Izbor sudija uporedno i u Republici Srbiji - predlozi za promenu Ustava:
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
Veröffentlicht: |
Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina]
Fondacija Centar za javno pravo
2013
|
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | BSB01 |
Beschreibung: | The adequate system of judicial appointments is one of the most important institutional guarantee of the real and personal independence of judiciary. In the first part of the article, the author briefly describes the main models of judicial appointments in comparative law. A lot of European states have introduced a special body (judicial council) with a competence to elect judges or to propose judicial candidates appointed by other organs (i. e. Parliament). However, there is no single non-political model of judicial appointments which could perfectly comply with the principle of the independence of judiciary, on the one hand, and the principle of the responsibility of judiciary, on the other. In the second part, the author analizes the most important features of the systems of judicial appointments in the states of the Region (the former Yugoslav republics). In all of them (except Slovenia), judicial councils elect judges. Those bodies consist of judicial and non-judical members. However, the judical element prevails. In almost all of them, there have been constitutional changes in the last few years whith a same goal to make a system of judicial appointments more objective. In the third part, the author, firstly, analizes the main characteristics of the system of judicial appointments under the Constitution of Serbia of 1990. The election of judges by the Parliament was the model with a lot of objections. The High Council of Judiciary was introduced in 2001 by the law not by the Constitution. The Constitution of Serbia of 2006 has made two important changes in the election of judiciary. Firstly, the Constitution has introduced the probationary period (three years) for a person who is elected a judge for the first time. Secondly, the Constitution constitutes The High Judicial Council as "an independent and autonomous body which shall provide for and guarantee independence and autonomy of courts and judges". The author emphasizes the bad constitutional solutions from the inadequate definition of the principle of the separation of powers to the competences and the composition of the High Judicial Council |
Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 20) |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV048261062 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 220609s2013 |||| o||u| ||||||srp d | ||
035 | |a (ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol572430 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)1334060182 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV048261062 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
041 | 0 | |a srp | |
049 | |a DE-12 | ||
084 | |a OST |q DE-12 |2 fid | ||
100 | 1 | |a Petrov, Vladan |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Izbor sudija uporedno i u Republici Srbiji - predlozi za promenu Ustava |c Vladan Petrov |
264 | 1 | |a Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina] |b Fondacija Centar za javno pravo |c 2013 | |
264 | 2 | |a Frankfurt M. |b CEEOL |c 2013 | |
300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 20) | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a The adequate system of judicial appointments is one of the most important institutional guarantee of the real and personal independence of judiciary. In the first part of the article, the author briefly describes the main models of judicial appointments in comparative law. A lot of European states have introduced a special body (judicial council) with a competence to elect judges or to propose judicial candidates appointed by other organs (i. e. Parliament). However, there is no single non-political model of judicial appointments which could perfectly comply with the principle of the independence of judiciary, on the one hand, and the principle of the responsibility of judiciary, on the other. In the second part, the author analizes the most important features of the systems of judicial appointments in the states of the Region (the former Yugoslav republics). In all of them (except Slovenia), judicial councils elect judges. Those bodies consist of judicial and non-judical members. | ||
500 | |a However, the judical element prevails. In almost all of them, there have been constitutional changes in the last few years whith a same goal to make a system of judicial appointments more objective. In the third part, the author, firstly, analizes the main characteristics of the system of judicial appointments under the Constitution of Serbia of 1990. The election of judges by the Parliament was the model with a lot of objections. The High Council of Judiciary was introduced in 2001 by the law not by the Constitution. The Constitution of Serbia of 2006 has made two important changes in the election of judiciary. Firstly, the Constitution has introduced the probationary period (three years) for a person who is elected a judge for the first time. Secondly, the Constitution constitutes The High Judicial Council as "an independent and autonomous body which shall provide for and guarantee independence and autonomy of courts and judges". | ||
500 | |a The author emphasizes the bad constitutional solutions from the inadequate definition of the principle of the separation of powers to the competences and the composition of the High Judicial Council | ||
650 | 4 | |a Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence | |
650 | 4 | |a Constitutional Law | |
650 | 4 | |a Public Law | |
650 | 4 | |a Policy, planning, forecast and speculation | |
912 | |a ZDB-45-CGR | ||
940 | 1 | |n oe | |
940 | 1 | |q BSB_OE_CEEOL | |
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033641265 | ||
966 | e | |u https://www.ceeol.com/search/gray-literature-detail?id=572430 |l BSB01 |p ZDB-45-CGR |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804184064222035968 |
---|---|
adam_txt | |
any_adam_object | |
any_adam_object_boolean | |
author | Petrov, Vladan |
author_facet | Petrov, Vladan |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Petrov, Vladan |
author_variant | v p vp |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV048261062 |
collection | ZDB-45-CGR |
ctrlnum | (ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol572430 (OCoLC)1334060182 (DE-599)BVBBV048261062 |
format | Electronic eBook |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03422nmm a2200409zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV048261062</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220609s2013 |||| o||u| ||||||srp d</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol572430</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1334060182</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV048261062</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">srp</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OST</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Petrov, Vladan</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Izbor sudija uporedno i u Republici Srbiji - predlozi za promenu Ustava</subfield><subfield code="c">Vladan Petrov</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina]</subfield><subfield code="b">Fondacija Centar za javno pravo</subfield><subfield code="c">2013</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Frankfurt M.</subfield><subfield code="b">CEEOL</subfield><subfield code="c">2013</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 20)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The adequate system of judicial appointments is one of the most important institutional guarantee of the real and personal independence of judiciary. In the first part of the article, the author briefly describes the main models of judicial appointments in comparative law. A lot of European states have introduced a special body (judicial council) with a competence to elect judges or to propose judicial candidates appointed by other organs (i. e. Parliament). However, there is no single non-political model of judicial appointments which could perfectly comply with the principle of the independence of judiciary, on the one hand, and the principle of the responsibility of judiciary, on the other. In the second part, the author analizes the most important features of the systems of judicial appointments in the states of the Region (the former Yugoslav republics). In all of them (except Slovenia), judicial councils elect judges. Those bodies consist of judicial and non-judical members. </subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">However, the judical element prevails. In almost all of them, there have been constitutional changes in the last few years whith a same goal to make a system of judicial appointments more objective. In the third part, the author, firstly, analizes the main characteristics of the system of judicial appointments under the Constitution of Serbia of 1990. The election of judges by the Parliament was the model with a lot of objections. The High Council of Judiciary was introduced in 2001 by the law not by the Constitution. The Constitution of Serbia of 2006 has made two important changes in the election of judiciary. Firstly, the Constitution has introduced the probationary period (three years) for a person who is elected a judge for the first time. Secondly, the Constitution constitutes The High Judicial Council as "an independent and autonomous body which shall provide for and guarantee independence and autonomy of courts and judges". </subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The author emphasizes the bad constitutional solutions from the inadequate definition of the principle of the separation of powers to the competences and the composition of the High Judicial Council</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Constitutional Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Public Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Policy, planning, forecast and speculation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-45-CGR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">BSB_OE_CEEOL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033641265</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://www.ceeol.com/search/gray-literature-detail?id=572430</subfield><subfield code="l">BSB01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-45-CGR</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | DE-604.BV048261062 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
index_date | 2024-07-03T19:59:34Z |
indexdate | 2024-07-10T09:33:24Z |
institution | BVB |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033641265 |
oclc_num | 1334060182 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-12 |
owner_facet | DE-12 |
physical | 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 20) |
psigel | ZDB-45-CGR BSB_OE_CEEOL |
publishDate | 2013 |
publishDateSearch | 2013 |
publishDateSort | 2013 |
publisher | Fondacija Centar za javno pravo |
record_format | marc |
spelling | Petrov, Vladan Verfasser aut Izbor sudija uporedno i u Republici Srbiji - predlozi za promenu Ustava Vladan Petrov Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina] Fondacija Centar za javno pravo 2013 Frankfurt M. CEEOL 2013 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 20) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier The adequate system of judicial appointments is one of the most important institutional guarantee of the real and personal independence of judiciary. In the first part of the article, the author briefly describes the main models of judicial appointments in comparative law. A lot of European states have introduced a special body (judicial council) with a competence to elect judges or to propose judicial candidates appointed by other organs (i. e. Parliament). However, there is no single non-political model of judicial appointments which could perfectly comply with the principle of the independence of judiciary, on the one hand, and the principle of the responsibility of judiciary, on the other. In the second part, the author analizes the most important features of the systems of judicial appointments in the states of the Region (the former Yugoslav republics). In all of them (except Slovenia), judicial councils elect judges. Those bodies consist of judicial and non-judical members. However, the judical element prevails. In almost all of them, there have been constitutional changes in the last few years whith a same goal to make a system of judicial appointments more objective. In the third part, the author, firstly, analizes the main characteristics of the system of judicial appointments under the Constitution of Serbia of 1990. The election of judges by the Parliament was the model with a lot of objections. The High Council of Judiciary was introduced in 2001 by the law not by the Constitution. The Constitution of Serbia of 2006 has made two important changes in the election of judiciary. Firstly, the Constitution has introduced the probationary period (three years) for a person who is elected a judge for the first time. Secondly, the Constitution constitutes The High Judicial Council as "an independent and autonomous body which shall provide for and guarantee independence and autonomy of courts and judges". The author emphasizes the bad constitutional solutions from the inadequate definition of the principle of the separation of powers to the competences and the composition of the High Judicial Council Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence Constitutional Law Public Law Policy, planning, forecast and speculation |
spellingShingle | Petrov, Vladan Izbor sudija uporedno i u Republici Srbiji - predlozi za promenu Ustava Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence Constitutional Law Public Law Policy, planning, forecast and speculation |
title | Izbor sudija uporedno i u Republici Srbiji - predlozi za promenu Ustava |
title_auth | Izbor sudija uporedno i u Republici Srbiji - predlozi za promenu Ustava |
title_exact_search | Izbor sudija uporedno i u Republici Srbiji - predlozi za promenu Ustava |
title_exact_search_txtP | Izbor sudija uporedno i u Republici Srbiji - predlozi za promenu Ustava |
title_full | Izbor sudija uporedno i u Republici Srbiji - predlozi za promenu Ustava Vladan Petrov |
title_fullStr | Izbor sudija uporedno i u Republici Srbiji - predlozi za promenu Ustava Vladan Petrov |
title_full_unstemmed | Izbor sudija uporedno i u Republici Srbiji - predlozi za promenu Ustava Vladan Petrov |
title_short | Izbor sudija uporedno i u Republici Srbiji - predlozi za promenu Ustava |
title_sort | izbor sudija uporedno i u republici srbiji predlozi za promenu ustava |
topic | Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence Constitutional Law Public Law Policy, planning, forecast and speculation |
topic_facet | Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence Constitutional Law Public Law Policy, planning, forecast and speculation |
work_keys_str_mv | AT petrovvladan izborsudijauporednoiurepublicisrbijipredlozizapromenuustava |