing legislation provides significant opportunities for Ombudsman to intervene in Administrative Procedure, as well as in Administrative Dispute, as a continuation of the Administrative Procedure. Analysis has been carried out in the area of Freedom of access to information, while the Freedom of Access to Information Act specifically emphasizes the role of the Ombudsman and due to the fact that this freedom is realized in Special Administrative Procedure. The Annual Report on results of the activities of the Institution of Human Rights Ombudsman of Bosnia and Herzegovina for 2016 was taken as the basis for the analysis. | ||
| 500 | |a Data from aforementioned report compared to the legally regulated potentials led to the conclusion that the Ombudsman does not have significant influence on Administrative Procedures. The Ombudsmen does not use all the available remedies in the area of Freedom of access to information and in this cases it almost never acts as a party in the first instance and second instance of Administrative Procedure nor as the Plaintiff in an Administrative Dispute. Also, the Ombudsman's recommendations are rarely addressed to the second instance bodies or to the Court before termination of the (second instance or judicial) procedure. Timely issued recommendations (although by legal nature not binding) could be helpful in making legitimate and fair decisions by the power of their arguments. | ||
| 500 | |a Also, it was found that there is not a satisfactory level of cooperation between Ombudsmen and Public Bodies, which challenges the effectiveness and efficiency of the Ombudsman in the area of Freedom of access to information. This requires appropriate measures which can lead to effective protection of the mentioned right. Improvement of the legal framework, cooperation and mutual respect are key factors | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Constitutional Law | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Human Rights and Humanitarian Law | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Public Law | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Evaluation research | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Horić, Selma |4 aut | |
| 912 | |a ZDB-45-CGR | ||
| 940 | 1 | |n oe | |
| 940 | 1 | |q BSB_OE_CEEOL | |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033641387 | ||
| 966 | e | |u https://www.ceeol.com/search/gray-literature-detail?id=571239 |l BSB01 |p ZDB-45-CGR |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804184064395051008 |
|---|---|
| adam_txt | |
| any_adam_object | |
| any_adam_object_boolean | |
| author | Mehmedović, Emir Horić, Selma |
| author_facet | Mehmedović, Emir Horić, Selma |
| author_role | aut aut |
| author_sort | Mehmedović, Emir |
| author_variant | e m em s h sh |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV048261184 |
| collection | ZDB-45-CGR |
| ctrlnum | (ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol571239 (OCoLC)1334021143 (DE-599)BVBBV048261184 |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03388nmm a2200433zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV048261184</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220609s2017 |||| o||u| ||||||bos d</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol571239</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1334021143</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV048261184</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">bos</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OST</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mehmedović, Emir</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Mogućnosti intervencije ombudsmana u upravnim postupcima na primjeru Zakona o slobodi pristupa informacijama</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina]</subfield><subfield code="b">Fondacija Centar za javno pravo</subfield><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Frankfurt M.</subfield><subfield code="b">CEEOL</subfield><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 16)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In this paper authors are considering the potential of the Ombudsman's intervention in the Administrative Procedure, which is the basic procedure related to the work of Public administration. Existing legislation provides significant opportunities for Ombudsman to intervene in Administrative Procedure, as well as in Administrative Dispute, as a continuation of the Administrative Procedure. Analysis has been carried out in the area of Freedom of access to information, while the Freedom of Access to Information Act specifically emphasizes the role of the Ombudsman and due to the fact that this freedom is realized in Special Administrative Procedure. The Annual Report on results of the activities of the Institution of Human Rights Ombudsman of Bosnia and Herzegovina for 2016 was taken as the basis for the analysis. </subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Data from aforementioned report compared to the legally regulated potentials led to the conclusion that the Ombudsman does not have significant influence on Administrative Procedures. The Ombudsmen does not use all the available remedies in the area of Freedom of access to information and in this cases it almost never acts as a party in the first instance and second instance of Administrative Procedure nor as the Plaintiff in an Administrative Dispute. Also, the Ombudsman's recommendations are rarely addressed to the second instance bodies or to the Court before termination of the (second instance or judicial) procedure. Timely issued recommendations (although by legal nature not binding) could be helpful in making legitimate and fair decisions by the power of their arguments. </subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Also, it was found that there is not a satisfactory level of cooperation between Ombudsmen and Public Bodies, which challenges the effectiveness and efficiency of the Ombudsman in the area of Freedom of access to information. This requires appropriate measures which can lead to effective protection of the mentioned right. Improvement of the legal framework, cooperation and mutual respect are key factors</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Constitutional Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Human Rights and Humanitarian Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Public Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Evaluation research</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Horić, Selma</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-45-CGR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">BSB_OE_CEEOL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033641387</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://www.ceeol.com/search/gray-literature-detail?id=571239</subfield><subfield code="l">BSB01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-45-CGR</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV048261184 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T19:59:34Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T09:33:24Z |
| institution | BVB |
| language | Bosnian |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033641387 |
| oclc_num | 1334021143 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 |
| physical | 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 16) |
| psigel | ZDB-45-CGR BSB_OE_CEEOL |
| publishDate | 2017 |
| publishDateSearch | 2017 |
| publishDateSort | 2017 |
| publisher | Fondacija Centar za javno pravo |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Mehmedović, Emir Verfasser aut Mogućnosti intervencije ombudsmana u upravnim postupcima na primjeru Zakona o slobodi pristupa informacijama Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina] Fondacija Centar za javno pravo 2017 Frankfurt M. CEEOL 2017 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 16) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier In this paper authors are considering the potential of the Ombudsman's intervention in the Administrative Procedure, which is the basic procedure related to the work of Public administration. Existing legislation provides significant opportunities for Ombudsman to intervene in Administrative Procedure, as well as in Administrative Dispute, as a continuation of the Administrative Procedure. Analysis has been carried out in the area of Freedom of access to information, while the Freedom of Access to Information Act specifically emphasizes the role of the Ombudsman and due to the fact that this freedom is realized in Special Administrative Procedure. The Annual Report on results of the activities of the Institution of Human Rights Ombudsman of Bosnia and Herzegovina for 2016 was taken as the basis for the analysis. Data from aforementioned report compared to the legally regulated potentials led to the conclusion that the Ombudsman does not have significant influence on Administrative Procedures. The Ombudsmen does not use all the available remedies in the area of Freedom of access to information and in this cases it almost never acts as a party in the first instance and second instance of Administrative Procedure nor as the Plaintiff in an Administrative Dispute. Also, the Ombudsman's recommendations are rarely addressed to the second instance bodies or to the Court before termination of the (second instance or judicial) procedure. Timely issued recommendations (although by legal nature not binding) could be helpful in making legitimate and fair decisions by the power of their arguments. Also, it was found that there is not a satisfactory level of cooperation between Ombudsmen and Public Bodies, which challenges the effectiveness and efficiency of the Ombudsman in the area of Freedom of access to information. This requires appropriate measures which can lead to effective protection of the mentioned right. Improvement of the legal framework, cooperation and mutual respect are key factors Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence Constitutional Law Human Rights and Humanitarian Law Public Law Evaluation research Horić, Selma aut |
| spellingShingle | Mehmedović, Emir Horić, Selma Mogućnosti intervencije ombudsmana u upravnim postupcima na primjeru Zakona o slobodi pristupa informacijama Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence Constitutional Law Human Rights and Humanitarian Law Public Law Evaluation research |
| title | Mogućnosti intervencije ombudsmana u upravnim postupcima na primjeru Zakona o slobodi pristupa informacijama |
| title_auth | Mogućnosti intervencije ombudsmana u upravnim postupcima na primjeru Zakona o slobodi pristupa informacijama |
| title_exact_search | Mogućnosti intervencije ombudsmana u upravnim postupcima na primjeru Zakona o slobodi pristupa informacijama |
| title_exact_search_txtP | Mogućnosti intervencije ombudsmana u upravnim postupcima na primjeru Zakona o slobodi pristupa informacijama |
| title_full | Mogućnosti intervencije ombudsmana u upravnim postupcima na primjeru Zakona o slobodi pristupa informacijama |
| title_fullStr | Mogućnosti intervencije ombudsmana u upravnim postupcima na primjeru Zakona o slobodi pristupa informacijama |
| title_full_unstemmed | Mogućnosti intervencije ombudsmana u upravnim postupcima na primjeru Zakona o slobodi pristupa informacijama |
| title_short | Mogućnosti intervencije ombudsmana u upravnim postupcima na primjeru Zakona o slobodi pristupa informacijama |
| title_sort | mogucnosti intervencije ombudsmana u upravnim postupcima na primjeru zakona o slobodi pristupa informacijama |
| topic | Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence Constitutional Law Human Rights and Humanitarian Law Public Law Evaluation research |
| topic_facet | Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence Constitutional Law Human Rights and Humanitarian Law Public Law Evaluation research |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT mehmedovicemir mogucnostiintervencijeombudsmanauupravnimpostupcimanaprimjeruzakonaoslobodipristupainformacijama AT horicselma mogucnostiintervencijeombudsmanauupravnimpostupcimanaprimjeruzakonaoslobodipristupainformacijama |