OECD Extended Regional Typology: The Economic Performance of Remote Rural Regions
To account for differences among rural and urban regions, the OECD s established a regional typology, classifying TL3 regions as predominantly urban (PU), intermediate (IN) or predominantly rural (PR) (OECD, 2009). This typology, based essentially on the percentage of regional population living in u...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Weitere Verfasser: | , |
Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Paris
OECD Publishing
2011
|
Schriftenreihe: | OECD Regional Development Working Papers
|
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Zusammenfassung: | To account for differences among rural and urban regions, the OECD s established a regional typology, classifying TL3 regions as predominantly urban (PU), intermediate (IN) or predominantly rural (PR) (OECD, 2009). This typology, based essentially on the percentage of regional population living in urban or rural communities, has proved to be meaningful to better explain regional differences in economic and labour market performance. However this typology does not take into account the presence of economic agglomerations if they happen to be in neighbouring regions. For example, a region is classified as rural or intermediate regardless its distance from a large urban centre where labour market, access to services, education opportunities and logistics for firms can be wider. Previous work reveals great heterogeneity in economic growth among rural regions and the distance from a populated centre could be a significant factor explaining these differences. For the latter, the OECD regional typology is extended to include an accessibility criterion. This criterion is based on the driving time needed for at least half of the population in a region to reach a populated centre of with 50 000 or more inhabitants. The resulting classification consists of four types of regions: Predominantly Urban (PU), Intermediate (IN), Predominantly Rural Close to a city (PRC) and Predominantly Rural Remote (PRR). For the time being, the extended typology has only been computed for regions in North America (Canada, Mexico and the United States) and Europe. The extended typology is used to compare the dynamics of population and labour markets. Remote rural regions show a stronger decline in population and a faster ageing process than rural regions close to a city. The remoteness of rural regions is in fact a significant factor explaining regional outflows of working age population, confirming that this extended typology captures the economic distance from market and services. Remote rural regions appear economically more fragile: lower employment rates (Canada and Mexico) and economic output (Europe) |
Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource (20 Seiten) 21 x 29.7cm |
DOI: | 10.1787/5kg6z83tw7f4-en |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a2200000zc 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV047935397 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 220413s2011 xx o|||| 00||| eng d | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1787/5kg6z83tw7f4-en |2 doi | |
035 | |a (ZDB-13-SOC)06126749X | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)1312694824 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV047935397 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-384 |a DE-91 |a DE-473 |a DE-824 |a DE-29 |a DE-739 |a DE-355 |a DE-20 |a DE-1028 |a DE-1049 |a DE-188 |a DE-521 |a DE-861 |a DE-898 |a DE-92 |a DE-573 |a DE-19 | ||
100 | 1 | |a Brezzi, Monica |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a OECD Extended Regional Typology |b The Economic Performance of Remote Rural Regions |c Monica Brezzi, Lewis Dijkstra and Vicente Ruiz |
264 | 1 | |a Paris |b OECD Publishing |c 2011 | |
300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (20 Seiten) |c 21 x 29.7cm | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 0 | |a OECD Regional Development Working Papers | |
520 | |a To account for differences among rural and urban regions, the OECD s established a regional typology, classifying TL3 regions as predominantly urban (PU), intermediate (IN) or predominantly rural (PR) (OECD, 2009). This typology, based essentially on the percentage of regional population living in urban or rural communities, has proved to be meaningful to better explain regional differences in economic and labour market performance. However this typology does not take into account the presence of economic agglomerations if they happen to be in neighbouring regions. For example, a region is classified as rural or intermediate regardless its distance from a large urban centre where labour market, access to services, education opportunities and logistics for firms can be wider. Previous work reveals great heterogeneity in economic growth among rural regions and the distance from a populated centre could be a significant factor explaining these differences. | ||
520 | |a For the latter, the OECD regional typology is extended to include an accessibility criterion. This criterion is based on the driving time needed for at least half of the population in a region to reach a populated centre of with 50 000 or more inhabitants. The resulting classification consists of four types of regions: Predominantly Urban (PU), Intermediate (IN), Predominantly Rural Close to a city (PRC) and Predominantly Rural Remote (PRR). For the time being, the extended typology has only been computed for regions in North America (Canada, Mexico and the United States) and Europe. The extended typology is used to compare the dynamics of population and labour markets. Remote rural regions show a stronger decline in population and a faster ageing process than rural regions close to a city. | ||
520 | |a The remoteness of rural regions is in fact a significant factor explaining regional outflows of working age population, confirming that this extended typology captures the economic distance from market and services. Remote rural regions appear economically more fragile: lower employment rates (Canada and Mexico) and economic output (Europe) | ||
650 | 4 | |a Urban, Rural and Regional Development | |
700 | 1 | |a Dijkstra, Lewis |4 ctb | |
700 | 1 | |a Ruiz, Vicente |4 ctb | |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1787/5kg6z83tw7f4-en |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
912 | |a ZDB-13-SOC | ||
943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033316890 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1818806082864152576 |
---|---|
adam_text | |
adam_txt | |
any_adam_object | |
any_adam_object_boolean | |
author | Brezzi, Monica |
author2 | Dijkstra, Lewis Ruiz, Vicente |
author2_role | ctb ctb |
author2_variant | l d ld v r vr |
author_facet | Brezzi, Monica Dijkstra, Lewis Ruiz, Vicente |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Brezzi, Monica |
author_variant | m b mb |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV047935397 |
collection | ZDB-13-SOC |
ctrlnum | (ZDB-13-SOC)06126749X (OCoLC)1312694824 (DE-599)BVBBV047935397 |
discipline | Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
discipline_str_mv | Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
doi_str_mv | 10.1787/5kg6z83tw7f4-en |
format | Electronic eBook |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nam a2200000zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV047935397</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220413s2011 xx o|||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1787/5kg6z83tw7f4-en</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-13-SOC)06126749X</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1312694824</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV047935397</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-384</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-91</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-473</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-824</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-29</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-739</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-355</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-20</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-1028</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-1049</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-188</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-521</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-861</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-898</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-92</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-573</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Brezzi, Monica</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">OECD Extended Regional Typology</subfield><subfield code="b">The Economic Performance of Remote Rural Regions</subfield><subfield code="c">Monica Brezzi, Lewis Dijkstra and Vicente Ruiz</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Paris</subfield><subfield code="b">OECD Publishing</subfield><subfield code="c">2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (20 Seiten)</subfield><subfield code="c">21 x 29.7cm</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OECD Regional Development Working Papers</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">To account for differences among rural and urban regions, the OECD s established a regional typology, classifying TL3 regions as predominantly urban (PU), intermediate (IN) or predominantly rural (PR) (OECD, 2009). This typology, based essentially on the percentage of regional population living in urban or rural communities, has proved to be meaningful to better explain regional differences in economic and labour market performance. However this typology does not take into account the presence of economic agglomerations if they happen to be in neighbouring regions. For example, a region is classified as rural or intermediate regardless its distance from a large urban centre where labour market, access to services, education opportunities and logistics for firms can be wider. Previous work reveals great heterogeneity in economic growth among rural regions and the distance from a populated centre could be a significant factor explaining these differences.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">For the latter, the OECD regional typology is extended to include an accessibility criterion. This criterion is based on the driving time needed for at least half of the population in a region to reach a populated centre of with 50 000 or more inhabitants. The resulting classification consists of four types of regions: Predominantly Urban (PU), Intermediate (IN), Predominantly Rural Close to a city (PRC) and Predominantly Rural Remote (PRR). For the time being, the extended typology has only been computed for regions in North America (Canada, Mexico and the United States) and Europe. The extended typology is used to compare the dynamics of population and labour markets. Remote rural regions show a stronger decline in population and a faster ageing process than rural regions close to a city.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The remoteness of rural regions is in fact a significant factor explaining regional outflows of working age population, confirming that this extended typology captures the economic distance from market and services. Remote rural regions appear economically more fragile: lower employment rates (Canada and Mexico) and economic output (Europe)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Urban, Rural and Regional Development</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dijkstra, Lewis</subfield><subfield code="4">ctb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ruiz, Vicente</subfield><subfield code="4">ctb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1787/5kg6z83tw7f4-en</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033316890</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | DE-604.BV047935397 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
index_date | 2024-07-03T19:35:04Z |
indexdate | 2024-12-18T19:04:07Z |
institution | BVB |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033316890 |
oclc_num | 1312694824 |
open_access_boolean | 1 |
owner | DE-384 DE-91 DE-BY-TUM DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-824 DE-29 DE-739 DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-20 DE-1028 DE-1049 DE-188 DE-521 DE-861 DE-898 DE-BY-UBR DE-92 DE-573 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM |
owner_facet | DE-384 DE-91 DE-BY-TUM DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-824 DE-29 DE-739 DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-20 DE-1028 DE-1049 DE-188 DE-521 DE-861 DE-898 DE-BY-UBR DE-92 DE-573 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM |
physical | 1 Online-Ressource (20 Seiten) 21 x 29.7cm |
psigel | ZDB-13-SOC |
publishDate | 2011 |
publishDateSearch | 2011 |
publishDateSort | 2011 |
publisher | OECD Publishing |
record_format | marc |
series2 | OECD Regional Development Working Papers |
spelling | Brezzi, Monica Verfasser aut OECD Extended Regional Typology The Economic Performance of Remote Rural Regions Monica Brezzi, Lewis Dijkstra and Vicente Ruiz Paris OECD Publishing 2011 1 Online-Ressource (20 Seiten) 21 x 29.7cm txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier OECD Regional Development Working Papers To account for differences among rural and urban regions, the OECD s established a regional typology, classifying TL3 regions as predominantly urban (PU), intermediate (IN) or predominantly rural (PR) (OECD, 2009). This typology, based essentially on the percentage of regional population living in urban or rural communities, has proved to be meaningful to better explain regional differences in economic and labour market performance. However this typology does not take into account the presence of economic agglomerations if they happen to be in neighbouring regions. For example, a region is classified as rural or intermediate regardless its distance from a large urban centre where labour market, access to services, education opportunities and logistics for firms can be wider. Previous work reveals great heterogeneity in economic growth among rural regions and the distance from a populated centre could be a significant factor explaining these differences. For the latter, the OECD regional typology is extended to include an accessibility criterion. This criterion is based on the driving time needed for at least half of the population in a region to reach a populated centre of with 50 000 or more inhabitants. The resulting classification consists of four types of regions: Predominantly Urban (PU), Intermediate (IN), Predominantly Rural Close to a city (PRC) and Predominantly Rural Remote (PRR). For the time being, the extended typology has only been computed for regions in North America (Canada, Mexico and the United States) and Europe. The extended typology is used to compare the dynamics of population and labour markets. Remote rural regions show a stronger decline in population and a faster ageing process than rural regions close to a city. The remoteness of rural regions is in fact a significant factor explaining regional outflows of working age population, confirming that this extended typology captures the economic distance from market and services. Remote rural regions appear economically more fragile: lower employment rates (Canada and Mexico) and economic output (Europe) Urban, Rural and Regional Development Dijkstra, Lewis ctb Ruiz, Vicente ctb https://doi.org/10.1787/5kg6z83tw7f4-en Verlag kostenfrei Volltext |
spellingShingle | Brezzi, Monica OECD Extended Regional Typology The Economic Performance of Remote Rural Regions Urban, Rural and Regional Development |
title | OECD Extended Regional Typology The Economic Performance of Remote Rural Regions |
title_auth | OECD Extended Regional Typology The Economic Performance of Remote Rural Regions |
title_exact_search | OECD Extended Regional Typology The Economic Performance of Remote Rural Regions |
title_exact_search_txtP | OECD Extended Regional Typology The Economic Performance of Remote Rural Regions |
title_full | OECD Extended Regional Typology The Economic Performance of Remote Rural Regions Monica Brezzi, Lewis Dijkstra and Vicente Ruiz |
title_fullStr | OECD Extended Regional Typology The Economic Performance of Remote Rural Regions Monica Brezzi, Lewis Dijkstra and Vicente Ruiz |
title_full_unstemmed | OECD Extended Regional Typology The Economic Performance of Remote Rural Regions Monica Brezzi, Lewis Dijkstra and Vicente Ruiz |
title_short | OECD Extended Regional Typology |
title_sort | oecd extended regional typology the economic performance of remote rural regions |
title_sub | The Economic Performance of Remote Rural Regions |
topic | Urban, Rural and Regional Development |
topic_facet | Urban, Rural and Regional Development |
url | https://doi.org/10.1787/5kg6z83tw7f4-en |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brezzimonica oecdextendedregionaltypologytheeconomicperformanceofremoteruralregions AT dijkstralewis oecdextendedregionaltypologytheeconomicperformanceofremoteruralregions AT ruizvicente oecdextendedregionaltypologytheeconomicperformanceofremoteruralregions |