Cost-Benefit Analysis in Transport: A UK Perspective
It has always been a controversial tool, generating accusations of unacceptable principle, improper application, inadequate evidence base and bias. One early application was to the appraisal of the proposed third London Airport where a critic labelled the project appraisal as "nonsense on stilt...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Paris
OECD Publishing
2010
|
| Schriftenreihe: | OECD/ITF Joint Transport Research Centre Discussion Papers
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | kostenfrei |
| Zusammenfassung: | It has always been a controversial tool, generating accusations of unacceptable principle, improper application, inadequate evidence base and bias. One early application was to the appraisal of the proposed third London Airport where a critic labelled the project appraisal as "nonsense on stilts" and the method was defended against accusations of being "bastard science and/or insidious poison in the body politick" (Self 1970, Williams, 1973). Since that time, appraisal has found itself at the centre of public disputes about the road planning system, the treatment of environmental impacts, the socalled "roads generate traffic" issue and the relationship between transport and the economy. The... |
| Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource (27 Seiten) 21 x 29.7cm |
| DOI: | 10.1787/5km4q8j8m2f6-en |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV047935421 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220413s2010 xx o|||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1787/5km4q8j8m2f6-en |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (ZDB-13-SOC)061267090 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1312691342 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV047935421 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-384 |a DE-91 |a DE-473 |a DE-824 |a DE-29 |a DE-739 |a DE-355 |a DE-20 |a DE-1028 |a DE-1049 |a DE-188 |a DE-521 |a DE-861 |a DE-898 |a DE-92 |a DE-573 |a DE-19 | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Mackie, Peter |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Cost-Benefit Analysis in Transport |b A UK Perspective |c Peter Mackie |
| 264 | 1 | |a Paris |b OECD Publishing |c 2010 | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (27 Seiten) |c 21 x 29.7cm | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a OECD/ITF Joint Transport Research Centre Discussion Papers | |
| 520 | |a It has always been a controversial tool, generating accusations of unacceptable principle, improper application, inadequate evidence base and bias. One early application was to the appraisal of the proposed third London Airport where a critic labelled the project appraisal as "nonsense on stilts" and the method was defended against accusations of being "bastard science and/or insidious poison in the body politick" (Self 1970, Williams, 1973). Since that time, appraisal has found itself at the centre of public disputes about the road planning system, the treatment of environmental impacts, the socalled "roads generate traffic" issue and the relationship between transport and the economy. The... | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Transport | |
| 650 | 4 | |a United Kingdom | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1787/5km4q8j8m2f6-en |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a ZDB-13-SOC | ||
| 943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033316914 | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1818806082918678528 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | |
| adam_txt | |
| any_adam_object | |
| any_adam_object_boolean | |
| author | Mackie, Peter |
| author_facet | Mackie, Peter |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Mackie, Peter |
| author_variant | p m pm |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV047935421 |
| collection | ZDB-13-SOC |
| ctrlnum | (ZDB-13-SOC)061267090 (OCoLC)1312691342 (DE-599)BVBBV047935421 |
| discipline | Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
| discipline_str_mv | Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1787/5km4q8j8m2f6-en |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nam a2200000zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV047935421</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220413s2010 xx o|||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1787/5km4q8j8m2f6-en</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-13-SOC)061267090</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1312691342</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV047935421</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-384</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-91</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-473</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-824</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-29</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-739</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-355</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-20</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-1028</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-1049</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-188</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-521</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-861</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-898</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-92</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-573</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Mackie, Peter</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Cost-Benefit Analysis in Transport</subfield><subfield code="b">A UK Perspective</subfield><subfield code="c">Peter Mackie</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Paris</subfield><subfield code="b">OECD Publishing</subfield><subfield code="c">2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (27 Seiten)</subfield><subfield code="c">21 x 29.7cm</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OECD/ITF Joint Transport Research Centre Discussion Papers</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">It has always been a controversial tool, generating accusations of unacceptable principle, improper application, inadequate evidence base and bias. One early application was to the appraisal of the proposed third London Airport where a critic labelled the project appraisal as "nonsense on stilts" and the method was defended against accusations of being "bastard science and/or insidious poison in the body politick" (Self 1970, Williams, 1973). Since that time, appraisal has found itself at the centre of public disputes about the road planning system, the treatment of environmental impacts, the socalled "roads generate traffic" issue and the relationship between transport and the economy. The...</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Transport</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">United Kingdom</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1787/5km4q8j8m2f6-en</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033316914</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV047935421 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T19:35:04Z |
| indexdate | 2024-12-18T19:04:07Z |
| institution | BVB |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033316914 |
| oclc_num | 1312691342 |
| open_access_boolean | 1 |
| owner | DE-384 DE-91 DE-BY-TUM DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-824 DE-29 DE-739 DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-20 DE-1028 DE-1049 DE-188 DE-521 DE-861 DE-898 DE-BY-UBR DE-92 DE-573 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM |
| owner_facet | DE-384 DE-91 DE-BY-TUM DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-824 DE-29 DE-739 DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-20 DE-1028 DE-1049 DE-188 DE-521 DE-861 DE-898 DE-BY-UBR DE-92 DE-573 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM |
| physical | 1 Online-Ressource (27 Seiten) 21 x 29.7cm |
| psigel | ZDB-13-SOC |
| publishDate | 2010 |
| publishDateSearch | 2010 |
| publishDateSort | 2010 |
| publisher | OECD Publishing |
| record_format | marc |
| series2 | OECD/ITF Joint Transport Research Centre Discussion Papers |
| spelling | Mackie, Peter Verfasser aut Cost-Benefit Analysis in Transport A UK Perspective Peter Mackie Paris OECD Publishing 2010 1 Online-Ressource (27 Seiten) 21 x 29.7cm txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier OECD/ITF Joint Transport Research Centre Discussion Papers It has always been a controversial tool, generating accusations of unacceptable principle, improper application, inadequate evidence base and bias. One early application was to the appraisal of the proposed third London Airport where a critic labelled the project appraisal as "nonsense on stilts" and the method was defended against accusations of being "bastard science and/or insidious poison in the body politick" (Self 1970, Williams, 1973). Since that time, appraisal has found itself at the centre of public disputes about the road planning system, the treatment of environmental impacts, the socalled "roads generate traffic" issue and the relationship between transport and the economy. The... Transport United Kingdom https://doi.org/10.1787/5km4q8j8m2f6-en Verlag kostenfrei Volltext |
| spellingShingle | Mackie, Peter Cost-Benefit Analysis in Transport A UK Perspective Transport United Kingdom |
| title | Cost-Benefit Analysis in Transport A UK Perspective |
| title_auth | Cost-Benefit Analysis in Transport A UK Perspective |
| title_exact_search | Cost-Benefit Analysis in Transport A UK Perspective |
| title_exact_search_txtP | Cost-Benefit Analysis in Transport A UK Perspective |
| title_full | Cost-Benefit Analysis in Transport A UK Perspective Peter Mackie |
| title_fullStr | Cost-Benefit Analysis in Transport A UK Perspective Peter Mackie |
| title_full_unstemmed | Cost-Benefit Analysis in Transport A UK Perspective Peter Mackie |
| title_short | Cost-Benefit Analysis in Transport |
| title_sort | cost benefit analysis in transport a uk perspective |
| title_sub | A UK Perspective |
| topic | Transport United Kingdom |
| topic_facet | Transport United Kingdom |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1787/5km4q8j8m2f6-en |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT mackiepeter costbenefitanalysisintransportaukperspective |