Globalisation, Liberalisation, Poverty and Income Inequality in Southeast Asia:
Malaysia, Thailand and Indonesia have been touted as models for other developing countries of how liberalisation can bring faster growth and greater equity. In fact their performance has been mixed and often inferior to other Asian economies, notably in structural change, tax reform, industrialisati...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Paris
OECD Publishing
2001
|
| Schriftenreihe: | OECD Development Centre Working Papers
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Zusammenfassung: | Malaysia, Thailand and Indonesia have been touted as models for other developing countries of how liberalisation can bring faster growth and greater equity. In fact their performance has been mixed and often inferior to other Asian economies, notably in structural change, tax reform, industrialisation, education and democratisation. Liberalisation and globalisation in finance, trade and investment has harmed redistribution and growth, as well as a country's ability to "catch up," except where governments have successfully intervened. The Washington Consensus and its argument that there is no alternative must be rejected. A solution must be founded on greater government competence, transparency and accountability, along with technology and a revival of regional and international solidarity and co-operation ... |
| Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource (43 Seiten) 21 x 29.7cm |
| DOI: | 10.1787/873322617282 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV047937335 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220413s2001 xx o|||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1787/873322617282 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (ZDB-13-SOC)061240532 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1312693779 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV047937335 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-384 |a DE-91 |a DE-473 |a DE-824 |a DE-29 |a DE-739 |a DE-355 |a DE-20 |a DE-1028 |a DE-1049 |a DE-188 |a DE-521 |a DE-861 |a DE-898 |a DE-92 |a DE-573 |a DE-19 | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Jomo, K. S... |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Globalisation, Liberalisation, Poverty and Income Inequality in Southeast Asia |c K. S. Jomo |
| 264 | 1 | |a Paris |b OECD Publishing |c 2001 | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (43 Seiten) |c 21 x 29.7cm | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a OECD Development Centre Working Papers | |
| 520 | |a Malaysia, Thailand and Indonesia have been touted as models for other developing countries of how liberalisation can bring faster growth and greater equity. In fact their performance has been mixed and often inferior to other Asian economies, notably in structural change, tax reform, industrialisation, education and democratisation. Liberalisation and globalisation in finance, trade and investment has harmed redistribution and growth, as well as a country's ability to "catch up," except where governments have successfully intervened. The Washington Consensus and its argument that there is no alternative must be rejected. A solution must be founded on greater government competence, transparency and accountability, along with technology and a revival of regional and international solidarity and co-operation ... | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Development | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1787/873322617282 |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a ZDB-13-SOC | ||
| 943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033318829 | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1818806115930996736 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | |
| adam_txt | |
| any_adam_object | |
| any_adam_object_boolean | |
| author | Jomo, K. S.. |
| author_facet | Jomo, K. S.. |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Jomo, K. S.. |
| author_variant | k s j ks ksj |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV047937335 |
| collection | ZDB-13-SOC |
| ctrlnum | (ZDB-13-SOC)061240532 (OCoLC)1312693779 (DE-599)BVBBV047937335 |
| discipline | Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
| discipline_str_mv | Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1787/873322617282 |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nam a2200000zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV047937335</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220413s2001 xx o|||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1787/873322617282</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-13-SOC)061240532</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1312693779</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV047937335</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-384</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-91</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-473</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-824</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-29</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-739</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-355</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-20</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-1028</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-1049</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-188</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-521</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-861</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-898</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-92</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-573</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Jomo, K. S...</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Globalisation, Liberalisation, Poverty and Income Inequality in Southeast Asia</subfield><subfield code="c">K. S. Jomo</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Paris</subfield><subfield code="b">OECD Publishing</subfield><subfield code="c">2001</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (43 Seiten)</subfield><subfield code="c">21 x 29.7cm</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OECD Development Centre Working Papers</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Malaysia, Thailand and Indonesia have been touted as models for other developing countries of how liberalisation can bring faster growth and greater equity. In fact their performance has been mixed and often inferior to other Asian economies, notably in structural change, tax reform, industrialisation, education and democratisation. Liberalisation and globalisation in finance, trade and investment has harmed redistribution and growth, as well as a country's ability to "catch up," except where governments have successfully intervened. The Washington Consensus and its argument that there is no alternative must be rejected. A solution must be founded on greater government competence, transparency and accountability, along with technology and a revival of regional and international solidarity and co-operation ...</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Development</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1787/873322617282</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033318829</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV047937335 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T19:35:07Z |
| indexdate | 2024-12-18T19:04:39Z |
| institution | BVB |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033318829 |
| oclc_num | 1312693779 |
| open_access_boolean | 1 |
| owner | DE-384 DE-91 DE-BY-TUM DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-824 DE-29 DE-739 DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-20 DE-1028 DE-1049 DE-188 DE-521 DE-861 DE-898 DE-BY-UBR DE-92 DE-573 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM |
| owner_facet | DE-384 DE-91 DE-BY-TUM DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-824 DE-29 DE-739 DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-20 DE-1028 DE-1049 DE-188 DE-521 DE-861 DE-898 DE-BY-UBR DE-92 DE-573 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM |
| physical | 1 Online-Ressource (43 Seiten) 21 x 29.7cm |
| psigel | ZDB-13-SOC |
| publishDate | 2001 |
| publishDateSearch | 2001 |
| publishDateSort | 2001 |
| publisher | OECD Publishing |
| record_format | marc |
| series2 | OECD Development Centre Working Papers |
| spelling | Jomo, K. S... Verfasser aut Globalisation, Liberalisation, Poverty and Income Inequality in Southeast Asia K. S. Jomo Paris OECD Publishing 2001 1 Online-Ressource (43 Seiten) 21 x 29.7cm txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier OECD Development Centre Working Papers Malaysia, Thailand and Indonesia have been touted as models for other developing countries of how liberalisation can bring faster growth and greater equity. In fact their performance has been mixed and often inferior to other Asian economies, notably in structural change, tax reform, industrialisation, education and democratisation. Liberalisation and globalisation in finance, trade and investment has harmed redistribution and growth, as well as a country's ability to "catch up," except where governments have successfully intervened. The Washington Consensus and its argument that there is no alternative must be rejected. A solution must be founded on greater government competence, transparency and accountability, along with technology and a revival of regional and international solidarity and co-operation ... Development https://doi.org/10.1787/873322617282 Verlag kostenfrei Volltext |
| spellingShingle | Jomo, K. S.. Globalisation, Liberalisation, Poverty and Income Inequality in Southeast Asia Development |
| title | Globalisation, Liberalisation, Poverty and Income Inequality in Southeast Asia |
| title_auth | Globalisation, Liberalisation, Poverty and Income Inequality in Southeast Asia |
| title_exact_search | Globalisation, Liberalisation, Poverty and Income Inequality in Southeast Asia |
| title_exact_search_txtP | Globalisation, Liberalisation, Poverty and Income Inequality in Southeast Asia |
| title_full | Globalisation, Liberalisation, Poverty and Income Inequality in Southeast Asia K. S. Jomo |
| title_fullStr | Globalisation, Liberalisation, Poverty and Income Inequality in Southeast Asia K. S. Jomo |
| title_full_unstemmed | Globalisation, Liberalisation, Poverty and Income Inequality in Southeast Asia K. S. Jomo |
| title_short | Globalisation, Liberalisation, Poverty and Income Inequality in Southeast Asia |
| title_sort | globalisation liberalisation poverty and income inequality in southeast asia |
| topic | Development |
| topic_facet | Development |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1787/873322617282 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT jomoks globalisationliberalisationpovertyandincomeinequalityinsoutheastasia |