Assessing Options to Increase Climate Support:
Climate support will be an important element in reaching a post-2020 climate agreement at COP 21 in December 2015. To further increase and mobilise the levels of climate support post-2020, a number of proposals have been made in the negotiating text produced in the Geneva session of the Ad-hoc Worki...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Weitere Verfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Paris
OECD Publishing
2015
|
| Schriftenreihe: | OECD/IEA Climate Change Expert Group Papers
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Zusammenfassung: | Climate support will be an important element in reaching a post-2020 climate agreement at COP 21 in December 2015. To further increase and mobilise the levels of climate support post-2020, a number of proposals have been made in the negotiating text produced in the Geneva session of the Ad-hoc Working Group on the Durban Platform of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) in February 2015. This paper explores the advantages and disadvantages of several of these proposals, focusing on those that are clear and specific. The paper assesses proposals on mobilising climate finance using the following criteria: (i) the level of financial flows that they could generate; (ii) how much of this could be mobilised in the UNFCCC context; (iii) the ease of implementation of the proposal; (iv) if and how such increased mobilisation could be monitored; and (v) whether the proposal would fill a specific gap in the context of climate support within the UNFCCC. The paper undertakes a similar assessment for proposals in the Geneva text on enhancing the level of technology development and transfer, as well as capacity building. It discusses whether the proposals could potentially increase technology development and transfer, capacity building and development, as well as whether they are likely to do so in practice, based on current experience and ease of implementation. The proposals vary significantly in the amount of climate support they could mobilise (or enhance, in the case of technology and capacity building), for a range of reasons. These include the particular wording of the proposals, their sensitivity to national implementation, uncertainty in measuring progress towards objectives, and in some cases the limited role the UNFCCC plays as an institution in a given area of climate support |
| Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource (53 Seiten) 21 x 29.7cm |
| DOI: | 10.1787/5jrw65rp0pg8-en |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV047936347 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220413s2015 xx o|||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1787/5jrw65rp0pg8-en |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (ZDB-13-SOC)061254355 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1312704455 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV047936347 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-384 |a DE-91 |a DE-473 |a DE-824 |a DE-29 |a DE-739 |a DE-355 |a DE-20 |a DE-1028 |a DE-1049 |a DE-188 |a DE-521 |a DE-861 |a DE-898 |a DE-92 |a DE-573 |a DE-19 | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Ellis, Jane |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Assessing Options to Increase Climate Support |c Jane Ellis ... [et al] = Évaluation des options envisageables pour accroître le soutien en faveur de l'action climatique / Jane Ellis ... [et al] |
| 246 | 1 | 3 | |a Évaluation des options envisageables pour accroître le soutien en faveur de l'action climatique |
| 264 | 1 | |a Paris |b OECD Publishing |c 2015 | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (53 Seiten) |c 21 x 29.7cm | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a OECD/IEA Climate Change Expert Group Papers | |
| 520 | |a Climate support will be an important element in reaching a post-2020 climate agreement at COP 21 in December 2015. To further increase and mobilise the levels of climate support post-2020, a number of proposals have been made in the negotiating text produced in the Geneva session of the Ad-hoc Working Group on the Durban Platform of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) in February 2015. This paper explores the advantages and disadvantages of several of these proposals, focusing on those that are clear and specific. The paper assesses proposals on mobilising climate finance using the following criteria: (i) the level of financial flows that they could generate; (ii) how much of this could be mobilised in the UNFCCC context; (iii) the ease of implementation of the proposal; (iv) if and how such increased mobilisation could be monitored; and (v) whether the proposal would fill a specific gap in the context of climate support within the UNFCCC. The paper undertakes a similar assessment for proposals in the Geneva text on enhancing the level of technology development and transfer, as well as capacity building. It discusses whether the proposals could potentially increase technology development and transfer, capacity building and development, as well as whether they are likely to do so in practice, based on current experience and ease of implementation. The proposals vary significantly in the amount of climate support they could mobilise (or enhance, in the case of technology and capacity building), for a range of reasons. These include the particular wording of the proposals, their sensitivity to national implementation, uncertainty in measuring progress towards objectives, and in some cases the limited role the UNFCCC plays as an institution in a given area of climate support | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Energy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Environment | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Moarif, Sara |4 ctb | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Nobuoka, Yoko |4 ctb | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Pellegrino, Marta |4 ctb | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1787/5jrw65rp0pg8-en |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a ZDB-13-SOC | ||
| 943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033317840 | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1818806113889419264 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | |
| adam_txt | |
| any_adam_object | |
| any_adam_object_boolean | |
| author | Ellis, Jane |
| author2 | Moarif, Sara Nobuoka, Yoko Pellegrino, Marta |
| author2_role | ctb ctb ctb |
| author2_variant | s m sm y n yn m p mp |
| author_facet | Ellis, Jane Moarif, Sara Nobuoka, Yoko Pellegrino, Marta |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Ellis, Jane |
| author_variant | j e je |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV047936347 |
| collection | ZDB-13-SOC |
| ctrlnum | (ZDB-13-SOC)061254355 (OCoLC)1312704455 (DE-599)BVBBV047936347 |
| discipline | Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
| discipline_str_mv | Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1787/5jrw65rp0pg8-en |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nam a2200000zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV047936347</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220413s2015 xx o|||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1787/5jrw65rp0pg8-en</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-13-SOC)061254355</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1312704455</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV047936347</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-384</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-91</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-473</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-824</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-29</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-739</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-355</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-20</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-1028</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-1049</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-188</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-521</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-861</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-898</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-92</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-573</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ellis, Jane</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Assessing Options to Increase Climate Support</subfield><subfield code="c">Jane Ellis ... [et al] = Évaluation des options envisageables pour accroître le soutien en faveur de l'action climatique / Jane Ellis ... [et al]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="246" ind1="1" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Évaluation des options envisageables pour accroître le soutien en faveur de l'action climatique</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Paris</subfield><subfield code="b">OECD Publishing</subfield><subfield code="c">2015</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (53 Seiten)</subfield><subfield code="c">21 x 29.7cm</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OECD/IEA Climate Change Expert Group Papers</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Climate support will be an important element in reaching a post-2020 climate agreement at COP 21 in December 2015. To further increase and mobilise the levels of climate support post-2020, a number of proposals have been made in the negotiating text produced in the Geneva session of the Ad-hoc Working Group on the Durban Platform of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) in February 2015. This paper explores the advantages and disadvantages of several of these proposals, focusing on those that are clear and specific. The paper assesses proposals on mobilising climate finance using the following criteria: (i) the level of financial flows that they could generate; (ii) how much of this could be mobilised in the UNFCCC context; (iii) the ease of implementation of the proposal; (iv) if and how such increased mobilisation could be monitored; and (v) whether the proposal would fill a specific gap in the context of climate support within the UNFCCC. The paper undertakes a similar assessment for proposals in the Geneva text on enhancing the level of technology development and transfer, as well as capacity building. It discusses whether the proposals could potentially increase technology development and transfer, capacity building and development, as well as whether they are likely to do so in practice, based on current experience and ease of implementation. The proposals vary significantly in the amount of climate support they could mobilise (or enhance, in the case of technology and capacity building), for a range of reasons. These include the particular wording of the proposals, their sensitivity to national implementation, uncertainty in measuring progress towards objectives, and in some cases the limited role the UNFCCC plays as an institution in a given area of climate support</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Energy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Environment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Moarif, Sara</subfield><subfield code="4">ctb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Nobuoka, Yoko</subfield><subfield code="4">ctb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pellegrino, Marta</subfield><subfield code="4">ctb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1787/5jrw65rp0pg8-en</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033317840</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV047936347 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T19:35:05Z |
| indexdate | 2024-12-18T19:04:37Z |
| institution | BVB |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033317840 |
| oclc_num | 1312704455 |
| open_access_boolean | 1 |
| owner | DE-384 DE-91 DE-BY-TUM DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-824 DE-29 DE-739 DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-20 DE-1028 DE-1049 DE-188 DE-521 DE-861 DE-898 DE-BY-UBR DE-92 DE-573 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM |
| owner_facet | DE-384 DE-91 DE-BY-TUM DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-824 DE-29 DE-739 DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-20 DE-1028 DE-1049 DE-188 DE-521 DE-861 DE-898 DE-BY-UBR DE-92 DE-573 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM |
| physical | 1 Online-Ressource (53 Seiten) 21 x 29.7cm |
| psigel | ZDB-13-SOC |
| publishDate | 2015 |
| publishDateSearch | 2015 |
| publishDateSort | 2015 |
| publisher | OECD Publishing |
| record_format | marc |
| series2 | OECD/IEA Climate Change Expert Group Papers |
| spelling | Ellis, Jane Verfasser aut Assessing Options to Increase Climate Support Jane Ellis ... [et al] = Évaluation des options envisageables pour accroître le soutien en faveur de l'action climatique / Jane Ellis ... [et al] Évaluation des options envisageables pour accroître le soutien en faveur de l'action climatique Paris OECD Publishing 2015 1 Online-Ressource (53 Seiten) 21 x 29.7cm txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier OECD/IEA Climate Change Expert Group Papers Climate support will be an important element in reaching a post-2020 climate agreement at COP 21 in December 2015. To further increase and mobilise the levels of climate support post-2020, a number of proposals have been made in the negotiating text produced in the Geneva session of the Ad-hoc Working Group on the Durban Platform of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) in February 2015. This paper explores the advantages and disadvantages of several of these proposals, focusing on those that are clear and specific. The paper assesses proposals on mobilising climate finance using the following criteria: (i) the level of financial flows that they could generate; (ii) how much of this could be mobilised in the UNFCCC context; (iii) the ease of implementation of the proposal; (iv) if and how such increased mobilisation could be monitored; and (v) whether the proposal would fill a specific gap in the context of climate support within the UNFCCC. The paper undertakes a similar assessment for proposals in the Geneva text on enhancing the level of technology development and transfer, as well as capacity building. It discusses whether the proposals could potentially increase technology development and transfer, capacity building and development, as well as whether they are likely to do so in practice, based on current experience and ease of implementation. The proposals vary significantly in the amount of climate support they could mobilise (or enhance, in the case of technology and capacity building), for a range of reasons. These include the particular wording of the proposals, their sensitivity to national implementation, uncertainty in measuring progress towards objectives, and in some cases the limited role the UNFCCC plays as an institution in a given area of climate support Energy Environment Moarif, Sara ctb Nobuoka, Yoko ctb Pellegrino, Marta ctb https://doi.org/10.1787/5jrw65rp0pg8-en Verlag kostenfrei Volltext |
| spellingShingle | Ellis, Jane Assessing Options to Increase Climate Support Energy Environment |
| title | Assessing Options to Increase Climate Support |
| title_alt | Évaluation des options envisageables pour accroître le soutien en faveur de l'action climatique |
| title_auth | Assessing Options to Increase Climate Support |
| title_exact_search | Assessing Options to Increase Climate Support |
| title_exact_search_txtP | Assessing Options to Increase Climate Support |
| title_full | Assessing Options to Increase Climate Support Jane Ellis ... [et al] = Évaluation des options envisageables pour accroître le soutien en faveur de l'action climatique / Jane Ellis ... [et al] |
| title_fullStr | Assessing Options to Increase Climate Support Jane Ellis ... [et al] = Évaluation des options envisageables pour accroître le soutien en faveur de l'action climatique / Jane Ellis ... [et al] |
| title_full_unstemmed | Assessing Options to Increase Climate Support Jane Ellis ... [et al] = Évaluation des options envisageables pour accroître le soutien en faveur de l'action climatique / Jane Ellis ... [et al] |
| title_short | Assessing Options to Increase Climate Support |
| title_sort | assessing options to increase climate support |
| topic | Energy Environment |
| topic_facet | Energy Environment |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1787/5jrw65rp0pg8-en |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT ellisjane assessingoptionstoincreaseclimatesupport AT moarifsara assessingoptionstoincreaseclimatesupport AT nobuokayoko assessingoptionstoincreaseclimatesupport AT pellegrinomarta assessingoptionstoincreaseclimatesupport AT ellisjane evaluationdesoptionsenvisageablespouraccroitrelesoutienenfaveurdelactionclimatique AT moarifsara evaluationdesoptionsenvisageablespouraccroitrelesoutienenfaveurdelactionclimatique AT nobuokayoko evaluationdesoptionsenvisageablespouraccroitrelesoutienenfaveurdelactionclimatique AT pellegrinomarta evaluationdesoptionsenvisageablespouraccroitrelesoutienenfaveurdelactionclimatique |