CSD Policy Brief No. 48, Antikorupcionni merki v pravoochranitelnite institucii:
Gespeichert in:
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
|---|---|
| Sprache: | Bulgarian |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Sofia [Bulgaria]
Centăr za izsledvane na demokracijata
2014
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | BSB01 |
| Beschreibung: | In countries with endemic corruption, integrity reforms can only be successful if anti-corruption institutions succeed in tackling internal corruption challenges. A sharp decline of corruption in law enforcement would provide society with the necessary tools to pursue tangible change. The experience of established democracies is that a successful transformation depends not simply on individual measures but rather on the introduction of sets of effective anti-corruption measures across the entire public administration. Corruption among lawenforcement officers has been viewed with an increasing concern by the authorities and the public in many European states. As a result, while no common approach has ever been tested with respect to the judiciary, elected politicians or the customs, countering police corruption has become an all-European effort. During the last decade, several European countries developed multi-institutional systems for police integrity. On EU level, platforms like the European Partners against Corruption (EPAC) were introduced, enabling specialised anti-corruption institutions to cooperate and share experience. In addition, Europol, Interpol and the UN developed and shared the blueprints of common standards and good practices in preventing police corruption |
| Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 8) |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV048260481 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220609s2014 |||| o||u| ||||||bul d | ||
| 035 | |a (ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol526508 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1334044878 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV048260481 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a bul | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 | ||
| 084 | |a OST |q DE-12 |2 fid | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a CSD Policy Brief No. 48, Antikorupcionni merki v pravoochranitelnite institucii |c Author Not Specified |
| 264 | 1 | |a Sofia [Bulgaria] |b Centăr za izsledvane na demokracijata |c 2014 | |
| 264 | 2 | |a Frankfurt M. |b CEEOL |c 2014 | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 8) | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a In countries with endemic corruption, integrity reforms can only be successful if anti-corruption institutions succeed in tackling internal corruption challenges. A sharp decline of corruption in law enforcement would provide society with the necessary tools to pursue tangible change. The experience of established democracies is that a successful transformation depends not simply on individual measures but rather on the introduction of sets of effective anti-corruption measures across the entire public administration. Corruption among lawenforcement officers has been viewed with an increasing concern by the authorities and the public in many European states. As a result, while no common approach has ever been tested with respect to the judiciary, elected politicians or the customs, countering police corruption has become an all-European effort. During the last decade, several European countries developed multi-institutional systems for police integrity. On EU level, platforms like the European Partners against Corruption (EPAC) were introduced, enabling specialised anti-corruption institutions to cooperate and share experience. In addition, Europol, Interpol and the UN developed and shared the blueprints of common standards and good practices in preventing police corruption | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Politics / Political Sciences | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Social Sciences | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Economy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence | |
| 912 | |a ZDB-45-CGR | ||
| 940 | 1 | |n oe | |
| 940 | 1 | |q BSB_OE_CEEOL | |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033640684 | ||
| 966 | e | |u https://www.ceeol.com/search/gray-literature-detail?id=526508 |l BSB01 |p ZDB-45-CGR |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804184063347523584 |
|---|---|
| adam_txt | |
| any_adam_object | |
| any_adam_object_boolean | |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV048260481 |
| collection | ZDB-45-CGR |
| ctrlnum | (ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol526508 (OCoLC)1334044878 (DE-599)BVBBV048260481 |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02477nmm a2200373zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV048260481</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220609s2014 |||| o||u| ||||||bul d</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol526508</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1334044878</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV048260481</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">bul</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OST</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">CSD Policy Brief No. 48, Antikorupcionni merki v pravoochranitelnite institucii</subfield><subfield code="c">Author Not Specified</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Sofia [Bulgaria]</subfield><subfield code="b">Centăr za izsledvane na demokracijata</subfield><subfield code="c">2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Frankfurt M.</subfield><subfield code="b">CEEOL</subfield><subfield code="c">2014</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 8)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In countries with endemic corruption, integrity reforms can only be successful if anti-corruption institutions succeed in tackling internal corruption challenges. A sharp decline of corruption in law enforcement would provide society with the necessary tools to pursue tangible change. The experience of established democracies is that a successful transformation depends not simply on individual measures but rather on the introduction of sets of effective anti-corruption measures across the entire public administration. Corruption among lawenforcement officers has been viewed with an increasing concern by the authorities and the public in many European states. As a result, while no common approach has ever been tested with respect to the judiciary, elected politicians or the customs, countering police corruption has become an all-European effort. During the last decade, several European countries developed multi-institutional systems for police integrity. On EU level, platforms like the European Partners against Corruption (EPAC) were introduced, enabling specialised anti-corruption institutions to cooperate and share experience. In addition, Europol, Interpol and the UN developed and shared the blueprints of common standards and good practices in preventing police corruption</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Politics / Political Sciences</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Social Sciences</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Economy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-45-CGR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">BSB_OE_CEEOL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033640684</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://www.ceeol.com/search/gray-literature-detail?id=526508</subfield><subfield code="l">BSB01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-45-CGR</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV048260481 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T19:59:33Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T09:33:23Z |
| institution | BVB |
| language | Bulgarian |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033640684 |
| oclc_num | 1334044878 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 |
| physical | 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 8) |
| psigel | ZDB-45-CGR BSB_OE_CEEOL |
| publishDate | 2014 |
| publishDateSearch | 2014 |
| publishDateSort | 2014 |
| publisher | Centăr za izsledvane na demokracijata |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | CSD Policy Brief No. 48, Antikorupcionni merki v pravoochranitelnite institucii Author Not Specified Sofia [Bulgaria] Centăr za izsledvane na demokracijata 2014 Frankfurt M. CEEOL 2014 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 8) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier In countries with endemic corruption, integrity reforms can only be successful if anti-corruption institutions succeed in tackling internal corruption challenges. A sharp decline of corruption in law enforcement would provide society with the necessary tools to pursue tangible change. The experience of established democracies is that a successful transformation depends not simply on individual measures but rather on the introduction of sets of effective anti-corruption measures across the entire public administration. Corruption among lawenforcement officers has been viewed with an increasing concern by the authorities and the public in many European states. As a result, while no common approach has ever been tested with respect to the judiciary, elected politicians or the customs, countering police corruption has become an all-European effort. During the last decade, several European countries developed multi-institutional systems for police integrity. On EU level, platforms like the European Partners against Corruption (EPAC) were introduced, enabling specialised anti-corruption institutions to cooperate and share experience. In addition, Europol, Interpol and the UN developed and shared the blueprints of common standards and good practices in preventing police corruption Politics / Political Sciences Social Sciences Economy Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence |
| spellingShingle | CSD Policy Brief No. 48, Antikorupcionni merki v pravoochranitelnite institucii Politics / Political Sciences Social Sciences Economy Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence |
| title | CSD Policy Brief No. 48, Antikorupcionni merki v pravoochranitelnite institucii |
| title_auth | CSD Policy Brief No. 48, Antikorupcionni merki v pravoochranitelnite institucii |
| title_exact_search | CSD Policy Brief No. 48, Antikorupcionni merki v pravoochranitelnite institucii |
| title_exact_search_txtP | CSD Policy Brief No. 48, Antikorupcionni merki v pravoochranitelnite institucii |
| title_full | CSD Policy Brief No. 48, Antikorupcionni merki v pravoochranitelnite institucii Author Not Specified |
| title_fullStr | CSD Policy Brief No. 48, Antikorupcionni merki v pravoochranitelnite institucii Author Not Specified |
| title_full_unstemmed | CSD Policy Brief No. 48, Antikorupcionni merki v pravoochranitelnite institucii Author Not Specified |
| title_short | CSD Policy Brief No. 48, Antikorupcionni merki v pravoochranitelnite institucii |
| title_sort | csd policy brief no 48 antikorupcionni merki v pravoochranitelnite institucii |
| topic | Politics / Political Sciences Social Sciences Economy Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence |
| topic_facet | Politics / Political Sciences Social Sciences Economy Law, Constitution, Jurisprudence |