OECD Productivity Growth in the 2000s: A Descriptive Analysis of the Impact of Sectoral Effects and Innovation:
This paper brings together the latest data and OECD productivity indicators in different areas with the aim of reviewing the main productivity trends over the past decade, comparing the United States, Europe and to some extent Japan. Concerning economy wide indicators of productivity, the slowdown a...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Weitere Verfasser: | , |
| Format: | Elektronisch Buchkapitel |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Paris
OECD Publishing
2011
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | UBA01 UBG01 UEI01 UER01 UPA01 UBR01 UBW01 FFW01 FNU01 EUV01 FRO01 FHR01 FHN01 TUM01 FHI01 UBM01 Volltext |
| Zusammenfassung: | This paper brings together the latest data and OECD productivity indicators in different areas with the aim of reviewing the main productivity trends over the past decade, comparing the United States, Europe and to some extent Japan. Concerning economy wide indicators of productivity, the slowdown appears to be due to a significant slowdown in investment in information and communication technologies (ICT) followed by a decrease in multi-factor productivity (MFP). However, a new set of indicators of MFP growth by industry shows that the decline of productivity is particularly marked in sectors such as construction and market services. Looking for possible explanations of the decline, a marked slowdown in innovation emerged as the most likely cause. It concludes that, if no new wave of innovation materialises, comparable in size to the one of the late 1990s (around notably the Internet), the OECD trend productivity growth is not likely to resume at its end-1990s level. Only a recovery in innovation itself could trigger a sustainable recovery in productivity in the major OECD countries |
| Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource (23 Seiten) 21 x 28cm |
| DOI: | 10.1787/eco_studies-2011-5kgf3281fmtc |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nma a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV047938121 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220413s2011 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1787/eco_studies-2011-5kgf3281fmtc |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (ZDB-13-SOC)061324256 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV047938121 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-384 |a DE-91 |a DE-473 |a DE-824 |a DE-29 |a DE-739 |a DE-355 |a DE-20 |a DE-1028 |a DE-1049 |a DE-188 |a DE-521 |a DE-861 |a DE-898 |a DE-92 |a DE-573 |a DE-19 | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Dupont, Julien |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a OECD Productivity Growth in the 2000s: A Descriptive Analysis of the Impact of Sectoral Effects and Innovation |c Julien Dupont, Dominique Guellec and Joaquim Oliveira Martins |
| 264 | 1 | |a Paris |b OECD Publishing |c 2011 | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (23 Seiten) |c 21 x 28cm | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a This paper brings together the latest data and OECD productivity indicators in different areas with the aim of reviewing the main productivity trends over the past decade, comparing the United States, Europe and to some extent Japan. Concerning economy wide indicators of productivity, the slowdown appears to be due to a significant slowdown in investment in information and communication technologies (ICT) followed by a decrease in multi-factor productivity (MFP). However, a new set of indicators of MFP growth by industry shows that the decline of productivity is particularly marked in sectors such as construction and market services. Looking for possible explanations of the decline, a marked slowdown in innovation emerged as the most likely cause. It concludes that, if no new wave of innovation materialises, comparable in size to the one of the late 1990s (around notably the Internet), the OECD trend productivity growth is not likely to resume at its end-1990s level. Only a recovery in innovation itself could trigger a sustainable recovery in productivity in the major OECD countries | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Economics | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Guellec, Dominique |4 ctb | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Oliveira Martins, Joaquim |4 ctb | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1787/eco_studies-2011-5kgf3281fmtc |x Verlag |z URL des Erstveröffentlichers |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a ZDB-13-SOC | ||
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033319615 | ||
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1787/eco_studies-2011-5kgf3281fmtc |l UBA01 |p ZDB-13-SOC |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1787/eco_studies-2011-5kgf3281fmtc |l UBG01 |p ZDB-13-SOC |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1787/eco_studies-2011-5kgf3281fmtc |l UEI01 |p ZDB-13-SOC |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1787/eco_studies-2011-5kgf3281fmtc |l UER01 |p ZDB-13-SOC |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1787/eco_studies-2011-5kgf3281fmtc |l UPA01 |p ZDB-13-SOC |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1787/eco_studies-2011-5kgf3281fmtc |l UBR01 |p ZDB-13-SOC |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1787/eco_studies-2011-5kgf3281fmtc |l UBW01 |p ZDB-13-SOC |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1787/eco_studies-2011-5kgf3281fmtc |l FFW01 |p ZDB-13-SOC |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1787/eco_studies-2011-5kgf3281fmtc |l FNU01 |p ZDB-13-SOC |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1787/eco_studies-2011-5kgf3281fmtc |l EUV01 |p ZDB-13-SOC |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1787/eco_studies-2011-5kgf3281fmtc |l FRO01 |p ZDB-13-SOC |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1787/eco_studies-2011-5kgf3281fmtc |l FHR01 |p ZDB-13-SOC |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1787/eco_studies-2011-5kgf3281fmtc |l FHN01 |p ZDB-13-SOC |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1787/eco_studies-2011-5kgf3281fmtc |l TUM01 |p ZDB-13-SOC |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1787/eco_studies-2011-5kgf3281fmtc |l FHI01 |p ZDB-13-SOC |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1787/eco_studies-2011-5kgf3281fmtc |l UBM01 |p ZDB-13-SOC |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804183581908533248 |
|---|---|
| adam_txt | |
| any_adam_object | |
| any_adam_object_boolean | |
| author | Dupont, Julien |
| author2 | Guellec, Dominique Oliveira Martins, Joaquim |
| author2_role | ctb ctb |
| author2_variant | d g dg m j o mj mjo |
| author_facet | Dupont, Julien Guellec, Dominique Oliveira Martins, Joaquim |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Dupont, Julien |
| author_variant | j d jd |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV047938121 |
| collection | ZDB-13-SOC |
| ctrlnum | (ZDB-13-SOC)061324256 (DE-599)BVBBV047938121 |
| discipline | Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
| discipline_str_mv | Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1787/eco_studies-2011-5kgf3281fmtc |
| format | Electronic Book Chapter |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>04087nma a2200517zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV047938121</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220413s2011 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1787/eco_studies-2011-5kgf3281fmtc</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-13-SOC)061324256</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV047938121</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-384</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-91</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-473</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-824</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-29</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-739</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-355</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-20</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-1028</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-1049</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-188</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-521</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-861</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-898</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-92</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-573</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dupont, Julien</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">OECD Productivity Growth in the 2000s: A Descriptive Analysis of the Impact of Sectoral Effects and Innovation</subfield><subfield code="c">Julien Dupont, Dominique Guellec and Joaquim Oliveira Martins</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Paris</subfield><subfield code="b">OECD Publishing</subfield><subfield code="c">2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (23 Seiten)</subfield><subfield code="c">21 x 28cm</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This paper brings together the latest data and OECD productivity indicators in different areas with the aim of reviewing the main productivity trends over the past decade, comparing the United States, Europe and to some extent Japan. Concerning economy wide indicators of productivity, the slowdown appears to be due to a significant slowdown in investment in information and communication technologies (ICT) followed by a decrease in multi-factor productivity (MFP). However, a new set of indicators of MFP growth by industry shows that the decline of productivity is particularly marked in sectors such as construction and market services. Looking for possible explanations of the decline, a marked slowdown in innovation emerged as the most likely cause. It concludes that, if no new wave of innovation materialises, comparable in size to the one of the late 1990s (around notably the Internet), the OECD trend productivity growth is not likely to resume at its end-1990s level. Only a recovery in innovation itself could trigger a sustainable recovery in productivity in the major OECD countries</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Economics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Guellec, Dominique</subfield><subfield code="4">ctb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Oliveira Martins, Joaquim</subfield><subfield code="4">ctb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1787/eco_studies-2011-5kgf3281fmtc</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">URL des Erstveröffentlichers</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033319615</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1787/eco_studies-2011-5kgf3281fmtc</subfield><subfield code="l">UBA01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1787/eco_studies-2011-5kgf3281fmtc</subfield><subfield code="l">UBG01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1787/eco_studies-2011-5kgf3281fmtc</subfield><subfield code="l">UEI01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1787/eco_studies-2011-5kgf3281fmtc</subfield><subfield code="l">UER01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1787/eco_studies-2011-5kgf3281fmtc</subfield><subfield code="l">UPA01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1787/eco_studies-2011-5kgf3281fmtc</subfield><subfield code="l">UBR01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1787/eco_studies-2011-5kgf3281fmtc</subfield><subfield code="l">UBW01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1787/eco_studies-2011-5kgf3281fmtc</subfield><subfield code="l">FFW01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1787/eco_studies-2011-5kgf3281fmtc</subfield><subfield code="l">FNU01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1787/eco_studies-2011-5kgf3281fmtc</subfield><subfield code="l">EUV01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1787/eco_studies-2011-5kgf3281fmtc</subfield><subfield code="l">FRO01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1787/eco_studies-2011-5kgf3281fmtc</subfield><subfield code="l">FHR01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1787/eco_studies-2011-5kgf3281fmtc</subfield><subfield code="l">FHN01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1787/eco_studies-2011-5kgf3281fmtc</subfield><subfield code="l">TUM01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1787/eco_studies-2011-5kgf3281fmtc</subfield><subfield code="l">FHI01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1787/eco_studies-2011-5kgf3281fmtc</subfield><subfield code="l">UBM01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV047938121 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T19:35:08Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T09:25:44Z |
| institution | BVB |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033319615 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-384 DE-91 DE-BY-TUM DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-824 DE-29 DE-739 DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-20 DE-1028 DE-1049 DE-188 DE-521 DE-861 DE-898 DE-BY-UBR DE-92 DE-573 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM |
| owner_facet | DE-384 DE-91 DE-BY-TUM DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-824 DE-29 DE-739 DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-20 DE-1028 DE-1049 DE-188 DE-521 DE-861 DE-898 DE-BY-UBR DE-92 DE-573 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM |
| physical | 1 Online-Ressource (23 Seiten) 21 x 28cm |
| psigel | ZDB-13-SOC |
| publishDate | 2011 |
| publishDateSearch | 2011 |
| publishDateSort | 2011 |
| publisher | OECD Publishing |
| record_format | marc |
| spelling | Dupont, Julien Verfasser aut OECD Productivity Growth in the 2000s: A Descriptive Analysis of the Impact of Sectoral Effects and Innovation Julien Dupont, Dominique Guellec and Joaquim Oliveira Martins Paris OECD Publishing 2011 1 Online-Ressource (23 Seiten) 21 x 28cm txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier This paper brings together the latest data and OECD productivity indicators in different areas with the aim of reviewing the main productivity trends over the past decade, comparing the United States, Europe and to some extent Japan. Concerning economy wide indicators of productivity, the slowdown appears to be due to a significant slowdown in investment in information and communication technologies (ICT) followed by a decrease in multi-factor productivity (MFP). However, a new set of indicators of MFP growth by industry shows that the decline of productivity is particularly marked in sectors such as construction and market services. Looking for possible explanations of the decline, a marked slowdown in innovation emerged as the most likely cause. It concludes that, if no new wave of innovation materialises, comparable in size to the one of the late 1990s (around notably the Internet), the OECD trend productivity growth is not likely to resume at its end-1990s level. Only a recovery in innovation itself could trigger a sustainable recovery in productivity in the major OECD countries Economics Guellec, Dominique ctb Oliveira Martins, Joaquim ctb https://doi.org/10.1787/eco_studies-2011-5kgf3281fmtc Verlag URL des Erstveröffentlichers Volltext |
| spellingShingle | Dupont, Julien OECD Productivity Growth in the 2000s: A Descriptive Analysis of the Impact of Sectoral Effects and Innovation Economics |
| title | OECD Productivity Growth in the 2000s: A Descriptive Analysis of the Impact of Sectoral Effects and Innovation |
| title_auth | OECD Productivity Growth in the 2000s: A Descriptive Analysis of the Impact of Sectoral Effects and Innovation |
| title_exact_search | OECD Productivity Growth in the 2000s: A Descriptive Analysis of the Impact of Sectoral Effects and Innovation |
| title_exact_search_txtP | OECD Productivity Growth in the 2000s: A Descriptive Analysis of the Impact of Sectoral Effects and Innovation |
| title_full | OECD Productivity Growth in the 2000s: A Descriptive Analysis of the Impact of Sectoral Effects and Innovation Julien Dupont, Dominique Guellec and Joaquim Oliveira Martins |
| title_fullStr | OECD Productivity Growth in the 2000s: A Descriptive Analysis of the Impact of Sectoral Effects and Innovation Julien Dupont, Dominique Guellec and Joaquim Oliveira Martins |
| title_full_unstemmed | OECD Productivity Growth in the 2000s: A Descriptive Analysis of the Impact of Sectoral Effects and Innovation Julien Dupont, Dominique Guellec and Joaquim Oliveira Martins |
| title_short | OECD Productivity Growth in the 2000s: A Descriptive Analysis of the Impact of Sectoral Effects and Innovation |
| title_sort | oecd productivity growth in the 2000s a descriptive analysis of the impact of sectoral effects and innovation |
| topic | Economics |
| topic_facet | Economics |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1787/eco_studies-2011-5kgf3281fmtc |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT dupontjulien oecdproductivitygrowthinthe2000sadescriptiveanalysisoftheimpactofsectoraleffectsandinnovation AT guellecdominique oecdproductivitygrowthinthe2000sadescriptiveanalysisoftheimpactofsectoraleffectsandinnovation AT oliveiramartinsjoaquim oecdproductivitygrowthinthe2000sadescriptiveanalysisoftheimpactofsectoraleffectsandinnovation |