№180. The Case for a Gas Transit Consortium in Ukraine, A Cost-Benefit Analysis:
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Brussels [Belgium]
CEPS Centre for European Policy Studies
2009
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | BSB01 |
| Beschreibung: | The 2009 gas dispute between Ukraine and Russia has led to a severe drop in Russian gas supplies to some EU member states. The dispute has once again shown that the status quo is defective and unsustainable as a policy. This Policy Brief argues that - beyond ad hoc temporary measures, such as the monitoring by EU experts agreed on January 12th and the 2009-10 price agreement apparently reached on January 18th - the problem needs a comprehensive and robust solution. This would be a gas transit consortium, bringing all major stakeholders - Gazprom, Naftohaz, one or a few European energy companies, and the international financial institutions - to jointly manage the trans- Ukrainian trunk pipeline. The consortium agreement would be underwritten politically and legally by a tripartite treaty to be ratified by the EU, Russia and Ukraine. The consortium should be bound by European standards of transparency, corporate governance and accounting in order to tackle the major problem - the lack of trust - in the EU-Ukraine- Russia energy triangle |
| Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 13) |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV048259667 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220609s2009 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
| 035 | |a (ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol511919 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1334018618 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV048259667 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 | ||
| 084 | |a OST |q DE-12 |2 fid | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Gnedina, Elena |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a №180. The Case for a Gas Transit Consortium in Ukraine, A Cost-Benefit Analysis |
| 264 | 1 | |a Brussels [Belgium] |b CEPS Centre for European Policy Studies |c 2009 | |
| 264 | 2 | |a Frankfurt M. |b CEEOL |c 2009 | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 13) | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a The 2009 gas dispute between Ukraine and Russia has led to a severe drop in Russian gas supplies to some EU member states. The dispute has once again shown that the status quo is defective and unsustainable as a policy. This Policy Brief argues that - beyond ad hoc temporary measures, such as the monitoring by EU experts agreed on January 12th and the 2009-10 price agreement apparently reached on January 18th - the problem needs a comprehensive and robust solution. This would be a gas transit consortium, bringing all major stakeholders - Gazprom, Naftohaz, one or a few European energy companies, and the international financial institutions - to jointly manage the trans- Ukrainian trunk pipeline. The consortium agreement would be underwritten politically and legally by a tripartite treaty to be ratified by the EU, Russia and Ukraine. The consortium should be bound by European standards of transparency, corporate governance and accounting in order to tackle the major problem - the lack of trust - in the EU-Ukraine- Russia energy triangle | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Energy and Environmental Studies | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Economic policy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a International relations/trade | |
| 650 | 4 | |a EU-Accession / EU-DEvelopment | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Emerson, Michael |4 aut | |
| 912 | |a ZDB-45-CGR | ||
| 940 | 1 | |n oe | |
| 940 | 1 | |q BSB_OE_CEEOL | |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033639870 | ||
| 966 | e | |u https://www.ceeol.com/search/gray-literature-detail?id=511919 |l BSB01 |p ZDB-45-CGR |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804184062495031296 |
|---|---|
| adam_txt | |
| any_adam_object | |
| any_adam_object_boolean | |
| author | Gnedina, Elena Emerson, Michael |
| author_facet | Gnedina, Elena Emerson, Michael |
| author_role | aut aut |
| author_sort | Gnedina, Elena |
| author_variant | e g eg m e me |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV048259667 |
| collection | ZDB-45-CGR |
| ctrlnum | (ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol511919 (OCoLC)1334018618 (DE-599)BVBBV048259667 |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02325nmm a2200397zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV048259667</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220609s2009 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol511919</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1334018618</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV048259667</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OST</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gnedina, Elena</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">№180. The Case for a Gas Transit Consortium in Ukraine, A Cost-Benefit Analysis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Brussels [Belgium]</subfield><subfield code="b">CEPS Centre for European Policy Studies</subfield><subfield code="c">2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Frankfurt M.</subfield><subfield code="b">CEEOL</subfield><subfield code="c">2009</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 13)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The 2009 gas dispute between Ukraine and Russia has led to a severe drop in Russian gas supplies to some EU member states. The dispute has once again shown that the status quo is defective and unsustainable as a policy. This Policy Brief argues that - beyond ad hoc temporary measures, such as the monitoring by EU experts agreed on January 12th and the 2009-10 price agreement apparently reached on January 18th - the problem needs a comprehensive and robust solution. This would be a gas transit consortium, bringing all major stakeholders - Gazprom, Naftohaz, one or a few European energy companies, and the international financial institutions - to jointly manage the trans- Ukrainian trunk pipeline. The consortium agreement would be underwritten politically and legally by a tripartite treaty to be ratified by the EU, Russia and Ukraine. The consortium should be bound by European standards of transparency, corporate governance and accounting in order to tackle the major problem - the lack of trust - in the EU-Ukraine- Russia energy triangle</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Energy and Environmental Studies</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Economic policy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">International relations/trade</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">EU-Accession / EU-DEvelopment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Emerson, Michael</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-45-CGR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">BSB_OE_CEEOL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033639870</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://www.ceeol.com/search/gray-literature-detail?id=511919</subfield><subfield code="l">BSB01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-45-CGR</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV048259667 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T19:59:32Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T09:33:22Z |
| institution | BVB |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033639870 |
| oclc_num | 1334018618 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 |
| physical | 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 13) |
| psigel | ZDB-45-CGR BSB_OE_CEEOL |
| publishDate | 2009 |
| publishDateSearch | 2009 |
| publishDateSort | 2009 |
| publisher | CEPS Centre for European Policy Studies |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Gnedina, Elena Verfasser aut №180. The Case for a Gas Transit Consortium in Ukraine, A Cost-Benefit Analysis Brussels [Belgium] CEPS Centre for European Policy Studies 2009 Frankfurt M. CEEOL 2009 1 Online-Ressource(1 p. 13) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier The 2009 gas dispute between Ukraine and Russia has led to a severe drop in Russian gas supplies to some EU member states. The dispute has once again shown that the status quo is defective and unsustainable as a policy. This Policy Brief argues that - beyond ad hoc temporary measures, such as the monitoring by EU experts agreed on January 12th and the 2009-10 price agreement apparently reached on January 18th - the problem needs a comprehensive and robust solution. This would be a gas transit consortium, bringing all major stakeholders - Gazprom, Naftohaz, one or a few European energy companies, and the international financial institutions - to jointly manage the trans- Ukrainian trunk pipeline. The consortium agreement would be underwritten politically and legally by a tripartite treaty to be ratified by the EU, Russia and Ukraine. The consortium should be bound by European standards of transparency, corporate governance and accounting in order to tackle the major problem - the lack of trust - in the EU-Ukraine- Russia energy triangle Energy and Environmental Studies Economic policy International relations/trade EU-Accession / EU-DEvelopment Emerson, Michael aut |
| spellingShingle | Gnedina, Elena Emerson, Michael №180. The Case for a Gas Transit Consortium in Ukraine, A Cost-Benefit Analysis Energy and Environmental Studies Economic policy International relations/trade EU-Accession / EU-DEvelopment |
| title | №180. The Case for a Gas Transit Consortium in Ukraine, A Cost-Benefit Analysis |
| title_auth | №180. The Case for a Gas Transit Consortium in Ukraine, A Cost-Benefit Analysis |
| title_exact_search | №180. The Case for a Gas Transit Consortium in Ukraine, A Cost-Benefit Analysis |
| title_exact_search_txtP | №180. The Case for a Gas Transit Consortium in Ukraine, A Cost-Benefit Analysis |
| title_full | №180. The Case for a Gas Transit Consortium in Ukraine, A Cost-Benefit Analysis |
| title_fullStr | №180. The Case for a Gas Transit Consortium in Ukraine, A Cost-Benefit Analysis |
| title_full_unstemmed | №180. The Case for a Gas Transit Consortium in Ukraine, A Cost-Benefit Analysis |
| title_short | №180. The Case for a Gas Transit Consortium in Ukraine, A Cost-Benefit Analysis |
| title_sort | №180 the case for a gas transit consortium in ukraine a cost benefit analysis |
| topic | Energy and Environmental Studies Economic policy International relations/trade EU-Accession / EU-DEvelopment |
| topic_facet | Energy and Environmental Studies Economic policy International relations/trade EU-Accession / EU-DEvelopment |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT gnedinaelena 180thecaseforagastransitconsortiuminukraineacostbenefitanalysis AT emersonmichael 180thecaseforagastransitconsortiuminukraineacostbenefitanalysis |