Monitoring and Evaluation for Adaptation: Lessons from Development Co-operation Agencies:
In the context of scaled up funding for climate change adaptation, it is more important than ever to ensure the effectiveness, equity and efficiency of adaptation interventions. Robust monitoring and evaluation (M&E) is an essential part of this, both to ensure that the prospective benefits of i...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Weitere Verfasser: | , |
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Paris
OECD Publishing
2012
|
| Schriftenreihe: | OECD Environment Working Papers
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Zusammenfassung: | In the context of scaled up funding for climate change adaptation, it is more important than ever to ensure the effectiveness, equity and efficiency of adaptation interventions. Robust monitoring and evaluation (M&E) is an essential part of this, both to ensure that the prospective benefits of interventions are being realised and to help improve the design of future interventions. This paper is the first empirical assessment of M&E frameworks used by development co-operation agencies for projects and programmes with adaptation-specific or adaptation-related components. It has analysed 106 project documents across six bilateral development agencies. Based on this, it identifies the characteristics of M&E for adaptation and shares lessons learned on the choice and use of indicators for adaptation. This analysis has found that Result Based Management, the Logical Framework Approach and the accompanying logframe are the most common M&E approaches used for adaptation. In applying these approaches, the long-term perspective of most adaptation initiatives means that it is particularly important to clearly differentiate between outcomes, outputs and activities. In addition, M&E frameworks for adaptation should combine qualitative, quantitative and binary indicators. The baselines for these indicators should include the effects of future climate change, particularly for projects with long-term implications, such as investments in infrastructure. Significant challenges remain in relation to dealing with shifting baselines, attribution and time lags between interventions and outcomes |
| Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource (49 Seiten) 21 x 29.7cm |
| DOI: | 10.1787/5kg20mj6c2bw-en |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV047934284 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220413s2012 xx o|||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1787/5kg20mj6c2bw-en |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (ZDB-13-SOC)061282359 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1312707271 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV047934284 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-384 |a DE-91 |a DE-473 |a DE-824 |a DE-29 |a DE-739 |a DE-355 |a DE-20 |a DE-1028 |a DE-1049 |a DE-188 |a DE-521 |a DE-861 |a DE-898 |a DE-92 |a DE-573 |a DE-19 | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Lamhauge, Nicolina |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Monitoring and Evaluation for Adaptation: Lessons from Development Co-operation Agencies |c Nicolina Lamhauge, Elisa Lanzi and Shardul Agrawala |
| 264 | 1 | |a Paris |b OECD Publishing |c 2012 | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (49 Seiten) |c 21 x 29.7cm | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a OECD Environment Working Papers | |
| 520 | |a In the context of scaled up funding for climate change adaptation, it is more important than ever to ensure the effectiveness, equity and efficiency of adaptation interventions. Robust monitoring and evaluation (M&E) is an essential part of this, both to ensure that the prospective benefits of interventions are being realised and to help improve the design of future interventions. This paper is the first empirical assessment of M&E frameworks used by development co-operation agencies for projects and programmes with adaptation-specific or adaptation-related components. It has analysed 106 project documents across six bilateral development agencies. Based on this, it identifies the characteristics of M&E for adaptation and shares lessons learned on the choice and use of indicators for adaptation. This analysis has found that Result Based Management, the Logical Framework Approach and the accompanying logframe are the most common M&E approaches used for adaptation. In applying these approaches, the long-term perspective of most adaptation initiatives means that it is particularly important to clearly differentiate between outcomes, outputs and activities. In addition, M&E frameworks for adaptation should combine qualitative, quantitative and binary indicators. The baselines for these indicators should include the effects of future climate change, particularly for projects with long-term implications, such as investments in infrastructure. Significant challenges remain in relation to dealing with shifting baselines, attribution and time lags between interventions and outcomes | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Environment | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Development | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Lanzi, Elisa |4 ctb | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Agrawala, Shardul |4 ctb | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1787/5kg20mj6c2bw-en |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a ZDB-13-SOC | ||
| 943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033315778 | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1818806051804282880 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | |
| adam_txt | |
| any_adam_object | |
| any_adam_object_boolean | |
| author | Lamhauge, Nicolina |
| author2 | Lanzi, Elisa Agrawala, Shardul |
| author2_role | ctb ctb |
| author2_variant | e l el s a sa |
| author_facet | Lamhauge, Nicolina Lanzi, Elisa Agrawala, Shardul |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Lamhauge, Nicolina |
| author_variant | n l nl |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV047934284 |
| collection | ZDB-13-SOC |
| ctrlnum | (ZDB-13-SOC)061282359 (OCoLC)1312707271 (DE-599)BVBBV047934284 |
| discipline | Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
| discipline_str_mv | Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1787/5kg20mj6c2bw-en |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nam a2200000zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV047934284</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220413s2012 xx o|||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1787/5kg20mj6c2bw-en</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-13-SOC)061282359</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1312707271</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV047934284</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-384</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-91</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-473</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-824</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-29</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-739</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-355</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-20</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-1028</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-1049</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-188</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-521</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-861</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-898</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-92</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-573</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lamhauge, Nicolina</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Monitoring and Evaluation for Adaptation: Lessons from Development Co-operation Agencies</subfield><subfield code="c">Nicolina Lamhauge, Elisa Lanzi and Shardul Agrawala</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Paris</subfield><subfield code="b">OECD Publishing</subfield><subfield code="c">2012</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (49 Seiten)</subfield><subfield code="c">21 x 29.7cm</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OECD Environment Working Papers</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In the context of scaled up funding for climate change adaptation, it is more important than ever to ensure the effectiveness, equity and efficiency of adaptation interventions. Robust monitoring and evaluation (M&E) is an essential part of this, both to ensure that the prospective benefits of interventions are being realised and to help improve the design of future interventions. This paper is the first empirical assessment of M&E frameworks used by development co-operation agencies for projects and programmes with adaptation-specific or adaptation-related components. It has analysed 106 project documents across six bilateral development agencies. Based on this, it identifies the characteristics of M&E for adaptation and shares lessons learned on the choice and use of indicators for adaptation. This analysis has found that Result Based Management, the Logical Framework Approach and the accompanying logframe are the most common M&E approaches used for adaptation. In applying these approaches, the long-term perspective of most adaptation initiatives means that it is particularly important to clearly differentiate between outcomes, outputs and activities. In addition, M&E frameworks for adaptation should combine qualitative, quantitative and binary indicators. The baselines for these indicators should include the effects of future climate change, particularly for projects with long-term implications, such as investments in infrastructure. Significant challenges remain in relation to dealing with shifting baselines, attribution and time lags between interventions and outcomes</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Environment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Development</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lanzi, Elisa</subfield><subfield code="4">ctb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Agrawala, Shardul</subfield><subfield code="4">ctb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1787/5kg20mj6c2bw-en</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033315778</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV047934284 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T19:35:02Z |
| indexdate | 2024-12-18T19:03:38Z |
| institution | BVB |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033315778 |
| oclc_num | 1312707271 |
| open_access_boolean | 1 |
| owner | DE-384 DE-91 DE-BY-TUM DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-824 DE-29 DE-739 DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-20 DE-1028 DE-1049 DE-188 DE-521 DE-861 DE-898 DE-BY-UBR DE-92 DE-573 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM |
| owner_facet | DE-384 DE-91 DE-BY-TUM DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-824 DE-29 DE-739 DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-20 DE-1028 DE-1049 DE-188 DE-521 DE-861 DE-898 DE-BY-UBR DE-92 DE-573 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM |
| physical | 1 Online-Ressource (49 Seiten) 21 x 29.7cm |
| psigel | ZDB-13-SOC |
| publishDate | 2012 |
| publishDateSearch | 2012 |
| publishDateSort | 2012 |
| publisher | OECD Publishing |
| record_format | marc |
| series2 | OECD Environment Working Papers |
| spelling | Lamhauge, Nicolina Verfasser aut Monitoring and Evaluation for Adaptation: Lessons from Development Co-operation Agencies Nicolina Lamhauge, Elisa Lanzi and Shardul Agrawala Paris OECD Publishing 2012 1 Online-Ressource (49 Seiten) 21 x 29.7cm txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier OECD Environment Working Papers In the context of scaled up funding for climate change adaptation, it is more important than ever to ensure the effectiveness, equity and efficiency of adaptation interventions. Robust monitoring and evaluation (M&E) is an essential part of this, both to ensure that the prospective benefits of interventions are being realised and to help improve the design of future interventions. This paper is the first empirical assessment of M&E frameworks used by development co-operation agencies for projects and programmes with adaptation-specific or adaptation-related components. It has analysed 106 project documents across six bilateral development agencies. Based on this, it identifies the characteristics of M&E for adaptation and shares lessons learned on the choice and use of indicators for adaptation. This analysis has found that Result Based Management, the Logical Framework Approach and the accompanying logframe are the most common M&E approaches used for adaptation. In applying these approaches, the long-term perspective of most adaptation initiatives means that it is particularly important to clearly differentiate between outcomes, outputs and activities. In addition, M&E frameworks for adaptation should combine qualitative, quantitative and binary indicators. The baselines for these indicators should include the effects of future climate change, particularly for projects with long-term implications, such as investments in infrastructure. Significant challenges remain in relation to dealing with shifting baselines, attribution and time lags between interventions and outcomes Environment Development Lanzi, Elisa ctb Agrawala, Shardul ctb https://doi.org/10.1787/5kg20mj6c2bw-en Verlag kostenfrei Volltext |
| spellingShingle | Lamhauge, Nicolina Monitoring and Evaluation for Adaptation: Lessons from Development Co-operation Agencies Environment Development |
| title | Monitoring and Evaluation for Adaptation: Lessons from Development Co-operation Agencies |
| title_auth | Monitoring and Evaluation for Adaptation: Lessons from Development Co-operation Agencies |
| title_exact_search | Monitoring and Evaluation for Adaptation: Lessons from Development Co-operation Agencies |
| title_exact_search_txtP | Monitoring and Evaluation for Adaptation: Lessons from Development Co-operation Agencies |
| title_full | Monitoring and Evaluation for Adaptation: Lessons from Development Co-operation Agencies Nicolina Lamhauge, Elisa Lanzi and Shardul Agrawala |
| title_fullStr | Monitoring and Evaluation for Adaptation: Lessons from Development Co-operation Agencies Nicolina Lamhauge, Elisa Lanzi and Shardul Agrawala |
| title_full_unstemmed | Monitoring and Evaluation for Adaptation: Lessons from Development Co-operation Agencies Nicolina Lamhauge, Elisa Lanzi and Shardul Agrawala |
| title_short | Monitoring and Evaluation for Adaptation: Lessons from Development Co-operation Agencies |
| title_sort | monitoring and evaluation for adaptation lessons from development co operation agencies |
| topic | Environment Development |
| topic_facet | Environment Development |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1787/5kg20mj6c2bw-en |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT lamhaugenicolina monitoringandevaluationforadaptationlessonsfromdevelopmentcooperationagencies AT lanzielisa monitoringandevaluationforadaptationlessonsfromdevelopmentcooperationagencies AT agrawalashardul monitoringandevaluationforadaptationlessonsfromdevelopmentcooperationagencies |