HISTORY AND CHARACTER Visions of National Peculiarity in the Romanian Political Discourse of the 19th century:
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Sofia [Bulgaria]
Centre for Advanced Study Sofia (CAS)
2011
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | BSB01 |
| Beschreibung: | As in most European cases, some aspects of the Romanian discourse of national peculiarity can be traced back to the humanist genre of "Descripţia" of the land, narrating the origins and political history of the respective people, a genre which in the Danubian Principalities reached its climax in the works of the erudite Moldavian prince-scholar Dimitrie Cantemir (1673-1723).1 The works rooted in the humanist chorographical paradigm of course had a very different discursive function and referential basis than the characterological constructions underpinning the projects of modern nationhood and statebuilding, emerging from the late 18th century onwards, making "national individuality" a key argument of political self-legitimization. Some references to this national individuality can be identified in the political and cultural works of the Transylvanian Greek Catholic elite, which sought to anchor the historical-institutional identity of Transylvanian Romanians in a genealogical construction. They were stressing customs and behavior as the proof of continuity with the Roman colonists of Dacia and accidentally, even the concept of "character" surfaced in some of their writings. Simultaneously, the culturalgeographical literature stemming from the Danubian Principalities (often by travelers or cosmopolitan intellectuals, whose work can be related to more than one national tradition, such as the Greek Daniil Philippide or Dionisie Fotino, both of whom authored geographical descriptions of these lands, or the French Encyclopédiste, J. L. Carra) sought to put these polities on the map of Europe, making references to the customs of the inhabitants. Significantly, the concept of character was already able to become politicized in the late 18th century, as was the case with the reformist discourse of the Moldavian boyar Ionică Tăutul, who deplored the loss of patriotic identification and the growth of egoism on the part of the ruling elite |
| Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 36) |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV048259739 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220609s2011 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
| 035 | |a (ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol513252 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1334033334 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV048259739 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 | ||
| 084 | |a OST |q DE-12 |2 fid | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Trencsényi, Balázs |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a HISTORY AND CHARACTER Visions of National Peculiarity in the Romanian Political Discourse of the 19th century |c Balázs Trencsényi |
| 264 | 1 | |a Sofia [Bulgaria] |b Centre for Advanced Study Sofia (CAS) |c 2011 | |
| 264 | 2 | |a Frankfurt M. |b CEEOL |c 2011 | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 36) | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a As in most European cases, some aspects of the Romanian discourse of national peculiarity can be traced back to the humanist genre of "Descripţia" of the land, narrating the origins and political history of the respective people, a genre which in the Danubian Principalities reached its climax in the works of the erudite Moldavian prince-scholar Dimitrie Cantemir (1673-1723).1 The works rooted in the humanist chorographical paradigm of course had a very different discursive function and referential basis than the characterological constructions underpinning the projects of modern nationhood and statebuilding, emerging from the late 18th century onwards, making "national individuality" a key argument of political self-legitimization. Some references to this national individuality can be identified in the political and cultural works of the Transylvanian Greek Catholic elite, which sought to anchor the historical-institutional identity of Transylvanian Romanians in a genealogical construction. They were stressing customs and behavior as the proof of continuity with the Roman colonists of Dacia and accidentally, even the concept of "character" surfaced in some of their writings. Simultaneously, the culturalgeographical literature stemming from the Danubian Principalities (often by travelers or cosmopolitan intellectuals, whose work can be related to more than one national tradition, such as the Greek Daniil Philippide or Dionisie Fotino, both of whom authored geographical descriptions of these lands, or the French Encyclopédiste, J. L. Carra) sought to put these polities on the map of Europe, making references to the customs of the inhabitants. Significantly, the concept of character was already able to become politicized in the late 18th century, as was the case with the reformist discourse of the Moldavian boyar Ionică Tăutul, who deplored the loss of patriotic identification and the growth of egoism on the part of the ruling elite | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Cultural Anthropology / Ethnology | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Period(s) of Nation Building | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Inter-Ethnic Relations | |
| 912 | |a ZDB-45-CGR | ||
| 940 | 1 | |n oe | |
| 940 | 1 | |q BSB_OE_CEEOL | |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033639942 | ||
| 966 | e | |u https://www.ceeol.com/search/gray-literature-detail?id=513252 |l BSB01 |p ZDB-45-CGR |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804184062583111680 |
|---|---|
| adam_txt | |
| any_adam_object | |
| any_adam_object_boolean | |
| author | Trencsényi, Balázs |
| author_facet | Trencsényi, Balázs |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Trencsényi, Balázs |
| author_variant | b t bt |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV048259739 |
| collection | ZDB-45-CGR |
| ctrlnum | (ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol513252 (OCoLC)1334033334 (DE-599)BVBBV048259739 |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03215nmm a2200373zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV048259739</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220609s2011 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol513252</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1334033334</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV048259739</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OST</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Trencsényi, Balázs</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">HISTORY AND CHARACTER Visions of National Peculiarity in the Romanian Political Discourse of the 19th century</subfield><subfield code="c">Balázs Trencsényi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Sofia [Bulgaria]</subfield><subfield code="b">Centre for Advanced Study Sofia (CAS)</subfield><subfield code="c">2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Frankfurt M.</subfield><subfield code="b">CEEOL</subfield><subfield code="c">2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 36)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">As in most European cases, some aspects of the Romanian discourse of national peculiarity can be traced back to the humanist genre of "Descripţia" of the land, narrating the origins and political history of the respective people, a genre which in the Danubian Principalities reached its climax in the works of the erudite Moldavian prince-scholar Dimitrie Cantemir (1673-1723).1 The works rooted in the humanist chorographical paradigm of course had a very different discursive function and referential basis than the characterological constructions underpinning the projects of modern nationhood and statebuilding, emerging from the late 18th century onwards, making "national individuality" a key argument of political self-legitimization. Some references to this national individuality can be identified in the political and cultural works of the Transylvanian Greek Catholic elite, which sought to anchor the historical-institutional identity of Transylvanian Romanians in a genealogical construction. They were stressing customs and behavior as the proof of continuity with the Roman colonists of Dacia and accidentally, even the concept of "character" surfaced in some of their writings. Simultaneously, the culturalgeographical literature stemming from the Danubian Principalities (often by travelers or cosmopolitan intellectuals, whose work can be related to more than one national tradition, such as the Greek Daniil Philippide or Dionisie Fotino, both of whom authored geographical descriptions of these lands, or the French Encyclopédiste, J. L. Carra) sought to put these polities on the map of Europe, making references to the customs of the inhabitants. Significantly, the concept of character was already able to become politicized in the late 18th century, as was the case with the reformist discourse of the Moldavian boyar Ionică Tăutul, who deplored the loss of patriotic identification and the growth of egoism on the part of the ruling elite</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Cultural Anthropology / Ethnology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Period(s) of Nation Building</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Inter-Ethnic Relations</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-45-CGR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">BSB_OE_CEEOL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033639942</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://www.ceeol.com/search/gray-literature-detail?id=513252</subfield><subfield code="l">BSB01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-45-CGR</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV048259739 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T19:59:32Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T09:33:22Z |
| institution | BVB |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033639942 |
| oclc_num | 1334033334 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 |
| physical | 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 36) |
| psigel | ZDB-45-CGR BSB_OE_CEEOL |
| publishDate | 2011 |
| publishDateSearch | 2011 |
| publishDateSort | 2011 |
| publisher | Centre for Advanced Study Sofia (CAS) |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Trencsényi, Balázs Verfasser aut HISTORY AND CHARACTER Visions of National Peculiarity in the Romanian Political Discourse of the 19th century Balázs Trencsényi Sofia [Bulgaria] Centre for Advanced Study Sofia (CAS) 2011 Frankfurt M. CEEOL 2011 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 36) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier As in most European cases, some aspects of the Romanian discourse of national peculiarity can be traced back to the humanist genre of "Descripţia" of the land, narrating the origins and political history of the respective people, a genre which in the Danubian Principalities reached its climax in the works of the erudite Moldavian prince-scholar Dimitrie Cantemir (1673-1723).1 The works rooted in the humanist chorographical paradigm of course had a very different discursive function and referential basis than the characterological constructions underpinning the projects of modern nationhood and statebuilding, emerging from the late 18th century onwards, making "national individuality" a key argument of political self-legitimization. Some references to this national individuality can be identified in the political and cultural works of the Transylvanian Greek Catholic elite, which sought to anchor the historical-institutional identity of Transylvanian Romanians in a genealogical construction. They were stressing customs and behavior as the proof of continuity with the Roman colonists of Dacia and accidentally, even the concept of "character" surfaced in some of their writings. Simultaneously, the culturalgeographical literature stemming from the Danubian Principalities (often by travelers or cosmopolitan intellectuals, whose work can be related to more than one national tradition, such as the Greek Daniil Philippide or Dionisie Fotino, both of whom authored geographical descriptions of these lands, or the French Encyclopédiste, J. L. Carra) sought to put these polities on the map of Europe, making references to the customs of the inhabitants. Significantly, the concept of character was already able to become politicized in the late 18th century, as was the case with the reformist discourse of the Moldavian boyar Ionică Tăutul, who deplored the loss of patriotic identification and the growth of egoism on the part of the ruling elite Cultural Anthropology / Ethnology Period(s) of Nation Building Inter-Ethnic Relations |
| spellingShingle | Trencsényi, Balázs HISTORY AND CHARACTER Visions of National Peculiarity in the Romanian Political Discourse of the 19th century Cultural Anthropology / Ethnology Period(s) of Nation Building Inter-Ethnic Relations |
| title | HISTORY AND CHARACTER Visions of National Peculiarity in the Romanian Political Discourse of the 19th century |
| title_auth | HISTORY AND CHARACTER Visions of National Peculiarity in the Romanian Political Discourse of the 19th century |
| title_exact_search | HISTORY AND CHARACTER Visions of National Peculiarity in the Romanian Political Discourse of the 19th century |
| title_exact_search_txtP | HISTORY AND CHARACTER Visions of National Peculiarity in the Romanian Political Discourse of the 19th century |
| title_full | HISTORY AND CHARACTER Visions of National Peculiarity in the Romanian Political Discourse of the 19th century Balázs Trencsényi |
| title_fullStr | HISTORY AND CHARACTER Visions of National Peculiarity in the Romanian Political Discourse of the 19th century Balázs Trencsényi |
| title_full_unstemmed | HISTORY AND CHARACTER Visions of National Peculiarity in the Romanian Political Discourse of the 19th century Balázs Trencsényi |
| title_short | HISTORY AND CHARACTER Visions of National Peculiarity in the Romanian Political Discourse of the 19th century |
| title_sort | history and character visions of national peculiarity in the romanian political discourse of the 19th century |
| topic | Cultural Anthropology / Ethnology Period(s) of Nation Building Inter-Ethnic Relations |
| topic_facet | Cultural Anthropology / Ethnology Period(s) of Nation Building Inter-Ethnic Relations |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT trencsenyibalazs historyandcharactervisionsofnationalpeculiarityintheromanianpoliticaldiscourseofthe19thcentury |