Assessing Default Investment Strategies in Defined Contribution Pension Plans:
This paper assesses the relative performance of different investment strategies for different structures of the payout phase. In particular, it looks at whether the specific glide-path of life-cycle investment strategies and the introduction of dynamic features in the design of default investment st...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Weitere Verfasser: | , |
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Paris
OECD Publishing
2010
|
| Schriftenreihe: | OECD Working Papers on Finance, Insurance and Private Pensions
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Zusammenfassung: | This paper assesses the relative performance of different investment strategies for different structures of the payout phase. In particular, it looks at whether the specific glide-path of life-cycle investment strategies and the introduction of dynamic features in the design of default investment strategies affect significantly retirement income outcomes. The analysis concludes that there is no ?one-size-fits-all? default investment option. Life cycle and dynamic investment strategies deliver comparable replacement rates adjusted by risk. However, life cycle strategies that maintain a constant exposure to equities during most of the accumulation period, switching swiftly to bonds in the last decade before retirement seem to produce better results and are easier to explain. Dynamic management strategies can provide somewhat higher replacement rates for a given level of risk than the more deterministic strategies, at least in the case of pay-outs in the form of variable withdrawals. The length of the contribution period also affects the ranking of the different investment strategies with life cycle strategies having a stronger positive impact the shorter is the contribution period |
| Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource (29 Seiten) 21 x 29.7cm |
| DOI: | 10.1787/5kmdbx1nhfnp-en |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV047934545 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220413s2010 xx o|||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1787/5kmdbx1nhfnp-en |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (ZDB-13-SOC)061278750 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1312691739 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV047934545 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-384 |a DE-91 |a DE-473 |a DE-824 |a DE-29 |a DE-739 |a DE-355 |a DE-20 |a DE-1028 |a DE-1049 |a DE-188 |a DE-521 |a DE-861 |a DE-898 |a DE-92 |a DE-573 |a DE-19 | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Antolín, Pablo |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Assessing Default Investment Strategies in Defined Contribution Pension Plans |c Pablo Antolín, Stéphanie Payet and Juan Yermo = Évaluation des stratégies d'investissement par défaut pour les plans de retraite à cotisations définies / Pablo Antolín, Stéphanie Payet et Juan Yermo |
| 246 | 1 | 3 | |a Évaluation des stratégies d'investissement par défaut pour les plans de retraite à cotisations définies |
| 264 | 1 | |a Paris |b OECD Publishing |c 2010 | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (29 Seiten) |c 21 x 29.7cm | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a OECD Working Papers on Finance, Insurance and Private Pensions | |
| 520 | |a This paper assesses the relative performance of different investment strategies for different structures of the payout phase. In particular, it looks at whether the specific glide-path of life-cycle investment strategies and the introduction of dynamic features in the design of default investment strategies affect significantly retirement income outcomes. The analysis concludes that there is no ?one-size-fits-all? default investment option. Life cycle and dynamic investment strategies deliver comparable replacement rates adjusted by risk. However, life cycle strategies that maintain a constant exposure to equities during most of the accumulation period, switching swiftly to bonds in the last decade before retirement seem to produce better results and are easier to explain. Dynamic management strategies can provide somewhat higher replacement rates for a given level of risk than the more deterministic strategies, at least in the case of pay-outs in the form of variable withdrawals. The length of the contribution period also affects the ranking of the different investment strategies with life cycle strategies having a stronger positive impact the shorter is the contribution period | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Finance and Investment | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Payet, Stéphanie |4 ctb | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Yermo, Juan |4 ctb | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1787/5kmdbx1nhfnp-en |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a ZDB-13-SOC | ||
| 943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033316039 | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1818806052300259328 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | |
| adam_txt | |
| any_adam_object | |
| any_adam_object_boolean | |
| author | Antolín, Pablo |
| author2 | Payet, Stéphanie Yermo, Juan |
| author2_role | ctb ctb |
| author2_variant | s p sp j y jy |
| author_facet | Antolín, Pablo Payet, Stéphanie Yermo, Juan |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Antolín, Pablo |
| author_variant | p a pa |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV047934545 |
| collection | ZDB-13-SOC |
| ctrlnum | (ZDB-13-SOC)061278750 (OCoLC)1312691739 (DE-599)BVBBV047934545 |
| discipline | Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
| discipline_str_mv | Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1787/5kmdbx1nhfnp-en |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nam a2200000zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV047934545</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220413s2010 xx o|||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1787/5kmdbx1nhfnp-en</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-13-SOC)061278750</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1312691739</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV047934545</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-384</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-91</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-473</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-824</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-29</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-739</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-355</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-20</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-1028</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-1049</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-188</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-521</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-861</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-898</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-92</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-573</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Antolín, Pablo</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Assessing Default Investment Strategies in Defined Contribution Pension Plans</subfield><subfield code="c">Pablo Antolín, Stéphanie Payet and Juan Yermo = Évaluation des stratégies d'investissement par défaut pour les plans de retraite à cotisations définies / Pablo Antolín, Stéphanie Payet et Juan Yermo</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="246" ind1="1" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Évaluation des stratégies d'investissement par défaut pour les plans de retraite à cotisations définies</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Paris</subfield><subfield code="b">OECD Publishing</subfield><subfield code="c">2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (29 Seiten)</subfield><subfield code="c">21 x 29.7cm</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OECD Working Papers on Finance, Insurance and Private Pensions</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This paper assesses the relative performance of different investment strategies for different structures of the payout phase. In particular, it looks at whether the specific glide-path of life-cycle investment strategies and the introduction of dynamic features in the design of default investment strategies affect significantly retirement income outcomes. The analysis concludes that there is no ?one-size-fits-all? default investment option. Life cycle and dynamic investment strategies deliver comparable replacement rates adjusted by risk. However, life cycle strategies that maintain a constant exposure to equities during most of the accumulation period, switching swiftly to bonds in the last decade before retirement seem to produce better results and are easier to explain. Dynamic management strategies can provide somewhat higher replacement rates for a given level of risk than the more deterministic strategies, at least in the case of pay-outs in the form of variable withdrawals. The length of the contribution period also affects the ranking of the different investment strategies with life cycle strategies having a stronger positive impact the shorter is the contribution period</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Finance and Investment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Payet, Stéphanie</subfield><subfield code="4">ctb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Yermo, Juan</subfield><subfield code="4">ctb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1787/5kmdbx1nhfnp-en</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033316039</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV047934545 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T19:35:02Z |
| indexdate | 2024-12-18T19:03:38Z |
| institution | BVB |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033316039 |
| oclc_num | 1312691739 |
| open_access_boolean | 1 |
| owner | DE-384 DE-91 DE-BY-TUM DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-824 DE-29 DE-739 DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-20 DE-1028 DE-1049 DE-188 DE-521 DE-861 DE-898 DE-BY-UBR DE-92 DE-573 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM |
| owner_facet | DE-384 DE-91 DE-BY-TUM DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-824 DE-29 DE-739 DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-20 DE-1028 DE-1049 DE-188 DE-521 DE-861 DE-898 DE-BY-UBR DE-92 DE-573 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM |
| physical | 1 Online-Ressource (29 Seiten) 21 x 29.7cm |
| psigel | ZDB-13-SOC |
| publishDate | 2010 |
| publishDateSearch | 2010 |
| publishDateSort | 2010 |
| publisher | OECD Publishing |
| record_format | marc |
| series2 | OECD Working Papers on Finance, Insurance and Private Pensions |
| spelling | Antolín, Pablo Verfasser aut Assessing Default Investment Strategies in Defined Contribution Pension Plans Pablo Antolín, Stéphanie Payet and Juan Yermo = Évaluation des stratégies d'investissement par défaut pour les plans de retraite à cotisations définies / Pablo Antolín, Stéphanie Payet et Juan Yermo Évaluation des stratégies d'investissement par défaut pour les plans de retraite à cotisations définies Paris OECD Publishing 2010 1 Online-Ressource (29 Seiten) 21 x 29.7cm txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier OECD Working Papers on Finance, Insurance and Private Pensions This paper assesses the relative performance of different investment strategies for different structures of the payout phase. In particular, it looks at whether the specific glide-path of life-cycle investment strategies and the introduction of dynamic features in the design of default investment strategies affect significantly retirement income outcomes. The analysis concludes that there is no ?one-size-fits-all? default investment option. Life cycle and dynamic investment strategies deliver comparable replacement rates adjusted by risk. However, life cycle strategies that maintain a constant exposure to equities during most of the accumulation period, switching swiftly to bonds in the last decade before retirement seem to produce better results and are easier to explain. Dynamic management strategies can provide somewhat higher replacement rates for a given level of risk than the more deterministic strategies, at least in the case of pay-outs in the form of variable withdrawals. The length of the contribution period also affects the ranking of the different investment strategies with life cycle strategies having a stronger positive impact the shorter is the contribution period Finance and Investment Payet, Stéphanie ctb Yermo, Juan ctb https://doi.org/10.1787/5kmdbx1nhfnp-en Verlag kostenfrei Volltext |
| spellingShingle | Antolín, Pablo Assessing Default Investment Strategies in Defined Contribution Pension Plans Finance and Investment |
| title | Assessing Default Investment Strategies in Defined Contribution Pension Plans |
| title_alt | Évaluation des stratégies d'investissement par défaut pour les plans de retraite à cotisations définies |
| title_auth | Assessing Default Investment Strategies in Defined Contribution Pension Plans |
| title_exact_search | Assessing Default Investment Strategies in Defined Contribution Pension Plans |
| title_exact_search_txtP | Assessing Default Investment Strategies in Defined Contribution Pension Plans |
| title_full | Assessing Default Investment Strategies in Defined Contribution Pension Plans Pablo Antolín, Stéphanie Payet and Juan Yermo = Évaluation des stratégies d'investissement par défaut pour les plans de retraite à cotisations définies / Pablo Antolín, Stéphanie Payet et Juan Yermo |
| title_fullStr | Assessing Default Investment Strategies in Defined Contribution Pension Plans Pablo Antolín, Stéphanie Payet and Juan Yermo = Évaluation des stratégies d'investissement par défaut pour les plans de retraite à cotisations définies / Pablo Antolín, Stéphanie Payet et Juan Yermo |
| title_full_unstemmed | Assessing Default Investment Strategies in Defined Contribution Pension Plans Pablo Antolín, Stéphanie Payet and Juan Yermo = Évaluation des stratégies d'investissement par défaut pour les plans de retraite à cotisations définies / Pablo Antolín, Stéphanie Payet et Juan Yermo |
| title_short | Assessing Default Investment Strategies in Defined Contribution Pension Plans |
| title_sort | assessing default investment strategies in defined contribution pension plans |
| topic | Finance and Investment |
| topic_facet | Finance and Investment |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1787/5kmdbx1nhfnp-en |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT antolinpablo assessingdefaultinvestmentstrategiesindefinedcontributionpensionplans AT payetstephanie assessingdefaultinvestmentstrategiesindefinedcontributionpensionplans AT yermojuan assessingdefaultinvestmentstrategiesindefinedcontributionpensionplans AT antolinpablo evaluationdesstrategiesdinvestissementpardefautpourlesplansderetraiteacotisationsdefinies AT payetstephanie evaluationdesstrategiesdinvestissementpardefautpourlesplansderetraiteacotisationsdefinies AT yermojuan evaluationdesstrategiesdinvestissementpardefautpourlesplansderetraiteacotisationsdefinies |