Measuring Success of the Common Foreign and Security Policy of the European Union in the Case of Macedonia:
Gespeichert in:
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
|---|---|
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Skopje [North Macedonia ]
Centar za istražuvanje i kreiranje politiki
2007
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | BSB01 |
| Beschreibung: | The Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) is one of the most widely discussed and analyzed policy areas of the European Union (EU). The development of the European Security and Defence Policy (ESDP) within the framework of the CFSP took place at the end of the '90s, in a process that interacted with the unfolding of the crisis of the Balkan regional order. Given this context, I believe that a study on the development of the CFSP/ESDP has to investigate how the EU Crisis Management instruments have been used. The crisis that occurred in the Republic of Macedonia, in this respect, is a case of critical salience. Macedonia is a specific case in which both the civilian and the military dimension of EU Crisis Management mechanism were applied, and there exists widespread consensus in the EU on the fact that this was done successfully. However, when talking about successes or failures, a number of slippery questions arise: what indicators of success can one refer to? For example, does success refer to the fact that the ESDP mechanism has been activated without major setbacks, or to the way in which it has affected the situation in Macedonia? Is the Macedonian case a success for the CFSP? How is success determined? Which are its standards of measurement? |
| Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 16) |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV048259847 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220609s2007 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
| 035 | |a (ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol513387 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1334045811 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV048259847 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 | ||
| 084 | |a OST |q DE-12 |2 fid | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Measuring Success of the Common Foreign and Security Policy of the European Union in the Case of Macedonia |c Author Not Specified |
| 264 | 1 | |a Skopje [North Macedonia ] |b Centar za istražuvanje i kreiranje politiki |c 2007 | |
| 264 | 2 | |a Frankfurt M. |b CEEOL |c 2007 | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 16) | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a The Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) is one of the most widely discussed and analyzed policy areas of the European Union (EU). The development of the European Security and Defence Policy (ESDP) within the framework of the CFSP took place at the end of the '90s, in a process that interacted with the unfolding of the crisis of the Balkan regional order. Given this context, I believe that a study on the development of the CFSP/ESDP has to investigate how the EU Crisis Management instruments have been used. The crisis that occurred in the Republic of Macedonia, in this respect, is a case of critical salience. Macedonia is a specific case in which both the civilian and the military dimension of EU Crisis Management mechanism were applied, and there exists widespread consensus in the EU on the fact that this was done successfully. However, when talking about successes or failures, a number of slippery questions arise: what indicators of success can one refer to? For example, does success refer to the fact that the ESDP mechanism has been activated without major setbacks, or to the way in which it has affected the situation in Macedonia? Is the Macedonian case a success for the CFSP? How is success determined? Which are its standards of measurement? | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a International relations/trade | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Security and defense | |
| 650 | 4 | |a EU-Accession / EU-DEvelopment | |
| 912 | |a ZDB-45-CGR | ||
| 940 | 1 | |n oe | |
| 940 | 1 | |q BSB_OE_CEEOL | |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033640050 | ||
| 966 | e | |u https://www.ceeol.com/search/gray-literature-detail?id=513387 |l BSB01 |p ZDB-45-CGR |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804184062761369600 |
|---|---|
| adam_txt | |
| any_adam_object | |
| any_adam_object_boolean | |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV048259847 |
| collection | ZDB-45-CGR |
| ctrlnum | (ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol513387 (OCoLC)1334045811 (DE-599)BVBBV048259847 |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02475nmm a2200361zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV048259847</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220609s2007 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol513387</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1334045811</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV048259847</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OST</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Measuring Success of the Common Foreign and Security Policy of the European Union in the Case of Macedonia</subfield><subfield code="c">Author Not Specified</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Skopje [North Macedonia ]</subfield><subfield code="b">Centar za istražuvanje i kreiranje politiki</subfield><subfield code="c">2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Frankfurt M.</subfield><subfield code="b">CEEOL</subfield><subfield code="c">2007</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 16)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) is one of the most widely discussed and analyzed policy areas of the European Union (EU). The development of the European Security and Defence Policy (ESDP) within the framework of the CFSP took place at the end of the '90s, in a process that interacted with the unfolding of the crisis of the Balkan regional order. Given this context, I believe that a study on the development of the CFSP/ESDP has to investigate how the EU Crisis Management instruments have been used. The crisis that occurred in the Republic of Macedonia, in this respect, is a case of critical salience. Macedonia is a specific case in which both the civilian and the military dimension of EU Crisis Management mechanism were applied, and there exists widespread consensus in the EU on the fact that this was done successfully. However, when talking about successes or failures, a number of slippery questions arise: what indicators of success can one refer to? For example, does success refer to the fact that the ESDP mechanism has been activated without major setbacks, or to the way in which it has affected the situation in Macedonia? Is the Macedonian case a success for the CFSP? How is success determined? Which are its standards of measurement?</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">International relations/trade</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Security and defense</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">EU-Accession / EU-DEvelopment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-45-CGR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">BSB_OE_CEEOL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033640050</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://www.ceeol.com/search/gray-literature-detail?id=513387</subfield><subfield code="l">BSB01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-45-CGR</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV048259847 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T19:59:32Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T09:33:22Z |
| institution | BVB |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033640050 |
| oclc_num | 1334045811 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 |
| physical | 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 16) |
| psigel | ZDB-45-CGR BSB_OE_CEEOL |
| publishDate | 2007 |
| publishDateSearch | 2007 |
| publishDateSort | 2007 |
| publisher | Centar za istražuvanje i kreiranje politiki |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Measuring Success of the Common Foreign and Security Policy of the European Union in the Case of Macedonia Author Not Specified Skopje [North Macedonia ] Centar za istražuvanje i kreiranje politiki 2007 Frankfurt M. CEEOL 2007 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 16) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier The Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) is one of the most widely discussed and analyzed policy areas of the European Union (EU). The development of the European Security and Defence Policy (ESDP) within the framework of the CFSP took place at the end of the '90s, in a process that interacted with the unfolding of the crisis of the Balkan regional order. Given this context, I believe that a study on the development of the CFSP/ESDP has to investigate how the EU Crisis Management instruments have been used. The crisis that occurred in the Republic of Macedonia, in this respect, is a case of critical salience. Macedonia is a specific case in which both the civilian and the military dimension of EU Crisis Management mechanism were applied, and there exists widespread consensus in the EU on the fact that this was done successfully. However, when talking about successes or failures, a number of slippery questions arise: what indicators of success can one refer to? For example, does success refer to the fact that the ESDP mechanism has been activated without major setbacks, or to the way in which it has affected the situation in Macedonia? Is the Macedonian case a success for the CFSP? How is success determined? Which are its standards of measurement? International relations/trade Security and defense EU-Accession / EU-DEvelopment |
| spellingShingle | Measuring Success of the Common Foreign and Security Policy of the European Union in the Case of Macedonia International relations/trade Security and defense EU-Accession / EU-DEvelopment |
| title | Measuring Success of the Common Foreign and Security Policy of the European Union in the Case of Macedonia |
| title_auth | Measuring Success of the Common Foreign and Security Policy of the European Union in the Case of Macedonia |
| title_exact_search | Measuring Success of the Common Foreign and Security Policy of the European Union in the Case of Macedonia |
| title_exact_search_txtP | Measuring Success of the Common Foreign and Security Policy of the European Union in the Case of Macedonia |
| title_full | Measuring Success of the Common Foreign and Security Policy of the European Union in the Case of Macedonia Author Not Specified |
| title_fullStr | Measuring Success of the Common Foreign and Security Policy of the European Union in the Case of Macedonia Author Not Specified |
| title_full_unstemmed | Measuring Success of the Common Foreign and Security Policy of the European Union in the Case of Macedonia Author Not Specified |
| title_short | Measuring Success of the Common Foreign and Security Policy of the European Union in the Case of Macedonia |
| title_sort | measuring success of the common foreign and security policy of the european union in the case of macedonia |
| topic | International relations/trade Security and defense EU-Accession / EU-DEvelopment |
| topic_facet | International relations/trade Security and defense EU-Accession / EU-DEvelopment |