State-Owned Enterprises: Trade Effects and Policy Implications
With a growing integration via trade and investment, state-owned enterprises (SOEs) that have traditionally been oriented towards domestic markets increasingly compete with private firms in the global market place. Three principal questions emerge from the international trade perspective: (1) How im...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Weitere Verfasser: | , , |
Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Paris
OECD Publishing
2013
|
Schriftenreihe: | OECD Trade Policy Papers
|
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Zusammenfassung: | With a growing integration via trade and investment, state-owned enterprises (SOEs) that have traditionally been oriented towards domestic markets increasingly compete with private firms in the global market place. Three principal questions emerge from the international trade perspective: (1) How important is state ownership in the global economy; (2) What types of advantages granted to SOEs by governments (or disadvantages afflicting them) are inconsistent with the key principles of the non-discriminatory trading system; and (3) What policies and practices support effective competition among all market participants? Using a sample of world's largest firms and their foreign subsidiaries, this paper shows that the extent of state presence in various countries and economic sectors is significant. Moreover, many of the countries with the highest SOE shares and economic sectors with strong SOE presence are intensely traded. The potential for economic distortions is hence large, if some of these SOEs benefit from unfair advantages granted to them by governments-an allegation that is often raised in political and business circles. Existing information on such advantages is often either anecdotal or limited to individual cases. As a groundwork for future analysis and building on the existing information and literature, this paper presents a conceptual discussion of how potential SOE advantages can generate cross-border effects. It also describes several cases when actions of SOEs as well as advantages allegedly granted to them by governments have been contested as inconsistent with national or international regulations, albeit with varying degree of success. This may be partially explained by the fact that existing regulatory frameworks that discipline some forms of anti-competitive behaviour of SOEs have been designed with domestic objectives in mind or were conceived at times when the state sector was oriented primarily towards domestic markets. The survey of existing rules at the national, bilateral and multilateral levels presented in this paper is a first step in determining whether there is a need to fill any gaps and in finding the most constructive ways of doing so |
Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource (92 Seiten) 21 x 29.7cm |
DOI: | 10.1787/5k4869ckqk7l-en |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a2200000zc 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV047934011 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 220413s2013 xx o|||| 00||| eng d | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1787/5k4869ckqk7l-en |2 doi | |
035 | |a (ZDB-13-SOC)061286095 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)1312698936 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV047934011 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-384 |a DE-91 |a DE-473 |a DE-824 |a DE-29 |a DE-739 |a DE-355 |a DE-20 |a DE-1028 |a DE-1049 |a DE-188 |a DE-521 |a DE-861 |a DE-898 |a DE-92 |a DE-573 |a DE-19 | ||
100 | 1 | |a Kowalski, Przemyslaw |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a State-Owned Enterprises |b Trade Effects and Policy Implications |c Przemyslaw Kowalski ... [et al] |
264 | 1 | |a Paris |b OECD Publishing |c 2013 | |
300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (92 Seiten) |c 21 x 29.7cm | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 0 | |a OECD Trade Policy Papers | |
520 | |a With a growing integration via trade and investment, state-owned enterprises (SOEs) that have traditionally been oriented towards domestic markets increasingly compete with private firms in the global market place. Three principal questions emerge from the international trade perspective: (1) How important is state ownership in the global economy; (2) What types of advantages granted to SOEs by governments (or disadvantages afflicting them) are inconsistent with the key principles of the non-discriminatory trading system; and (3) What policies and practices support effective competition among all market participants? Using a sample of world's largest firms and their foreign subsidiaries, this paper shows that the extent of state presence in various countries and economic sectors is significant. Moreover, many of the countries with the highest SOE shares and economic sectors with strong SOE presence are intensely traded. | ||
520 | |a The potential for economic distortions is hence large, if some of these SOEs benefit from unfair advantages granted to them by governments-an allegation that is often raised in political and business circles. Existing information on such advantages is often either anecdotal or limited to individual cases. As a groundwork for future analysis and building on the existing information and literature, this paper presents a conceptual discussion of how potential SOE advantages can generate cross-border effects. It also describes several cases when actions of SOEs as well as advantages allegedly granted to them by governments have been contested as inconsistent with national or international regulations, albeit with varying degree of success. | ||
520 | |a This may be partially explained by the fact that existing regulatory frameworks that discipline some forms of anti-competitive behaviour of SOEs have been designed with domestic objectives in mind or were conceived at times when the state sector was oriented primarily towards domestic markets. The survey of existing rules at the national, bilateral and multilateral levels presented in this paper is a first step in determining whether there is a need to fill any gaps and in finding the most constructive ways of doing so | ||
650 | 4 | |a Finance and Investment | |
650 | 4 | |a Trade | |
700 | 1 | |a Büge, Max |4 ctb | |
700 | 1 | |a Sztajerowska, Monika |4 ctb | |
700 | 1 | |a Egeland, Matias |4 ctb | |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1787/5k4869ckqk7l-en |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
912 | |a ZDB-13-SOC | ||
943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033315505 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1818806051283140608 |
---|---|
adam_text | |
adam_txt | |
any_adam_object | |
any_adam_object_boolean | |
author | Kowalski, Przemyslaw |
author2 | Büge, Max Sztajerowska, Monika Egeland, Matias |
author2_role | ctb ctb ctb |
author2_variant | m b mb m s ms m e me |
author_facet | Kowalski, Przemyslaw Büge, Max Sztajerowska, Monika Egeland, Matias |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Kowalski, Przemyslaw |
author_variant | p k pk |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV047934011 |
collection | ZDB-13-SOC |
ctrlnum | (ZDB-13-SOC)061286095 (OCoLC)1312698936 (DE-599)BVBBV047934011 |
discipline | Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
discipline_str_mv | Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
doi_str_mv | 10.1787/5k4869ckqk7l-en |
format | Electronic eBook |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nam a2200000zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV047934011</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220413s2013 xx o|||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1787/5k4869ckqk7l-en</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-13-SOC)061286095</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1312698936</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV047934011</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-384</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-91</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-473</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-824</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-29</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-739</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-355</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-20</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-1028</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-1049</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-188</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-521</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-861</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-898</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-92</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-573</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Kowalski, Przemyslaw</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">State-Owned Enterprises</subfield><subfield code="b">Trade Effects and Policy Implications</subfield><subfield code="c">Przemyslaw Kowalski ... [et al]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Paris</subfield><subfield code="b">OECD Publishing</subfield><subfield code="c">2013</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (92 Seiten)</subfield><subfield code="c">21 x 29.7cm</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OECD Trade Policy Papers</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">With a growing integration via trade and investment, state-owned enterprises (SOEs) that have traditionally been oriented towards domestic markets increasingly compete with private firms in the global market place. Three principal questions emerge from the international trade perspective: (1) How important is state ownership in the global economy; (2) What types of advantages granted to SOEs by governments (or disadvantages afflicting them) are inconsistent with the key principles of the non-discriminatory trading system; and (3) What policies and practices support effective competition among all market participants? Using a sample of world's largest firms and their foreign subsidiaries, this paper shows that the extent of state presence in various countries and economic sectors is significant. Moreover, many of the countries with the highest SOE shares and economic sectors with strong SOE presence are intensely traded.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The potential for economic distortions is hence large, if some of these SOEs benefit from unfair advantages granted to them by governments-an allegation that is often raised in political and business circles. Existing information on such advantages is often either anecdotal or limited to individual cases. As a groundwork for future analysis and building on the existing information and literature, this paper presents a conceptual discussion of how potential SOE advantages can generate cross-border effects. It also describes several cases when actions of SOEs as well as advantages allegedly granted to them by governments have been contested as inconsistent with national or international regulations, albeit with varying degree of success.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This may be partially explained by the fact that existing regulatory frameworks that discipline some forms of anti-competitive behaviour of SOEs have been designed with domestic objectives in mind or were conceived at times when the state sector was oriented primarily towards domestic markets. The survey of existing rules at the national, bilateral and multilateral levels presented in this paper is a first step in determining whether there is a need to fill any gaps and in finding the most constructive ways of doing so</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Finance and Investment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Trade</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Büge, Max</subfield><subfield code="4">ctb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Sztajerowska, Monika</subfield><subfield code="4">ctb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Egeland, Matias</subfield><subfield code="4">ctb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1787/5k4869ckqk7l-en</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033315505</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | DE-604.BV047934011 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
index_date | 2024-07-03T19:35:01Z |
indexdate | 2024-12-18T19:03:37Z |
institution | BVB |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033315505 |
oclc_num | 1312698936 |
open_access_boolean | 1 |
owner | DE-384 DE-91 DE-BY-TUM DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-824 DE-29 DE-739 DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-20 DE-1028 DE-1049 DE-188 DE-521 DE-861 DE-898 DE-BY-UBR DE-92 DE-573 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM |
owner_facet | DE-384 DE-91 DE-BY-TUM DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-824 DE-29 DE-739 DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-20 DE-1028 DE-1049 DE-188 DE-521 DE-861 DE-898 DE-BY-UBR DE-92 DE-573 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM |
physical | 1 Online-Ressource (92 Seiten) 21 x 29.7cm |
psigel | ZDB-13-SOC |
publishDate | 2013 |
publishDateSearch | 2013 |
publishDateSort | 2013 |
publisher | OECD Publishing |
record_format | marc |
series2 | OECD Trade Policy Papers |
spelling | Kowalski, Przemyslaw Verfasser aut State-Owned Enterprises Trade Effects and Policy Implications Przemyslaw Kowalski ... [et al] Paris OECD Publishing 2013 1 Online-Ressource (92 Seiten) 21 x 29.7cm txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier OECD Trade Policy Papers With a growing integration via trade and investment, state-owned enterprises (SOEs) that have traditionally been oriented towards domestic markets increasingly compete with private firms in the global market place. Three principal questions emerge from the international trade perspective: (1) How important is state ownership in the global economy; (2) What types of advantages granted to SOEs by governments (or disadvantages afflicting them) are inconsistent with the key principles of the non-discriminatory trading system; and (3) What policies and practices support effective competition among all market participants? Using a sample of world's largest firms and their foreign subsidiaries, this paper shows that the extent of state presence in various countries and economic sectors is significant. Moreover, many of the countries with the highest SOE shares and economic sectors with strong SOE presence are intensely traded. The potential for economic distortions is hence large, if some of these SOEs benefit from unfair advantages granted to them by governments-an allegation that is often raised in political and business circles. Existing information on such advantages is often either anecdotal or limited to individual cases. As a groundwork for future analysis and building on the existing information and literature, this paper presents a conceptual discussion of how potential SOE advantages can generate cross-border effects. It also describes several cases when actions of SOEs as well as advantages allegedly granted to them by governments have been contested as inconsistent with national or international regulations, albeit with varying degree of success. This may be partially explained by the fact that existing regulatory frameworks that discipline some forms of anti-competitive behaviour of SOEs have been designed with domestic objectives in mind or were conceived at times when the state sector was oriented primarily towards domestic markets. The survey of existing rules at the national, bilateral and multilateral levels presented in this paper is a first step in determining whether there is a need to fill any gaps and in finding the most constructive ways of doing so Finance and Investment Trade Büge, Max ctb Sztajerowska, Monika ctb Egeland, Matias ctb https://doi.org/10.1787/5k4869ckqk7l-en Verlag kostenfrei Volltext |
spellingShingle | Kowalski, Przemyslaw State-Owned Enterprises Trade Effects and Policy Implications Finance and Investment Trade |
title | State-Owned Enterprises Trade Effects and Policy Implications |
title_auth | State-Owned Enterprises Trade Effects and Policy Implications |
title_exact_search | State-Owned Enterprises Trade Effects and Policy Implications |
title_exact_search_txtP | State-Owned Enterprises Trade Effects and Policy Implications |
title_full | State-Owned Enterprises Trade Effects and Policy Implications Przemyslaw Kowalski ... [et al] |
title_fullStr | State-Owned Enterprises Trade Effects and Policy Implications Przemyslaw Kowalski ... [et al] |
title_full_unstemmed | State-Owned Enterprises Trade Effects and Policy Implications Przemyslaw Kowalski ... [et al] |
title_short | State-Owned Enterprises |
title_sort | state owned enterprises trade effects and policy implications |
title_sub | Trade Effects and Policy Implications |
topic | Finance and Investment Trade |
topic_facet | Finance and Investment Trade |
url | https://doi.org/10.1787/5k4869ckqk7l-en |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kowalskiprzemyslaw stateownedenterprisestradeeffectsandpolicyimplications AT bugemax stateownedenterprisestradeeffectsandpolicyimplications AT sztajerowskamonika stateownedenterprisestradeeffectsandpolicyimplications AT egelandmatias stateownedenterprisestradeeffectsandpolicyimplications |