State-to-state Arbitration based on International Investment Agreements: Scope, Utility and Potential
This book discusses the use of the compromissory clause in international investment agreements (IIAs) for interstate dispute resolution. It puts forward the possibility of using state-to-state arbitration based on the compromissory clause in IIAs as an alternative means of resolving investment dispu...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Cham
Springer International Publishing
2021
|
| Ausgabe: | 1st edition |
| Schriftenreihe: | EYIEL Monographs - Studies in European and International Economic Law
10 |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | BTU01 Volltext |
| Zusammenfassung: | This book discusses the use of the compromissory clause in international investment agreements (IIAs) for interstate dispute resolution. It puts forward the possibility of using state-to-state arbitration based on the compromissory clause in IIAs as an alternative means of resolving investment disputes in light of the global debate on the shortcomings of investor-state arbitration. The book's main conclusion is that state-to-state arbitration may be used as an alternative to currently popular investor-state arbitration by resolving procedural hurdles which impede its acceptance. It becomes more important with the removal of investor-state arbitration as an option in certain recent IIAs, which then elevates state-to-state arbitration as the sole option for binding third party dispute resolution in the treaty. Even then, it is unlikely to replace investor-state arbitration completely due to its inherent shortcomings, such as the risk of re-politicising disputes and a lack of direct control over the process for the affected investors. Nevertheless, the availability of an alternative forum will benefit all parties involved, as they will no longer be wholly dependent on investor-state arbitration, which can be affected by events such as denunciation from the ICSID Convention or the refusal of a host state to enforce an arbitration award |
| Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource (XV, 252 Seiten) |
| ISBN: | 9783030500351 |
| DOI: | 10.1007/978-3-030-50035-1 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zcb4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV047951343 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220422s2021 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9783030500351 |9 978-3-030-50035-1 | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/978-3-030-50035-1 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (ZDB-2-LCR)978-3-030-50035-1 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1312693311 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV047951343 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-634 |a DE-188 | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 347.09 |2 23 | |
| 084 | |a PR 2353 |0 (DE-625)139576: |2 rvk | ||
| 084 | |a PT 350 |0 (DE-625)139874: |2 rvk | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Hazarika, Angshuman |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a State-to-state Arbitration based on International Investment Agreements |b Scope, Utility and Potential |c by Angshuman Hazarika |
| 250 | |a 1st edition | ||
| 264 | 1 | |a Cham |b Springer International Publishing |c 2021 | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (XV, 252 Seiten) | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a EYIEL Monographs - Studies in European and International Economic Law |v 10 | |
| 520 | |a This book discusses the use of the compromissory clause in international investment agreements (IIAs) for interstate dispute resolution. It puts forward the possibility of using state-to-state arbitration based on the compromissory clause in IIAs as an alternative means of resolving investment disputes in light of the global debate on the shortcomings of investor-state arbitration. The book's main conclusion is that state-to-state arbitration may be used as an alternative to currently popular investor-state arbitration by resolving procedural hurdles which impede its acceptance. It becomes more important with the removal of investor-state arbitration as an option in certain recent IIAs, which then elevates state-to-state arbitration as the sole option for binding third party dispute resolution in the treaty. Even then, it is unlikely to replace investor-state arbitration completely due to its inherent shortcomings, such as the risk of re-politicising disputes and a lack of direct control over the process for the affected investors. Nevertheless, the availability of an alternative forum will benefit all parties involved, as they will no longer be wholly dependent on investor-state arbitration, which can be affected by events such as denunciation from the ICSID Convention or the refusal of a host state to enforce an arbitration award | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Dispute Resolution, Mediation, Arbitration | |
| 650 | 4 | |a International Economic Law, Trade Law | |
| 650 | 4 | |a European Economic Law | |
| 650 | 4 | |a International Economics | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Mediation | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Dispute resolution (Law) | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Conflict management | |
| 650 | 4 | |a International law | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Trade | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Commercial law / European Economic Community countries | |
| 650 | 4 | |a International economics | |
| 655 | 7 | |0 (DE-588)4113937-9 |a Hochschulschrift |2 gnd-content | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druck-Ausgabe |z 9783030500344 |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druck-Ausgabe |z 9783030500368 |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druck-Ausgabe |z 9783030500375 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50035-1 |x Verlag |z URL des Erstveröffentlichers |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a ZDB-2-LCR | ||
| 940 | 1 | |q ZDB-2-LCR_2021 | |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033332706 | ||
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50035-1 |l BTU01 |p ZDB-2-LCR |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804183634019614720 |
|---|---|
| adam_txt | |
| any_adam_object | |
| any_adam_object_boolean | |
| author | Hazarika, Angshuman |
| author_facet | Hazarika, Angshuman |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Hazarika, Angshuman |
| author_variant | a h ah |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV047951343 |
| classification_rvk | PR 2353 PT 350 |
| collection | ZDB-2-LCR |
| ctrlnum | (ZDB-2-LCR)978-3-030-50035-1 (OCoLC)1312693311 (DE-599)BVBBV047951343 |
| dewey-full | 347.09 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 347 - Procedure and courts |
| dewey-raw | 347.09 |
| dewey-search | 347.09 |
| dewey-sort | 3347.09 |
| dewey-tens | 340 - Law |
| discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
| discipline_str_mv | Rechtswissenschaft |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/978-3-030-50035-1 |
| edition | 1st edition |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03513nmm a2200577zcb4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV047951343</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220422s2021 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9783030500351</subfield><subfield code="9">978-3-030-50035-1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1007/978-3-030-50035-1</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-2-LCR)978-3-030-50035-1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1312693311</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV047951343</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-634</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-188</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">347.09</subfield><subfield code="2">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PR 2353</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)139576:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PT 350</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)139874:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hazarika, Angshuman</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">State-to-state Arbitration based on International Investment Agreements</subfield><subfield code="b">Scope, Utility and Potential</subfield><subfield code="c">by Angshuman Hazarika</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="250" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1st edition</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Cham</subfield><subfield code="b">Springer International Publishing</subfield><subfield code="c">2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (XV, 252 Seiten)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">EYIEL Monographs - Studies in European and International Economic Law</subfield><subfield code="v">10</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This book discusses the use of the compromissory clause in international investment agreements (IIAs) for interstate dispute resolution. It puts forward the possibility of using state-to-state arbitration based on the compromissory clause in IIAs as an alternative means of resolving investment disputes in light of the global debate on the shortcomings of investor-state arbitration. The book's main conclusion is that state-to-state arbitration may be used as an alternative to currently popular investor-state arbitration by resolving procedural hurdles which impede its acceptance. It becomes more important with the removal of investor-state arbitration as an option in certain recent IIAs, which then elevates state-to-state arbitration as the sole option for binding third party dispute resolution in the treaty. Even then, it is unlikely to replace investor-state arbitration completely due to its inherent shortcomings, such as the risk of re-politicising disputes and a lack of direct control over the process for the affected investors. Nevertheless, the availability of an alternative forum will benefit all parties involved, as they will no longer be wholly dependent on investor-state arbitration, which can be affected by events such as denunciation from the ICSID Convention or the refusal of a host state to enforce an arbitration award</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Dispute Resolution, Mediation, Arbitration</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">International Economic Law, Trade Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">European Economic Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">International Economics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Mediation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Dispute resolution (Law)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Conflict management</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">International law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Trade</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Commercial law / European Economic Community countries</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">International economics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4113937-9</subfield><subfield code="a">Hochschulschrift</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd-content</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druck-Ausgabe</subfield><subfield code="z">9783030500344</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druck-Ausgabe</subfield><subfield code="z">9783030500368</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druck-Ausgabe</subfield><subfield code="z">9783030500375</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50035-1</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">URL des Erstveröffentlichers</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-2-LCR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">ZDB-2-LCR_2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033332706</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50035-1</subfield><subfield code="l">BTU01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-2-LCR</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| genre | (DE-588)4113937-9 Hochschulschrift gnd-content |
| genre_facet | Hochschulschrift |
| id | DE-604.BV047951343 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T19:37:29Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T09:26:33Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9783030500351 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033332706 |
| oclc_num | 1312693311 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-634 DE-188 |
| owner_facet | DE-634 DE-188 |
| physical | 1 Online-Ressource (XV, 252 Seiten) |
| psigel | ZDB-2-LCR ZDB-2-LCR_2021 |
| publishDate | 2021 |
| publishDateSearch | 2021 |
| publishDateSort | 2021 |
| publisher | Springer International Publishing |
| record_format | marc |
| series2 | EYIEL Monographs - Studies in European and International Economic Law |
| spelling | Hazarika, Angshuman Verfasser aut State-to-state Arbitration based on International Investment Agreements Scope, Utility and Potential by Angshuman Hazarika 1st edition Cham Springer International Publishing 2021 1 Online-Ressource (XV, 252 Seiten) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier EYIEL Monographs - Studies in European and International Economic Law 10 This book discusses the use of the compromissory clause in international investment agreements (IIAs) for interstate dispute resolution. It puts forward the possibility of using state-to-state arbitration based on the compromissory clause in IIAs as an alternative means of resolving investment disputes in light of the global debate on the shortcomings of investor-state arbitration. The book's main conclusion is that state-to-state arbitration may be used as an alternative to currently popular investor-state arbitration by resolving procedural hurdles which impede its acceptance. It becomes more important with the removal of investor-state arbitration as an option in certain recent IIAs, which then elevates state-to-state arbitration as the sole option for binding third party dispute resolution in the treaty. Even then, it is unlikely to replace investor-state arbitration completely due to its inherent shortcomings, such as the risk of re-politicising disputes and a lack of direct control over the process for the affected investors. Nevertheless, the availability of an alternative forum will benefit all parties involved, as they will no longer be wholly dependent on investor-state arbitration, which can be affected by events such as denunciation from the ICSID Convention or the refusal of a host state to enforce an arbitration award Dispute Resolution, Mediation, Arbitration International Economic Law, Trade Law European Economic Law International Economics Mediation Dispute resolution (Law) Conflict management International law Trade Commercial law / European Economic Community countries International economics (DE-588)4113937-9 Hochschulschrift gnd-content Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe 9783030500344 Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe 9783030500368 Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe 9783030500375 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50035-1 Verlag URL des Erstveröffentlichers Volltext |
| spellingShingle | Hazarika, Angshuman State-to-state Arbitration based on International Investment Agreements Scope, Utility and Potential Dispute Resolution, Mediation, Arbitration International Economic Law, Trade Law European Economic Law International Economics Mediation Dispute resolution (Law) Conflict management International law Trade Commercial law / European Economic Community countries International economics |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)4113937-9 |
| title | State-to-state Arbitration based on International Investment Agreements Scope, Utility and Potential |
| title_auth | State-to-state Arbitration based on International Investment Agreements Scope, Utility and Potential |
| title_exact_search | State-to-state Arbitration based on International Investment Agreements Scope, Utility and Potential |
| title_exact_search_txtP | State-to-state Arbitration based on International Investment Agreements Scope, Utility and Potential |
| title_full | State-to-state Arbitration based on International Investment Agreements Scope, Utility and Potential by Angshuman Hazarika |
| title_fullStr | State-to-state Arbitration based on International Investment Agreements Scope, Utility and Potential by Angshuman Hazarika |
| title_full_unstemmed | State-to-state Arbitration based on International Investment Agreements Scope, Utility and Potential by Angshuman Hazarika |
| title_short | State-to-state Arbitration based on International Investment Agreements |
| title_sort | state to state arbitration based on international investment agreements scope utility and potential |
| title_sub | Scope, Utility and Potential |
| topic | Dispute Resolution, Mediation, Arbitration International Economic Law, Trade Law European Economic Law International Economics Mediation Dispute resolution (Law) Conflict management International law Trade Commercial law / European Economic Community countries International economics |
| topic_facet | Dispute Resolution, Mediation, Arbitration International Economic Law, Trade Law European Economic Law International Economics Mediation Dispute resolution (Law) Conflict management International law Trade Commercial law / European Economic Community countries International economics Hochschulschrift |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50035-1 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT hazarikaangshuman statetostatearbitrationbasedoninternationalinvestmentagreementsscopeutilityandpotential |