Interrogation, Confession, and Truth: Comparative Studies in Criminal Procedure
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Baden-Baden
Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft
2020
|
| Ausgabe: | 1st ed |
| Schriftenreihe: | Schriften zum Internationalen und Europäischen Strafrecht
v.43 |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | HWR01 |
| Beschreibung: | Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources |
| Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource (214 Seiten) |
| ISBN: | 9783748904380 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zcb4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV048220408 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220516s2020 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9783748904380 |9 978-3-7489-0438-0 | ||
| 035 | |a (ZDB-30-PQE)EBC6405246 | ||
| 035 | |a (ZDB-30-PAD)EBC6405246 | ||
| 035 | |a (ZDB-89-EBL)EBL6405246 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1319624634 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV048220408 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-2070s | ||
| 084 | |a PH 4830 |0 (DE-625)136153: |2 rvk | ||
| 084 | |a PH 6050 |0 (DE-625)136214: |2 rvk | ||
| 084 | |a PH 6145 |0 (DE-625)136406:406 |2 rvk | ||
| 084 | |a PH 6405 |0 (DE-625)136436:406 |2 rvk | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Eidam, Lutz |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Interrogation, Confession, and Truth |b Comparative Studies in Criminal Procedure |
| 250 | |a 1st ed | ||
| 264 | 1 | |a Baden-Baden |b Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft |c 2020 | |
| 264 | 4 | |c ©2020 | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (214 Seiten) | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a Schriften zum Internationalen und Europäischen Strafrecht |v v.43 | |
| 500 | |a Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources | ||
| 505 | 8 | |a Cover -- The Suspect as a Source of Information -- I. Why Should the Suspect Serve as a Source of Information? -- II. A Brief Journey to the Past -- III. The Role of the Suspect before Trial -- IV. Mechanisms Protecting the Suspect? -- 1. Presumption of Innocence -- 2. Privilege against Self-Incrimination -- V. The Suspect as a Co-Equal Party to the Pretrial Proceedings -- 1. Non-Controversial Consequences -- 2. Problem Areas -- a) Suspects and Non-Suspects -- b) Interrogation -- 3. Exclusion of Illegally Obtained Evidence -- VI. Concluding Remarks -- Pretrial Self-Incrimination, Miranda, and Truth -- I. Criminal Procedure Litigation, Sentencing, and Pretrial Self-Incrimination -- 1. Litigating the Exclusionary Rule -- 2. Punishing Litigation of the Exclusionary Rule -- II. Pretrial Self-Incrimination and the Constitutional Status of Miranda -- III. Pretrial Self-Incrimination and Truth -- 1. Miranda's Truth-Seeking Function -- 2. The Questionable Accuracy of Pretrial Obstruction Punishment -- Contemporary Problems of the Right to Remain Silent in Germany -- I. Introduction - making sense of "Comparative Criminal Law" -- II. "Nemo tenetur se ipsum accusare" - some basics -- III. (Selected) Contemporary Problems -- 1. 133 StPO - Summons / Citation to appear without giving details about the Criminal Investigation -- 2. 133 StPO - Summons / Citation of a suspect that chose to remain silent -- 3. Medical Examination - Case (BGH NStZ 2019, 36) -- 4. The "Proberichter" - Case (BGH NJW 2019, 789) -- 5. Actual Policy: 163g StPO-E -- IV. Conclusion -- The Legality of Trickery During Interrogation -- I. Is Trickery Necessary to Obtain Confessions? -- 1. Trickery and True Confessions -- 2. Trickery and False Confessions -- 3. Detection of False Confessions -- II. Does Trickery Impermissibly Undermine Dignity? -- III. Is Trickery Coercive? | |
| 505 | 8 | |a 1. Manipulative Techniques That Are Impermissibly Coercive -- 2. Manipulative Techniques That Are Not Impermissibly Coercive -- 3. The Rights Predicate and State Action -- 4. Summary -- IV. Is Trickery Illegitimately Fraudulent? -- V. Conclusion -- The Mr. Big Method: On or Beyond the Boundaries of Lawfulness and Reliability? -- I. Introduction -- II. Setting the stage: Introduction of the Mr. Big method -- III. The Mr. Big method and the psychology of (falsely) confessing -- 1. The misclassification error -- 2. The coercion error -- a) Confrontation with (false) evidence during the interrogation -- b) The use of violence -- c) The use of psychological coercion -- 3. The contamination error -- 4. Content analysis of the confession -- 5. Personality traits of the suspect -- a) Suggestibility -- b) Compliance -- 6. Conclusion -- IV. The Mr. Big method and the right to silence -- 1. The right to silence and the privilege against self-incrimination -- a) Reliability of the statement -- b) Autonomy -- c) Dignity -- d) Conclusion -- V. General conclusion -- Erosion of the Right to Silence in Dutch Criminal Justice? -- 1. Introduction -- 2. Interrogation of the suspect or accused in Dutch criminal justice -- 3. Origins and rationale of the right to silence -- 4. Exploring the scope of the right to silence in the Netherlands -- 5. Ways to circumvent the right to silence -- 5.1 Use of trickery -- 5.2 The 'Mr. Big' technique -- 5.3 Adverse inferences -- 5.4 Evidentiary presumptions -- 6. Conclusion -- Self-Incrimination Privilege and Interrogation. A German and Comparative View -- I. Interrogating the Defendant -- 1. German Police Manuals on Interrogation -- 2. Police Interrogations Techniques before the Federal Criminal Court -- II. The Self-Incrimination Privilege in Germany -- 1. Statutory and Constitutional Law | |
| 505 | 8 | |a 2. Illegal Interrogation Techniques after Waiving the Right to Remain Silent -- a) Unlawful Promises and Threats -- b) Deception and Trickery -- c) Severe Infringements of Free Will -- III. Manipulative Interrogation Methods and the Truth Finding Process -- 1. Truth: Interpretation of Events -- 2. The Reality of False Confessions -- IV. The Need to Control -- 1. Videotaping the Interrogation -- 2. Presence of Defense Counsel -- V. Conclusion -- References -- Abbreviations -- Structural Police Deception in American Police Interrogation: A Closer Look at Minimization and Maximization -- I. Introduction -- II. The Structural Logic of Police Deception During American Interrogation -- III. False Evidence Ploys -- (A) Simple Evidence Ploys -- (B) Orchestrated Evidence Ploys -- IV. Minimization and Maximization Interrogation Techniques -- V. Conclusion -- References -- Report on the Comparative Conference on Criminal Procedure at Bielefeld University, Interrogation, Confession, and Truth, 21 - 22 May 2019 | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Beschuldigter |0 (DE-588)4144883-2 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Vernehmung |0 (DE-588)4063099-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Ermittlungsverfahren |0 (DE-588)4015326-5 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Rechtsvergleich |0 (DE-588)4115712-6 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Aussagefreiheit |0 (DE-588)4193611-5 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 651 | 7 | |a Deutschland |0 (DE-588)4011882-4 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 651 | 7 | |a USA |0 (DE-588)4078704-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 651 | 7 | |a Niederlande |0 (DE-588)4042203-3 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 655 | 7 | |0 (DE-588)1071861417 |a Konferenzschrift |y 2019 |z Bielefeld |2 gnd-content | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Deutschland |0 (DE-588)4011882-4 |D g |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |a Niederlande |0 (DE-588)4042203-3 |D g |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |a USA |0 (DE-588)4078704-7 |D g |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |a Ermittlungsverfahren |0 (DE-588)4015326-5 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 4 | |a Beschuldigter |0 (DE-588)4144883-2 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 5 | |a Vernehmung |0 (DE-588)4063099-7 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 6 | |a Aussagefreiheit |0 (DE-588)4193611-5 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | 7 | |a Rechtsvergleich |0 (DE-588)4115712-6 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Lindemann, Michael |e Sonstige |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Ransiek, Andreas |e Sonstige |4 oth | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druck-Ausgabe |a Eidam, Lutz |t Interrogation, Confession, and Truth : Comparative Studies in Criminal Procedure |d Baden-Baden : Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft,c2020 |z 9783848763306 |
| 912 | |a ZDB-30-PQE | ||
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033601153 | ||
| 966 | e | |u https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/hwr/detail.action?docID=6405246 |l HWR01 |p ZDB-30-PQE |q HWR_PDA_PQE |x Aggregator |3 Volltext | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804184001025409025 |
|---|---|
| adam_txt | |
| any_adam_object | |
| any_adam_object_boolean | |
| author | Eidam, Lutz |
| author_facet | Eidam, Lutz |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Eidam, Lutz |
| author_variant | l e le |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV048220408 |
| classification_rvk | PH 4830 PH 6050 PH 6145 PH 6405 |
| collection | ZDB-30-PQE |
| contents | Cover -- The Suspect as a Source of Information -- I. Why Should the Suspect Serve as a Source of Information? -- II. A Brief Journey to the Past -- III. The Role of the Suspect before Trial -- IV. Mechanisms Protecting the Suspect? -- 1. Presumption of Innocence -- 2. Privilege against Self-Incrimination -- V. The Suspect as a Co-Equal Party to the Pretrial Proceedings -- 1. Non-Controversial Consequences -- 2. Problem Areas -- a) Suspects and Non-Suspects -- b) Interrogation -- 3. Exclusion of Illegally Obtained Evidence -- VI. Concluding Remarks -- Pretrial Self-Incrimination, Miranda, and Truth -- I. Criminal Procedure Litigation, Sentencing, and Pretrial Self-Incrimination -- 1. Litigating the Exclusionary Rule -- 2. Punishing Litigation of the Exclusionary Rule -- II. Pretrial Self-Incrimination and the Constitutional Status of Miranda -- III. Pretrial Self-Incrimination and Truth -- 1. Miranda's Truth-Seeking Function -- 2. The Questionable Accuracy of Pretrial Obstruction Punishment -- Contemporary Problems of the Right to Remain Silent in Germany -- I. Introduction - making sense of "Comparative Criminal Law" -- II. "Nemo tenetur se ipsum accusare" - some basics -- III. (Selected) Contemporary Problems -- 1. 133 StPO - Summons / Citation to appear without giving details about the Criminal Investigation -- 2. 133 StPO - Summons / Citation of a suspect that chose to remain silent -- 3. Medical Examination - Case (BGH NStZ 2019, 36) -- 4. The "Proberichter" - Case (BGH NJW 2019, 789) -- 5. Actual Policy: 163g StPO-E -- IV. Conclusion -- The Legality of Trickery During Interrogation -- I. Is Trickery Necessary to Obtain Confessions? -- 1. Trickery and True Confessions -- 2. Trickery and False Confessions -- 3. Detection of False Confessions -- II. Does Trickery Impermissibly Undermine Dignity? -- III. Is Trickery Coercive? 1. Manipulative Techniques That Are Impermissibly Coercive -- 2. Manipulative Techniques That Are Not Impermissibly Coercive -- 3. The Rights Predicate and State Action -- 4. Summary -- IV. Is Trickery Illegitimately Fraudulent? -- V. Conclusion -- The Mr. Big Method: On or Beyond the Boundaries of Lawfulness and Reliability? -- I. Introduction -- II. Setting the stage: Introduction of the Mr. Big method -- III. The Mr. Big method and the psychology of (falsely) confessing -- 1. The misclassification error -- 2. The coercion error -- a) Confrontation with (false) evidence during the interrogation -- b) The use of violence -- c) The use of psychological coercion -- 3. The contamination error -- 4. Content analysis of the confession -- 5. Personality traits of the suspect -- a) Suggestibility -- b) Compliance -- 6. Conclusion -- IV. The Mr. Big method and the right to silence -- 1. The right to silence and the privilege against self-incrimination -- a) Reliability of the statement -- b) Autonomy -- c) Dignity -- d) Conclusion -- V. General conclusion -- Erosion of the Right to Silence in Dutch Criminal Justice? -- 1. Introduction -- 2. Interrogation of the suspect or accused in Dutch criminal justice -- 3. Origins and rationale of the right to silence -- 4. Exploring the scope of the right to silence in the Netherlands -- 5. Ways to circumvent the right to silence -- 5.1 Use of trickery -- 5.2 The 'Mr. Big' technique -- 5.3 Adverse inferences -- 5.4 Evidentiary presumptions -- 6. Conclusion -- Self-Incrimination Privilege and Interrogation. A German and Comparative View -- I. Interrogating the Defendant -- 1. German Police Manuals on Interrogation -- 2. Police Interrogations Techniques before the Federal Criminal Court -- II. The Self-Incrimination Privilege in Germany -- 1. Statutory and Constitutional Law 2. Illegal Interrogation Techniques after Waiving the Right to Remain Silent -- a) Unlawful Promises and Threats -- b) Deception and Trickery -- c) Severe Infringements of Free Will -- III. Manipulative Interrogation Methods and the Truth Finding Process -- 1. Truth: Interpretation of Events -- 2. The Reality of False Confessions -- IV. The Need to Control -- 1. Videotaping the Interrogation -- 2. Presence of Defense Counsel -- V. Conclusion -- References -- Abbreviations -- Structural Police Deception in American Police Interrogation: A Closer Look at Minimization and Maximization -- I. Introduction -- II. The Structural Logic of Police Deception During American Interrogation -- III. False Evidence Ploys -- (A) Simple Evidence Ploys -- (B) Orchestrated Evidence Ploys -- IV. Minimization and Maximization Interrogation Techniques -- V. Conclusion -- References -- Report on the Comparative Conference on Criminal Procedure at Bielefeld University, Interrogation, Confession, and Truth, 21 - 22 May 2019 |
| ctrlnum | (ZDB-30-PQE)EBC6405246 (ZDB-30-PAD)EBC6405246 (ZDB-89-EBL)EBL6405246 (OCoLC)1319624634 (DE-599)BVBBV048220408 |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| discipline_str_mv | Rechtswissenschaft |
| edition | 1st ed |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>07543nmm a2200697zcb4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV048220408</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220516s2020 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9783748904380</subfield><subfield code="9">978-3-7489-0438-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-30-PQE)EBC6405246</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-30-PAD)EBC6405246</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-89-EBL)EBL6405246</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1319624634</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV048220408</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-2070s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PH 4830</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)136153:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PH 6050</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)136214:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PH 6145</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)136406:406</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PH 6405</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)136436:406</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Eidam, Lutz</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Interrogation, Confession, and Truth</subfield><subfield code="b">Comparative Studies in Criminal Procedure</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="250" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1st ed</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Baden-Baden</subfield><subfield code="b">Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft</subfield><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="c">©2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (214 Seiten)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Schriften zum Internationalen und Europäischen Strafrecht</subfield><subfield code="v">v.43</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cover -- The Suspect as a Source of Information -- I. Why Should the Suspect Serve as a Source of Information? -- II. A Brief Journey to the Past -- III. The Role of the Suspect before Trial -- IV. Mechanisms Protecting the Suspect? -- 1. Presumption of Innocence -- 2. Privilege against Self-Incrimination -- V. The Suspect as a Co-Equal Party to the Pretrial Proceedings -- 1. Non-Controversial Consequences -- 2. Problem Areas -- a) Suspects and Non-Suspects -- b) Interrogation -- 3. Exclusion of Illegally Obtained Evidence -- VI. Concluding Remarks -- Pretrial Self-Incrimination, Miranda, and Truth -- I. Criminal Procedure Litigation, Sentencing, and Pretrial Self-Incrimination -- 1. Litigating the Exclusionary Rule -- 2. Punishing Litigation of the Exclusionary Rule -- II. Pretrial Self-Incrimination and the Constitutional Status of Miranda -- III. Pretrial Self-Incrimination and Truth -- 1. Miranda's Truth-Seeking Function -- 2. The Questionable Accuracy of Pretrial Obstruction Punishment -- Contemporary Problems of the Right to Remain Silent in Germany -- I. Introduction - making sense of "Comparative Criminal Law" -- II. "Nemo tenetur se ipsum accusare" - some basics -- III. (Selected) Contemporary Problems -- 1. 133 StPO - Summons / Citation to appear without giving details about the Criminal Investigation -- 2. 133 StPO - Summons / Citation of a suspect that chose to remain silent -- 3. Medical Examination - Case (BGH NStZ 2019, 36) -- 4. The "Proberichter" - Case (BGH NJW 2019, 789) -- 5. Actual Policy: 163g StPO-E -- IV. Conclusion -- The Legality of Trickery During Interrogation -- I. Is Trickery Necessary to Obtain Confessions? -- 1. Trickery and True Confessions -- 2. Trickery and False Confessions -- 3. Detection of False Confessions -- II. Does Trickery Impermissibly Undermine Dignity? -- III. Is Trickery Coercive?</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1. Manipulative Techniques That Are Impermissibly Coercive -- 2. Manipulative Techniques That Are Not Impermissibly Coercive -- 3. The Rights Predicate and State Action -- 4. Summary -- IV. Is Trickery Illegitimately Fraudulent? -- V. Conclusion -- The Mr. Big Method: On or Beyond the Boundaries of Lawfulness and Reliability? -- I. Introduction -- II. Setting the stage: Introduction of the Mr. Big method -- III. The Mr. Big method and the psychology of (falsely) confessing -- 1. The misclassification error -- 2. The coercion error -- a) Confrontation with (false) evidence during the interrogation -- b) The use of violence -- c) The use of psychological coercion -- 3. The contamination error -- 4. Content analysis of the confession -- 5. Personality traits of the suspect -- a) Suggestibility -- b) Compliance -- 6. Conclusion -- IV. The Mr. Big method and the right to silence -- 1. The right to silence and the privilege against self-incrimination -- a) Reliability of the statement -- b) Autonomy -- c) Dignity -- d) Conclusion -- V. General conclusion -- Erosion of the Right to Silence in Dutch Criminal Justice? -- 1. Introduction -- 2. Interrogation of the suspect or accused in Dutch criminal justice -- 3. Origins and rationale of the right to silence -- 4. Exploring the scope of the right to silence in the Netherlands -- 5. Ways to circumvent the right to silence -- 5.1 Use of trickery -- 5.2 The 'Mr. Big' technique -- 5.3 Adverse inferences -- 5.4 Evidentiary presumptions -- 6. Conclusion -- Self-Incrimination Privilege and Interrogation. A German and Comparative View -- I. Interrogating the Defendant -- 1. German Police Manuals on Interrogation -- 2. Police Interrogations Techniques before the Federal Criminal Court -- II. The Self-Incrimination Privilege in Germany -- 1. Statutory and Constitutional Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">2. Illegal Interrogation Techniques after Waiving the Right to Remain Silent -- a) Unlawful Promises and Threats -- b) Deception and Trickery -- c) Severe Infringements of Free Will -- III. Manipulative Interrogation Methods and the Truth Finding Process -- 1. Truth: Interpretation of Events -- 2. The Reality of False Confessions -- IV. The Need to Control -- 1. Videotaping the Interrogation -- 2. Presence of Defense Counsel -- V. Conclusion -- References -- Abbreviations -- Structural Police Deception in American Police Interrogation: A Closer Look at Minimization and Maximization -- I. Introduction -- II. The Structural Logic of Police Deception During American Interrogation -- III. False Evidence Ploys -- (A) Simple Evidence Ploys -- (B) Orchestrated Evidence Ploys -- IV. Minimization and Maximization Interrogation Techniques -- V. Conclusion -- References -- Report on the Comparative Conference on Criminal Procedure at Bielefeld University, Interrogation, Confession, and Truth, 21 - 22 May 2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Beschuldigter</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4144883-2</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Vernehmung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4063099-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Ermittlungsverfahren</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4015326-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rechtsvergleich</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4115712-6</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Aussagefreiheit</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4193611-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Deutschland</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4011882-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4078704-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Niederlande</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4042203-3</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1071861417</subfield><subfield code="a">Konferenzschrift</subfield><subfield code="y">2019</subfield><subfield code="z">Bielefeld</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd-content</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Deutschland</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4011882-4</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Niederlande</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4042203-3</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4078704-7</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Ermittlungsverfahren</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4015326-5</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Beschuldigter</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4144883-2</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="5"><subfield code="a">Vernehmung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4063099-7</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Aussagefreiheit</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4193611-5</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Rechtsvergleich</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4115712-6</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lindemann, Michael</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ransiek, Andreas</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druck-Ausgabe</subfield><subfield code="a">Eidam, Lutz</subfield><subfield code="t">Interrogation, Confession, and Truth : Comparative Studies in Criminal Procedure</subfield><subfield code="d">Baden-Baden : Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft,c2020</subfield><subfield code="z">9783848763306</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-30-PQE</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033601153</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/hwr/detail.action?docID=6405246</subfield><subfield code="l">HWR01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-30-PQE</subfield><subfield code="q">HWR_PDA_PQE</subfield><subfield code="x">Aggregator</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| genre | (DE-588)1071861417 Konferenzschrift 2019 Bielefeld gnd-content |
| genre_facet | Konferenzschrift 2019 Bielefeld |
| geographic | Deutschland (DE-588)4011882-4 gnd USA (DE-588)4078704-7 gnd Niederlande (DE-588)4042203-3 gnd |
| geographic_facet | Deutschland USA Niederlande |
| id | DE-604.BV048220408 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T19:50:30Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T09:32:23Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9783748904380 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033601153 |
| oclc_num | 1319624634 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-2070s |
| owner_facet | DE-2070s |
| physical | 1 Online-Ressource (214 Seiten) |
| psigel | ZDB-30-PQE ZDB-30-PQE HWR_PDA_PQE |
| publishDate | 2020 |
| publishDateSearch | 2020 |
| publishDateSort | 2020 |
| publisher | Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft |
| record_format | marc |
| series2 | Schriften zum Internationalen und Europäischen Strafrecht |
| spelling | Eidam, Lutz Verfasser aut Interrogation, Confession, and Truth Comparative Studies in Criminal Procedure 1st ed Baden-Baden Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft 2020 ©2020 1 Online-Ressource (214 Seiten) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Schriften zum Internationalen und Europäischen Strafrecht v.43 Description based on publisher supplied metadata and other sources Cover -- The Suspect as a Source of Information -- I. Why Should the Suspect Serve as a Source of Information? -- II. A Brief Journey to the Past -- III. The Role of the Suspect before Trial -- IV. Mechanisms Protecting the Suspect? -- 1. Presumption of Innocence -- 2. Privilege against Self-Incrimination -- V. The Suspect as a Co-Equal Party to the Pretrial Proceedings -- 1. Non-Controversial Consequences -- 2. Problem Areas -- a) Suspects and Non-Suspects -- b) Interrogation -- 3. Exclusion of Illegally Obtained Evidence -- VI. Concluding Remarks -- Pretrial Self-Incrimination, Miranda, and Truth -- I. Criminal Procedure Litigation, Sentencing, and Pretrial Self-Incrimination -- 1. Litigating the Exclusionary Rule -- 2. Punishing Litigation of the Exclusionary Rule -- II. Pretrial Self-Incrimination and the Constitutional Status of Miranda -- III. Pretrial Self-Incrimination and Truth -- 1. Miranda's Truth-Seeking Function -- 2. The Questionable Accuracy of Pretrial Obstruction Punishment -- Contemporary Problems of the Right to Remain Silent in Germany -- I. Introduction - making sense of "Comparative Criminal Law" -- II. "Nemo tenetur se ipsum accusare" - some basics -- III. (Selected) Contemporary Problems -- 1. 133 StPO - Summons / Citation to appear without giving details about the Criminal Investigation -- 2. 133 StPO - Summons / Citation of a suspect that chose to remain silent -- 3. Medical Examination - Case (BGH NStZ 2019, 36) -- 4. The "Proberichter" - Case (BGH NJW 2019, 789) -- 5. Actual Policy: 163g StPO-E -- IV. Conclusion -- The Legality of Trickery During Interrogation -- I. Is Trickery Necessary to Obtain Confessions? -- 1. Trickery and True Confessions -- 2. Trickery and False Confessions -- 3. Detection of False Confessions -- II. Does Trickery Impermissibly Undermine Dignity? -- III. Is Trickery Coercive? 1. Manipulative Techniques That Are Impermissibly Coercive -- 2. Manipulative Techniques That Are Not Impermissibly Coercive -- 3. The Rights Predicate and State Action -- 4. Summary -- IV. Is Trickery Illegitimately Fraudulent? -- V. Conclusion -- The Mr. Big Method: On or Beyond the Boundaries of Lawfulness and Reliability? -- I. Introduction -- II. Setting the stage: Introduction of the Mr. Big method -- III. The Mr. Big method and the psychology of (falsely) confessing -- 1. The misclassification error -- 2. The coercion error -- a) Confrontation with (false) evidence during the interrogation -- b) The use of violence -- c) The use of psychological coercion -- 3. The contamination error -- 4. Content analysis of the confession -- 5. Personality traits of the suspect -- a) Suggestibility -- b) Compliance -- 6. Conclusion -- IV. The Mr. Big method and the right to silence -- 1. The right to silence and the privilege against self-incrimination -- a) Reliability of the statement -- b) Autonomy -- c) Dignity -- d) Conclusion -- V. General conclusion -- Erosion of the Right to Silence in Dutch Criminal Justice? -- 1. Introduction -- 2. Interrogation of the suspect or accused in Dutch criminal justice -- 3. Origins and rationale of the right to silence -- 4. Exploring the scope of the right to silence in the Netherlands -- 5. Ways to circumvent the right to silence -- 5.1 Use of trickery -- 5.2 The 'Mr. Big' technique -- 5.3 Adverse inferences -- 5.4 Evidentiary presumptions -- 6. Conclusion -- Self-Incrimination Privilege and Interrogation. A German and Comparative View -- I. Interrogating the Defendant -- 1. German Police Manuals on Interrogation -- 2. Police Interrogations Techniques before the Federal Criminal Court -- II. The Self-Incrimination Privilege in Germany -- 1. Statutory and Constitutional Law 2. Illegal Interrogation Techniques after Waiving the Right to Remain Silent -- a) Unlawful Promises and Threats -- b) Deception and Trickery -- c) Severe Infringements of Free Will -- III. Manipulative Interrogation Methods and the Truth Finding Process -- 1. Truth: Interpretation of Events -- 2. The Reality of False Confessions -- IV. The Need to Control -- 1. Videotaping the Interrogation -- 2. Presence of Defense Counsel -- V. Conclusion -- References -- Abbreviations -- Structural Police Deception in American Police Interrogation: A Closer Look at Minimization and Maximization -- I. Introduction -- II. The Structural Logic of Police Deception During American Interrogation -- III. False Evidence Ploys -- (A) Simple Evidence Ploys -- (B) Orchestrated Evidence Ploys -- IV. Minimization and Maximization Interrogation Techniques -- V. Conclusion -- References -- Report on the Comparative Conference on Criminal Procedure at Bielefeld University, Interrogation, Confession, and Truth, 21 - 22 May 2019 Beschuldigter (DE-588)4144883-2 gnd rswk-swf Vernehmung (DE-588)4063099-7 gnd rswk-swf Ermittlungsverfahren (DE-588)4015326-5 gnd rswk-swf Rechtsvergleich (DE-588)4115712-6 gnd rswk-swf Aussagefreiheit (DE-588)4193611-5 gnd rswk-swf Deutschland (DE-588)4011882-4 gnd rswk-swf USA (DE-588)4078704-7 gnd rswk-swf Niederlande (DE-588)4042203-3 gnd rswk-swf (DE-588)1071861417 Konferenzschrift 2019 Bielefeld gnd-content Deutschland (DE-588)4011882-4 g Niederlande (DE-588)4042203-3 g USA (DE-588)4078704-7 g Ermittlungsverfahren (DE-588)4015326-5 s Beschuldigter (DE-588)4144883-2 s Vernehmung (DE-588)4063099-7 s Aussagefreiheit (DE-588)4193611-5 s Rechtsvergleich (DE-588)4115712-6 s DE-604 Lindemann, Michael Sonstige oth Ransiek, Andreas Sonstige oth Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe Eidam, Lutz Interrogation, Confession, and Truth : Comparative Studies in Criminal Procedure Baden-Baden : Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft,c2020 9783848763306 |
| spellingShingle | Eidam, Lutz Interrogation, Confession, and Truth Comparative Studies in Criminal Procedure Cover -- The Suspect as a Source of Information -- I. Why Should the Suspect Serve as a Source of Information? -- II. A Brief Journey to the Past -- III. The Role of the Suspect before Trial -- IV. Mechanisms Protecting the Suspect? -- 1. Presumption of Innocence -- 2. Privilege against Self-Incrimination -- V. The Suspect as a Co-Equal Party to the Pretrial Proceedings -- 1. Non-Controversial Consequences -- 2. Problem Areas -- a) Suspects and Non-Suspects -- b) Interrogation -- 3. Exclusion of Illegally Obtained Evidence -- VI. Concluding Remarks -- Pretrial Self-Incrimination, Miranda, and Truth -- I. Criminal Procedure Litigation, Sentencing, and Pretrial Self-Incrimination -- 1. Litigating the Exclusionary Rule -- 2. Punishing Litigation of the Exclusionary Rule -- II. Pretrial Self-Incrimination and the Constitutional Status of Miranda -- III. Pretrial Self-Incrimination and Truth -- 1. Miranda's Truth-Seeking Function -- 2. The Questionable Accuracy of Pretrial Obstruction Punishment -- Contemporary Problems of the Right to Remain Silent in Germany -- I. Introduction - making sense of "Comparative Criminal Law" -- II. "Nemo tenetur se ipsum accusare" - some basics -- III. (Selected) Contemporary Problems -- 1. 133 StPO - Summons / Citation to appear without giving details about the Criminal Investigation -- 2. 133 StPO - Summons / Citation of a suspect that chose to remain silent -- 3. Medical Examination - Case (BGH NStZ 2019, 36) -- 4. The "Proberichter" - Case (BGH NJW 2019, 789) -- 5. Actual Policy: 163g StPO-E -- IV. Conclusion -- The Legality of Trickery During Interrogation -- I. Is Trickery Necessary to Obtain Confessions? -- 1. Trickery and True Confessions -- 2. Trickery and False Confessions -- 3. Detection of False Confessions -- II. Does Trickery Impermissibly Undermine Dignity? -- III. Is Trickery Coercive? 1. Manipulative Techniques That Are Impermissibly Coercive -- 2. Manipulative Techniques That Are Not Impermissibly Coercive -- 3. The Rights Predicate and State Action -- 4. Summary -- IV. Is Trickery Illegitimately Fraudulent? -- V. Conclusion -- The Mr. Big Method: On or Beyond the Boundaries of Lawfulness and Reliability? -- I. Introduction -- II. Setting the stage: Introduction of the Mr. Big method -- III. The Mr. Big method and the psychology of (falsely) confessing -- 1. The misclassification error -- 2. The coercion error -- a) Confrontation with (false) evidence during the interrogation -- b) The use of violence -- c) The use of psychological coercion -- 3. The contamination error -- 4. Content analysis of the confession -- 5. Personality traits of the suspect -- a) Suggestibility -- b) Compliance -- 6. Conclusion -- IV. The Mr. Big method and the right to silence -- 1. The right to silence and the privilege against self-incrimination -- a) Reliability of the statement -- b) Autonomy -- c) Dignity -- d) Conclusion -- V. General conclusion -- Erosion of the Right to Silence in Dutch Criminal Justice? -- 1. Introduction -- 2. Interrogation of the suspect or accused in Dutch criminal justice -- 3. Origins and rationale of the right to silence -- 4. Exploring the scope of the right to silence in the Netherlands -- 5. Ways to circumvent the right to silence -- 5.1 Use of trickery -- 5.2 The 'Mr. Big' technique -- 5.3 Adverse inferences -- 5.4 Evidentiary presumptions -- 6. Conclusion -- Self-Incrimination Privilege and Interrogation. A German and Comparative View -- I. Interrogating the Defendant -- 1. German Police Manuals on Interrogation -- 2. Police Interrogations Techniques before the Federal Criminal Court -- II. The Self-Incrimination Privilege in Germany -- 1. Statutory and Constitutional Law 2. Illegal Interrogation Techniques after Waiving the Right to Remain Silent -- a) Unlawful Promises and Threats -- b) Deception and Trickery -- c) Severe Infringements of Free Will -- III. Manipulative Interrogation Methods and the Truth Finding Process -- 1. Truth: Interpretation of Events -- 2. The Reality of False Confessions -- IV. The Need to Control -- 1. Videotaping the Interrogation -- 2. Presence of Defense Counsel -- V. Conclusion -- References -- Abbreviations -- Structural Police Deception in American Police Interrogation: A Closer Look at Minimization and Maximization -- I. Introduction -- II. The Structural Logic of Police Deception During American Interrogation -- III. False Evidence Ploys -- (A) Simple Evidence Ploys -- (B) Orchestrated Evidence Ploys -- IV. Minimization and Maximization Interrogation Techniques -- V. Conclusion -- References -- Report on the Comparative Conference on Criminal Procedure at Bielefeld University, Interrogation, Confession, and Truth, 21 - 22 May 2019 Beschuldigter (DE-588)4144883-2 gnd Vernehmung (DE-588)4063099-7 gnd Ermittlungsverfahren (DE-588)4015326-5 gnd Rechtsvergleich (DE-588)4115712-6 gnd Aussagefreiheit (DE-588)4193611-5 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4144883-2 (DE-588)4063099-7 (DE-588)4015326-5 (DE-588)4115712-6 (DE-588)4193611-5 (DE-588)4011882-4 (DE-588)4078704-7 (DE-588)4042203-3 (DE-588)1071861417 |
| title | Interrogation, Confession, and Truth Comparative Studies in Criminal Procedure |
| title_auth | Interrogation, Confession, and Truth Comparative Studies in Criminal Procedure |
| title_exact_search | Interrogation, Confession, and Truth Comparative Studies in Criminal Procedure |
| title_exact_search_txtP | Interrogation, Confession, and Truth Comparative Studies in Criminal Procedure |
| title_full | Interrogation, Confession, and Truth Comparative Studies in Criminal Procedure |
| title_fullStr | Interrogation, Confession, and Truth Comparative Studies in Criminal Procedure |
| title_full_unstemmed | Interrogation, Confession, and Truth Comparative Studies in Criminal Procedure |
| title_short | Interrogation, Confession, and Truth |
| title_sort | interrogation confession and truth comparative studies in criminal procedure |
| title_sub | Comparative Studies in Criminal Procedure |
| topic | Beschuldigter (DE-588)4144883-2 gnd Vernehmung (DE-588)4063099-7 gnd Ermittlungsverfahren (DE-588)4015326-5 gnd Rechtsvergleich (DE-588)4115712-6 gnd Aussagefreiheit (DE-588)4193611-5 gnd |
| topic_facet | Beschuldigter Vernehmung Ermittlungsverfahren Rechtsvergleich Aussagefreiheit Deutschland USA Niederlande Konferenzschrift 2019 Bielefeld |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT eidamlutz interrogationconfessionandtruthcomparativestudiesincriminalprocedure AT lindemannmichael interrogationconfessionandtruthcomparativestudiesincriminalprocedure AT ransiekandreas interrogationconfessionandtruthcomparativestudiesincriminalprocedure |