Cancel culture: the latest attack on free speech and due process
A legal scholar makes an argument for free speech, due process, and restraint against the "cancellation" of individuals and institutions. Dershowitz states his case for restraint and care in decisions about whom and what to cancel, boycott, deplatform, and bar from public life, and offers...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Buch |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
New York, NY
Hot Books
[2020]
|
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis |
Zusammenfassung: | A legal scholar makes an argument for free speech, due process, and restraint against the "cancellation" of individuals and institutions. Dershowitz states his case for restraint and care in decisions about whom and what to cancel, boycott, deplatform, and bar from public life, and offers recommendations for when, why, and to what degree these steps may be appropriate, as long as objective, fair-minded criteria can be determined and met. While Dershowitz argues against excesses of cancel culture--the rush to judgment and the devastating results it can have on those who may be innocent, the power of social media to effect punishment without a thorough examination of evidence, the idea that historical events can be viewed through the same lens as actions in the present day--he also acknowledges that its defenders ostensibly try to use it to create meaningful, positive change, and notes that canceling may itself be a constitutionally-protected form of free speech "In Cancel Culture, Alan Dershowitz--New York Times bestselling author and one of America's most respected legal scholars--makes an argument for free speech, due process, and restraint against the often overeager impulse to completely cancel individuals and institutions at the ever-changing whims of social media-driven crowds. Alan Dershowitz has been called 'one of the most prominent and consistent defenders of civil liberties in America' by Politico and "the nation's most peripatetic civil liberties lawyer and one of its most distinguished defenders of individual rights" by Newsweek. Yet he has come under intense criticism for his steadfast and consistent championing of those same principles, and his famed 'shoe-on-the-other-foot test, ' to those who have been 'canceled' for any number of faults, both real and imagined. Cancel Culture is a defense of due process, free speech, and even-handedness in the application of judgment. It makes the case for restraint and care in decisions about whom and what to cancel, boycott, deplatform, and bar from public life, and offers recommendations for when, why, and to what degree these steps may be appropriate, as long as objective, fair-minded criteria can be determined and met. While Dershowitz argues against the worst excesses of cancel culture--the rush to judgment and the devastating results it can have on those who may be innocent, the power of social media to effect punishment without a thorough examination of evidence, the idea that historical events can be viewed through the same lens as actions in the present day--he also acknowledges that its defenders ostensibly try to use it to create meaningful, positive change, and notes that canceling may itself be a constitutionally protected form of free speech. |
Beschreibung: | 155 Seiten 24 cm |
ISBN: | 9781510764903 1510764909 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV047954140 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 20221216 | ||
007 | t | ||
008 | 220425s2020 |||| 00||| eng d | ||
020 | |a 9781510764903 |9 978-1-5107-6490-3 | ||
020 | |a 1510764909 |9 1510764909 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)1355306606 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV047954140 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-M382 |a DE-473 |a DE-739 | ||
084 | |a MG 70170 |0 (DE-625)122860:12062 |2 rvk | ||
100 | 1 | |a Dershowitz, Alan M. |d 1938- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)119065959 |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Cancel culture |b the latest attack on free speech and due process |c Alan Dershowitz |
264 | 1 | |a New York, NY |b Hot Books |c [2020] | |
264 | 4 | |c © 2020 | |
300 | |a 155 Seiten |c 24 cm | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | 3 | |a A legal scholar makes an argument for free speech, due process, and restraint against the "cancellation" of individuals and institutions. Dershowitz states his case for restraint and care in decisions about whom and what to cancel, boycott, deplatform, and bar from public life, and offers recommendations for when, why, and to what degree these steps may be appropriate, as long as objective, fair-minded criteria can be determined and met. While Dershowitz argues against excesses of cancel culture--the rush to judgment and the devastating results it can have on those who may be innocent, the power of social media to effect punishment without a thorough examination of evidence, the idea that historical events can be viewed through the same lens as actions in the present day--he also acknowledges that its defenders ostensibly try to use it to create meaningful, positive change, and notes that canceling may itself be a constitutionally-protected form of free speech | |
520 | 3 | |a "In Cancel Culture, Alan Dershowitz--New York Times bestselling author and one of America's most respected legal scholars--makes an argument for free speech, due process, and restraint against the often overeager impulse to completely cancel individuals and institutions at the ever-changing whims of social media-driven crowds. Alan Dershowitz has been called 'one of the most prominent and consistent defenders of civil liberties in America' by Politico and "the nation's most peripatetic civil liberties lawyer and one of its most distinguished defenders of individual rights" by Newsweek. Yet he has come under intense criticism for his steadfast and consistent championing of those same principles, and his famed 'shoe-on-the-other-foot test, ' to those who have been 'canceled' for any number of faults, both real and imagined. Cancel Culture is a defense of due process, free speech, and even-handedness in the application of judgment. | |
520 | 3 | |a It makes the case for restraint and care in decisions about whom and what to cancel, boycott, deplatform, and bar from public life, and offers recommendations for when, why, and to what degree these steps may be appropriate, as long as objective, fair-minded criteria can be determined and met. While Dershowitz argues against the worst excesses of cancel culture--the rush to judgment and the devastating results it can have on those who may be innocent, the power of social media to effect punishment without a thorough examination of evidence, the idea that historical events can be viewed through the same lens as actions in the present day--he also acknowledges that its defenders ostensibly try to use it to create meaningful, positive change, and notes that canceling may itself be a constitutionally protected form of free speech. | |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Pressefreiheit |0 (DE-588)4047160-3 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Boykott |0 (DE-588)4132654-4 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Redefreiheit |0 (DE-588)4177296-9 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
651 | 7 | |a USA |0 (DE-588)4078704-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
653 | 0 | |a Cancel culture | |
653 | 0 | |a Freedom of speech / United States | |
653 | 0 | |a Due process of law / United States | |
653 | 0 | |a Culture du bannissement | |
653 | 0 | |a Liberté d'expression / États-Unis | |
653 | 0 | |a Application régulière de la loi / États-Unis | |
653 | 0 | |a Freedom of speech | |
653 | 0 | |a Due process of law | |
653 | 0 | |a Cancel culture | |
653 | 2 | |a United States | |
653 | 0 | |a Cancel culture | |
653 | 0 | |a Freedom of speech / United States | |
653 | 0 | |a Due process of law / United States | |
653 | 0 | |a Freedom of speech / United States | |
653 | 0 | |a Due process of law / United States | |
653 | 6 | |a Instructional and educational works | |
653 | 6 | |a Instructional and educational works | |
653 | 6 | |a Matériel d'éducation et de formation | |
689 | 0 | 0 | |a USA |0 (DE-588)4078704-7 |D g |
689 | 0 | 1 | |a Redefreiheit |0 (DE-588)4177296-9 |D s |
689 | 0 | 2 | |a Pressefreiheit |0 (DE-588)4047160-3 |D s |
689 | 0 | 3 | |a Boykott |0 (DE-588)4132654-4 |D s |
689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Online-Ausgabe |z 978-1-5107-6491-0 |
856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung UB Bamberg - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=033335452&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033335452 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804183638918561792 |
---|---|
adam_text | Table of Contents 1 Introduction Chapter 1։ Cancelling Freedom of Speech for Thee, But Not for Me! 31 Chapter 2: Cancelling Due Process and Weaponizing Criminal “Justice” 41 Chapter 3։ Cancel Culture Court Chapter 4։ The Effect of Cancel Culture Rewriting History and Reality 49 59 Chapter 5: Cancelling Meritocracy 67 Chapter 6: Cancel Culture Cancels Israel 73 Chapter 7 : Cancelling Anti-Semitism in Black Lives Matter Platform 81 Chapter 8: Cancelling The Bible, Which Commands Personal Justice, Not the Double Standard of “Identity Justice” 91 Chapter 9: Cancelling Evidence, Science, and the Constitution: Arguments against Vaccines 95 Chapter 10: Cancelling Elections 109 Chapter 11: Could a President Cancel Due Process by Declaring Martial Law? 113 Chapter 12: What It Feels Like to Be Falsely Cancelled 117 Conclusion 123 Appendix I: A List of Cancelled Speakers 125 Appendix II: A Letter on Justice and Open Debate, from Harper’s Magazine 147 Appendix III: What Has Been Cancelled: A Brief Résumé of My Life and Achievements 153 Acknowledgments 156
|
adam_txt |
Table of Contents 1 Introduction Chapter 1։ Cancelling Freedom of Speech for Thee, But Not for Me! 31 Chapter 2: Cancelling Due Process and Weaponizing Criminal “Justice” 41 Chapter 3։ Cancel Culture Court Chapter 4։ The Effect of Cancel Culture Rewriting History and Reality 49 59 Chapter 5: Cancelling Meritocracy 67 Chapter 6: Cancel Culture Cancels Israel 73 Chapter 7 : Cancelling Anti-Semitism in Black Lives Matter Platform 81 Chapter 8: Cancelling The Bible, Which Commands Personal Justice, Not the Double Standard of “Identity Justice” 91 Chapter 9: Cancelling Evidence, Science, and the Constitution: Arguments against Vaccines 95 Chapter 10: Cancelling Elections 109 Chapter 11: Could a President Cancel Due Process by Declaring Martial Law? 113 Chapter 12: What It Feels Like to Be Falsely Cancelled 117 Conclusion 123 Appendix I: A List of Cancelled Speakers 125 Appendix II: A Letter on Justice and Open Debate, from Harper’s Magazine 147 Appendix III: What Has Been Cancelled: A Brief Résumé of My Life and Achievements 153 Acknowledgments 156 |
any_adam_object | 1 |
any_adam_object_boolean | 1 |
author | Dershowitz, Alan M. 1938- |
author_GND | (DE-588)119065959 |
author_facet | Dershowitz, Alan M. 1938- |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Dershowitz, Alan M. 1938- |
author_variant | a m d am amd |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV047954140 |
classification_rvk | MG 70170 |
ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1355306606 (DE-599)BVBBV047954140 |
discipline | Politologie |
discipline_str_mv | Politologie |
format | Book |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>05320nam a2200673 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV047954140</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20221216 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220425s2020 |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781510764903</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-5107-6490-3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1510764909</subfield><subfield code="9">1510764909</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1355306606</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV047954140</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-M382</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-473</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-739</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">MG 70170</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)122860:12062</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dershowitz, Alan M.</subfield><subfield code="d">1938-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)119065959</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Cancel culture</subfield><subfield code="b">the latest attack on free speech and due process</subfield><subfield code="c">Alan Dershowitz</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">New York, NY</subfield><subfield code="b">Hot Books</subfield><subfield code="c">[2020]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="c">© 2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">155 Seiten</subfield><subfield code="c">24 cm</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">A legal scholar makes an argument for free speech, due process, and restraint against the "cancellation" of individuals and institutions. Dershowitz states his case for restraint and care in decisions about whom and what to cancel, boycott, deplatform, and bar from public life, and offers recommendations for when, why, and to what degree these steps may be appropriate, as long as objective, fair-minded criteria can be determined and met. While Dershowitz argues against excesses of cancel culture--the rush to judgment and the devastating results it can have on those who may be innocent, the power of social media to effect punishment without a thorough examination of evidence, the idea that historical events can be viewed through the same lens as actions in the present day--he also acknowledges that its defenders ostensibly try to use it to create meaningful, positive change, and notes that canceling may itself be a constitutionally-protected form of free speech</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"In Cancel Culture, Alan Dershowitz--New York Times bestselling author and one of America's most respected legal scholars--makes an argument for free speech, due process, and restraint against the often overeager impulse to completely cancel individuals and institutions at the ever-changing whims of social media-driven crowds. Alan Dershowitz has been called 'one of the most prominent and consistent defenders of civil liberties in America' by Politico and "the nation's most peripatetic civil liberties lawyer and one of its most distinguished defenders of individual rights" by Newsweek. Yet he has come under intense criticism for his steadfast and consistent championing of those same principles, and his famed 'shoe-on-the-other-foot test, ' to those who have been 'canceled' for any number of faults, both real and imagined. Cancel Culture is a defense of due process, free speech, and even-handedness in the application of judgment. </subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">It makes the case for restraint and care in decisions about whom and what to cancel, boycott, deplatform, and bar from public life, and offers recommendations for when, why, and to what degree these steps may be appropriate, as long as objective, fair-minded criteria can be determined and met. While Dershowitz argues against the worst excesses of cancel culture--the rush to judgment and the devastating results it can have on those who may be innocent, the power of social media to effect punishment without a thorough examination of evidence, the idea that historical events can be viewed through the same lens as actions in the present day--he also acknowledges that its defenders ostensibly try to use it to create meaningful, positive change, and notes that canceling may itself be a constitutionally protected form of free speech. </subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Pressefreiheit</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4047160-3</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Boykott</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4132654-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Redefreiheit</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4177296-9</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4078704-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Cancel culture</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Freedom of speech / United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Due process of law / United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Culture du bannissement</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Liberté d'expression / États-Unis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Application régulière de la loi / États-Unis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Freedom of speech</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Due process of law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Cancel culture</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Cancel culture</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Freedom of speech / United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Due process of law / United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Freedom of speech / United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Due process of law / United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Instructional and educational works</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Instructional and educational works</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="6"><subfield code="a">Matériel d'éducation et de formation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">USA</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4078704-7</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Redefreiheit</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4177296-9</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Pressefreiheit</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4047160-3</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Boykott</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4132654-4</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Online-Ausgabe</subfield><subfield code="z">978-1-5107-6491-0</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung UB Bamberg - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=033335452&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033335452</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
geographic | USA (DE-588)4078704-7 gnd |
geographic_facet | USA |
id | DE-604.BV047954140 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
index_date | 2024-07-03T19:38:18Z |
indexdate | 2024-07-10T09:26:38Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 9781510764903 1510764909 |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033335452 |
oclc_num | 1355306606 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-M382 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-739 |
owner_facet | DE-M382 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-739 |
physical | 155 Seiten 24 cm |
publishDate | 2020 |
publishDateSearch | 2020 |
publishDateSort | 2020 |
publisher | Hot Books |
record_format | marc |
spelling | Dershowitz, Alan M. 1938- Verfasser (DE-588)119065959 aut Cancel culture the latest attack on free speech and due process Alan Dershowitz New York, NY Hot Books [2020] © 2020 155 Seiten 24 cm txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier A legal scholar makes an argument for free speech, due process, and restraint against the "cancellation" of individuals and institutions. Dershowitz states his case for restraint and care in decisions about whom and what to cancel, boycott, deplatform, and bar from public life, and offers recommendations for when, why, and to what degree these steps may be appropriate, as long as objective, fair-minded criteria can be determined and met. While Dershowitz argues against excesses of cancel culture--the rush to judgment and the devastating results it can have on those who may be innocent, the power of social media to effect punishment without a thorough examination of evidence, the idea that historical events can be viewed through the same lens as actions in the present day--he also acknowledges that its defenders ostensibly try to use it to create meaningful, positive change, and notes that canceling may itself be a constitutionally-protected form of free speech "In Cancel Culture, Alan Dershowitz--New York Times bestselling author and one of America's most respected legal scholars--makes an argument for free speech, due process, and restraint against the often overeager impulse to completely cancel individuals and institutions at the ever-changing whims of social media-driven crowds. Alan Dershowitz has been called 'one of the most prominent and consistent defenders of civil liberties in America' by Politico and "the nation's most peripatetic civil liberties lawyer and one of its most distinguished defenders of individual rights" by Newsweek. Yet he has come under intense criticism for his steadfast and consistent championing of those same principles, and his famed 'shoe-on-the-other-foot test, ' to those who have been 'canceled' for any number of faults, both real and imagined. Cancel Culture is a defense of due process, free speech, and even-handedness in the application of judgment. It makes the case for restraint and care in decisions about whom and what to cancel, boycott, deplatform, and bar from public life, and offers recommendations for when, why, and to what degree these steps may be appropriate, as long as objective, fair-minded criteria can be determined and met. While Dershowitz argues against the worst excesses of cancel culture--the rush to judgment and the devastating results it can have on those who may be innocent, the power of social media to effect punishment without a thorough examination of evidence, the idea that historical events can be viewed through the same lens as actions in the present day--he also acknowledges that its defenders ostensibly try to use it to create meaningful, positive change, and notes that canceling may itself be a constitutionally protected form of free speech. Pressefreiheit (DE-588)4047160-3 gnd rswk-swf Boykott (DE-588)4132654-4 gnd rswk-swf Redefreiheit (DE-588)4177296-9 gnd rswk-swf USA (DE-588)4078704-7 gnd rswk-swf Cancel culture Freedom of speech / United States Due process of law / United States Culture du bannissement Liberté d'expression / États-Unis Application régulière de la loi / États-Unis Freedom of speech Due process of law United States Instructional and educational works Matériel d'éducation et de formation USA (DE-588)4078704-7 g Redefreiheit (DE-588)4177296-9 s Pressefreiheit (DE-588)4047160-3 s Boykott (DE-588)4132654-4 s DE-604 Erscheint auch als Online-Ausgabe 978-1-5107-6491-0 Digitalisierung UB Bamberg - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=033335452&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis |
spellingShingle | Dershowitz, Alan M. 1938- Cancel culture the latest attack on free speech and due process Pressefreiheit (DE-588)4047160-3 gnd Boykott (DE-588)4132654-4 gnd Redefreiheit (DE-588)4177296-9 gnd |
subject_GND | (DE-588)4047160-3 (DE-588)4132654-4 (DE-588)4177296-9 (DE-588)4078704-7 |
title | Cancel culture the latest attack on free speech and due process |
title_auth | Cancel culture the latest attack on free speech and due process |
title_exact_search | Cancel culture the latest attack on free speech and due process |
title_exact_search_txtP | Cancel culture the latest attack on free speech and due process |
title_full | Cancel culture the latest attack on free speech and due process Alan Dershowitz |
title_fullStr | Cancel culture the latest attack on free speech and due process Alan Dershowitz |
title_full_unstemmed | Cancel culture the latest attack on free speech and due process Alan Dershowitz |
title_short | Cancel culture |
title_sort | cancel culture the latest attack on free speech and due process |
title_sub | the latest attack on free speech and due process |
topic | Pressefreiheit (DE-588)4047160-3 gnd Boykott (DE-588)4132654-4 gnd Redefreiheit (DE-588)4177296-9 gnd |
topic_facet | Pressefreiheit Boykott Redefreiheit USA |
url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=033335452&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dershowitzalanm cancelculturethelatestattackonfreespeechanddueprocess |