Ustavotvorne i revizione procedure u postkomunističkoj Srbiji - bilans i pogled unapred:
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina]
Fondacija Centar za javno pravo
2017
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | BSB01 |
| Beschreibung: | Both modern Serbian constitution, the first one from 1990 and the second one from 2006, are characterised by highly strong formal rigidity. The legitimization of that strong rigidity was found in the constitutional function of protection - in the first case, to prevent Serbia from the negative effects of disintegrative process in the Second Yugoslavia; in the second, to protect the territorial integrity of Serbia related to Kosovo and Metohija. The author considers that it is a false argument. The main reason of strong constitutional rigidity of both constitutions is the prevailing concept of constitution as a political instrument used by different serbian political elites aiming to save their ruling positions as much as possible. The highly complex amending procedure is not a pure tehnicallity. It could serve as one of the most effective instrument for conservation a political regime in power. The author pays special attention to the amendment procedure in the Constitution of 2006. He considers that the amendment procedure, as a rule, should be concentred (and finished) in the National Assembly. The obligatory constitutional referendum should be preserved as an exceptional tool in relation with amending the fundamental principles of the Constitution (for example, those which form the concept of legal state or the rule of law) |
| Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 14) |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV048260990 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220609s2017 |||| o||u| ||||||srp d | ||
| 035 | |a (ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol570583 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1334032671 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV048260990 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a srp | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 | ||
| 084 | |a OST |q DE-12 |2 fid | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Petrov, Vladan |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Ustavotvorne i revizione procedure u postkomunističkoj Srbiji - bilans i pogled unapred |c Vladan Petrov |
| 264 | 1 | |a Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina] |b Fondacija Centar za javno pravo |c 2017 | |
| 264 | 2 | |a Frankfurt M. |b CEEOL |c 2017 | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 14) | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Both modern Serbian constitution, the first one from 1990 and the second one from 2006, are characterised by highly strong formal rigidity. The legitimization of that strong rigidity was found in the constitutional function of protection - in the first case, to prevent Serbia from the negative effects of disintegrative process in the Second Yugoslavia; in the second, to protect the territorial integrity of Serbia related to Kosovo and Metohija. The author considers that it is a false argument. The main reason of strong constitutional rigidity of both constitutions is the prevailing concept of constitution as a political instrument used by different serbian political elites aiming to save their ruling positions as much as possible. The highly complex amending procedure is not a pure tehnicallity. It could serve as one of the most effective instrument for conservation a political regime in power. The author pays special attention to the amendment procedure in the Constitution of 2006. He considers that the amendment procedure, as a rule, should be concentred (and finished) in the National Assembly. The obligatory constitutional referendum should be preserved as an exceptional tool in relation with amending the fundamental principles of the Constitution (for example, those which form the concept of legal state or the rule of law) | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Politics | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Constitutional Law | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Public Law | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Evaluation research | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Transformation Period (1990 - 2010) | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Present Times (2010 - today) | |
| 912 | |a ZDB-45-CGR | ||
| 940 | 1 | |n oe | |
| 940 | 1 | |q BSB_OE_CEEOL | |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033641193 | ||
| 966 | e | |u https://www.ceeol.com/search/gray-literature-detail?id=570583 |l BSB01 |p ZDB-45-CGR |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804184064103546880 |
|---|---|
| adam_txt | |
| any_adam_object | |
| any_adam_object_boolean | |
| author | Petrov, Vladan |
| author_facet | Petrov, Vladan |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Petrov, Vladan |
| author_variant | v p vp |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV048260990 |
| collection | ZDB-45-CGR |
| ctrlnum | (ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol570583 (OCoLC)1334032671 (DE-599)BVBBV048260990 |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02712nmm a2200421zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV048260990</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220609s2017 |||| o||u| ||||||srp d</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol570583</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1334032671</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV048260990</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">srp</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OST</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Petrov, Vladan</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Ustavotvorne i revizione procedure u postkomunističkoj Srbiji - bilans i pogled unapred</subfield><subfield code="c">Vladan Petrov</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina]</subfield><subfield code="b">Fondacija Centar za javno pravo</subfield><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Frankfurt M.</subfield><subfield code="b">CEEOL</subfield><subfield code="c">2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 14)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Both modern Serbian constitution, the first one from 1990 and the second one from 2006, are characterised by highly strong formal rigidity. The legitimization of that strong rigidity was found in the constitutional function of protection - in the first case, to prevent Serbia from the negative effects of disintegrative process in the Second Yugoslavia; in the second, to protect the territorial integrity of Serbia related to Kosovo and Metohija. The author considers that it is a false argument. The main reason of strong constitutional rigidity of both constitutions is the prevailing concept of constitution as a political instrument used by different serbian political elites aiming to save their ruling positions as much as possible. The highly complex amending procedure is not a pure tehnicallity. It could serve as one of the most effective instrument for conservation a political regime in power. The author pays special attention to the amendment procedure in the Constitution of 2006. He considers that the amendment procedure, as a rule, should be concentred (and finished) in the National Assembly. The obligatory constitutional referendum should be preserved as an exceptional tool in relation with amending the fundamental principles of the Constitution (for example, those which form the concept of legal state or the rule of law)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Politics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Constitutional Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Public Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Evaluation research</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Transformation Period (1990 - 2010)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Present Times (2010 - today)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-45-CGR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">BSB_OE_CEEOL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033641193</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://www.ceeol.com/search/gray-literature-detail?id=570583</subfield><subfield code="l">BSB01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-45-CGR</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV048260990 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T19:59:33Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T09:33:23Z |
| institution | BVB |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033641193 |
| oclc_num | 1334032671 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 |
| physical | 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 14) |
| psigel | ZDB-45-CGR BSB_OE_CEEOL |
| publishDate | 2017 |
| publishDateSearch | 2017 |
| publishDateSort | 2017 |
| publisher | Fondacija Centar za javno pravo |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Petrov, Vladan Verfasser aut Ustavotvorne i revizione procedure u postkomunističkoj Srbiji - bilans i pogled unapred Vladan Petrov Sanski Most [Bosnia and Herzegovina] Fondacija Centar za javno pravo 2017 Frankfurt M. CEEOL 2017 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 14) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Both modern Serbian constitution, the first one from 1990 and the second one from 2006, are characterised by highly strong formal rigidity. The legitimization of that strong rigidity was found in the constitutional function of protection - in the first case, to prevent Serbia from the negative effects of disintegrative process in the Second Yugoslavia; in the second, to protect the territorial integrity of Serbia related to Kosovo and Metohija. The author considers that it is a false argument. The main reason of strong constitutional rigidity of both constitutions is the prevailing concept of constitution as a political instrument used by different serbian political elites aiming to save their ruling positions as much as possible. The highly complex amending procedure is not a pure tehnicallity. It could serve as one of the most effective instrument for conservation a political regime in power. The author pays special attention to the amendment procedure in the Constitution of 2006. He considers that the amendment procedure, as a rule, should be concentred (and finished) in the National Assembly. The obligatory constitutional referendum should be preserved as an exceptional tool in relation with amending the fundamental principles of the Constitution (for example, those which form the concept of legal state or the rule of law) Politics Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence Constitutional Law Public Law Evaluation research Transformation Period (1990 - 2010) Present Times (2010 - today) |
| spellingShingle | Petrov, Vladan Ustavotvorne i revizione procedure u postkomunističkoj Srbiji - bilans i pogled unapred Politics Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence Constitutional Law Public Law Evaluation research Transformation Period (1990 - 2010) Present Times (2010 - today) |
| title | Ustavotvorne i revizione procedure u postkomunističkoj Srbiji - bilans i pogled unapred |
| title_auth | Ustavotvorne i revizione procedure u postkomunističkoj Srbiji - bilans i pogled unapred |
| title_exact_search | Ustavotvorne i revizione procedure u postkomunističkoj Srbiji - bilans i pogled unapred |
| title_exact_search_txtP | Ustavotvorne i revizione procedure u postkomunističkoj Srbiji - bilans i pogled unapred |
| title_full | Ustavotvorne i revizione procedure u postkomunističkoj Srbiji - bilans i pogled unapred Vladan Petrov |
| title_fullStr | Ustavotvorne i revizione procedure u postkomunističkoj Srbiji - bilans i pogled unapred Vladan Petrov |
| title_full_unstemmed | Ustavotvorne i revizione procedure u postkomunističkoj Srbiji - bilans i pogled unapred Vladan Petrov |
| title_short | Ustavotvorne i revizione procedure u postkomunističkoj Srbiji - bilans i pogled unapred |
| title_sort | ustavotvorne i revizione procedure u postkomunistickoj srbiji bilans i pogled unapred |
| topic | Politics Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence Constitutional Law Public Law Evaluation research Transformation Period (1990 - 2010) Present Times (2010 - today) |
| topic_facet | Politics Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence Constitutional Law Public Law Evaluation research Transformation Period (1990 - 2010) Present Times (2010 - today) |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT petrovvladan ustavotvorneirevizioneprocedureupostkomunistickojsrbijibilansipogledunapred |