The Evolution of London's Crossrail Scheme and the Development of the Department for Transport's Economic Appraisal Methods:
Cost benefit analysis has been used in the United Kingdom for the appraisal of road schemes over the past fifty years. It was less widely used for rail, where most investment was concerned with renewing the existing network. The Central London Rail Study (1988) used cost benefit analysis to address...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Paris
OECD Publishing
2011
|
| Schriftenreihe: | International Transport Forum Discussion Papers
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | kostenfrei |
| Zusammenfassung: | Cost benefit analysis has been used in the United Kingdom for the appraisal of road schemes over the past fifty years. It was less widely used for rail, where most investment was concerned with renewing the existing network. The Central London Rail Study (1988) used cost benefit analysis to address the problem of overcrowding on London.s rail network. The Crossrail scheme proposed in the Study was discontinued because of a recession and because of the priority given the developing links to London.s Docklands. Progress on Crossrail was resumed in 2002 at the same time as the Department.s appraisal methods were being revised to incorporate Wider Economic Benefits. The quantification of these additional benefits, the resolution of a source of funding and the role of the Mayor all influenced the Government.s decision that the scheme should be built. Identification of some of the Wider Benefits poses problems for transport models that are only partially resolved through the use of land use transport interaction models. Although the use of a Gross Value Added metric provides an alternative way of estimating the economic impacts of a scheme, it does not replace cost benefit analysis as a decision aid for government ministers |
| Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource (37 Seiten) 21 x 29.7cm |
| DOI: | 10.1787/5kg0prk600jk-en |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV047936868 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220413s2011 xx o|||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1787/5kg0prk600jk-en |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (ZDB-13-SOC)061246999 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1312705908 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV047936868 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-384 |a DE-91 |a DE-473 |a DE-824 |a DE-29 |a DE-739 |a DE-355 |a DE-20 |a DE-1028 |a DE-1049 |a DE-188 |a DE-521 |a DE-861 |a DE-898 |a DE-92 |a DE-573 |a DE-19 | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Worsley, Tom |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a The Evolution of London's Crossrail Scheme and the Development of the Department for Transport's Economic Appraisal Methods |c Tom Worsley |
| 264 | 1 | |a Paris |b OECD Publishing |c 2011 | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (37 Seiten) |c 21 x 29.7cm | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a International Transport Forum Discussion Papers | |
| 520 | |a Cost benefit analysis has been used in the United Kingdom for the appraisal of road schemes over the past fifty years. It was less widely used for rail, where most investment was concerned with renewing the existing network. The Central London Rail Study (1988) used cost benefit analysis to address the problem of overcrowding on London.s rail network. The Crossrail scheme proposed in the Study was discontinued because of a recession and because of the priority given the developing links to London.s Docklands. Progress on Crossrail was resumed in 2002 at the same time as the Department.s appraisal methods were being revised to incorporate Wider Economic Benefits. The quantification of these additional benefits, the resolution of a source of funding and the role of the Mayor all influenced the Government.s decision that the scheme should be built. Identification of some of the Wider Benefits poses problems for transport models that are only partially resolved through the use of land use transport interaction models. Although the use of a Gross Value Added metric provides an alternative way of estimating the economic impacts of a scheme, it does not replace cost benefit analysis as a decision aid for government ministers | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Urban, Rural and Regional Development | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Transport | |
| 650 | 4 | |a United Kingdom | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1787/5kg0prk600jk-en |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a ZDB-13-SOC | ||
| 943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033318362 | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1818806115084795904 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | |
| adam_txt | |
| any_adam_object | |
| any_adam_object_boolean | |
| author | Worsley, Tom |
| author_facet | Worsley, Tom |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Worsley, Tom |
| author_variant | t w tw |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV047936868 |
| collection | ZDB-13-SOC |
| ctrlnum | (ZDB-13-SOC)061246999 (OCoLC)1312705908 (DE-599)BVBBV047936868 |
| discipline | Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
| discipline_str_mv | Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1787/5kg0prk600jk-en |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nam a2200000zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV047936868</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220413s2011 xx o|||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1787/5kg0prk600jk-en</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-13-SOC)061246999</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1312705908</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV047936868</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-384</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-91</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-473</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-824</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-29</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-739</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-355</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-20</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-1028</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-1049</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-188</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-521</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-861</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-898</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-92</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-573</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Worsley, Tom</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">The Evolution of London's Crossrail Scheme and the Development of the Department for Transport's Economic Appraisal Methods</subfield><subfield code="c">Tom Worsley</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Paris</subfield><subfield code="b">OECD Publishing</subfield><subfield code="c">2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (37 Seiten)</subfield><subfield code="c">21 x 29.7cm</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">International Transport Forum Discussion Papers</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cost benefit analysis has been used in the United Kingdom for the appraisal of road schemes over the past fifty years. It was less widely used for rail, where most investment was concerned with renewing the existing network. The Central London Rail Study (1988) used cost benefit analysis to address the problem of overcrowding on London.s rail network. The Crossrail scheme proposed in the Study was discontinued because of a recession and because of the priority given the developing links to London.s Docklands. Progress on Crossrail was resumed in 2002 at the same time as the Department.s appraisal methods were being revised to incorporate Wider Economic Benefits. The quantification of these additional benefits, the resolution of a source of funding and the role of the Mayor all influenced the Government.s decision that the scheme should be built. Identification of some of the Wider Benefits poses problems for transport models that are only partially resolved through the use of land use transport interaction models. Although the use of a Gross Value Added metric provides an alternative way of estimating the economic impacts of a scheme, it does not replace cost benefit analysis as a decision aid for government ministers</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Urban, Rural and Regional Development</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Transport</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">United Kingdom</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1787/5kg0prk600jk-en</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033318362</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV047936868 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T19:35:06Z |
| indexdate | 2024-12-18T19:04:38Z |
| institution | BVB |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033318362 |
| oclc_num | 1312705908 |
| open_access_boolean | 1 |
| owner | DE-384 DE-91 DE-BY-TUM DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-824 DE-29 DE-739 DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-20 DE-1028 DE-1049 DE-188 DE-521 DE-861 DE-898 DE-BY-UBR DE-92 DE-573 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM |
| owner_facet | DE-384 DE-91 DE-BY-TUM DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-824 DE-29 DE-739 DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-20 DE-1028 DE-1049 DE-188 DE-521 DE-861 DE-898 DE-BY-UBR DE-92 DE-573 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM |
| physical | 1 Online-Ressource (37 Seiten) 21 x 29.7cm |
| psigel | ZDB-13-SOC |
| publishDate | 2011 |
| publishDateSearch | 2011 |
| publishDateSort | 2011 |
| publisher | OECD Publishing |
| record_format | marc |
| series2 | International Transport Forum Discussion Papers |
| spelling | Worsley, Tom Verfasser aut The Evolution of London's Crossrail Scheme and the Development of the Department for Transport's Economic Appraisal Methods Tom Worsley Paris OECD Publishing 2011 1 Online-Ressource (37 Seiten) 21 x 29.7cm txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier International Transport Forum Discussion Papers Cost benefit analysis has been used in the United Kingdom for the appraisal of road schemes over the past fifty years. It was less widely used for rail, where most investment was concerned with renewing the existing network. The Central London Rail Study (1988) used cost benefit analysis to address the problem of overcrowding on London.s rail network. The Crossrail scheme proposed in the Study was discontinued because of a recession and because of the priority given the developing links to London.s Docklands. Progress on Crossrail was resumed in 2002 at the same time as the Department.s appraisal methods were being revised to incorporate Wider Economic Benefits. The quantification of these additional benefits, the resolution of a source of funding and the role of the Mayor all influenced the Government.s decision that the scheme should be built. Identification of some of the Wider Benefits poses problems for transport models that are only partially resolved through the use of land use transport interaction models. Although the use of a Gross Value Added metric provides an alternative way of estimating the economic impacts of a scheme, it does not replace cost benefit analysis as a decision aid for government ministers Urban, Rural and Regional Development Transport United Kingdom https://doi.org/10.1787/5kg0prk600jk-en Verlag kostenfrei Volltext |
| spellingShingle | Worsley, Tom The Evolution of London's Crossrail Scheme and the Development of the Department for Transport's Economic Appraisal Methods Urban, Rural and Regional Development Transport United Kingdom |
| title | The Evolution of London's Crossrail Scheme and the Development of the Department for Transport's Economic Appraisal Methods |
| title_auth | The Evolution of London's Crossrail Scheme and the Development of the Department for Transport's Economic Appraisal Methods |
| title_exact_search | The Evolution of London's Crossrail Scheme and the Development of the Department for Transport's Economic Appraisal Methods |
| title_exact_search_txtP | The Evolution of London's Crossrail Scheme and the Development of the Department for Transport's Economic Appraisal Methods |
| title_full | The Evolution of London's Crossrail Scheme and the Development of the Department for Transport's Economic Appraisal Methods Tom Worsley |
| title_fullStr | The Evolution of London's Crossrail Scheme and the Development of the Department for Transport's Economic Appraisal Methods Tom Worsley |
| title_full_unstemmed | The Evolution of London's Crossrail Scheme and the Development of the Department for Transport's Economic Appraisal Methods Tom Worsley |
| title_short | The Evolution of London's Crossrail Scheme and the Development of the Department for Transport's Economic Appraisal Methods |
| title_sort | the evolution of london s crossrail scheme and the development of the department for transport s economic appraisal methods |
| topic | Urban, Rural and Regional Development Transport United Kingdom |
| topic_facet | Urban, Rural and Regional Development Transport United Kingdom |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1787/5kg0prk600jk-en |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT worsleytom theevolutionoflondonscrossrailschemeandthedevelopmentofthedepartmentfortransportseconomicappraisalmethods |