The Mimetic Evolution of the Court of Justice of the EU: A Comparative Law Perspective
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Cham
Springer International Publishing AG
2020
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Beschreibung: | Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources |
| Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource (418 pages) |
| ISBN: | 9783030478643 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV048222961 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220516s2020 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9783030478643 |9 978-3-030-47864-3 | ||
| 035 | |a (ZDB-30-PQE)EBC6270585 | ||
| 035 | |a (ZDB-30-PAD)EBC6270585 | ||
| 035 | |a (ZDB-89-EBL)EBL6270585 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1176256827 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV048222961 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 082 | 0 | |a 347.2401 | |
| 100 | 1 | |a Pierdominici, Leonardo |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a The Mimetic Evolution of the Court of Justice of the EU |b A Comparative Law Perspective |
| 264 | 1 | |a Cham |b Springer International Publishing AG |c 2020 | |
| 264 | 4 | |c ©2020 | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (418 pages) | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources | ||
| 505 | 8 | |a Intro -- Acknowledgments -- Contents -- 1 Introduction -- 1.1 The Structure -- 1.2 Some Key-Concepts: Autonomy, Authority, Mimetism -- 1.3 The Situation of the Research -- 1.3.1 Mimetism as a Potential Link Between Cultural Studies and Functionalism in Supranational Law -- 1.4 The Work Plan -- 2 The Foundation and Structuring of the Powers of the Court -- 2.1 Choice of Form: The Original Debate on the Creation of a Court for the European Communities -- 2.2 Design of Powers of the Court and National Influences -- 2.2.1 The "Administrative" Competences -- 2.2.2 Transformation of the Preliminary Reference Procedure -- 2.3 Different Perspective, Same Dynamics: The Establishment of the Doctrines of Primacy and Direct Effect -- 2.4 The Original Choices in the Establishment of the Court of Justice as a Form of Improvement of Its Authority -- 3 The Appointment of Members of the Court -- 3.1 Selection of Judges: Comparative Trends at the National and International Level and Their Rationale -- 3.1.1 The Historical Rise of Judicial Selection Models -- 3.1.2 Models of Apical Court Selections, in Europe and at the International Level -- 3.2 Selection of Judges in Luxembourg: Liberal Supranationalism as a Reaction to Pure Intergovernmentalism? -- 3.3 The Evolution of Judicial Appointments as a Form of Improvement of the Court's Authority -- 4 The Deliberation of the Court and Its Transparency -- 4.1 Openness as Access to Deliberation: Comparative Remarks -- 4.2 Openness as Access to Deliberation: The Debate for the European Court (also with Reference to the Advocates General and Their Opinions) -- 4.2.1 Old and New Debates on the Adoption of Dissenting Opinions in Luxembourg -- 4.2.2 The Advocates General and Their Role in the Transparency of the Court's Deliberations -- 4.3 Openness as Access to Court Documents | |
| 505 | 8 | |a 4.3.1 Access to Court Documents as a Second Dimension of Openness -- 4.3.2 The International Debate, the Comparative Paradigms -- 4.3.3 Openness as Access to Court Documents: The Debate in European Union Law -- 4.4 Dimensions of Openness and the Authority of the Court of Justice -- 5 Docket Control at the Court of Justice -- 5.1 The European Court of Justice and Its Docket -- 5.2 Docket Control as the Use of Certiorari and Procedural "Passive Virtues" -- 5.3 The Possibility of Adopting Other "Passive Virtues" in Luxembourg -- 5.4 Docket Control as a Result of Substantive Interpretative Choices, Delegation and Efficiency -- 5.5 Preliminary Reference Procedure, Unitas,Diversitas -- 5.6 Looking for Neutral Institutional Solutions -- 5.7 The Evolution of Docket Control as a Form of Improvement of the Court's Authority -- 6 The Style of Court Decisions -- 6.1 The Style of the Court's Decisions Within the "Fabrication" Process of EU Law -- 6.2 The Style of the Court's Decisions as Culturally Shaped -- 6.3 The Style as Shaped by the Machinery of the Court and the Plurality of the EU Legal Order -- 6.4 The Style Decisions and the New Factors of Change -- 6.5 The Evolution of Judgement Style as a Form of Improvement of the Court's Authority -- 7 Conclusions -- 7.1 The Autonomy and Authority of the Court in Its Evolution -- 7.2 Mimetism as Phenomenon and a Method in the Plurality of the EU Legal Order -- Bibliography -- Index | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Court of Justice of the European Union.. | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Comparative law.. | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Conflict of laws.. | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Legislative bodies | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druck-Ausgabe |a Pierdominici, Leonardo |t The Mimetic Evolution of the Court of Justice of the EU |d Cham : Springer International Publishing AG,c2020 |z 9783030478636 |
| 912 | |a ZDB-30-PQE | ||
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033603694 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804184004680744960 |
|---|---|
| adam_txt | |
| any_adam_object | |
| any_adam_object_boolean | |
| author | Pierdominici, Leonardo |
| author_facet | Pierdominici, Leonardo |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Pierdominici, Leonardo |
| author_variant | l p lp |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV048222961 |
| collection | ZDB-30-PQE |
| contents | Intro -- Acknowledgments -- Contents -- 1 Introduction -- 1.1 The Structure -- 1.2 Some Key-Concepts: Autonomy, Authority, Mimetism -- 1.3 The Situation of the Research -- 1.3.1 Mimetism as a Potential Link Between Cultural Studies and Functionalism in Supranational Law -- 1.4 The Work Plan -- 2 The Foundation and Structuring of the Powers of the Court -- 2.1 Choice of Form: The Original Debate on the Creation of a Court for the European Communities -- 2.2 Design of Powers of the Court and National Influences -- 2.2.1 The "Administrative" Competences -- 2.2.2 Transformation of the Preliminary Reference Procedure -- 2.3 Different Perspective, Same Dynamics: The Establishment of the Doctrines of Primacy and Direct Effect -- 2.4 The Original Choices in the Establishment of the Court of Justice as a Form of Improvement of Its Authority -- 3 The Appointment of Members of the Court -- 3.1 Selection of Judges: Comparative Trends at the National and International Level and Their Rationale -- 3.1.1 The Historical Rise of Judicial Selection Models -- 3.1.2 Models of Apical Court Selections, in Europe and at the International Level -- 3.2 Selection of Judges in Luxembourg: Liberal Supranationalism as a Reaction to Pure Intergovernmentalism? -- 3.3 The Evolution of Judicial Appointments as a Form of Improvement of the Court's Authority -- 4 The Deliberation of the Court and Its Transparency -- 4.1 Openness as Access to Deliberation: Comparative Remarks -- 4.2 Openness as Access to Deliberation: The Debate for the European Court (also with Reference to the Advocates General and Their Opinions) -- 4.2.1 Old and New Debates on the Adoption of Dissenting Opinions in Luxembourg -- 4.2.2 The Advocates General and Their Role in the Transparency of the Court's Deliberations -- 4.3 Openness as Access to Court Documents 4.3.1 Access to Court Documents as a Second Dimension of Openness -- 4.3.2 The International Debate, the Comparative Paradigms -- 4.3.3 Openness as Access to Court Documents: The Debate in European Union Law -- 4.4 Dimensions of Openness and the Authority of the Court of Justice -- 5 Docket Control at the Court of Justice -- 5.1 The European Court of Justice and Its Docket -- 5.2 Docket Control as the Use of Certiorari and Procedural "Passive Virtues" -- 5.3 The Possibility of Adopting Other "Passive Virtues" in Luxembourg -- 5.4 Docket Control as a Result of Substantive Interpretative Choices, Delegation and Efficiency -- 5.5 Preliminary Reference Procedure, Unitas,Diversitas -- 5.6 Looking for Neutral Institutional Solutions -- 5.7 The Evolution of Docket Control as a Form of Improvement of the Court's Authority -- 6 The Style of Court Decisions -- 6.1 The Style of the Court's Decisions Within the "Fabrication" Process of EU Law -- 6.2 The Style of the Court's Decisions as Culturally Shaped -- 6.3 The Style as Shaped by the Machinery of the Court and the Plurality of the EU Legal Order -- 6.4 The Style Decisions and the New Factors of Change -- 6.5 The Evolution of Judgement Style as a Form of Improvement of the Court's Authority -- 7 Conclusions -- 7.1 The Autonomy and Authority of the Court in Its Evolution -- 7.2 Mimetism as Phenomenon and a Method in the Plurality of the EU Legal Order -- Bibliography -- Index |
| ctrlnum | (ZDB-30-PQE)EBC6270585 (ZDB-30-PAD)EBC6270585 (ZDB-89-EBL)EBL6270585 (OCoLC)1176256827 (DE-599)BVBBV048222961 |
| dewey-full | 347.2401 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 347 - Procedure and courts |
| dewey-raw | 347.2401 |
| dewey-search | 347.2401 |
| dewey-sort | 3347.2401 |
| dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| discipline_str_mv | Rechtswissenschaft |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>04867nmm a2200409zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV048222961</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220516s2020 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9783030478643</subfield><subfield code="9">978-3-030-47864-3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-30-PQE)EBC6270585</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-30-PAD)EBC6270585</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-89-EBL)EBL6270585</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1176256827</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV048222961</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">347.2401</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pierdominici, Leonardo</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">The Mimetic Evolution of the Court of Justice of the EU</subfield><subfield code="b">A Comparative Law Perspective</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Cham</subfield><subfield code="b">Springer International Publishing AG</subfield><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="c">©2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (418 pages)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Intro -- Acknowledgments -- Contents -- 1 Introduction -- 1.1 The Structure -- 1.2 Some Key-Concepts: Autonomy, Authority, Mimetism -- 1.3 The Situation of the Research -- 1.3.1 Mimetism as a Potential Link Between Cultural Studies and Functionalism in Supranational Law -- 1.4 The Work Plan -- 2 The Foundation and Structuring of the Powers of the Court -- 2.1 Choice of Form: The Original Debate on the Creation of a Court for the European Communities -- 2.2 Design of Powers of the Court and National Influences -- 2.2.1 The "Administrative" Competences -- 2.2.2 Transformation of the Preliminary Reference Procedure -- 2.3 Different Perspective, Same Dynamics: The Establishment of the Doctrines of Primacy and Direct Effect -- 2.4 The Original Choices in the Establishment of the Court of Justice as a Form of Improvement of Its Authority -- 3 The Appointment of Members of the Court -- 3.1 Selection of Judges: Comparative Trends at the National and International Level and Their Rationale -- 3.1.1 The Historical Rise of Judicial Selection Models -- 3.1.2 Models of Apical Court Selections, in Europe and at the International Level -- 3.2 Selection of Judges in Luxembourg: Liberal Supranationalism as a Reaction to Pure Intergovernmentalism? -- 3.3 The Evolution of Judicial Appointments as a Form of Improvement of the Court's Authority -- 4 The Deliberation of the Court and Its Transparency -- 4.1 Openness as Access to Deliberation: Comparative Remarks -- 4.2 Openness as Access to Deliberation: The Debate for the European Court (also with Reference to the Advocates General and Their Opinions) -- 4.2.1 Old and New Debates on the Adoption of Dissenting Opinions in Luxembourg -- 4.2.2 The Advocates General and Their Role in the Transparency of the Court's Deliberations -- 4.3 Openness as Access to Court Documents</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">4.3.1 Access to Court Documents as a Second Dimension of Openness -- 4.3.2 The International Debate, the Comparative Paradigms -- 4.3.3 Openness as Access to Court Documents: The Debate in European Union Law -- 4.4 Dimensions of Openness and the Authority of the Court of Justice -- 5 Docket Control at the Court of Justice -- 5.1 The European Court of Justice and Its Docket -- 5.2 Docket Control as the Use of Certiorari and Procedural "Passive Virtues" -- 5.3 The Possibility of Adopting Other "Passive Virtues" in Luxembourg -- 5.4 Docket Control as a Result of Substantive Interpretative Choices, Delegation and Efficiency -- 5.5 Preliminary Reference Procedure, Unitas,Diversitas -- 5.6 Looking for Neutral Institutional Solutions -- 5.7 The Evolution of Docket Control as a Form of Improvement of the Court's Authority -- 6 The Style of Court Decisions -- 6.1 The Style of the Court's Decisions Within the "Fabrication" Process of EU Law -- 6.2 The Style of the Court's Decisions as Culturally Shaped -- 6.3 The Style as Shaped by the Machinery of the Court and the Plurality of the EU Legal Order -- 6.4 The Style Decisions and the New Factors of Change -- 6.5 The Evolution of Judgement Style as a Form of Improvement of the Court's Authority -- 7 Conclusions -- 7.1 The Autonomy and Authority of the Court in Its Evolution -- 7.2 Mimetism as Phenomenon and a Method in the Plurality of the EU Legal Order -- Bibliography -- Index</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Court of Justice of the European Union..</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Comparative law..</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Conflict of laws..</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Legislative bodies</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druck-Ausgabe</subfield><subfield code="a">Pierdominici, Leonardo</subfield><subfield code="t">The Mimetic Evolution of the Court of Justice of the EU</subfield><subfield code="d">Cham : Springer International Publishing AG,c2020</subfield><subfield code="z">9783030478636</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-30-PQE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033603694</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV048222961 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T19:50:37Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T09:32:27Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9783030478643 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033603694 |
| oclc_num | 1176256827 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| physical | 1 Online-Ressource (418 pages) |
| psigel | ZDB-30-PQE |
| publishDate | 2020 |
| publishDateSearch | 2020 |
| publishDateSort | 2020 |
| publisher | Springer International Publishing AG |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Pierdominici, Leonardo Verfasser aut The Mimetic Evolution of the Court of Justice of the EU A Comparative Law Perspective Cham Springer International Publishing AG 2020 ©2020 1 Online-Ressource (418 pages) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources Intro -- Acknowledgments -- Contents -- 1 Introduction -- 1.1 The Structure -- 1.2 Some Key-Concepts: Autonomy, Authority, Mimetism -- 1.3 The Situation of the Research -- 1.3.1 Mimetism as a Potential Link Between Cultural Studies and Functionalism in Supranational Law -- 1.4 The Work Plan -- 2 The Foundation and Structuring of the Powers of the Court -- 2.1 Choice of Form: The Original Debate on the Creation of a Court for the European Communities -- 2.2 Design of Powers of the Court and National Influences -- 2.2.1 The "Administrative" Competences -- 2.2.2 Transformation of the Preliminary Reference Procedure -- 2.3 Different Perspective, Same Dynamics: The Establishment of the Doctrines of Primacy and Direct Effect -- 2.4 The Original Choices in the Establishment of the Court of Justice as a Form of Improvement of Its Authority -- 3 The Appointment of Members of the Court -- 3.1 Selection of Judges: Comparative Trends at the National and International Level and Their Rationale -- 3.1.1 The Historical Rise of Judicial Selection Models -- 3.1.2 Models of Apical Court Selections, in Europe and at the International Level -- 3.2 Selection of Judges in Luxembourg: Liberal Supranationalism as a Reaction to Pure Intergovernmentalism? -- 3.3 The Evolution of Judicial Appointments as a Form of Improvement of the Court's Authority -- 4 The Deliberation of the Court and Its Transparency -- 4.1 Openness as Access to Deliberation: Comparative Remarks -- 4.2 Openness as Access to Deliberation: The Debate for the European Court (also with Reference to the Advocates General and Their Opinions) -- 4.2.1 Old and New Debates on the Adoption of Dissenting Opinions in Luxembourg -- 4.2.2 The Advocates General and Their Role in the Transparency of the Court's Deliberations -- 4.3 Openness as Access to Court Documents 4.3.1 Access to Court Documents as a Second Dimension of Openness -- 4.3.2 The International Debate, the Comparative Paradigms -- 4.3.3 Openness as Access to Court Documents: The Debate in European Union Law -- 4.4 Dimensions of Openness and the Authority of the Court of Justice -- 5 Docket Control at the Court of Justice -- 5.1 The European Court of Justice and Its Docket -- 5.2 Docket Control as the Use of Certiorari and Procedural "Passive Virtues" -- 5.3 The Possibility of Adopting Other "Passive Virtues" in Luxembourg -- 5.4 Docket Control as a Result of Substantive Interpretative Choices, Delegation and Efficiency -- 5.5 Preliminary Reference Procedure, Unitas,Diversitas -- 5.6 Looking for Neutral Institutional Solutions -- 5.7 The Evolution of Docket Control as a Form of Improvement of the Court's Authority -- 6 The Style of Court Decisions -- 6.1 The Style of the Court's Decisions Within the "Fabrication" Process of EU Law -- 6.2 The Style of the Court's Decisions as Culturally Shaped -- 6.3 The Style as Shaped by the Machinery of the Court and the Plurality of the EU Legal Order -- 6.4 The Style Decisions and the New Factors of Change -- 6.5 The Evolution of Judgement Style as a Form of Improvement of the Court's Authority -- 7 Conclusions -- 7.1 The Autonomy and Authority of the Court in Its Evolution -- 7.2 Mimetism as Phenomenon and a Method in the Plurality of the EU Legal Order -- Bibliography -- Index Court of Justice of the European Union.. Comparative law.. Conflict of laws.. Legislative bodies Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe Pierdominici, Leonardo The Mimetic Evolution of the Court of Justice of the EU Cham : Springer International Publishing AG,c2020 9783030478636 |
| spellingShingle | Pierdominici, Leonardo The Mimetic Evolution of the Court of Justice of the EU A Comparative Law Perspective Intro -- Acknowledgments -- Contents -- 1 Introduction -- 1.1 The Structure -- 1.2 Some Key-Concepts: Autonomy, Authority, Mimetism -- 1.3 The Situation of the Research -- 1.3.1 Mimetism as a Potential Link Between Cultural Studies and Functionalism in Supranational Law -- 1.4 The Work Plan -- 2 The Foundation and Structuring of the Powers of the Court -- 2.1 Choice of Form: The Original Debate on the Creation of a Court for the European Communities -- 2.2 Design of Powers of the Court and National Influences -- 2.2.1 The "Administrative" Competences -- 2.2.2 Transformation of the Preliminary Reference Procedure -- 2.3 Different Perspective, Same Dynamics: The Establishment of the Doctrines of Primacy and Direct Effect -- 2.4 The Original Choices in the Establishment of the Court of Justice as a Form of Improvement of Its Authority -- 3 The Appointment of Members of the Court -- 3.1 Selection of Judges: Comparative Trends at the National and International Level and Their Rationale -- 3.1.1 The Historical Rise of Judicial Selection Models -- 3.1.2 Models of Apical Court Selections, in Europe and at the International Level -- 3.2 Selection of Judges in Luxembourg: Liberal Supranationalism as a Reaction to Pure Intergovernmentalism? -- 3.3 The Evolution of Judicial Appointments as a Form of Improvement of the Court's Authority -- 4 The Deliberation of the Court and Its Transparency -- 4.1 Openness as Access to Deliberation: Comparative Remarks -- 4.2 Openness as Access to Deliberation: The Debate for the European Court (also with Reference to the Advocates General and Their Opinions) -- 4.2.1 Old and New Debates on the Adoption of Dissenting Opinions in Luxembourg -- 4.2.2 The Advocates General and Their Role in the Transparency of the Court's Deliberations -- 4.3 Openness as Access to Court Documents 4.3.1 Access to Court Documents as a Second Dimension of Openness -- 4.3.2 The International Debate, the Comparative Paradigms -- 4.3.3 Openness as Access to Court Documents: The Debate in European Union Law -- 4.4 Dimensions of Openness and the Authority of the Court of Justice -- 5 Docket Control at the Court of Justice -- 5.1 The European Court of Justice and Its Docket -- 5.2 Docket Control as the Use of Certiorari and Procedural "Passive Virtues" -- 5.3 The Possibility of Adopting Other "Passive Virtues" in Luxembourg -- 5.4 Docket Control as a Result of Substantive Interpretative Choices, Delegation and Efficiency -- 5.5 Preliminary Reference Procedure, Unitas,Diversitas -- 5.6 Looking for Neutral Institutional Solutions -- 5.7 The Evolution of Docket Control as a Form of Improvement of the Court's Authority -- 6 The Style of Court Decisions -- 6.1 The Style of the Court's Decisions Within the "Fabrication" Process of EU Law -- 6.2 The Style of the Court's Decisions as Culturally Shaped -- 6.3 The Style as Shaped by the Machinery of the Court and the Plurality of the EU Legal Order -- 6.4 The Style Decisions and the New Factors of Change -- 6.5 The Evolution of Judgement Style as a Form of Improvement of the Court's Authority -- 7 Conclusions -- 7.1 The Autonomy and Authority of the Court in Its Evolution -- 7.2 Mimetism as Phenomenon and a Method in the Plurality of the EU Legal Order -- Bibliography -- Index Court of Justice of the European Union.. Comparative law.. Conflict of laws.. Legislative bodies |
| title | The Mimetic Evolution of the Court of Justice of the EU A Comparative Law Perspective |
| title_auth | The Mimetic Evolution of the Court of Justice of the EU A Comparative Law Perspective |
| title_exact_search | The Mimetic Evolution of the Court of Justice of the EU A Comparative Law Perspective |
| title_exact_search_txtP | The Mimetic Evolution of the Court of Justice of the EU A Comparative Law Perspective |
| title_full | The Mimetic Evolution of the Court of Justice of the EU A Comparative Law Perspective |
| title_fullStr | The Mimetic Evolution of the Court of Justice of the EU A Comparative Law Perspective |
| title_full_unstemmed | The Mimetic Evolution of the Court of Justice of the EU A Comparative Law Perspective |
| title_short | The Mimetic Evolution of the Court of Justice of the EU |
| title_sort | the mimetic evolution of the court of justice of the eu a comparative law perspective |
| title_sub | A Comparative Law Perspective |
| topic | Court of Justice of the European Union.. Comparative law.. Conflict of laws.. Legislative bodies |
| topic_facet | Court of Justice of the European Union.. Comparative law.. Conflict of laws.. Legislative bodies |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT pierdominicileonardo themimeticevolutionofthecourtofjusticeoftheeuacomparativelawperspective |