Should We Extend the Role of Private Social Expenditure?:
Some people make great claims about the advantages to be gained from greater reliance on the private sector for the provision of social protection. Many of the claims for great macroeconomic advantages do not stand up to scrutiny. However, there is some reason to hope that private provision might pr...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Weitere Verfasser: | |
Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Paris
OECD Publishing
2005
|
Schriftenreihe: | OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers
|
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | kostenfrei |
Zusammenfassung: | Some people make great claims about the advantages to be gained from greater reliance on the private sector for the provision of social protection. Many of the claims for great macroeconomic advantages do not stand up to scrutiny. However, there is some reason to hope that private provision might promote microeconomic efficiency and services which are more responsive to consumer preferences than those provided by a single monopoly public sector provider. Drawing on examples from recent OECD country experiences with private health insurance, care for children and the elderly, and private pension provision, three main conclusions can be drawn. First, opening provision to a diversity of providers has often promoted more choice and innovation. Second, however, efficiency gains have often been limited. This is due to a number of inter-related reasons: (a) Individualisation of packages of services is expensive. (b) In order to ensure adequate coverage of the ... |
Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource (38 Seiten) 21 x 29.7cm |
DOI: | 10.1787/866271756736 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a2200000zc 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV047932576 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 220413s2005 xx o|||| 00||| eng d | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1787/866271756736 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (ZDB-13-SOC)061305456 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)835403280 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV047932576 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-384 |a DE-91 |a DE-473 |a DE-824 |a DE-29 |a DE-739 |a DE-355 |a DE-20 |a DE-1028 |a DE-1049 |a DE-188 |a DE-521 |a DE-861 |a DE-898 |a DE-92 |a DE-573 |a DE-19 | ||
100 | 1 | |a Pearson, Mark |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Should We Extend the Role of Private Social Expenditure? |c Mark Pearson and John P. Martin |
264 | 1 | |a Paris |b OECD Publishing |c 2005 | |
300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (38 Seiten) |c 21 x 29.7cm | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 0 | |a OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers | |
520 | |a Some people make great claims about the advantages to be gained from greater reliance on the private sector for the provision of social protection. Many of the claims for great macroeconomic advantages do not stand up to scrutiny. However, there is some reason to hope that private provision might promote microeconomic efficiency and services which are more responsive to consumer preferences than those provided by a single monopoly public sector provider. Drawing on examples from recent OECD country experiences with private health insurance, care for children and the elderly, and private pension provision, three main conclusions can be drawn. First, opening provision to a diversity of providers has often promoted more choice and innovation. Second, however, efficiency gains have often been limited. This is due to a number of inter-related reasons: (a) Individualisation of packages of services is expensive. (b) In order to ensure adequate coverage of the ... | ||
650 | 4 | |a Social Issues/Migration/Health | |
700 | 1 | |a Martin, John P... |4 ctb | |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1787/866271756736 |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
912 | |a ZDB-13-SOC | ||
943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033314070 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1818806028283674624 |
---|---|
adam_text | |
adam_txt | |
any_adam_object | |
any_adam_object_boolean | |
author | Pearson, Mark |
author2 | Martin, John P.. |
author2_role | ctb |
author2_variant | j p m jp jpm |
author_facet | Pearson, Mark Martin, John P.. |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Pearson, Mark |
author_variant | m p mp |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV047932576 |
collection | ZDB-13-SOC |
ctrlnum | (ZDB-13-SOC)061305456 (OCoLC)835403280 (DE-599)BVBBV047932576 |
discipline | Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
discipline_str_mv | Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
doi_str_mv | 10.1787/866271756736 |
format | Electronic eBook |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nam a2200000zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV047932576</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220413s2005 xx o|||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1787/866271756736</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-13-SOC)061305456</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)835403280</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV047932576</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-384</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-91</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-473</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-824</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-29</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-739</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-355</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-20</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-1028</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-1049</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-188</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-521</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-861</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-898</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-92</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-573</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pearson, Mark</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Should We Extend the Role of Private Social Expenditure?</subfield><subfield code="c">Mark Pearson and John P. Martin</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Paris</subfield><subfield code="b">OECD Publishing</subfield><subfield code="c">2005</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (38 Seiten)</subfield><subfield code="c">21 x 29.7cm</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Some people make great claims about the advantages to be gained from greater reliance on the private sector for the provision of social protection. Many of the claims for great macroeconomic advantages do not stand up to scrutiny. However, there is some reason to hope that private provision might promote microeconomic efficiency and services which are more responsive to consumer preferences than those provided by a single monopoly public sector provider. Drawing on examples from recent OECD country experiences with private health insurance, care for children and the elderly, and private pension provision, three main conclusions can be drawn. First, opening provision to a diversity of providers has often promoted more choice and innovation. Second, however, efficiency gains have often been limited. This is due to a number of inter-related reasons: (a) Individualisation of packages of services is expensive. (b) In order to ensure adequate coverage of the ...</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Social Issues/Migration/Health</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Martin, John P...</subfield><subfield code="4">ctb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1787/866271756736</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033314070</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | DE-604.BV047932576 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
index_date | 2024-07-03T19:34:59Z |
indexdate | 2024-12-18T19:03:15Z |
institution | BVB |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033314070 |
oclc_num | 835403280 |
open_access_boolean | 1 |
owner | DE-384 DE-91 DE-BY-TUM DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-824 DE-29 DE-739 DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-20 DE-1028 DE-1049 DE-188 DE-521 DE-861 DE-898 DE-BY-UBR DE-92 DE-573 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM |
owner_facet | DE-384 DE-91 DE-BY-TUM DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-824 DE-29 DE-739 DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-20 DE-1028 DE-1049 DE-188 DE-521 DE-861 DE-898 DE-BY-UBR DE-92 DE-573 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM |
physical | 1 Online-Ressource (38 Seiten) 21 x 29.7cm |
psigel | ZDB-13-SOC |
publishDate | 2005 |
publishDateSearch | 2005 |
publishDateSort | 2005 |
publisher | OECD Publishing |
record_format | marc |
series2 | OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers |
spelling | Pearson, Mark Verfasser aut Should We Extend the Role of Private Social Expenditure? Mark Pearson and John P. Martin Paris OECD Publishing 2005 1 Online-Ressource (38 Seiten) 21 x 29.7cm txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers Some people make great claims about the advantages to be gained from greater reliance on the private sector for the provision of social protection. Many of the claims for great macroeconomic advantages do not stand up to scrutiny. However, there is some reason to hope that private provision might promote microeconomic efficiency and services which are more responsive to consumer preferences than those provided by a single monopoly public sector provider. Drawing on examples from recent OECD country experiences with private health insurance, care for children and the elderly, and private pension provision, three main conclusions can be drawn. First, opening provision to a diversity of providers has often promoted more choice and innovation. Second, however, efficiency gains have often been limited. This is due to a number of inter-related reasons: (a) Individualisation of packages of services is expensive. (b) In order to ensure adequate coverage of the ... Social Issues/Migration/Health Martin, John P... ctb https://doi.org/10.1787/866271756736 Verlag kostenfrei Volltext |
spellingShingle | Pearson, Mark Should We Extend the Role of Private Social Expenditure? Social Issues/Migration/Health |
title | Should We Extend the Role of Private Social Expenditure? |
title_auth | Should We Extend the Role of Private Social Expenditure? |
title_exact_search | Should We Extend the Role of Private Social Expenditure? |
title_exact_search_txtP | Should We Extend the Role of Private Social Expenditure? |
title_full | Should We Extend the Role of Private Social Expenditure? Mark Pearson and John P. Martin |
title_fullStr | Should We Extend the Role of Private Social Expenditure? Mark Pearson and John P. Martin |
title_full_unstemmed | Should We Extend the Role of Private Social Expenditure? Mark Pearson and John P. Martin |
title_short | Should We Extend the Role of Private Social Expenditure? |
title_sort | should we extend the role of private social expenditure |
topic | Social Issues/Migration/Health |
topic_facet | Social Issues/Migration/Health |
url | https://doi.org/10.1787/866271756736 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pearsonmark shouldweextendtheroleofprivatesocialexpenditure AT martinjohnp shouldweextendtheroleofprivatesocialexpenditure |