Gig economy platforms: Boon or Bane?:
The rapid emergence of gig economy platforms that use digital technologies to intermediate labour on a per-task basis has triggered an intense policy debate about the economic and social implications. This paper takes stock of the emerging evidence. The results suggest that gig economy platforms...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Weitere Verfasser: | , , |
Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Paris
OECD Publishing
2019
|
Schriftenreihe: | OECD Economics Department Working Papers
|
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | kostenfrei |
Zusammenfassung: | The rapid emergence of gig economy platforms that use digital technologies to intermediate labour on a per-task basis has triggered an intense policy debate about the economic and social implications. This paper takes stock of the emerging evidence. The results suggest that gig economy platforms' size remains modest (1-3 per cent of overall employment). Their growth has been most pronounced in a small number of services industries with high shares of own-account workers, suggesting that thus far they have been a substitute for traditional self-employment rather than dependent employment. New evidence provided in this paper is consistent with positive effects of platform growth on overall employment and small negative or insignificant effects on dependent employment and wages. While most empirical studies suggest that platforms are more efficient in matching workers to clients, reductions in barriers to work could offset such productivity-enhancing effects by creating employment opportunities for low-productivity workers. Fully reaping the potential benefits from gig economy platforms while protecting workers and consumers requires adapting existing policy settings in product and labour markets and applying them to traditional businesses and platforms on an equal footing |
Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource (33 Seiten) |
DOI: | 10.1787/fdb0570b-en |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a2200000zc 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV047932570 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 220413s2019 xx o|||| 00||| eng d | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1787/fdb0570b-en |2 doi | |
035 | |a (ZDB-13-SOC)061305529 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)1312690887 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV047932570 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-384 |a DE-91 |a DE-473 |a DE-824 |a DE-29 |a DE-739 |a DE-355 |a DE-20 |a DE-1028 |a DE-1049 |a DE-188 |a DE-521 |a DE-861 |a DE-898 |a DE-92 |a DE-573 |a DE-19 | ||
100 | 1 | |a Schwellnus, Cyrille |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Gig economy platforms: Boon or Bane? |c Cyrille Schwellnus ... [et al] |
264 | 1 | |a Paris |b OECD Publishing |c 2019 | |
300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (33 Seiten) | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 0 | |a OECD Economics Department Working Papers | |
520 | |a The rapid emergence of gig economy platforms that use digital technologies to intermediate labour on a per-task basis has triggered an intense policy debate about the economic and social implications. This paper takes stock of the emerging evidence. The results suggest that gig economy platforms' size remains modest (1-3 per cent of overall employment). Their growth has been most pronounced in a small number of services industries with high shares of own-account workers, suggesting that thus far they have been a substitute for traditional self-employment rather than dependent employment. New evidence provided in this paper is consistent with positive effects of platform growth on overall employment and small negative or insignificant effects on dependent employment and wages. While most empirical studies suggest that platforms are more efficient in matching workers to clients, reductions in barriers to work could offset such productivity-enhancing effects by creating employment opportunities for low-productivity workers. Fully reaping the potential benefits from gig economy platforms while protecting workers and consumers requires adapting existing policy settings in product and labour markets and applying them to traditional businesses and platforms on an equal footing | ||
650 | 4 | |a Economics | |
700 | 1 | |a Geva, Assaf |4 ctb | |
700 | 1 | |a Pak, Mathilde |4 ctb | |
700 | 1 | |a Veiel, Rafael |4 ctb | |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1787/fdb0570b-en |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
912 | |a ZDB-13-SOC | ||
943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033314064 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1818806028287868928 |
---|---|
adam_text | |
adam_txt | |
any_adam_object | |
any_adam_object_boolean | |
author | Schwellnus, Cyrille |
author2 | Geva, Assaf Pak, Mathilde Veiel, Rafael |
author2_role | ctb ctb ctb |
author2_variant | a g ag m p mp r v rv |
author_facet | Schwellnus, Cyrille Geva, Assaf Pak, Mathilde Veiel, Rafael |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Schwellnus, Cyrille |
author_variant | c s cs |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV047932570 |
collection | ZDB-13-SOC |
ctrlnum | (ZDB-13-SOC)061305529 (OCoLC)1312690887 (DE-599)BVBBV047932570 |
discipline | Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
discipline_str_mv | Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
doi_str_mv | 10.1787/fdb0570b-en |
format | Electronic eBook |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nam a2200000zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV047932570</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220413s2019 xx o|||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1787/fdb0570b-en</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-13-SOC)061305529</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1312690887</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV047932570</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-384</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-91</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-473</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-824</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-29</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-739</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-355</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-20</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-1028</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-1049</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-188</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-521</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-861</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-898</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-92</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-573</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Schwellnus, Cyrille</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Gig economy platforms: Boon or Bane?</subfield><subfield code="c">Cyrille Schwellnus ... [et al]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Paris</subfield><subfield code="b">OECD Publishing</subfield><subfield code="c">2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (33 Seiten)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OECD Economics Department Working Papers</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The rapid emergence of gig economy platforms that use digital technologies to intermediate labour on a per-task basis has triggered an intense policy debate about the economic and social implications. This paper takes stock of the emerging evidence. The results suggest that gig economy platforms' size remains modest (1-3 per cent of overall employment). Their growth has been most pronounced in a small number of services industries with high shares of own-account workers, suggesting that thus far they have been a substitute for traditional self-employment rather than dependent employment. New evidence provided in this paper is consistent with positive effects of platform growth on overall employment and small negative or insignificant effects on dependent employment and wages. While most empirical studies suggest that platforms are more efficient in matching workers to clients, reductions in barriers to work could offset such productivity-enhancing effects by creating employment opportunities for low-productivity workers. Fully reaping the potential benefits from gig economy platforms while protecting workers and consumers requires adapting existing policy settings in product and labour markets and applying them to traditional businesses and platforms on an equal footing</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Economics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Geva, Assaf</subfield><subfield code="4">ctb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pak, Mathilde</subfield><subfield code="4">ctb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Veiel, Rafael</subfield><subfield code="4">ctb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1787/fdb0570b-en</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033314064</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | DE-604.BV047932570 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
index_date | 2024-07-03T19:34:59Z |
indexdate | 2024-12-18T19:03:15Z |
institution | BVB |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033314064 |
oclc_num | 1312690887 |
open_access_boolean | 1 |
owner | DE-384 DE-91 DE-BY-TUM DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-824 DE-29 DE-739 DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-20 DE-1028 DE-1049 DE-188 DE-521 DE-861 DE-898 DE-BY-UBR DE-92 DE-573 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM |
owner_facet | DE-384 DE-91 DE-BY-TUM DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-824 DE-29 DE-739 DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-20 DE-1028 DE-1049 DE-188 DE-521 DE-861 DE-898 DE-BY-UBR DE-92 DE-573 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM |
physical | 1 Online-Ressource (33 Seiten) |
psigel | ZDB-13-SOC |
publishDate | 2019 |
publishDateSearch | 2019 |
publishDateSort | 2019 |
publisher | OECD Publishing |
record_format | marc |
series2 | OECD Economics Department Working Papers |
spelling | Schwellnus, Cyrille Verfasser aut Gig economy platforms: Boon or Bane? Cyrille Schwellnus ... [et al] Paris OECD Publishing 2019 1 Online-Ressource (33 Seiten) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier OECD Economics Department Working Papers The rapid emergence of gig economy platforms that use digital technologies to intermediate labour on a per-task basis has triggered an intense policy debate about the economic and social implications. This paper takes stock of the emerging evidence. The results suggest that gig economy platforms' size remains modest (1-3 per cent of overall employment). Their growth has been most pronounced in a small number of services industries with high shares of own-account workers, suggesting that thus far they have been a substitute for traditional self-employment rather than dependent employment. New evidence provided in this paper is consistent with positive effects of platform growth on overall employment and small negative or insignificant effects on dependent employment and wages. While most empirical studies suggest that platforms are more efficient in matching workers to clients, reductions in barriers to work could offset such productivity-enhancing effects by creating employment opportunities for low-productivity workers. Fully reaping the potential benefits from gig economy platforms while protecting workers and consumers requires adapting existing policy settings in product and labour markets and applying them to traditional businesses and platforms on an equal footing Economics Geva, Assaf ctb Pak, Mathilde ctb Veiel, Rafael ctb https://doi.org/10.1787/fdb0570b-en Verlag kostenfrei Volltext |
spellingShingle | Schwellnus, Cyrille Gig economy platforms: Boon or Bane? Economics |
title | Gig economy platforms: Boon or Bane? |
title_auth | Gig economy platforms: Boon or Bane? |
title_exact_search | Gig economy platforms: Boon or Bane? |
title_exact_search_txtP | Gig economy platforms: Boon or Bane? |
title_full | Gig economy platforms: Boon or Bane? Cyrille Schwellnus ... [et al] |
title_fullStr | Gig economy platforms: Boon or Bane? Cyrille Schwellnus ... [et al] |
title_full_unstemmed | Gig economy platforms: Boon or Bane? Cyrille Schwellnus ... [et al] |
title_short | Gig economy platforms: Boon or Bane? |
title_sort | gig economy platforms boon or bane |
topic | Economics |
topic_facet | Economics |
url | https://doi.org/10.1787/fdb0570b-en |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schwellnuscyrille gigeconomyplatformsboonorbane AT gevaassaf gigeconomyplatformsboonorbane AT pakmathilde gigeconomyplatformsboonorbane AT veielrafael gigeconomyplatformsboonorbane |