Test-taking engagement in PIAAC:
In this study, we investigated how empirical indicators of test-taking engagement can be defined, empirically validated, and used to describe group differences in the context of the Programme of International Assessment of Adult Competences (PIAAC). The approach was to distinguish between disengaged...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Weitere Verfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Paris
OECD Publishing
2016
|
| Schriftenreihe: | OECD Education Working Papers
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | UBA01 UBG01 UEI01 UER01 UPA01 UBR01 UBW01 FFW01 FNU01 EUV01 FRO01 FHR01 FHN01 TUM01 FHI01 UBM01 Volltext |
| Zusammenfassung: | In this study, we investigated how empirical indicators of test-taking engagement can be defined, empirically validated, and used to describe group differences in the context of the Programme of International Assessment of Adult Competences (PIAAC). The approach was to distinguish between disengaged and engaged response behavior by means of response time thresholds. Constant thresholds of 3000 ms and 5000 ms were considered, as well as item-specific thresholds based on the visual inspection of (bimodal) response time distributions (VI method) and the proportion correct conditional on response time (P+>0% method). Overall, the validity checks comparing the proportion correct of engaged and disengaged response behavior by domain and by item showed that the P+>0% method performed slightly better than the VI method and the methods assuming constant thresholds. The results for Literacy and Numeracy by module revealed that there was an increase from Module 1 to Module 2 in the proportion of disengaged responses, suggesting a drop in test-taking engagement. The investigation of country differences in test-taking engagement by domain using the P+>0% method showed that the proportion of responses classified as disengaged was quite low. For Literacy, the proportion was well below 5% for the majority of countries; in Numeracy, the proportion was even smaller than 1% for almost all countries; while for Problem solving, the proportion of disengaged responses was more than 5% but usually well below 10%. There were significant differences in test-taking engagement between countries; the obtained effect sizes were small to medium. Population differences in test-taking engagement were highly correlated between the three domains, suggesting that test-taking engagement can be conceived as a consistent characteristic. Furthermore, there was a clear negative association between test-taking disengagement and proficiency in Literacy, Numeracy and Problem solving, respectively. Finally, subgroup differences for gender, age, educational attainment, and language proved to be insignificant or very small. Results suggest that males tend to be more disengaged, that disengagement increases with age in Problem solving, with lower educational attainment and when the test language is not the same as a testee's native language |
| Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource (67 Seiten) 21 x 29.7cm |
| DOI: | 10.1787/5jlzfl6fhxs2-en |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV047936150 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220413s2016 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1787/5jlzfl6fhxs2-en |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (ZDB-13-SOC)061257141 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1312686925 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV047936150 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-384 |a DE-91 |a DE-473 |a DE-824 |a DE-29 |a DE-739 |a DE-355 |a DE-20 |a DE-1028 |a DE-1049 |a DE-188 |a DE-521 |a DE-861 |a DE-898 |a DE-92 |a DE-573 |a DE-19 | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Goldhammer, Frank |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Test-taking engagement in PIAAC |c Frank Goldhammer ... [et al] |
| 264 | 1 | |a Paris |b OECD Publishing |c 2016 | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (67 Seiten) |c 21 x 29.7cm | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a OECD Education Working Papers | |
| 520 | |a In this study, we investigated how empirical indicators of test-taking engagement can be defined, empirically validated, and used to describe group differences in the context of the Programme of International Assessment of Adult Competences (PIAAC). The approach was to distinguish between disengaged and engaged response behavior by means of response time thresholds. Constant thresholds of 3000 ms and 5000 ms were considered, as well as item-specific thresholds based on the visual inspection of (bimodal) response time distributions (VI method) and the proportion correct conditional on response time (P+>0% method). Overall, the validity checks comparing the proportion correct of engaged and disengaged response behavior by domain and by item showed that the P+>0% method performed slightly better than the VI method and the methods assuming constant thresholds. | ||
| 520 | |a The results for Literacy and Numeracy by module revealed that there was an increase from Module 1 to Module 2 in the proportion of disengaged responses, suggesting a drop in test-taking engagement. The investigation of country differences in test-taking engagement by domain using the P+>0% method showed that the proportion of responses classified as disengaged was quite low. For Literacy, the proportion was well below 5% for the majority of countries; in Numeracy, the proportion was even smaller than 1% for almost all countries; while for Problem solving, the proportion of disengaged responses was more than 5% but usually well below 10%. There were significant differences in test-taking engagement between countries; the obtained effect sizes were small to medium. Population differences in test-taking engagement were highly correlated between the three domains, suggesting that test-taking engagement can be conceived as a consistent characteristic. | ||
| 520 | |a Furthermore, there was a clear negative association between test-taking disengagement and proficiency in Literacy, Numeracy and Problem solving, respectively. Finally, subgroup differences for gender, age, educational attainment, and language proved to be insignificant or very small. Results suggest that males tend to be more disengaged, that disengagement increases with age in Problem solving, with lower educational attainment and when the test language is not the same as a testee's native language | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Education | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Martens, Thomas |4 ctb | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Christoph, Gabriela |4 ctb | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Lüdtke, Oliver |4 ctb | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1787/5jlzfl6fhxs2-en |x Verlag |z URL des Erstveröffentlichers |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a ZDB-13-SOC | ||
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033317643 | ||
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1787/5jlzfl6fhxs2-en |l UBA01 |p ZDB-13-SOC |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1787/5jlzfl6fhxs2-en |l UBG01 |p ZDB-13-SOC |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1787/5jlzfl6fhxs2-en |l UEI01 |p ZDB-13-SOC |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1787/5jlzfl6fhxs2-en |l UER01 |p ZDB-13-SOC |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1787/5jlzfl6fhxs2-en |l UPA01 |p ZDB-13-SOC |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1787/5jlzfl6fhxs2-en |l UBR01 |p ZDB-13-SOC |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1787/5jlzfl6fhxs2-en |l UBW01 |p ZDB-13-SOC |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1787/5jlzfl6fhxs2-en |l FFW01 |p ZDB-13-SOC |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1787/5jlzfl6fhxs2-en |l FNU01 |p ZDB-13-SOC |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1787/5jlzfl6fhxs2-en |l EUV01 |p ZDB-13-SOC |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1787/5jlzfl6fhxs2-en |l FRO01 |p ZDB-13-SOC |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1787/5jlzfl6fhxs2-en |l FHR01 |p ZDB-13-SOC |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1787/5jlzfl6fhxs2-en |l FHN01 |p ZDB-13-SOC |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1787/5jlzfl6fhxs2-en |l TUM01 |p ZDB-13-SOC |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1787/5jlzfl6fhxs2-en |l FHI01 |p ZDB-13-SOC |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1787/5jlzfl6fhxs2-en |l UBM01 |p ZDB-13-SOC |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804183578435649536 |
|---|---|
| adam_txt | |
| any_adam_object | |
| any_adam_object_boolean | |
| author | Goldhammer, Frank |
| author2 | Martens, Thomas Christoph, Gabriela Lüdtke, Oliver |
| author2_role | ctb ctb ctb |
| author2_variant | t m tm g c gc o l ol |
| author_facet | Goldhammer, Frank Martens, Thomas Christoph, Gabriela Lüdtke, Oliver |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Goldhammer, Frank |
| author_variant | f g fg |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV047936150 |
| collection | ZDB-13-SOC |
| ctrlnum | (ZDB-13-SOC)061257141 (OCoLC)1312686925 (DE-599)BVBBV047936150 |
| discipline | Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
| discipline_str_mv | Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1787/5jlzfl6fhxs2-en |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>05105nmm a2200577zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV047936150</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220413s2016 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1787/5jlzfl6fhxs2-en</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-13-SOC)061257141</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1312686925</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV047936150</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-384</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-91</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-473</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-824</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-29</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-739</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-355</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-20</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-1028</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-1049</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-188</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-521</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-861</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-898</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-92</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-573</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Goldhammer, Frank</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Test-taking engagement in PIAAC</subfield><subfield code="c">Frank Goldhammer ... [et al]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Paris</subfield><subfield code="b">OECD Publishing</subfield><subfield code="c">2016</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (67 Seiten)</subfield><subfield code="c">21 x 29.7cm</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OECD Education Working Papers</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In this study, we investigated how empirical indicators of test-taking engagement can be defined, empirically validated, and used to describe group differences in the context of the Programme of International Assessment of Adult Competences (PIAAC). The approach was to distinguish between disengaged and engaged response behavior by means of response time thresholds. Constant thresholds of 3000 ms and 5000 ms were considered, as well as item-specific thresholds based on the visual inspection of (bimodal) response time distributions (VI method) and the proportion correct conditional on response time (P+>0% method). Overall, the validity checks comparing the proportion correct of engaged and disengaged response behavior by domain and by item showed that the P+>0% method performed slightly better than the VI method and the methods assuming constant thresholds. </subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The results for Literacy and Numeracy by module revealed that there was an increase from Module 1 to Module 2 in the proportion of disengaged responses, suggesting a drop in test-taking engagement. The investigation of country differences in test-taking engagement by domain using the P+>0% method showed that the proportion of responses classified as disengaged was quite low. For Literacy, the proportion was well below 5% for the majority of countries; in Numeracy, the proportion was even smaller than 1% for almost all countries; while for Problem solving, the proportion of disengaged responses was more than 5% but usually well below 10%. There were significant differences in test-taking engagement between countries; the obtained effect sizes were small to medium. Population differences in test-taking engagement were highly correlated between the three domains, suggesting that test-taking engagement can be conceived as a consistent characteristic. </subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Furthermore, there was a clear negative association between test-taking disengagement and proficiency in Literacy, Numeracy and Problem solving, respectively. Finally, subgroup differences for gender, age, educational attainment, and language proved to be insignificant or very small. Results suggest that males tend to be more disengaged, that disengagement increases with age in Problem solving, with lower educational attainment and when the test language is not the same as a testee's native language</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Education</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Martens, Thomas</subfield><subfield code="4">ctb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Christoph, Gabriela</subfield><subfield code="4">ctb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lüdtke, Oliver</subfield><subfield code="4">ctb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1787/5jlzfl6fhxs2-en</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">URL des Erstveröffentlichers</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033317643</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1787/5jlzfl6fhxs2-en</subfield><subfield code="l">UBA01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1787/5jlzfl6fhxs2-en</subfield><subfield code="l">UBG01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1787/5jlzfl6fhxs2-en</subfield><subfield code="l">UEI01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1787/5jlzfl6fhxs2-en</subfield><subfield code="l">UER01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1787/5jlzfl6fhxs2-en</subfield><subfield code="l">UPA01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1787/5jlzfl6fhxs2-en</subfield><subfield code="l">UBR01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1787/5jlzfl6fhxs2-en</subfield><subfield code="l">UBW01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1787/5jlzfl6fhxs2-en</subfield><subfield code="l">FFW01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1787/5jlzfl6fhxs2-en</subfield><subfield code="l">FNU01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1787/5jlzfl6fhxs2-en</subfield><subfield code="l">EUV01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1787/5jlzfl6fhxs2-en</subfield><subfield code="l">FRO01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1787/5jlzfl6fhxs2-en</subfield><subfield code="l">FHR01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1787/5jlzfl6fhxs2-en</subfield><subfield code="l">FHN01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1787/5jlzfl6fhxs2-en</subfield><subfield code="l">TUM01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1787/5jlzfl6fhxs2-en</subfield><subfield code="l">FHI01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1787/5jlzfl6fhxs2-en</subfield><subfield code="l">UBM01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV047936150 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T19:35:05Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T09:25:40Z |
| institution | BVB |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033317643 |
| oclc_num | 1312686925 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-384 DE-91 DE-BY-TUM DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-824 DE-29 DE-739 DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-20 DE-1028 DE-1049 DE-188 DE-521 DE-861 DE-898 DE-BY-UBR DE-92 DE-573 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM |
| owner_facet | DE-384 DE-91 DE-BY-TUM DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-824 DE-29 DE-739 DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-20 DE-1028 DE-1049 DE-188 DE-521 DE-861 DE-898 DE-BY-UBR DE-92 DE-573 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM |
| physical | 1 Online-Ressource (67 Seiten) 21 x 29.7cm |
| psigel | ZDB-13-SOC |
| publishDate | 2016 |
| publishDateSearch | 2016 |
| publishDateSort | 2016 |
| publisher | OECD Publishing |
| record_format | marc |
| series2 | OECD Education Working Papers |
| spelling | Goldhammer, Frank Verfasser aut Test-taking engagement in PIAAC Frank Goldhammer ... [et al] Paris OECD Publishing 2016 1 Online-Ressource (67 Seiten) 21 x 29.7cm txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier OECD Education Working Papers In this study, we investigated how empirical indicators of test-taking engagement can be defined, empirically validated, and used to describe group differences in the context of the Programme of International Assessment of Adult Competences (PIAAC). The approach was to distinguish between disengaged and engaged response behavior by means of response time thresholds. Constant thresholds of 3000 ms and 5000 ms were considered, as well as item-specific thresholds based on the visual inspection of (bimodal) response time distributions (VI method) and the proportion correct conditional on response time (P+>0% method). Overall, the validity checks comparing the proportion correct of engaged and disengaged response behavior by domain and by item showed that the P+>0% method performed slightly better than the VI method and the methods assuming constant thresholds. The results for Literacy and Numeracy by module revealed that there was an increase from Module 1 to Module 2 in the proportion of disengaged responses, suggesting a drop in test-taking engagement. The investigation of country differences in test-taking engagement by domain using the P+>0% method showed that the proportion of responses classified as disengaged was quite low. For Literacy, the proportion was well below 5% for the majority of countries; in Numeracy, the proportion was even smaller than 1% for almost all countries; while for Problem solving, the proportion of disengaged responses was more than 5% but usually well below 10%. There were significant differences in test-taking engagement between countries; the obtained effect sizes were small to medium. Population differences in test-taking engagement were highly correlated between the three domains, suggesting that test-taking engagement can be conceived as a consistent characteristic. Furthermore, there was a clear negative association between test-taking disengagement and proficiency in Literacy, Numeracy and Problem solving, respectively. Finally, subgroup differences for gender, age, educational attainment, and language proved to be insignificant or very small. Results suggest that males tend to be more disengaged, that disengagement increases with age in Problem solving, with lower educational attainment and when the test language is not the same as a testee's native language Education Martens, Thomas ctb Christoph, Gabriela ctb Lüdtke, Oliver ctb https://doi.org/10.1787/5jlzfl6fhxs2-en Verlag URL des Erstveröffentlichers Volltext |
| spellingShingle | Goldhammer, Frank Test-taking engagement in PIAAC Education |
| title | Test-taking engagement in PIAAC |
| title_auth | Test-taking engagement in PIAAC |
| title_exact_search | Test-taking engagement in PIAAC |
| title_exact_search_txtP | Test-taking engagement in PIAAC |
| title_full | Test-taking engagement in PIAAC Frank Goldhammer ... [et al] |
| title_fullStr | Test-taking engagement in PIAAC Frank Goldhammer ... [et al] |
| title_full_unstemmed | Test-taking engagement in PIAAC Frank Goldhammer ... [et al] |
| title_short | Test-taking engagement in PIAAC |
| title_sort | test taking engagement in piaac |
| topic | Education |
| topic_facet | Education |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1787/5jlzfl6fhxs2-en |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT goldhammerfrank testtakingengagementinpiaac AT martensthomas testtakingengagementinpiaac AT christophgabriela testtakingengagementinpiaac AT ludtkeoliver testtakingengagementinpiaac |