PEINES AMBULATOIRES, UNE ALTERNATIVE A L'EMPRISONNEMENT DANS L'UNION EUROPEENNE?:
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | French |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Sofia [Bulgaria]
Centăr za izsledvane na demokracijata
2015
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | BSB01 |
| Beschreibung: | The issue of imprisonment vs. alternative penalties has been debated in various European countries during the last decades, and ambulant sanctions have been heavily on the rise. Community sentences and other alternatives to imprisonment are regarded as modern instruments for the rehabilitation of offenders. The objective of the present study is to examine the scope of application of penalties without deprivation of liberty as compared to imprisonment as well as to identify promising practices of alternative criminal sanctioning in Belgium, Bulgaria, Germany, Spain and Lithuania. As this study covers several European countries, the comparative perspective suggests itself nearly as a matter of course. In this connection, it seems reasonable to describe the existing ambulant sanctions of the different member states involved, taking into account their legal arrangement and their relation within the system of penal sanctions including their relation to the deprivation of liberty. It in addition appears sensible to describe and compare these ambulant sanctions with reference to their contribution to the re-socialisation or rehabilitation of those subjected to them as well as with special attention to the involvement of civil society in their execution. In a further step, promising practices in connection with ambulant sanctions could be highlighted which may be recommended for imitation by other member states. Such an approach proves to be impossible for multiple reasons, though, and it would be inadequate just to make such an attempt. There are exemplary references to ambulant sanctions in Belgium, Bulgaria, Germany, Lithuania and Spain. This is due to the fact that scientists from these countries have taken part in the realisation of this project but not necessarily because of specific outstanding features of their sanction systems in comparison with other member states |
| Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 62) |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV048260555 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220609s2015 |||| o||u| ||||||fre d | ||
| 035 | |a (ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol527965 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1334031896 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV048260555 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a fre | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 | ||
| 084 | |a OST |q DE-12 |2 fid | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Graebsch, Christine M. |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a PEINES AMBULATOIRES, UNE ALTERNATIVE A L'EMPRISONNEMENT DANS L'UNION EUROPEENNE? |
| 264 | 1 | |a Sofia [Bulgaria] |b Centăr za izsledvane na demokracijata |c 2015 | |
| 264 | 2 | |a Frankfurt M. |b CEEOL |c 2015 | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 62) | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a The issue of imprisonment vs. alternative penalties has been debated in various European countries during the last decades, and ambulant sanctions have been heavily on the rise. Community sentences and other alternatives to imprisonment are regarded as modern instruments for the rehabilitation of offenders. The objective of the present study is to examine the scope of application of penalties without deprivation of liberty as compared to imprisonment as well as to identify promising practices of alternative criminal sanctioning in Belgium, Bulgaria, Germany, Spain and Lithuania. As this study covers several European countries, the comparative perspective suggests itself nearly as a matter of course. In this connection, it seems reasonable to describe the existing ambulant sanctions of the different member states involved, taking into account their legal arrangement and their relation within the system of penal sanctions including their relation to the deprivation of liberty. It in addition appears sensible to describe and compare these ambulant sanctions with reference to their contribution to the re-socialisation or rehabilitation of those subjected to them as well as with special attention to the involvement of civil society in their execution. In a further step, promising practices in connection with ambulant sanctions could be highlighted which may be recommended for imitation by other member states. Such an approach proves to be impossible for multiple reasons, though, and it would be inadequate just to make such an attempt. There are exemplary references to ambulant sanctions in Belgium, Bulgaria, Germany, Lithuania and Spain. This is due to the fact that scientists from these countries have taken part in the realisation of this project but not necessarily because of specific outstanding features of their sanction systems in comparison with other member states | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Politics / Political Sciences | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Politics | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Social Sciences | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Sociology | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Applied Sociology | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Evaluation research | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Studies in violence and power | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Victimology | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Welfare services | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Penal Policy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Sociology of Politics | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Sociology of Law | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Burkhardt, Sven-U. |4 aut | |
| 912 | |a ZDB-45-CGR | ||
| 940 | 1 | |n oe | |
| 940 | 1 | |q BSB_OE_CEEOL | |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033640758 | ||
| 966 | e | |u https://www.ceeol.com/search/gray-literature-detail?id=527965 |l BSB01 |p ZDB-45-CGR |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804184063410438144 |
|---|---|
| adam_txt | |
| any_adam_object | |
| any_adam_object_boolean | |
| author | Graebsch, Christine M. Burkhardt, Sven-U |
| author_facet | Graebsch, Christine M. Burkhardt, Sven-U |
| author_role | aut aut |
| author_sort | Graebsch, Christine M. |
| author_variant | c m g cm cmg s u b sub |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV048260555 |
| collection | ZDB-45-CGR |
| ctrlnum | (ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol527965 (OCoLC)1334031896 (DE-599)BVBBV048260555 |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03460nmm a2200505zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV048260555</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220609s2015 |||| o||u| ||||||fre d</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol527965</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1334031896</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV048260555</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">fre</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OST</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Graebsch, Christine M.</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">PEINES AMBULATOIRES, UNE ALTERNATIVE A L'EMPRISONNEMENT DANS L'UNION EUROPEENNE?</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Sofia [Bulgaria]</subfield><subfield code="b">Centăr za izsledvane na demokracijata</subfield><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Frankfurt M.</subfield><subfield code="b">CEEOL</subfield><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 62)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The issue of imprisonment vs. alternative penalties has been debated in various European countries during the last decades, and ambulant sanctions have been heavily on the rise. Community sentences and other alternatives to imprisonment are regarded as modern instruments for the rehabilitation of offenders. The objective of the present study is to examine the scope of application of penalties without deprivation of liberty as compared to imprisonment as well as to identify promising practices of alternative criminal sanctioning in Belgium, Bulgaria, Germany, Spain and Lithuania. As this study covers several European countries, the comparative perspective suggests itself nearly as a matter of course. In this connection, it seems reasonable to describe the existing ambulant sanctions of the different member states involved, taking into account their legal arrangement and their relation within the system of penal sanctions including their relation to the deprivation of liberty. It in addition appears sensible to describe and compare these ambulant sanctions with reference to their contribution to the re-socialisation or rehabilitation of those subjected to them as well as with special attention to the involvement of civil society in their execution. In a further step, promising practices in connection with ambulant sanctions could be highlighted which may be recommended for imitation by other member states. Such an approach proves to be impossible for multiple reasons, though, and it would be inadequate just to make such an attempt. There are exemplary references to ambulant sanctions in Belgium, Bulgaria, Germany, Lithuania and Spain. This is due to the fact that scientists from these countries have taken part in the realisation of this project but not necessarily because of specific outstanding features of their sanction systems in comparison with other member states</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Politics / Political Sciences</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Politics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Social Sciences</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Sociology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Applied Sociology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Evaluation research</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Studies in violence and power</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Victimology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Welfare services</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Penal Policy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Sociology of Politics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Sociology of Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Burkhardt, Sven-U.</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-45-CGR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">BSB_OE_CEEOL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033640758</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://www.ceeol.com/search/gray-literature-detail?id=527965</subfield><subfield code="l">BSB01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-45-CGR</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV048260555 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T19:59:33Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T09:33:23Z |
| institution | BVB |
| language | French |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033640758 |
| oclc_num | 1334031896 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 |
| physical | 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 62) |
| psigel | ZDB-45-CGR BSB_OE_CEEOL |
| publishDate | 2015 |
| publishDateSearch | 2015 |
| publishDateSort | 2015 |
| publisher | Centăr za izsledvane na demokracijata |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Graebsch, Christine M. Verfasser aut PEINES AMBULATOIRES, UNE ALTERNATIVE A L'EMPRISONNEMENT DANS L'UNION EUROPEENNE? Sofia [Bulgaria] Centăr za izsledvane na demokracijata 2015 Frankfurt M. CEEOL 2015 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 62) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier The issue of imprisonment vs. alternative penalties has been debated in various European countries during the last decades, and ambulant sanctions have been heavily on the rise. Community sentences and other alternatives to imprisonment are regarded as modern instruments for the rehabilitation of offenders. The objective of the present study is to examine the scope of application of penalties without deprivation of liberty as compared to imprisonment as well as to identify promising practices of alternative criminal sanctioning in Belgium, Bulgaria, Germany, Spain and Lithuania. As this study covers several European countries, the comparative perspective suggests itself nearly as a matter of course. In this connection, it seems reasonable to describe the existing ambulant sanctions of the different member states involved, taking into account their legal arrangement and their relation within the system of penal sanctions including their relation to the deprivation of liberty. It in addition appears sensible to describe and compare these ambulant sanctions with reference to their contribution to the re-socialisation or rehabilitation of those subjected to them as well as with special attention to the involvement of civil society in their execution. In a further step, promising practices in connection with ambulant sanctions could be highlighted which may be recommended for imitation by other member states. Such an approach proves to be impossible for multiple reasons, though, and it would be inadequate just to make such an attempt. There are exemplary references to ambulant sanctions in Belgium, Bulgaria, Germany, Lithuania and Spain. This is due to the fact that scientists from these countries have taken part in the realisation of this project but not necessarily because of specific outstanding features of their sanction systems in comparison with other member states Politics / Political Sciences Politics Social Sciences Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence Sociology Applied Sociology Evaluation research Studies in violence and power Victimology Welfare services Penal Policy Sociology of Politics Sociology of Law Burkhardt, Sven-U. aut |
| spellingShingle | Graebsch, Christine M. Burkhardt, Sven-U PEINES AMBULATOIRES, UNE ALTERNATIVE A L'EMPRISONNEMENT DANS L'UNION EUROPEENNE? Politics / Political Sciences Politics Social Sciences Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence Sociology Applied Sociology Evaluation research Studies in violence and power Victimology Welfare services Penal Policy Sociology of Politics Sociology of Law |
| title | PEINES AMBULATOIRES, UNE ALTERNATIVE A L'EMPRISONNEMENT DANS L'UNION EUROPEENNE? |
| title_auth | PEINES AMBULATOIRES, UNE ALTERNATIVE A L'EMPRISONNEMENT DANS L'UNION EUROPEENNE? |
| title_exact_search | PEINES AMBULATOIRES, UNE ALTERNATIVE A L'EMPRISONNEMENT DANS L'UNION EUROPEENNE? |
| title_exact_search_txtP | PEINES AMBULATOIRES, UNE ALTERNATIVE A L'EMPRISONNEMENT DANS L'UNION EUROPEENNE? |
| title_full | PEINES AMBULATOIRES, UNE ALTERNATIVE A L'EMPRISONNEMENT DANS L'UNION EUROPEENNE? |
| title_fullStr | PEINES AMBULATOIRES, UNE ALTERNATIVE A L'EMPRISONNEMENT DANS L'UNION EUROPEENNE? |
| title_full_unstemmed | PEINES AMBULATOIRES, UNE ALTERNATIVE A L'EMPRISONNEMENT DANS L'UNION EUROPEENNE? |
| title_short | PEINES AMBULATOIRES, UNE ALTERNATIVE A L'EMPRISONNEMENT DANS L'UNION EUROPEENNE? |
| title_sort | peines ambulatoires une alternative a l emprisonnement dans l union europeenne |
| topic | Politics / Political Sciences Politics Social Sciences Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence Sociology Applied Sociology Evaluation research Studies in violence and power Victimology Welfare services Penal Policy Sociology of Politics Sociology of Law |
| topic_facet | Politics / Political Sciences Politics Social Sciences Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence Sociology Applied Sociology Evaluation research Studies in violence and power Victimology Welfare services Penal Policy Sociology of Politics Sociology of Law |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT graebschchristinem peinesambulatoiresunealternativealemprisonnementdanslunioneuropeenne AT burkhardtsvenu peinesambulatoiresunealternativealemprisonnementdanslunioneuropeenne |