The perilous public square: structural threats to free expression today
"Americans of all political persuasions fear that "free speech" is under attack. This may seem strange at a time when legal protections for free expression remain strong and overt government censorship minimal. Yet a range of political, economic, social, and technological developments...
Gespeichert in:
| Format: | Buch |
|---|---|
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
New York
Columbia University Press
[2020]
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Zusammenfassung: | "Americans of all political persuasions fear that "free speech" is under attack. This may seem strange at a time when legal protections for free expression remain strong and overt government censorship minimal. Yet a range of political, economic, social, and technological developments have raised profound challenges for how we manage speech. New threats to political discourse are mounting-from the rise of authoritarian populism and national security secrecy to the decline of print journalism and public trust in experts to the "fake news," trolling, and increasingly subtle modes of surveillance made possible by digital technologies. The Perilous Public Square brings together leading thinkers to identify and investigate today's multifaceted threats to free expression. They go beyond the campus and the courthouse to pinpoint key structural changes in the means of mass communication and forms of global capitalism. Beginning with Tim Wu's inquiry into whether the First Amendment is obsolete, Matthew Connelly, Jack Goldsmith, Kate Klonick, Frederick Schauer, Olivier Sylvain, and Heather Whitney explore ways to address these dangers and preserve the essential features of a healthy democracy. Their conversations with other leading thinkers, including Danielle Citron, Jelani Cobb, Frank Pasquale, Geoffrey Stone, Rebecca Tushnet, and Kirsten Weld, cross the disciplinary boundaries of First Amendment law, internet law, media policy, journalism, legal history, and legal theory, offering fresh perspectives on fortifying the speech system and reinvigorating the public square"-- |
| Beschreibung: | This volume grew out of, and includes, a series of papers entitled "Emerging threats" published from September 2017 to October 2018 at the website of the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University--Introduction, page 4 |
| Beschreibung: | ix, 396 Seiten 24 cm |
| ISBN: | 9780231197120 0231197128 9780231197137 0231197136 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV048191030 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20230124 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 220502s2020 b||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9780231197120 |9 9780231197120 | ||
| 020 | |a 0231197128 |9 0231197128 | ||
| 020 | |a 9780231197137 |9 9780231197137 | ||
| 020 | |a 0231197136 |9 0231197136 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV048191030 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-M382 | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a The perilous public square |b structural threats to free expression today |c edited by David E. Pozen |
| 264 | 1 | |a New York |b Columbia University Press |c [2020] | |
| 300 | |a ix, 396 Seiten |c 24 cm | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a This volume grew out of, and includes, a series of papers entitled "Emerging threats" published from September 2017 to October 2018 at the website of the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University--Introduction, page 4 | ||
| 505 | 8 | 0 | |t Introduction |r David E. Pozen |t Is the First Amendment obsolete? |r Tim Wu |t Reflections on whether the First Amendment is obsolete |r Geoffrey R. Stone |t Not waving but drowning : saving the audience from the floods |r Rebecca Tushnet |t From the heckler's veto to the provocateur's privilege |r David E. Pozen |t The hostile audience revisited |r Frederick Schauer |t Unsafe spaces |r Jelani Cobb |t Heading off the hostile audience |r Mark Edmundson |t Costing out campus speaker restrictions |r Suzanne B. Goldberg |t Policing, protesting, and the insignificance of hostile audiences |r Rachel A. Harmon |t Straining (analogies) to make sense of the First Amendment in cyberspace |r David E. Pozen |t Search engines, social media, and the editorial analogy |r Heather Whitney |t Of course the First Amendment protects Google and Facebook (and it's not a close question) |r Eric Goldman |t The problem isn't the use of analogies but the analogies courts use |r Genevieve Lakier |t Preventing a posthuman law of freedom of expression |r Frank Pasquale |t Intermediary immunity and discriminatory designs |r David E. Pozen |t Discriminatory designs on user data |r Olivier Sylvain |t Section 230's challenge to civil rights and civil liberties |r Danielle Keats Citron |t To err is platform |r James Grimmelmann |t Toward a clearer conversation about platform liability |r Daphne Keller |t The de-Americanization of internet freedom |t David E. Pozen -- |t The failure of internet freedom |r Jack Goldsmith |t The limits of supply-side internet freedom |r David Kaye |
| 505 | 8 | 0 | |t Internet freedom without imperialism |r Nani Jansen Reventlow and Jonathan McCully |t Crisis in the Archives |r David E. Pozen |t State secrecy, archival negligence, and the end of history as we know it |r Matthew Connelly |t A response from the National Archives |r David S. Ferriero |t Rescuing history (and accountability) from secrecy |r Elizabeth Goitein |t Archiving as politics in the national security state |r Kirsten Weld |t Authoritarian constitutionalism in Facebookland |r David E. Pozen |t Facebook v. Sullivan |r Kate Klonick |t Meet the new governors, same as the old governors |r Enrique Armijo |t Newsworthiness and the search for norms |r Amy Gajda |t Profits v. principles |r Sarah C. Haan |
| 520 | 3 | |a "Americans of all political persuasions fear that "free speech" is under attack. This may seem strange at a time when legal protections for free expression remain strong and overt government censorship minimal. Yet a range of political, economic, social, and technological developments have raised profound challenges for how we manage speech. New threats to political discourse are mounting-from the rise of authoritarian populism and national security secrecy to the decline of print journalism and public trust in experts to the "fake news," trolling, and increasingly subtle modes of surveillance made possible by digital technologies. The Perilous Public Square brings together leading thinkers to identify and investigate today's multifaceted threats to free expression. They go beyond the campus and the courthouse to pinpoint key structural changes in the means of mass communication and forms of global capitalism. Beginning with Tim Wu's inquiry into whether the First Amendment is obsolete, Matthew Connelly, Jack Goldsmith, Kate Klonick, Frederick Schauer, Olivier Sylvain, and Heather Whitney explore ways to address these dangers and preserve the essential features of a healthy democracy. Their conversations with other leading thinkers, including Danielle Citron, Jelani Cobb, Frank Pasquale, Geoffrey Stone, Rebecca Tushnet, and Kirsten Weld, cross the disciplinary boundaries of First Amendment law, internet law, media policy, journalism, legal history, and legal theory, offering fresh perspectives on fortifying the speech system and reinvigorating the public square"-- | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Freedom of expression / United States | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Liberté d'expression / États-Unis | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Freedom of expression | |
| 653 | 2 | |a United States | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Pozen, David E. |e Sonstige |0 (DE-588)133067548 |4 oth | |
| 710 | 2 | |a Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University |e Sonstige |4 oth | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Online version |t The perilous public square |d New York : Columbia University Press, 2020 |z 9780231551991 |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033572181 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804183948104826880 |
|---|---|
| adam_txt | |
| any_adam_object | |
| any_adam_object_boolean | |
| author_GND | (DE-588)133067548 |
| author_additional | David E. Pozen Tim Wu Geoffrey R. Stone Rebecca Tushnet Frederick Schauer Jelani Cobb Mark Edmundson Suzanne B. Goldberg Rachel A. Harmon Heather Whitney Eric Goldman Genevieve Lakier Frank Pasquale Olivier Sylvain Danielle Keats Citron James Grimmelmann Daphne Keller Jack Goldsmith David Kaye Nani Jansen Reventlow and Jonathan McCully Matthew Connelly David S. Ferriero Elizabeth Goitein Kirsten Weld Kate Klonick Enrique Armijo Amy Gajda Sarah C. Haan |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV048191030 |
| contents | Introduction Is the First Amendment obsolete? Reflections on whether the First Amendment is obsolete Not waving but drowning : saving the audience from the floods From the heckler's veto to the provocateur's privilege The hostile audience revisited Unsafe spaces Heading off the hostile audience Costing out campus speaker restrictions Policing, protesting, and the insignificance of hostile audiences Straining (analogies) to make sense of the First Amendment in cyberspace Search engines, social media, and the editorial analogy Of course the First Amendment protects Google and Facebook (and it's not a close question) The problem isn't the use of analogies but the analogies courts use Preventing a posthuman law of freedom of expression Intermediary immunity and discriminatory designs Discriminatory designs on user data Section 230's challenge to civil rights and civil liberties To err is platform Toward a clearer conversation about platform liability The de-Americanization of internet freedom David E. Pozen -- The failure of internet freedom The limits of supply-side internet freedom Internet freedom without imperialism Crisis in the Archives State secrecy, archival negligence, and the end of history as we know it A response from the National Archives Rescuing history (and accountability) from secrecy Archiving as politics in the national security state Authoritarian constitutionalism in Facebookland Facebook v. Sullivan Meet the new governors, same as the old governors Newsworthiness and the search for norms Profits v. principles |
| ctrlnum | (DE-599)BVBBV048191030 |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>05291nam a2200397 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV048191030</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230124 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220502s2020 b||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780231197120</subfield><subfield code="9">9780231197120</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">0231197128</subfield><subfield code="9">0231197128</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780231197137</subfield><subfield code="9">9780231197137</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">0231197136</subfield><subfield code="9">0231197136</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV048191030</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-M382</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">The perilous public square</subfield><subfield code="b">structural threats to free expression today</subfield><subfield code="c">edited by David E. Pozen</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">New York</subfield><subfield code="b">Columbia University Press</subfield><subfield code="c">[2020]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ix, 396 Seiten</subfield><subfield code="c">24 cm</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This volume grew out of, and includes, a series of papers entitled "Emerging threats" published from September 2017 to October 2018 at the website of the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University--Introduction, page 4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2="0"><subfield code="t">Introduction</subfield><subfield code="r">David E. Pozen</subfield><subfield code="t">Is the First Amendment obsolete?</subfield><subfield code="r">Tim Wu</subfield><subfield code="t">Reflections on whether the First Amendment is obsolete</subfield><subfield code="r">Geoffrey R. Stone</subfield><subfield code="t">Not waving but drowning : saving the audience from the floods</subfield><subfield code="r">Rebecca Tushnet</subfield><subfield code="t">From the heckler's veto to the provocateur's privilege</subfield><subfield code="r">David E. Pozen</subfield><subfield code="t">The hostile audience revisited</subfield><subfield code="r">Frederick Schauer</subfield><subfield code="t">Unsafe spaces</subfield><subfield code="r">Jelani Cobb</subfield><subfield code="t">Heading off the hostile audience</subfield><subfield code="r">Mark Edmundson</subfield><subfield code="t">Costing out campus speaker restrictions</subfield><subfield code="r">Suzanne B. Goldberg</subfield><subfield code="t">Policing, protesting, and the insignificance of hostile audiences</subfield><subfield code="r">Rachel A. Harmon</subfield><subfield code="t">Straining (analogies) to make sense of the First Amendment in cyberspace</subfield><subfield code="r">David E. Pozen</subfield><subfield code="t">Search engines, social media, and the editorial analogy</subfield><subfield code="r">Heather Whitney</subfield><subfield code="t">Of course the First Amendment protects Google and Facebook (and it's not a close question)</subfield><subfield code="r">Eric Goldman</subfield><subfield code="t">The problem isn't the use of analogies but the analogies courts use</subfield><subfield code="r">Genevieve Lakier</subfield><subfield code="t">Preventing a posthuman law of freedom of expression</subfield><subfield code="r">Frank Pasquale</subfield><subfield code="t">Intermediary immunity and discriminatory designs</subfield><subfield code="r">David E. Pozen</subfield><subfield code="t">Discriminatory designs on user data</subfield><subfield code="r">Olivier Sylvain</subfield><subfield code="t">Section 230's challenge to civil rights and civil liberties</subfield><subfield code="r">Danielle Keats Citron</subfield><subfield code="t">To err is platform</subfield><subfield code="r">James Grimmelmann</subfield><subfield code="t">Toward a clearer conversation about platform liability</subfield><subfield code="r">Daphne Keller</subfield><subfield code="t">The de-Americanization of internet freedom</subfield><subfield code="t">David E. Pozen --</subfield><subfield code="t">The failure of internet freedom</subfield><subfield code="r">Jack Goldsmith</subfield><subfield code="t">The limits of supply-side internet freedom</subfield><subfield code="r">David Kaye</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="505" ind1="8" ind2="0"><subfield code="t">Internet freedom without imperialism</subfield><subfield code="r">Nani Jansen Reventlow and Jonathan McCully</subfield><subfield code="t">Crisis in the Archives</subfield><subfield code="r">David E. Pozen</subfield><subfield code="t">State secrecy, archival negligence, and the end of history as we know it</subfield><subfield code="r">Matthew Connelly</subfield><subfield code="t">A response from the National Archives</subfield><subfield code="r">David S. Ferriero</subfield><subfield code="t">Rescuing history (and accountability) from secrecy</subfield><subfield code="r">Elizabeth Goitein</subfield><subfield code="t">Archiving as politics in the national security state</subfield><subfield code="r">Kirsten Weld</subfield><subfield code="t">Authoritarian constitutionalism in Facebookland</subfield><subfield code="r">David E. Pozen</subfield><subfield code="t">Facebook v. Sullivan</subfield><subfield code="r">Kate Klonick</subfield><subfield code="t">Meet the new governors, same as the old governors</subfield><subfield code="r">Enrique Armijo</subfield><subfield code="t">Newsworthiness and the search for norms</subfield><subfield code="r">Amy Gajda</subfield><subfield code="t">Profits v. principles</subfield><subfield code="r">Sarah C. Haan</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"Americans of all political persuasions fear that "free speech" is under attack. This may seem strange at a time when legal protections for free expression remain strong and overt government censorship minimal. Yet a range of political, economic, social, and technological developments have raised profound challenges for how we manage speech. New threats to political discourse are mounting-from the rise of authoritarian populism and national security secrecy to the decline of print journalism and public trust in experts to the "fake news," trolling, and increasingly subtle modes of surveillance made possible by digital technologies. The Perilous Public Square brings together leading thinkers to identify and investigate today's multifaceted threats to free expression. They go beyond the campus and the courthouse to pinpoint key structural changes in the means of mass communication and forms of global capitalism. Beginning with Tim Wu's inquiry into whether the First Amendment is obsolete, Matthew Connelly, Jack Goldsmith, Kate Klonick, Frederick Schauer, Olivier Sylvain, and Heather Whitney explore ways to address these dangers and preserve the essential features of a healthy democracy. Their conversations with other leading thinkers, including Danielle Citron, Jelani Cobb, Frank Pasquale, Geoffrey Stone, Rebecca Tushnet, and Kirsten Weld, cross the disciplinary boundaries of First Amendment law, internet law, media policy, journalism, legal history, and legal theory, offering fresh perspectives on fortifying the speech system and reinvigorating the public square"--</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Freedom of expression / United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Liberté d'expression / États-Unis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Freedom of expression</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pozen, David E.</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)133067548</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="710" ind1="2" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Online version</subfield><subfield code="t">The perilous public square</subfield><subfield code="d">New York : Columbia University Press, 2020</subfield><subfield code="z">9780231551991</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033572181</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV048191030 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T19:44:39Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T09:31:33Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9780231197120 0231197128 9780231197137 0231197136 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033572181 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-M382 |
| owner_facet | DE-M382 |
| physical | ix, 396 Seiten 24 cm |
| publishDate | 2020 |
| publishDateSearch | 2020 |
| publishDateSort | 2020 |
| publisher | Columbia University Press |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | The perilous public square structural threats to free expression today edited by David E. Pozen New York Columbia University Press [2020] ix, 396 Seiten 24 cm txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier This volume grew out of, and includes, a series of papers entitled "Emerging threats" published from September 2017 to October 2018 at the website of the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University--Introduction, page 4 Introduction David E. Pozen Is the First Amendment obsolete? Tim Wu Reflections on whether the First Amendment is obsolete Geoffrey R. Stone Not waving but drowning : saving the audience from the floods Rebecca Tushnet From the heckler's veto to the provocateur's privilege David E. Pozen The hostile audience revisited Frederick Schauer Unsafe spaces Jelani Cobb Heading off the hostile audience Mark Edmundson Costing out campus speaker restrictions Suzanne B. Goldberg Policing, protesting, and the insignificance of hostile audiences Rachel A. Harmon Straining (analogies) to make sense of the First Amendment in cyberspace David E. Pozen Search engines, social media, and the editorial analogy Heather Whitney Of course the First Amendment protects Google and Facebook (and it's not a close question) Eric Goldman The problem isn't the use of analogies but the analogies courts use Genevieve Lakier Preventing a posthuman law of freedom of expression Frank Pasquale Intermediary immunity and discriminatory designs David E. Pozen Discriminatory designs on user data Olivier Sylvain Section 230's challenge to civil rights and civil liberties Danielle Keats Citron To err is platform James Grimmelmann Toward a clearer conversation about platform liability Daphne Keller The de-Americanization of internet freedom David E. Pozen -- The failure of internet freedom Jack Goldsmith The limits of supply-side internet freedom David Kaye Internet freedom without imperialism Nani Jansen Reventlow and Jonathan McCully Crisis in the Archives David E. Pozen State secrecy, archival negligence, and the end of history as we know it Matthew Connelly A response from the National Archives David S. Ferriero Rescuing history (and accountability) from secrecy Elizabeth Goitein Archiving as politics in the national security state Kirsten Weld Authoritarian constitutionalism in Facebookland David E. Pozen Facebook v. Sullivan Kate Klonick Meet the new governors, same as the old governors Enrique Armijo Newsworthiness and the search for norms Amy Gajda Profits v. principles Sarah C. Haan "Americans of all political persuasions fear that "free speech" is under attack. This may seem strange at a time when legal protections for free expression remain strong and overt government censorship minimal. Yet a range of political, economic, social, and technological developments have raised profound challenges for how we manage speech. New threats to political discourse are mounting-from the rise of authoritarian populism and national security secrecy to the decline of print journalism and public trust in experts to the "fake news," trolling, and increasingly subtle modes of surveillance made possible by digital technologies. The Perilous Public Square brings together leading thinkers to identify and investigate today's multifaceted threats to free expression. They go beyond the campus and the courthouse to pinpoint key structural changes in the means of mass communication and forms of global capitalism. Beginning with Tim Wu's inquiry into whether the First Amendment is obsolete, Matthew Connelly, Jack Goldsmith, Kate Klonick, Frederick Schauer, Olivier Sylvain, and Heather Whitney explore ways to address these dangers and preserve the essential features of a healthy democracy. Their conversations with other leading thinkers, including Danielle Citron, Jelani Cobb, Frank Pasquale, Geoffrey Stone, Rebecca Tushnet, and Kirsten Weld, cross the disciplinary boundaries of First Amendment law, internet law, media policy, journalism, legal history, and legal theory, offering fresh perspectives on fortifying the speech system and reinvigorating the public square"-- Freedom of expression / United States Liberté d'expression / États-Unis Freedom of expression United States Pozen, David E. Sonstige (DE-588)133067548 oth Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University Sonstige oth Online version The perilous public square New York : Columbia University Press, 2020 9780231551991 |
| spellingShingle | The perilous public square structural threats to free expression today Introduction Is the First Amendment obsolete? Reflections on whether the First Amendment is obsolete Not waving but drowning : saving the audience from the floods From the heckler's veto to the provocateur's privilege The hostile audience revisited Unsafe spaces Heading off the hostile audience Costing out campus speaker restrictions Policing, protesting, and the insignificance of hostile audiences Straining (analogies) to make sense of the First Amendment in cyberspace Search engines, social media, and the editorial analogy Of course the First Amendment protects Google and Facebook (and it's not a close question) The problem isn't the use of analogies but the analogies courts use Preventing a posthuman law of freedom of expression Intermediary immunity and discriminatory designs Discriminatory designs on user data Section 230's challenge to civil rights and civil liberties To err is platform Toward a clearer conversation about platform liability The de-Americanization of internet freedom David E. Pozen -- The failure of internet freedom The limits of supply-side internet freedom Internet freedom without imperialism Crisis in the Archives State secrecy, archival negligence, and the end of history as we know it A response from the National Archives Rescuing history (and accountability) from secrecy Archiving as politics in the national security state Authoritarian constitutionalism in Facebookland Facebook v. Sullivan Meet the new governors, same as the old governors Newsworthiness and the search for norms Profits v. principles |
| title | The perilous public square structural threats to free expression today |
| title_alt | Introduction Is the First Amendment obsolete? Reflections on whether the First Amendment is obsolete Not waving but drowning : saving the audience from the floods From the heckler's veto to the provocateur's privilege The hostile audience revisited Unsafe spaces Heading off the hostile audience Costing out campus speaker restrictions Policing, protesting, and the insignificance of hostile audiences Straining (analogies) to make sense of the First Amendment in cyberspace Search engines, social media, and the editorial analogy Of course the First Amendment protects Google and Facebook (and it's not a close question) The problem isn't the use of analogies but the analogies courts use Preventing a posthuman law of freedom of expression Intermediary immunity and discriminatory designs Discriminatory designs on user data Section 230's challenge to civil rights and civil liberties To err is platform Toward a clearer conversation about platform liability The de-Americanization of internet freedom David E. Pozen -- The failure of internet freedom The limits of supply-side internet freedom Internet freedom without imperialism Crisis in the Archives State secrecy, archival negligence, and the end of history as we know it A response from the National Archives Rescuing history (and accountability) from secrecy Archiving as politics in the national security state Authoritarian constitutionalism in Facebookland Facebook v. Sullivan Meet the new governors, same as the old governors Newsworthiness and the search for norms Profits v. principles |
| title_auth | The perilous public square structural threats to free expression today |
| title_exact_search | The perilous public square structural threats to free expression today |
| title_exact_search_txtP | The perilous public square structural threats to free expression today |
| title_full | The perilous public square structural threats to free expression today edited by David E. Pozen |
| title_fullStr | The perilous public square structural threats to free expression today edited by David E. Pozen |
| title_full_unstemmed | The perilous public square structural threats to free expression today edited by David E. Pozen |
| title_short | The perilous public square |
| title_sort | the perilous public square structural threats to free expression today |
| title_sub | structural threats to free expression today |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT pozendavide theperilouspublicsquarestructuralthreatstofreeexpressiontoday AT knightfirstamendmentinstituteatcolumbiauniversity theperilouspublicsquarestructuralthreatstofreeexpressiontoday |