Design of insolvency regimes across countries:
This paper explores cross-country differences in the design of insolvency regimes, based on quantitative indicators constructed from countries' responses to a recent OECD policy questionnaire. The indicators - which are available for 36 countries for 2010 and 2016 - aim to better capture the ke...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Weitere Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Paris
OECD Publishing
2018
|
| Schriftenreihe: | OECD Economics Department Working Papers
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Zusammenfassung: | This paper explores cross-country differences in the design of insolvency regimes, based on quantitative indicators constructed from countries' responses to a recent OECD policy questionnaire. The indicators - which are available for 36 countries for 2010 and 2016 - aim to better capture the key design features of insolvency which impact the timely initiation and resolution of personal and corporate insolvency proceedings. According to these metrics, the design of insolvency regimes varies significantly across countries, with important differences emerging with respect to the treatment of failed entrepreneurs, the availability of preventative and streamlining tools and ease of corporate restructuring. While a comparison of indicator values for 2010 and 2016 imply that recent reform efforts have improved policy design, there remains much scope to reform insolvency regimes in many OECD countries. This is particularly significant in light of complementary analysis which shows that the design of insolvency regimes is relevant for understanding three inter-related sources of contemporary labour productivity weakness: the survival of "zombie" firms, capital misallocation and stalling technological diffusion |
| Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource (36 Seiten) |
| DOI: | 10.1787/d44dc56f-en |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV047932030 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220413s2018 xx o|||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1787/d44dc56f-en |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (ZDB-13-SOC)061312614 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1312710329 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV047932030 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-384 |a DE-91 |a DE-473 |a DE-824 |a DE-29 |a DE-739 |a DE-355 |a DE-20 |a DE-1028 |a DE-1049 |a DE-188 |a DE-521 |a DE-861 |a DE-898 |a DE-92 |a DE-573 |a DE-19 | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Adalet McGowan, Müge |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Design of insolvency regimes across countries |c Müge Adalet McGowan and Dan Andrews |
| 264 | 1 | |a Paris |b OECD Publishing |c 2018 | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (36 Seiten) | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a OECD Economics Department Working Papers | |
| 520 | |a This paper explores cross-country differences in the design of insolvency regimes, based on quantitative indicators constructed from countries' responses to a recent OECD policy questionnaire. The indicators - which are available for 36 countries for 2010 and 2016 - aim to better capture the key design features of insolvency which impact the timely initiation and resolution of personal and corporate insolvency proceedings. According to these metrics, the design of insolvency regimes varies significantly across countries, with important differences emerging with respect to the treatment of failed entrepreneurs, the availability of preventative and streamlining tools and ease of corporate restructuring. While a comparison of indicator values for 2010 and 2016 imply that recent reform efforts have improved policy design, there remains much scope to reform insolvency regimes in many OECD countries. This is particularly significant in light of complementary analysis which shows that the design of insolvency regimes is relevant for understanding three inter-related sources of contemporary labour productivity weakness: the survival of "zombie" firms, capital misallocation and stalling technological diffusion | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Economics | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Andrews, Dan |4 ctb | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1787/d44dc56f-en |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a ZDB-13-SOC | ||
| 943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033313524 | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1818806027072569344 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | |
| adam_txt | |
| any_adam_object | |
| any_adam_object_boolean | |
| author | Adalet McGowan, Müge |
| author2 | Andrews, Dan |
| author2_role | ctb |
| author2_variant | d a da |
| author_facet | Adalet McGowan, Müge Andrews, Dan |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Adalet McGowan, Müge |
| author_variant | m m a mm mma |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV047932030 |
| collection | ZDB-13-SOC |
| ctrlnum | (ZDB-13-SOC)061312614 (OCoLC)1312710329 (DE-599)BVBBV047932030 |
| discipline | Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
| discipline_str_mv | Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1787/d44dc56f-en |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nam a2200000zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV047932030</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220413s2018 xx o|||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1787/d44dc56f-en</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-13-SOC)061312614</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1312710329</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV047932030</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-384</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-91</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-473</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-824</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-29</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-739</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-355</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-20</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-1028</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-1049</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-188</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-521</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-861</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-898</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-92</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-573</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Adalet McGowan, Müge</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Design of insolvency regimes across countries</subfield><subfield code="c">Müge Adalet McGowan and Dan Andrews</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Paris</subfield><subfield code="b">OECD Publishing</subfield><subfield code="c">2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (36 Seiten)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OECD Economics Department Working Papers</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This paper explores cross-country differences in the design of insolvency regimes, based on quantitative indicators constructed from countries' responses to a recent OECD policy questionnaire. The indicators - which are available for 36 countries for 2010 and 2016 - aim to better capture the key design features of insolvency which impact the timely initiation and resolution of personal and corporate insolvency proceedings. According to these metrics, the design of insolvency regimes varies significantly across countries, with important differences emerging with respect to the treatment of failed entrepreneurs, the availability of preventative and streamlining tools and ease of corporate restructuring. While a comparison of indicator values for 2010 and 2016 imply that recent reform efforts have improved policy design, there remains much scope to reform insolvency regimes in many OECD countries. This is particularly significant in light of complementary analysis which shows that the design of insolvency regimes is relevant for understanding three inter-related sources of contemporary labour productivity weakness: the survival of "zombie" firms, capital misallocation and stalling technological diffusion</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Economics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Andrews, Dan</subfield><subfield code="4">ctb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1787/d44dc56f-en</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033313524</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV047932030 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T19:34:58Z |
| indexdate | 2024-12-18T19:03:14Z |
| institution | BVB |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033313524 |
| oclc_num | 1312710329 |
| open_access_boolean | 1 |
| owner | DE-384 DE-91 DE-BY-TUM DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-824 DE-29 DE-739 DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-20 DE-1028 DE-1049 DE-188 DE-521 DE-861 DE-898 DE-BY-UBR DE-92 DE-573 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM |
| owner_facet | DE-384 DE-91 DE-BY-TUM DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-824 DE-29 DE-739 DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-20 DE-1028 DE-1049 DE-188 DE-521 DE-861 DE-898 DE-BY-UBR DE-92 DE-573 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM |
| physical | 1 Online-Ressource (36 Seiten) |
| psigel | ZDB-13-SOC |
| publishDate | 2018 |
| publishDateSearch | 2018 |
| publishDateSort | 2018 |
| publisher | OECD Publishing |
| record_format | marc |
| series2 | OECD Economics Department Working Papers |
| spelling | Adalet McGowan, Müge Verfasser aut Design of insolvency regimes across countries Müge Adalet McGowan and Dan Andrews Paris OECD Publishing 2018 1 Online-Ressource (36 Seiten) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier OECD Economics Department Working Papers This paper explores cross-country differences in the design of insolvency regimes, based on quantitative indicators constructed from countries' responses to a recent OECD policy questionnaire. The indicators - which are available for 36 countries for 2010 and 2016 - aim to better capture the key design features of insolvency which impact the timely initiation and resolution of personal and corporate insolvency proceedings. According to these metrics, the design of insolvency regimes varies significantly across countries, with important differences emerging with respect to the treatment of failed entrepreneurs, the availability of preventative and streamlining tools and ease of corporate restructuring. While a comparison of indicator values for 2010 and 2016 imply that recent reform efforts have improved policy design, there remains much scope to reform insolvency regimes in many OECD countries. This is particularly significant in light of complementary analysis which shows that the design of insolvency regimes is relevant for understanding three inter-related sources of contemporary labour productivity weakness: the survival of "zombie" firms, capital misallocation and stalling technological diffusion Economics Andrews, Dan ctb https://doi.org/10.1787/d44dc56f-en Verlag kostenfrei Volltext |
| spellingShingle | Adalet McGowan, Müge Design of insolvency regimes across countries Economics |
| title | Design of insolvency regimes across countries |
| title_auth | Design of insolvency regimes across countries |
| title_exact_search | Design of insolvency regimes across countries |
| title_exact_search_txtP | Design of insolvency regimes across countries |
| title_full | Design of insolvency regimes across countries Müge Adalet McGowan and Dan Andrews |
| title_fullStr | Design of insolvency regimes across countries Müge Adalet McGowan and Dan Andrews |
| title_full_unstemmed | Design of insolvency regimes across countries Müge Adalet McGowan and Dan Andrews |
| title_short | Design of insolvency regimes across countries |
| title_sort | design of insolvency regimes across countries |
| topic | Economics |
| topic_facet | Economics |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1787/d44dc56f-en |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT adaletmcgowanmuge designofinsolvencyregimesacrosscountries AT andrewsdan designofinsolvencyregimesacrosscountries |