Modelling Policy Coherence Between Adaptation, Mitigation and Agricultural Productivity:
This paper develops theoretical and quantitative analysis to identify the potential synergies and trade-offs inherent in various policy instruments that address agricultural productivity, climate change mitigation and adaptation, and water quality objectives. The theoretical model used describes cro...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Weitere Verfasser: | , , |
Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Paris
OECD Publishing
2018
|
Schriftenreihe: | OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Papers
|
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Zusammenfassung: | This paper develops theoretical and quantitative analysis to identify the potential synergies and trade-offs inherent in various policy instruments that address agricultural productivity, climate change mitigation and adaptation, and water quality objectives. The theoretical model used describes crop production choices made by farmers given different sets of government policies and whereby crop yields can be impacted by climate change. Quantitative results on the basis of Finnish data show that decoupled area payment appears to provide more trade-offs than other policy instruments as it increases greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and nutrient runoff, and decrease total factor productivity and social welfare relative to a situation with no policy. Nitrogen fertiliser tax, a soil GHG emission tax, and a subsidy for green set-aside perform well with respect to all other objectives with the exception of adaptation to climate change. These policy instruments significantly reduce GHG emissions and nutrient runoff, and thus their social welfare performance is high |
Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource (28 Seiten) |
DOI: | 10.1787/ee62a5ae-en |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a2200000zc 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV047931748 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 220413s2018 xx o|||| 00||| eng d | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1787/ee62a5ae-en |2 doi | |
035 | |a (ZDB-13-SOC)061316350 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)1312695763 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV047931748 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-384 |a DE-91 |a DE-473 |a DE-824 |a DE-29 |a DE-739 |a DE-355 |a DE-20 |a DE-1028 |a DE-1049 |a DE-188 |a DE-521 |a DE-861 |a DE-898 |a DE-92 |a DE-573 |a DE-19 | ||
100 | 1 | |a Lankoski, J... |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Modelling Policy Coherence Between Adaptation, Mitigation and Agricultural Productivity |c J. Lankoski ... [et al] |
264 | 1 | |a Paris |b OECD Publishing |c 2018 | |
300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (28 Seiten) | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 0 | |a OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Papers | |
520 | |a This paper develops theoretical and quantitative analysis to identify the potential synergies and trade-offs inherent in various policy instruments that address agricultural productivity, climate change mitigation and adaptation, and water quality objectives. The theoretical model used describes crop production choices made by farmers given different sets of government policies and whereby crop yields can be impacted by climate change. Quantitative results on the basis of Finnish data show that decoupled area payment appears to provide more trade-offs than other policy instruments as it increases greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and nutrient runoff, and decrease total factor productivity and social welfare relative to a situation with no policy. Nitrogen fertiliser tax, a soil GHG emission tax, and a subsidy for green set-aside perform well with respect to all other objectives with the exception of adaptation to climate change. These policy instruments significantly reduce GHG emissions and nutrient runoff, and thus their social welfare performance is high | ||
650 | 4 | |a Agriculture and Food | |
700 | 1 | |a Lehtonen, H... |4 ctb | |
700 | 1 | |a Ollikainen, M... |4 ctb | |
700 | 1 | |a Myyrä, S... |4 ctb | |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1787/ee62a5ae-en |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
912 | |a ZDB-13-SOC | ||
943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033313241 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1818805996841074688 |
---|---|
adam_text | |
adam_txt | |
any_adam_object | |
any_adam_object_boolean | |
author | Lankoski, J.. |
author2 | Lehtonen, H.. Ollikainen, M.. Myyrä, S.. |
author2_role | ctb ctb ctb |
author2_variant | h l hl m o mo s m sm |
author_facet | Lankoski, J.. Lehtonen, H.. Ollikainen, M.. Myyrä, S.. |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Lankoski, J.. |
author_variant | j l jl |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV047931748 |
collection | ZDB-13-SOC |
ctrlnum | (ZDB-13-SOC)061316350 (OCoLC)1312695763 (DE-599)BVBBV047931748 |
discipline | Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
discipline_str_mv | Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
doi_str_mv | 10.1787/ee62a5ae-en |
format | Electronic eBook |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nam a2200000zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV047931748</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220413s2018 xx o|||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1787/ee62a5ae-en</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-13-SOC)061316350</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1312695763</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV047931748</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-384</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-91</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-473</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-824</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-29</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-739</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-355</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-20</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-1028</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-1049</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-188</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-521</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-861</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-898</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-92</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-573</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lankoski, J...</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Modelling Policy Coherence Between Adaptation, Mitigation and Agricultural Productivity</subfield><subfield code="c">J. Lankoski ... [et al]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Paris</subfield><subfield code="b">OECD Publishing</subfield><subfield code="c">2018</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (28 Seiten)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Papers</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This paper develops theoretical and quantitative analysis to identify the potential synergies and trade-offs inherent in various policy instruments that address agricultural productivity, climate change mitigation and adaptation, and water quality objectives. The theoretical model used describes crop production choices made by farmers given different sets of government policies and whereby crop yields can be impacted by climate change. Quantitative results on the basis of Finnish data show that decoupled area payment appears to provide more trade-offs than other policy instruments as it increases greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and nutrient runoff, and decrease total factor productivity and social welfare relative to a situation with no policy. Nitrogen fertiliser tax, a soil GHG emission tax, and a subsidy for green set-aside perform well with respect to all other objectives with the exception of adaptation to climate change. These policy instruments significantly reduce GHG emissions and nutrient runoff, and thus their social welfare performance is high</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Agriculture and Food</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lehtonen, H...</subfield><subfield code="4">ctb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ollikainen, M...</subfield><subfield code="4">ctb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Myyrä, S...</subfield><subfield code="4">ctb</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1787/ee62a5ae-en</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033313241</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | DE-604.BV047931748 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
index_date | 2024-07-03T19:34:57Z |
indexdate | 2024-12-18T19:02:45Z |
institution | BVB |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033313241 |
oclc_num | 1312695763 |
open_access_boolean | 1 |
owner | DE-384 DE-91 DE-BY-TUM DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-824 DE-29 DE-739 DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-20 DE-1028 DE-1049 DE-188 DE-521 DE-861 DE-898 DE-BY-UBR DE-92 DE-573 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM |
owner_facet | DE-384 DE-91 DE-BY-TUM DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-824 DE-29 DE-739 DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-20 DE-1028 DE-1049 DE-188 DE-521 DE-861 DE-898 DE-BY-UBR DE-92 DE-573 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM |
physical | 1 Online-Ressource (28 Seiten) |
psigel | ZDB-13-SOC |
publishDate | 2018 |
publishDateSearch | 2018 |
publishDateSort | 2018 |
publisher | OECD Publishing |
record_format | marc |
series2 | OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Papers |
spelling | Lankoski, J... Verfasser aut Modelling Policy Coherence Between Adaptation, Mitigation and Agricultural Productivity J. Lankoski ... [et al] Paris OECD Publishing 2018 1 Online-Ressource (28 Seiten) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Papers This paper develops theoretical and quantitative analysis to identify the potential synergies and trade-offs inherent in various policy instruments that address agricultural productivity, climate change mitigation and adaptation, and water quality objectives. The theoretical model used describes crop production choices made by farmers given different sets of government policies and whereby crop yields can be impacted by climate change. Quantitative results on the basis of Finnish data show that decoupled area payment appears to provide more trade-offs than other policy instruments as it increases greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and nutrient runoff, and decrease total factor productivity and social welfare relative to a situation with no policy. Nitrogen fertiliser tax, a soil GHG emission tax, and a subsidy for green set-aside perform well with respect to all other objectives with the exception of adaptation to climate change. These policy instruments significantly reduce GHG emissions and nutrient runoff, and thus their social welfare performance is high Agriculture and Food Lehtonen, H... ctb Ollikainen, M... ctb Myyrä, S... ctb https://doi.org/10.1787/ee62a5ae-en Verlag kostenfrei Volltext |
spellingShingle | Lankoski, J.. Modelling Policy Coherence Between Adaptation, Mitigation and Agricultural Productivity Agriculture and Food |
title | Modelling Policy Coherence Between Adaptation, Mitigation and Agricultural Productivity |
title_auth | Modelling Policy Coherence Between Adaptation, Mitigation and Agricultural Productivity |
title_exact_search | Modelling Policy Coherence Between Adaptation, Mitigation and Agricultural Productivity |
title_exact_search_txtP | Modelling Policy Coherence Between Adaptation, Mitigation and Agricultural Productivity |
title_full | Modelling Policy Coherence Between Adaptation, Mitigation and Agricultural Productivity J. Lankoski ... [et al] |
title_fullStr | Modelling Policy Coherence Between Adaptation, Mitigation and Agricultural Productivity J. Lankoski ... [et al] |
title_full_unstemmed | Modelling Policy Coherence Between Adaptation, Mitigation and Agricultural Productivity J. Lankoski ... [et al] |
title_short | Modelling Policy Coherence Between Adaptation, Mitigation and Agricultural Productivity |
title_sort | modelling policy coherence between adaptation mitigation and agricultural productivity |
topic | Agriculture and Food |
topic_facet | Agriculture and Food |
url | https://doi.org/10.1787/ee62a5ae-en |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lankoskij modellingpolicycoherencebetweenadaptationmitigationandagriculturalproductivity AT lehtonenh modellingpolicycoherencebetweenadaptationmitigationandagriculturalproductivity AT ollikainenm modellingpolicycoherencebetweenadaptationmitigationandagriculturalproductivity AT myyras modellingpolicycoherencebetweenadaptationmitigationandagriculturalproductivity |