Treba li Bosni i Hercegovini vrhovni sud?:
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | Bosnian |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina]
Fondacija Centar za javno pravo
2011
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | BSB01 |
| Beschreibung: | The author emphasizes the work of reason and the current need for a debate on the judicial system of Bosnia and Herzegovina, and in conjunction with the discussion of the need for the establishment of the Supreme Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina. The paper presents outlines of a model of the complex of courts (federal) states. Explained the reasons - why in Bosnia and Herzegovina has not established the Supreme Court. Such an "institutional gap" author sees the shortcomings of the Dayton constitution. Despite these shortcomings, the author's opinion, interpreting the relevant provisions of the Constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina, the Constitution can be found the basis for the decision of the Supreme Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina, and the establishment of the Court. The analogy is receiving appropriate in the Law on Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina in which the Constitutional Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina found that in accordance with the Constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Bosnia and Herzegovina (which in this respect can not be an exception compared to other states) requires the Supreme Court, because the existence of such a tribunal, as the highest court, ensures the unity of the judicial system, harmonization of court practice, the application of equal rights and equal justice before the law |
| Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 12) |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV048261037 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220609s2011 |||| o||u| ||||||bos d | ||
| 035 | |a (ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol572859 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1334057653 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV048261037 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a bos | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 | ||
| 084 | |a OST |q DE-12 |2 fid | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Pobrić, Nurko |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Treba li Bosni i Hercegovini vrhovni sud? |c Nurko Pobrić |
| 264 | 1 | |a Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina] |b Fondacija Centar za javno pravo |c 2011 | |
| 264 | 2 | |a Frankfurt M. |b CEEOL |c 2011 | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 12) | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a The author emphasizes the work of reason and the current need for a debate on the judicial system of Bosnia and Herzegovina, and in conjunction with the discussion of the need for the establishment of the Supreme Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina. The paper presents outlines of a model of the complex of courts (federal) states. Explained the reasons - why in Bosnia and Herzegovina has not established the Supreme Court. Such an "institutional gap" author sees the shortcomings of the Dayton constitution. Despite these shortcomings, the author's opinion, interpreting the relevant provisions of the Constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina, the Constitution can be found the basis for the decision of the Supreme Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina, and the establishment of the Court. The analogy is receiving appropriate in the Law on Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina in which the Constitutional Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina found that in accordance with the Constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Bosnia and Herzegovina (which in this respect can not be an exception compared to other states) requires the Supreme Court, because the existence of such a tribunal, as the highest court, ensures the unity of the judicial system, harmonization of court practice, the application of equal rights and equal justice before the law | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Constitutional Law | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Public Law | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Evaluation research | |
| 650 | 4 | |a EU-Accession / EU-DEvelopment | |
| 650 | 4 | |a EU-Legislation | |
| 912 | |a ZDB-45-CGR | ||
| 940 | 1 | |n oe | |
| 940 | 1 | |q BSB_OE_CEEOL | |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033641240 | ||
| 966 | e | |u https://www.ceeol.com/search/gray-literature-detail?id=572859 |l BSB01 |p ZDB-45-CGR |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804184064162267136 |
|---|---|
| adam_txt | |
| any_adam_object | |
| any_adam_object_boolean | |
| author | Pobrić, Nurko |
| author_facet | Pobrić, Nurko |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Pobrić, Nurko |
| author_variant | n p np |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV048261037 |
| collection | ZDB-45-CGR |
| ctrlnum | (ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol572859 (OCoLC)1334057653 (DE-599)BVBBV048261037 |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02597nmm a2200409zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV048261037</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220609s2011 |||| o||u| ||||||bos d</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol572859</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1334057653</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV048261037</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">bos</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OST</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pobrić, Nurko</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Treba li Bosni i Hercegovini vrhovni sud?</subfield><subfield code="c">Nurko Pobrić</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina]</subfield><subfield code="b">Fondacija Centar za javno pravo</subfield><subfield code="c">2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Frankfurt M.</subfield><subfield code="b">CEEOL</subfield><subfield code="c">2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 12)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The author emphasizes the work of reason and the current need for a debate on the judicial system of Bosnia and Herzegovina, and in conjunction with the discussion of the need for the establishment of the Supreme Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina. The paper presents outlines of a model of the complex of courts (federal) states. Explained the reasons - why in Bosnia and Herzegovina has not established the Supreme Court. Such an "institutional gap" author sees the shortcomings of the Dayton constitution. Despite these shortcomings, the author's opinion, interpreting the relevant provisions of the Constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina, the Constitution can be found the basis for the decision of the Supreme Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina, and the establishment of the Court. The analogy is receiving appropriate in the Law on Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina in which the Constitutional Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina found that in accordance with the Constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Bosnia and Herzegovina (which in this respect can not be an exception compared to other states) requires the Supreme Court, because the existence of such a tribunal, as the highest court, ensures the unity of the judicial system, harmonization of court practice, the application of equal rights and equal justice before the law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Constitutional Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Public Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Evaluation research</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">EU-Accession / EU-DEvelopment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">EU-Legislation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-45-CGR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">BSB_OE_CEEOL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033641240</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://www.ceeol.com/search/gray-literature-detail?id=572859</subfield><subfield code="l">BSB01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-45-CGR</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV048261037 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T19:59:34Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T09:33:24Z |
| institution | BVB |
| language | Bosnian |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033641240 |
| oclc_num | 1334057653 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 |
| physical | 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 12) |
| psigel | ZDB-45-CGR BSB_OE_CEEOL |
| publishDate | 2011 |
| publishDateSearch | 2011 |
| publishDateSort | 2011 |
| publisher | Fondacija Centar za javno pravo |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Pobrić, Nurko Verfasser aut Treba li Bosni i Hercegovini vrhovni sud? Nurko Pobrić Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina] Fondacija Centar za javno pravo 2011 Frankfurt M. CEEOL 2011 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 12) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier The author emphasizes the work of reason and the current need for a debate on the judicial system of Bosnia and Herzegovina, and in conjunction with the discussion of the need for the establishment of the Supreme Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina. The paper presents outlines of a model of the complex of courts (federal) states. Explained the reasons - why in Bosnia and Herzegovina has not established the Supreme Court. Such an "institutional gap" author sees the shortcomings of the Dayton constitution. Despite these shortcomings, the author's opinion, interpreting the relevant provisions of the Constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina, the Constitution can be found the basis for the decision of the Supreme Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina, and the establishment of the Court. The analogy is receiving appropriate in the Law on Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina in which the Constitutional Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina found that in accordance with the Constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Bosnia and Herzegovina (which in this respect can not be an exception compared to other states) requires the Supreme Court, because the existence of such a tribunal, as the highest court, ensures the unity of the judicial system, harmonization of court practice, the application of equal rights and equal justice before the law Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence Constitutional Law Public Law Evaluation research EU-Accession / EU-DEvelopment EU-Legislation |
| spellingShingle | Pobrić, Nurko Treba li Bosni i Hercegovini vrhovni sud? Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence Constitutional Law Public Law Evaluation research EU-Accession / EU-DEvelopment EU-Legislation |
| title | Treba li Bosni i Hercegovini vrhovni sud? |
| title_auth | Treba li Bosni i Hercegovini vrhovni sud? |
| title_exact_search | Treba li Bosni i Hercegovini vrhovni sud? |
| title_exact_search_txtP | Treba li Bosni i Hercegovini vrhovni sud? |
| title_full | Treba li Bosni i Hercegovini vrhovni sud? Nurko Pobrić |
| title_fullStr | Treba li Bosni i Hercegovini vrhovni sud? Nurko Pobrić |
| title_full_unstemmed | Treba li Bosni i Hercegovini vrhovni sud? Nurko Pobrić |
| title_short | Treba li Bosni i Hercegovini vrhovni sud? |
| title_sort | treba li bosni i hercegovini vrhovni sud |
| topic | Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence Constitutional Law Public Law Evaluation research EU-Accession / EU-DEvelopment EU-Legislation |
| topic_facet | Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence Constitutional Law Public Law Evaluation research EU-Accession / EU-DEvelopment EU-Legislation |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT pobricnurko trebalibosniihercegovinivrhovnisud |