Energijna (ne)sigurnost, rešenieto na bălgarskija parlament za Južen potok zasilva riskovete pred nacionalnata energijna politika. Medijna beležka:
Gespeichert in:
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
|---|---|
| Sprache: | Bulgarian |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Sofia [Bulgaria]
Centăr za izsledvane na demokracijata
2014
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | BSB01 |
| Beschreibung: | The decision of the Bulgarian Parliament from 4 April 2014 to adopt at first reading the amendments in the Energy Law, which grants South Stream special status highlights the lack of logic in the national energy policy and compounds the impression that public interest is not the driving force behind the proposed changes. The decision and the manner, in which it was taken, reveal some of the most serious problems in Bulgaria's energy policy in terms of bad governance and corruption.The adopted amendments at first reading to the Energy Law demonstrate yet again the risks of state capture by third-party interests, which do not correspond or even contradict the public interest. The real problems, which Bulgarian society faces on a daily basis, such as energy poverty, high energy prices, and low diversification and energy efficiency receive only a fraction of the attention, in terms of institutional and policy-making focus, compared to projects such as South Stream. What is even more alarming is that the recent actions of the ruling majority take place in the context of increasing geostrategic insecurity and danger of confrontation, which further exacerbate the risks deriving from such decisions |
| Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 2) |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV048260546 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220609s2014 |||| o||u| ||||||bul d | ||
| 035 | |a (ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol527940 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1334018082 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV048260546 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a bul | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 | ||
| 084 | |a OST |q DE-12 |2 fid | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Energijna (ne)sigurnost, rešenieto na bălgarskija parlament za Južen potok zasilva riskovete pred nacionalnata energijna politika. Medijna beležka |c Author Not Specified |
| 264 | 1 | |a Sofia [Bulgaria] |b Centăr za izsledvane na demokracijata |c 2014 | |
| 264 | 2 | |a Frankfurt M. |b CEEOL |c 2014 | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 2) | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a The decision of the Bulgarian Parliament from 4 April 2014 to adopt at first reading the amendments in the Energy Law, which grants South Stream special status highlights the lack of logic in the national energy policy and compounds the impression that public interest is not the driving force behind the proposed changes. The decision and the manner, in which it was taken, reveal some of the most serious problems in Bulgaria's energy policy in terms of bad governance and corruption.The adopted amendments at first reading to the Energy Law demonstrate yet again the risks of state capture by third-party interests, which do not correspond or even contradict the public interest. The real problems, which Bulgarian society faces on a daily basis, such as energy poverty, high energy prices, and low diversification and energy efficiency receive only a fraction of the attention, in terms of institutional and policy-making focus, compared to projects such as South Stream. What is even more alarming is that the recent actions of the ruling majority take place in the context of increasing geostrategic insecurity and danger of confrontation, which further exacerbate the risks deriving from such decisions | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Politics / Political Sciences | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Politics | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Social Sciences | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Economy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence | |
| 650 | 4 | |a National Economy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Energy and Environmental Studies | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Sociology | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Economic policy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Applied Sociology | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Economic development | |
| 912 | |a ZDB-45-CGR | ||
| 940 | 1 | |n oe | |
| 940 | 1 | |q BSB_OE_CEEOL | |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033640749 | ||
| 966 | e | |u https://www.ceeol.com/search/gray-literature-detail?id=527940 |l BSB01 |p ZDB-45-CGR |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804184063402049536 |
|---|---|
| adam_txt | |
| any_adam_object | |
| any_adam_object_boolean | |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV048260546 |
| collection | ZDB-45-CGR |
| ctrlnum | (ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol527940 (OCoLC)1334018082 (DE-599)BVBBV048260546 |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02699nmm a2200457zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV048260546</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220609s2014 |||| o||u| ||||||bul d</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol527940</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1334018082</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV048260546</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">bul</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OST</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Energijna (ne)sigurnost, rešenieto na bălgarskija parlament za Južen potok zasilva riskovete pred nacionalnata energijna politika. Medijna beležka</subfield><subfield code="c">Author Not Specified</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Sofia [Bulgaria]</subfield><subfield code="b">Centăr za izsledvane na demokracijata</subfield><subfield code="c">2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Frankfurt M.</subfield><subfield code="b">CEEOL</subfield><subfield code="c">2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 2)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The decision of the Bulgarian Parliament from 4 April 2014 to adopt at first reading the amendments in the Energy Law, which grants South Stream special status highlights the lack of logic in the national energy policy and compounds the impression that public interest is not the driving force behind the proposed changes. The decision and the manner, in which it was taken, reveal some of the most serious problems in Bulgaria's energy policy in terms of bad governance and corruption.The adopted amendments at first reading to the Energy Law demonstrate yet again the risks of state capture by third-party interests, which do not correspond or even contradict the public interest. The real problems, which Bulgarian society faces on a daily basis, such as energy poverty, high energy prices, and low diversification and energy efficiency receive only a fraction of the attention, in terms of institutional and policy-making focus, compared to projects such as South Stream. What is even more alarming is that the recent actions of the ruling majority take place in the context of increasing geostrategic insecurity and danger of confrontation, which further exacerbate the risks deriving from such decisions</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Politics / Political Sciences</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Politics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Social Sciences</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Economy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">National Economy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Energy and Environmental Studies</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Sociology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Economic policy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Applied Sociology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Economic development</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-45-CGR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">BSB_OE_CEEOL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033640749</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://www.ceeol.com/search/gray-literature-detail?id=527940</subfield><subfield code="l">BSB01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-45-CGR</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV048260546 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T19:59:33Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T09:33:23Z |
| institution | BVB |
| language | Bulgarian |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033640749 |
| oclc_num | 1334018082 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 |
| physical | 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 2) |
| psigel | ZDB-45-CGR BSB_OE_CEEOL |
| publishDate | 2014 |
| publishDateSearch | 2014 |
| publishDateSort | 2014 |
| publisher | Centăr za izsledvane na demokracijata |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Energijna (ne)sigurnost, rešenieto na bălgarskija parlament za Južen potok zasilva riskovete pred nacionalnata energijna politika. Medijna beležka Author Not Specified Sofia [Bulgaria] Centăr za izsledvane na demokracijata 2014 Frankfurt M. CEEOL 2014 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 2) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier The decision of the Bulgarian Parliament from 4 April 2014 to adopt at first reading the amendments in the Energy Law, which grants South Stream special status highlights the lack of logic in the national energy policy and compounds the impression that public interest is not the driving force behind the proposed changes. The decision and the manner, in which it was taken, reveal some of the most serious problems in Bulgaria's energy policy in terms of bad governance and corruption.The adopted amendments at first reading to the Energy Law demonstrate yet again the risks of state capture by third-party interests, which do not correspond or even contradict the public interest. The real problems, which Bulgarian society faces on a daily basis, such as energy poverty, high energy prices, and low diversification and energy efficiency receive only a fraction of the attention, in terms of institutional and policy-making focus, compared to projects such as South Stream. What is even more alarming is that the recent actions of the ruling majority take place in the context of increasing geostrategic insecurity and danger of confrontation, which further exacerbate the risks deriving from such decisions Politics / Political Sciences Politics Social Sciences Economy Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence National Economy Energy and Environmental Studies Sociology Economic policy Applied Sociology Economic development |
| spellingShingle | Energijna (ne)sigurnost, rešenieto na bălgarskija parlament za Južen potok zasilva riskovete pred nacionalnata energijna politika. Medijna beležka Politics / Political Sciences Politics Social Sciences Economy Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence National Economy Energy and Environmental Studies Sociology Economic policy Applied Sociology Economic development |
| title | Energijna (ne)sigurnost, rešenieto na bălgarskija parlament za Južen potok zasilva riskovete pred nacionalnata energijna politika. Medijna beležka |
| title_auth | Energijna (ne)sigurnost, rešenieto na bălgarskija parlament za Južen potok zasilva riskovete pred nacionalnata energijna politika. Medijna beležka |
| title_exact_search | Energijna (ne)sigurnost, rešenieto na bălgarskija parlament za Južen potok zasilva riskovete pred nacionalnata energijna politika. Medijna beležka |
| title_exact_search_txtP | Energijna (ne)sigurnost, rešenieto na bălgarskija parlament za Južen potok zasilva riskovete pred nacionalnata energijna politika. Medijna beležka |
| title_full | Energijna (ne)sigurnost, rešenieto na bălgarskija parlament za Južen potok zasilva riskovete pred nacionalnata energijna politika. Medijna beležka Author Not Specified |
| title_fullStr | Energijna (ne)sigurnost, rešenieto na bălgarskija parlament za Južen potok zasilva riskovete pred nacionalnata energijna politika. Medijna beležka Author Not Specified |
| title_full_unstemmed | Energijna (ne)sigurnost, rešenieto na bălgarskija parlament za Južen potok zasilva riskovete pred nacionalnata energijna politika. Medijna beležka Author Not Specified |
| title_short | Energijna (ne)sigurnost, rešenieto na bălgarskija parlament za Južen potok zasilva riskovete pred nacionalnata energijna politika. Medijna beležka |
| title_sort | energijna ne sigurnost resenieto na balgarskija parlament za juzen potok zasilva riskovete pred nacionalnata energijna politika medijna belezka |
| topic | Politics / Political Sciences Politics Social Sciences Economy Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence National Economy Energy and Environmental Studies Sociology Economic policy Applied Sociology Economic development |
| topic_facet | Politics / Political Sciences Politics Social Sciences Economy Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence National Economy Energy and Environmental Studies Sociology Economic policy Applied Sociology Economic development |