Supra-national accreditation, trust and institutional autonomy Contrasting developments of accreditation in the United States and Europe
Supra-national accreditation, trust and institutional autonomy: Contrasting developments of accreditation in the United States and Europe

There have been calls to increase the autonomy of higher education institutions in Europe for a number of years. They have been counterbalanced by demands for increasing accountability and a European quality assurance system. In London in 2007, the European ministers of education decided to implemen...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. Verfasser: Amaral, Alberto (VerfasserIn)
Weitere Verfasser: Rosa, Maria João (MitwirkendeR), Tavares, Diana Amado (MitwirkendeR)
Format: Elektronisch Buchkapitel
Sprache:English
Veröffentlicht: Paris OECD Publishing 2009
Schlagworte:
Education
United States
Online-Zugang:DE-384
DE-473
DE-824
DE-29
DE-739
DE-355
DE-20
DE-1028
DE-1049
DE-521
DE-861
DE-898
DE-92
DE-91
DE-573
DE-19
Volltext
Zusammenfassung:There have been calls to increase the autonomy of higher education institutions in Europe for a number of years. They have been counterbalanced by demands for increasing accountability and a European quality assurance system. In London in 2007, the European ministers of education decided to implement a European register of accredited quality agencies, and defined standards for registration. Being part of the register requires "substantial compliance with all standards" instead of "full-compliance". This might take into consideration the context of the national higher education system, the role of the agency in the quality assurance system, and even the national culture and traditions, allowing for different interpretations, some imprecision, and diverse degrees of flexibility and compliance.
Indications from the United States suggest an emerging desire at the federal level to play a more visible role in regulating higher education through intervention in the accreditation system to ensure increased institutional accountability. This may have a parallel in the European situation. While in the United States the attempts at increased federal control have so far apparently failed, in Europe quality systems linked to higher education institutions were replaced with "independent" accrediting agencies. We analyse these changes and offer a possible interpretation for the differences on the two sides of the Atlantic.
Accréditation supranationale, confiance et autonomie des établissements : Contrastes du développement de l'accréditation entre l'Europe et les États-Unis À l'échelon européen, certains soulignent depuis plusieurs années la nécessité de conférer une autonomie accrue aux établissements d'enseignement supérieur, alors même que d'autres exigent que ces derniers rendent davantage de comptes concernant leurs activités et leurs performances. À Londres en 2007, les ministres européens de l'éducation ont décidé la mise en place d'un registre européen où figureront les agences accréditées et où seront définies les normes auxquelles ces agences devront se plier pour être autorisées à y figurer. Les conditions à respecter pour pouvoir être inscrit au registre européen sont ainsi passées d'une « conformité totale à l'ensemble des normes » à une « large conformité ».
Beschreibung:1 Online-Ressource (18 Seiten) 16 x 23cm
DOI:10.1787/hemp-21-5ksf24qcgm45

Es ist kein Print-Exemplar vorhanden.

Fernleihe Bestellen Achtung: Nicht im THWS-Bestand! Volltext öffnen

Ähnliche Einträge