Research design in clinical psychology:
"There are many sciences, and it would be valuable, if not essential, to have the principles and practices consistent. We would not want the criteria for what "counts" as knowledge to vary as a function of quite different ways of going about obtaining that knowledge. This consistency...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Cambridge ; New York, NY
Cambridge University Press
[2022]
|
| Ausgabe: | Fifth edition |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Zusammenfassung: | "There are many sciences, and it would be valuable, if not essential, to have the principles and practices consistent. We would not want the criteria for what "counts" as knowledge to vary as a function of quite different ways of going about obtaining that knowledge. This consistency is more important than ever because much of research on a given topic involves the collaboration of scientists from many different fields to address a question. They must speak the same language, share the same underlying values about how to obtain knowledge, and agree on procedures and practices (e.g., statistical evaluation, reporting data that do and do not support a particular hypothesis). Consistency also is critical within any given scientific discipline. For a given science (e.g., psychology), we would want consistency throughout the world in what the standards are for obtaining scientific knowledge- the accumulation of knowledge from all individuals in a given field requires this level of consistency. Science "says" essentially, these are our goals (e.g., describe, understand, explain, intervene where needed, possible, and desirable) and these are our means (use of theory, methodology, guiding concepts, replication of results). Science is hardly a "game" because so many of the tasks we have are serious. Yet there are rules, and there are enormous benefits from following them among all sciences and scientists"-- |
| Beschreibung: | Originally published, 2017 Includes index |
| Beschreibung: | xxiii, 558 Seiten Diagramme |
| ISBN: | 9781108995214 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV047953204 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 220425s2022 xxk|||| |||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9781108995214 |c paperback |9 978-1-108-99521-4 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1759379573 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 044 | |a xxk |c XA-GB |a xxu |c XD-US | ||
| 049 | |a DE-188 | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a RC467.8 | |
| 082 | 0 | |a 616.890072 | |
| 084 | |a CM 3500 |0 (DE-625)18949: |2 rvk | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Kazdin, Alan E. |d 1945- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1161419411 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Research design in clinical psychology |c Alan E. Kazdin, Yale University, Connecticut |
| 250 | |a Fifth edition | ||
| 264 | 1 | |a Cambridge ; New York, NY |b Cambridge University Press |c [2022] | |
| 300 | |a xxiii, 558 Seiten |b Diagramme | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Originally published, 2017 | ||
| 500 | |a Includes index | ||
| 520 | 3 | |a "There are many sciences, and it would be valuable, if not essential, to have the principles and practices consistent. We would not want the criteria for what "counts" as knowledge to vary as a function of quite different ways of going about obtaining that knowledge. This consistency is more important than ever because much of research on a given topic involves the collaboration of scientists from many different fields to address a question. They must speak the same language, share the same underlying values about how to obtain knowledge, and agree on procedures and practices (e.g., statistical evaluation, reporting data that do and do not support a particular hypothesis). Consistency also is critical within any given scientific discipline. For a given science (e.g., psychology), we would want consistency throughout the world in what the standards are for obtaining scientific knowledge- the accumulation of knowledge from all individuals in a given field requires this level of consistency. Science "says" essentially, these are our goals (e.g., describe, understand, explain, intervene where needed, possible, and desirable) and these are our means (use of theory, methodology, guiding concepts, replication of results). Science is hardly a "game" because so many of the tasks we have are serious. Yet there are rules, and there are enormous benefits from following them among all sciences and scientists"-- | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Clinical psychology / Research / Methodology | |
| 653 | 0 | |a PSYCHOLOGY / Clinical Psychology | |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033334533 | ||
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804183637549121536 |
|---|---|
| adam_txt | |
| any_adam_object | |
| any_adam_object_boolean | |
| author | Kazdin, Alan E. 1945- |
| author_GND | (DE-588)1161419411 |
| author_facet | Kazdin, Alan E. 1945- |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Kazdin, Alan E. 1945- |
| author_variant | a e k ae aek |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV047953204 |
| callnumber-first | R - Medicine |
| callnumber-label | RC467 |
| callnumber-raw | RC467.8 |
| callnumber-search | RC467.8 |
| callnumber-sort | RC 3467.8 |
| callnumber-subject | RC - Internal Medicine |
| classification_rvk | CM 3500 |
| ctrlnum | (DE-599)KXP1759379573 |
| dewey-full | 616.890072 |
| dewey-hundreds | 600 - Technology (Applied sciences) |
| dewey-ones | 616 - Diseases |
| dewey-raw | 616.890072 |
| dewey-search | 616.890072 |
| dewey-sort | 3616.890072 |
| dewey-tens | 610 - Medicine and health |
| discipline | Psychologie Medizin |
| discipline_str_mv | Psychologie Medizin |
| edition | Fifth edition |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02568nam a2200361 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV047953204</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220425s2022 xxk|||| |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781108995214</subfield><subfield code="c">paperback</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-108-99521-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)KXP1759379573</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">xxk</subfield><subfield code="c">XA-GB</subfield><subfield code="a">xxu</subfield><subfield code="c">XD-US</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-188</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="050" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">RC467.8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">616.890072</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">CM 3500</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)18949:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kazdin, Alan E.</subfield><subfield code="d">1945-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1161419411</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Research design in clinical psychology</subfield><subfield code="c">Alan E. Kazdin, Yale University, Connecticut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="250" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Fifth edition</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Cambridge ; New York, NY</subfield><subfield code="b">Cambridge University Press</subfield><subfield code="c">[2022]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">xxiii, 558 Seiten</subfield><subfield code="b">Diagramme</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Originally published, 2017</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Includes index</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"There are many sciences, and it would be valuable, if not essential, to have the principles and practices consistent. We would not want the criteria for what "counts" as knowledge to vary as a function of quite different ways of going about obtaining that knowledge. This consistency is more important than ever because much of research on a given topic involves the collaboration of scientists from many different fields to address a question. They must speak the same language, share the same underlying values about how to obtain knowledge, and agree on procedures and practices (e.g., statistical evaluation, reporting data that do and do not support a particular hypothesis). Consistency also is critical within any given scientific discipline. For a given science (e.g., psychology), we would want consistency throughout the world in what the standards are for obtaining scientific knowledge- the accumulation of knowledge from all individuals in a given field requires this level of consistency. Science "says" essentially, these are our goals (e.g., describe, understand, explain, intervene where needed, possible, and desirable) and these are our means (use of theory, methodology, guiding concepts, replication of results). Science is hardly a "game" because so many of the tasks we have are serious. Yet there are rules, and there are enormous benefits from following them among all sciences and scientists"--</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Clinical psychology / Research / Methodology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">PSYCHOLOGY / Clinical Psychology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033334533</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV047953204 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T19:38:00Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T09:26:36Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9781108995214 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033334533 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-188 |
| owner_facet | DE-188 |
| physical | xxiii, 558 Seiten Diagramme |
| publishDate | 2022 |
| publishDateSearch | 2022 |
| publishDateSort | 2022 |
| publisher | Cambridge University Press |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Kazdin, Alan E. 1945- Verfasser (DE-588)1161419411 aut Research design in clinical psychology Alan E. Kazdin, Yale University, Connecticut Fifth edition Cambridge ; New York, NY Cambridge University Press [2022] xxiii, 558 Seiten Diagramme txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Originally published, 2017 Includes index "There are many sciences, and it would be valuable, if not essential, to have the principles and practices consistent. We would not want the criteria for what "counts" as knowledge to vary as a function of quite different ways of going about obtaining that knowledge. This consistency is more important than ever because much of research on a given topic involves the collaboration of scientists from many different fields to address a question. They must speak the same language, share the same underlying values about how to obtain knowledge, and agree on procedures and practices (e.g., statistical evaluation, reporting data that do and do not support a particular hypothesis). Consistency also is critical within any given scientific discipline. For a given science (e.g., psychology), we would want consistency throughout the world in what the standards are for obtaining scientific knowledge- the accumulation of knowledge from all individuals in a given field requires this level of consistency. Science "says" essentially, these are our goals (e.g., describe, understand, explain, intervene where needed, possible, and desirable) and these are our means (use of theory, methodology, guiding concepts, replication of results). Science is hardly a "game" because so many of the tasks we have are serious. Yet there are rules, and there are enormous benefits from following them among all sciences and scientists"-- Clinical psychology / Research / Methodology PSYCHOLOGY / Clinical Psychology |
| spellingShingle | Kazdin, Alan E. 1945- Research design in clinical psychology |
| title | Research design in clinical psychology |
| title_auth | Research design in clinical psychology |
| title_exact_search | Research design in clinical psychology |
| title_exact_search_txtP | Research design in clinical psychology |
| title_full | Research design in clinical psychology Alan E. Kazdin, Yale University, Connecticut |
| title_fullStr | Research design in clinical psychology Alan E. Kazdin, Yale University, Connecticut |
| title_full_unstemmed | Research design in clinical psychology Alan E. Kazdin, Yale University, Connecticut |
| title_short | Research design in clinical psychology |
| title_sort | research design in clinical psychology |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT kazdinalane researchdesigninclinicalpsychology |