The Political Economy of Services in Regional Trade Agreements:
Do the services commitments that countries have made in their post-Uruguay Round regional trade agreements (RTAs) indicate the types of concessions that they would be willing to multilateralise in the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS)? While there are important legal and economic dimensi...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Paris
OECD Publishing
2011
|
| Schriftenreihe: | OECD Trade Policy Papers
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Zusammenfassung: | Do the services commitments that countries have made in their post-Uruguay Round regional trade agreements (RTAs) indicate the types of concessions that they would be willing to multilateralise in the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS)? While there are important legal and economic dimensions to ponder in answering this question, considerations of political economy must also be taken into account. This paper focuses on issues in political economy that underlay RTAs in general, and especially the specific commitments and concessions that countries make on trade in services. It examines in detail the way that considerations of political economy have helped to shape the RTAs of Chile, Japan, the European Union and the United States. These four case studies help to develop and test a series of hypotheses regarding the international and domestic political factors that influence why RTAs are negotiated in the first place, between what kind of countries and with what kind of content, especially with respect to their provisions affecting services. The analysis rejects on a preliminary basis the hypothesis that RTAs create constituencies opposed to multilateral liberalisation, and finds empirical support for other hypotheses that are more multilateral-friendly |
| Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource (52 Seiten) 21 x 29.7cm |
| DOI: | 10.1787/5kgdst6lc344-en |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV047934575 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220413s2011 xx o|||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1787/5kgdst6lc344-en |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (ZDB-13-SOC)061278394 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1312699728 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV047934575 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-384 |a DE-91 |a DE-473 |a DE-824 |a DE-29 |a DE-739 |a DE-355 |a DE-20 |a DE-1028 |a DE-1049 |a DE-188 |a DE-521 |a DE-861 |a DE-898 |a DE-92 |a DE-573 |a DE-19 | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a VanGrasstek, Craig |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a The Political Economy of Services in Regional Trade Agreements |c Craig VanGrasstek |
| 264 | 1 | |a Paris |b OECD Publishing |c 2011 | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (52 Seiten) |c 21 x 29.7cm | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a OECD Trade Policy Papers | |
| 520 | |a Do the services commitments that countries have made in their post-Uruguay Round regional trade agreements (RTAs) indicate the types of concessions that they would be willing to multilateralise in the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS)? While there are important legal and economic dimensions to ponder in answering this question, considerations of political economy must also be taken into account. This paper focuses on issues in political economy that underlay RTAs in general, and especially the specific commitments and concessions that countries make on trade in services. It examines in detail the way that considerations of political economy have helped to shape the RTAs of Chile, Japan, the European Union and the United States. These four case studies help to develop and test a series of hypotheses regarding the international and domestic political factors that influence why RTAs are negotiated in the first place, between what kind of countries and with what kind of content, especially with respect to their provisions affecting services. The analysis rejects on a preliminary basis the hypothesis that RTAs create constituencies opposed to multilateral liberalisation, and finds empirical support for other hypotheses that are more multilateral-friendly | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Trade | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1787/5kgdst6lc344-en |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a ZDB-13-SOC | ||
| 943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033316069 | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1818806052362125312 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | |
| adam_txt | |
| any_adam_object | |
| any_adam_object_boolean | |
| author | VanGrasstek, Craig |
| author_facet | VanGrasstek, Craig |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | VanGrasstek, Craig |
| author_variant | c v cv |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV047934575 |
| collection | ZDB-13-SOC |
| ctrlnum | (ZDB-13-SOC)061278394 (OCoLC)1312699728 (DE-599)BVBBV047934575 |
| discipline | Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
| discipline_str_mv | Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1787/5kgdst6lc344-en |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nam a2200000zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV047934575</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220413s2011 xx o|||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1787/5kgdst6lc344-en</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-13-SOC)061278394</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1312699728</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV047934575</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-384</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-91</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-473</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-824</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-29</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-739</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-355</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-20</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-1028</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-1049</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-188</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-521</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-861</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-898</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-92</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-573</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">VanGrasstek, Craig</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">The Political Economy of Services in Regional Trade Agreements</subfield><subfield code="c">Craig VanGrasstek</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Paris</subfield><subfield code="b">OECD Publishing</subfield><subfield code="c">2011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (52 Seiten)</subfield><subfield code="c">21 x 29.7cm</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OECD Trade Policy Papers</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Do the services commitments that countries have made in their post-Uruguay Round regional trade agreements (RTAs) indicate the types of concessions that they would be willing to multilateralise in the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS)? While there are important legal and economic dimensions to ponder in answering this question, considerations of political economy must also be taken into account. This paper focuses on issues in political economy that underlay RTAs in general, and especially the specific commitments and concessions that countries make on trade in services. It examines in detail the way that considerations of political economy have helped to shape the RTAs of Chile, Japan, the European Union and the United States. These four case studies help to develop and test a series of hypotheses regarding the international and domestic political factors that influence why RTAs are negotiated in the first place, between what kind of countries and with what kind of content, especially with respect to their provisions affecting services. The analysis rejects on a preliminary basis the hypothesis that RTAs create constituencies opposed to multilateral liberalisation, and finds empirical support for other hypotheses that are more multilateral-friendly</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Trade</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1787/5kgdst6lc344-en</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033316069</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV047934575 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T19:35:02Z |
| indexdate | 2024-12-18T19:03:38Z |
| institution | BVB |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033316069 |
| oclc_num | 1312699728 |
| open_access_boolean | 1 |
| owner | DE-384 DE-91 DE-BY-TUM DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-824 DE-29 DE-739 DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-20 DE-1028 DE-1049 DE-188 DE-521 DE-861 DE-898 DE-BY-UBR DE-92 DE-573 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM |
| owner_facet | DE-384 DE-91 DE-BY-TUM DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-824 DE-29 DE-739 DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-20 DE-1028 DE-1049 DE-188 DE-521 DE-861 DE-898 DE-BY-UBR DE-92 DE-573 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM |
| physical | 1 Online-Ressource (52 Seiten) 21 x 29.7cm |
| psigel | ZDB-13-SOC |
| publishDate | 2011 |
| publishDateSearch | 2011 |
| publishDateSort | 2011 |
| publisher | OECD Publishing |
| record_format | marc |
| series2 | OECD Trade Policy Papers |
| spelling | VanGrasstek, Craig Verfasser aut The Political Economy of Services in Regional Trade Agreements Craig VanGrasstek Paris OECD Publishing 2011 1 Online-Ressource (52 Seiten) 21 x 29.7cm txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier OECD Trade Policy Papers Do the services commitments that countries have made in their post-Uruguay Round regional trade agreements (RTAs) indicate the types of concessions that they would be willing to multilateralise in the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS)? While there are important legal and economic dimensions to ponder in answering this question, considerations of political economy must also be taken into account. This paper focuses on issues in political economy that underlay RTAs in general, and especially the specific commitments and concessions that countries make on trade in services. It examines in detail the way that considerations of political economy have helped to shape the RTAs of Chile, Japan, the European Union and the United States. These four case studies help to develop and test a series of hypotheses regarding the international and domestic political factors that influence why RTAs are negotiated in the first place, between what kind of countries and with what kind of content, especially with respect to their provisions affecting services. The analysis rejects on a preliminary basis the hypothesis that RTAs create constituencies opposed to multilateral liberalisation, and finds empirical support for other hypotheses that are more multilateral-friendly Trade https://doi.org/10.1787/5kgdst6lc344-en Verlag kostenfrei Volltext |
| spellingShingle | VanGrasstek, Craig The Political Economy of Services in Regional Trade Agreements Trade |
| title | The Political Economy of Services in Regional Trade Agreements |
| title_auth | The Political Economy of Services in Regional Trade Agreements |
| title_exact_search | The Political Economy of Services in Regional Trade Agreements |
| title_exact_search_txtP | The Political Economy of Services in Regional Trade Agreements |
| title_full | The Political Economy of Services in Regional Trade Agreements Craig VanGrasstek |
| title_fullStr | The Political Economy of Services in Regional Trade Agreements Craig VanGrasstek |
| title_full_unstemmed | The Political Economy of Services in Regional Trade Agreements Craig VanGrasstek |
| title_short | The Political Economy of Services in Regional Trade Agreements |
| title_sort | the political economy of services in regional trade agreements |
| topic | Trade |
| topic_facet | Trade |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1787/5kgdst6lc344-en |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT vangrasstekcraig thepoliticaleconomyofservicesinregionaltradeagreements |