Temporal Validity of International Investment Agreements: A Large Sample Survey of Treaty Provisions
International investment agreements (IIAs) almost universally define their temporal validity and thus set conditions for States' exit from these treaties. This study presents the results of the survey of language that determines the temporal validity of 2,061 bilateral investment agreements tha...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Paris
OECD Publishing
2013
|
| Schriftenreihe: | OECD Working Papers on International Investment
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | kostenfrei |
| Zusammenfassung: | International investment agreements (IIAs) almost universally define their temporal validity and thus set conditions for States' exit from these treaties. This study presents the results of the survey of language that determines the temporal validity of 2,061 bilateral investment agreements that the 55 economies participating in the OECD-hosted Freedom of Investment Roundtables have concluded with any other economy. The paper summarises in its first part past and current treaty practice in this regard: how do States design the parameters that define the temporal validity of their treaties and the duration of the obligations contained therein? How has this design evolved over time? Do different kinds of IIAs take different approaches to this matter? Have individual States developed distinct practices or policies? The second part of the paper presents key findings that result from the analysis of treaty practice in a large number of agreements. It highlights characteristics of the provisions on temporal validity employed in IIAs; emphasises the collective engagement that results from the clauses in IIAs and the consequences of country-specific practice; and suggests questions on intriguing policy choices that a large comparative study reveals |
| Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource (47 Seiten) 21 x 29.7cm |
| DOI: | 10.1787/5k3tsjsl5fvh-en |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV047931652 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220413s2013 xx o|||| 00||| eng d | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1787/5k3tsjsl5fvh-en |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (ZDB-13-SOC)061317640 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1312700160 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV047931652 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-384 |a DE-91 |a DE-473 |a DE-824 |a DE-29 |a DE-739 |a DE-355 |a DE-20 |a DE-1028 |a DE-1049 |a DE-188 |a DE-521 |a DE-861 |a DE-898 |a DE-92 |a DE-573 |a DE-19 | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Pohl, Joachim |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Temporal Validity of International Investment Agreements |b A Large Sample Survey of Treaty Provisions |c Joachim Pohl |
| 264 | 1 | |a Paris |b OECD Publishing |c 2013 | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (47 Seiten) |c 21 x 29.7cm | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a OECD Working Papers on International Investment | |
| 520 | |a International investment agreements (IIAs) almost universally define their temporal validity and thus set conditions for States' exit from these treaties. This study presents the results of the survey of language that determines the temporal validity of 2,061 bilateral investment agreements that the 55 economies participating in the OECD-hosted Freedom of Investment Roundtables have concluded with any other economy. The paper summarises in its first part past and current treaty practice in this regard: how do States design the parameters that define the temporal validity of their treaties and the duration of the obligations contained therein? How has this design evolved over time? Do different kinds of IIAs take different approaches to this matter? Have individual States developed distinct practices or policies? The second part of the paper presents key findings that result from the analysis of treaty practice in a large number of agreements. It highlights characteristics of the provisions on temporal validity employed in IIAs; emphasises the collective engagement that results from the clauses in IIAs and the consequences of country-specific practice; and suggests questions on intriguing policy choices that a large comparative study reveals | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Finance and Investment | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1787/5k3tsjsl5fvh-en |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a ZDB-13-SOC | ||
| 943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033313145 | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1818805996669108224 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | |
| adam_txt | |
| any_adam_object | |
| any_adam_object_boolean | |
| author | Pohl, Joachim |
| author_facet | Pohl, Joachim |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Pohl, Joachim |
| author_variant | j p jp |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV047931652 |
| collection | ZDB-13-SOC |
| ctrlnum | (ZDB-13-SOC)061317640 (OCoLC)1312700160 (DE-599)BVBBV047931652 |
| discipline | Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
| discipline_str_mv | Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1787/5k3tsjsl5fvh-en |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nam a2200000zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV047931652</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220413s2013 xx o|||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1787/5k3tsjsl5fvh-en</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-13-SOC)061317640</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1312700160</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV047931652</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-384</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-91</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-473</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-824</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-29</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-739</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-355</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-20</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-1028</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-1049</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-188</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-521</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-861</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-898</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-92</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-573</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Pohl, Joachim</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Temporal Validity of International Investment Agreements</subfield><subfield code="b">A Large Sample Survey of Treaty Provisions</subfield><subfield code="c">Joachim Pohl</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Paris</subfield><subfield code="b">OECD Publishing</subfield><subfield code="c">2013</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (47 Seiten)</subfield><subfield code="c">21 x 29.7cm</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OECD Working Papers on International Investment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">International investment agreements (IIAs) almost universally define their temporal validity and thus set conditions for States' exit from these treaties. This study presents the results of the survey of language that determines the temporal validity of 2,061 bilateral investment agreements that the 55 economies participating in the OECD-hosted Freedom of Investment Roundtables have concluded with any other economy. The paper summarises in its first part past and current treaty practice in this regard: how do States design the parameters that define the temporal validity of their treaties and the duration of the obligations contained therein? How has this design evolved over time? Do different kinds of IIAs take different approaches to this matter? Have individual States developed distinct practices or policies? The second part of the paper presents key findings that result from the analysis of treaty practice in a large number of agreements. It highlights characteristics of the provisions on temporal validity employed in IIAs; emphasises the collective engagement that results from the clauses in IIAs and the consequences of country-specific practice; and suggests questions on intriguing policy choices that a large comparative study reveals</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Finance and Investment</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1787/5k3tsjsl5fvh-en</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-13-SOC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033313145</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV047931652 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T19:34:57Z |
| indexdate | 2024-12-18T19:02:45Z |
| institution | BVB |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033313145 |
| oclc_num | 1312700160 |
| open_access_boolean | 1 |
| owner | DE-384 DE-91 DE-BY-TUM DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-824 DE-29 DE-739 DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-20 DE-1028 DE-1049 DE-188 DE-521 DE-861 DE-898 DE-BY-UBR DE-92 DE-573 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM |
| owner_facet | DE-384 DE-91 DE-BY-TUM DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-824 DE-29 DE-739 DE-355 DE-BY-UBR DE-20 DE-1028 DE-1049 DE-188 DE-521 DE-861 DE-898 DE-BY-UBR DE-92 DE-573 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM |
| physical | 1 Online-Ressource (47 Seiten) 21 x 29.7cm |
| psigel | ZDB-13-SOC |
| publishDate | 2013 |
| publishDateSearch | 2013 |
| publishDateSort | 2013 |
| publisher | OECD Publishing |
| record_format | marc |
| series2 | OECD Working Papers on International Investment |
| spelling | Pohl, Joachim Verfasser aut Temporal Validity of International Investment Agreements A Large Sample Survey of Treaty Provisions Joachim Pohl Paris OECD Publishing 2013 1 Online-Ressource (47 Seiten) 21 x 29.7cm txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier OECD Working Papers on International Investment International investment agreements (IIAs) almost universally define their temporal validity and thus set conditions for States' exit from these treaties. This study presents the results of the survey of language that determines the temporal validity of 2,061 bilateral investment agreements that the 55 economies participating in the OECD-hosted Freedom of Investment Roundtables have concluded with any other economy. The paper summarises in its first part past and current treaty practice in this regard: how do States design the parameters that define the temporal validity of their treaties and the duration of the obligations contained therein? How has this design evolved over time? Do different kinds of IIAs take different approaches to this matter? Have individual States developed distinct practices or policies? The second part of the paper presents key findings that result from the analysis of treaty practice in a large number of agreements. It highlights characteristics of the provisions on temporal validity employed in IIAs; emphasises the collective engagement that results from the clauses in IIAs and the consequences of country-specific practice; and suggests questions on intriguing policy choices that a large comparative study reveals Finance and Investment https://doi.org/10.1787/5k3tsjsl5fvh-en Verlag kostenfrei Volltext |
| spellingShingle | Pohl, Joachim Temporal Validity of International Investment Agreements A Large Sample Survey of Treaty Provisions Finance and Investment |
| title | Temporal Validity of International Investment Agreements A Large Sample Survey of Treaty Provisions |
| title_auth | Temporal Validity of International Investment Agreements A Large Sample Survey of Treaty Provisions |
| title_exact_search | Temporal Validity of International Investment Agreements A Large Sample Survey of Treaty Provisions |
| title_exact_search_txtP | Temporal Validity of International Investment Agreements A Large Sample Survey of Treaty Provisions |
| title_full | Temporal Validity of International Investment Agreements A Large Sample Survey of Treaty Provisions Joachim Pohl |
| title_fullStr | Temporal Validity of International Investment Agreements A Large Sample Survey of Treaty Provisions Joachim Pohl |
| title_full_unstemmed | Temporal Validity of International Investment Agreements A Large Sample Survey of Treaty Provisions Joachim Pohl |
| title_short | Temporal Validity of International Investment Agreements |
| title_sort | temporal validity of international investment agreements a large sample survey of treaty provisions |
| title_sub | A Large Sample Survey of Treaty Provisions |
| topic | Finance and Investment |
| topic_facet | Finance and Investment |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1787/5k3tsjsl5fvh-en |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT pohljoachim temporalvalidityofinternationalinvestmentagreementsalargesamplesurveyoftreatyprovisions |