From Bratislava to Bratislava – The Regulation Process of the Transnistrian Conflict is sliding back to Years 2002-2003:
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Chisinau [Moldova, Republic of]
IDIS VIITORUL Institutul pentru Dezoltare şi Initiative Sociale
2019
|
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | BSB01 |
Beschreibung: | The accession to the government of PSRM, a political party with strong pro-Russian tendencies and which has openly stated more than once in the past that it is in the favor of achieving the settlement of the Transnistrian conflict through the federalization of the Republic of Moldova, has increased Russia’s influence in the political processes taking place in Chisinau. At the same time, the PSRM government, concentrated around President Igor Dodon, generated suppositions that in the near future we could expect the signing of a document which would regulate the Transnistrian conflict. These assumptions were fueled by the failed attempts to sign the Protocol of in the "5+2" format reunion on October 9-10, 2019 in Bratislava, and at the 8th Conference on strengthening the confidence in the Transnistrian conflict settlement process which took place in Munich on November 4-5, 2019. The belief the public space it was that the draft protocol could lead to the de fact federalization of the Republic of Moldova. The rumor in the political backstage was that the protocol was blocked by former Deputy Prime Minister for Reintegration, Vasile Șova, but also by the uncompromising position of not accepting this protocol and which was assumed by the former Prime Minister of the government, Maia Sandu |
Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource (1 p. 2) |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV047864516 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 220304s2019 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
035 | |a (ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol987911 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)1302311116 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV047864516 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-12 | ||
100 | 1 | |a Tăbârță, Ion |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a From Bratislava to Bratislava – The Regulation Process of the Transnistrian Conflict is sliding back to Years 2002-2003 |c Ion Tăbârță |
264 | 1 | |a Chisinau [Moldova, Republic of] |b IDIS VIITORUL Institutul pentru Dezoltare şi Initiative Sociale |c 2019 | |
264 | 2 | |a Frankfurt M. |b CEEOL |c 2019 | |
300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (1 p. 2) | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a The accession to the government of PSRM, a political party with strong pro-Russian tendencies and which has openly stated more than once in the past that it is in the favor of achieving the settlement of the Transnistrian conflict through the federalization of the Republic of Moldova, has increased Russia’s influence in the political processes taking place in Chisinau. At the same time, the PSRM government, concentrated around President Igor Dodon, generated suppositions that in the near future we could expect the signing of a document which would regulate the Transnistrian conflict. These assumptions were fueled by the failed attempts to sign the Protocol of in the "5+2" format reunion on October 9-10, 2019 in Bratislava, and at the 8th Conference on strengthening the confidence in the Transnistrian conflict settlement process which took place in Munich on November 4-5, 2019. The belief the public space it was that the draft protocol could lead to the de fact federalization of the Republic of Moldova. The rumor in the political backstage was that the protocol was blocked by former Deputy Prime Minister for Reintegration, Vasile Șova, but also by the uncompromising position of not accepting this protocol and which was assumed by the former Prime Minister of the government, Maia Sandu | ||
650 | 4 | |a International relations/trade | |
650 | 4 | |a Post-Communist Transformation | |
650 | 4 | |a Peace and Conflict Studies | |
710 | 2 | |a Central and Eastern European Online Library |e Sonstige |4 oth | |
912 | |a ZDB-45-CGR | ||
940 | 1 | |n oe | |
940 | 1 | |q BSB_OE_CEEOL | |
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033247088 | ||
966 | e | |u https://www.ceeol.com/search/gray-literature-detail?id=987911 |l BSB01 |p ZDB-45-CGR |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804183439549661184 |
---|---|
adam_txt | |
any_adam_object | |
any_adam_object_boolean | |
author | Tăbârță, Ion |
author_facet | Tăbârță, Ion |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Tăbârță, Ion |
author_variant | i t it |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV047864516 |
collection | ZDB-45-CGR |
ctrlnum | (ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol987911 (OCoLC)1302311116 (DE-599)BVBBV047864516 |
format | Electronic eBook |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02645nmm a2200373zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV047864516</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220304s2019 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol987911</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1302311116</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV047864516</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Tăbârță, Ion</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">From Bratislava to Bratislava – The Regulation Process of the Transnistrian Conflict is sliding back to Years 2002-2003</subfield><subfield code="c">Ion Tăbârță</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Chisinau [Moldova, Republic of]</subfield><subfield code="b">IDIS VIITORUL Institutul pentru Dezoltare şi Initiative Sociale</subfield><subfield code="c">2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Frankfurt M.</subfield><subfield code="b">CEEOL</subfield><subfield code="c">2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (1 p. 2)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">The accession to the government of PSRM, a political party with strong pro-Russian tendencies and which has openly stated more than once in the past that it is in the favor of achieving the settlement of the Transnistrian conflict through the federalization of the Republic of Moldova, has increased Russia’s influence in the political processes taking place in Chisinau. At the same time, the PSRM government, concentrated around President Igor Dodon, generated suppositions that in the near future we could expect the signing of a document which would regulate the Transnistrian conflict. These assumptions were fueled by the failed attempts to sign the Protocol of in the "5+2" format reunion on October 9-10, 2019 in Bratislava, and at the 8th Conference on strengthening the confidence in the Transnistrian conflict settlement process which took place in Munich on November 4-5, 2019. The belief the public space it was that the draft protocol could lead to the de fact federalization of the Republic of Moldova. The rumor in the political backstage was that the protocol was blocked by former Deputy Prime Minister for Reintegration, Vasile Șova, but also by the uncompromising position of not accepting this protocol and which was assumed by the former Prime Minister of the government, Maia Sandu</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">International relations/trade</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Post-Communist Transformation</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Peace and Conflict Studies</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="710" ind1="2" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Central and Eastern European Online Library</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-45-CGR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">BSB_OE_CEEOL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033247088</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://www.ceeol.com/search/gray-literature-detail?id=987911</subfield><subfield code="l">BSB01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-45-CGR</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | DE-604.BV047864516 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
index_date | 2024-07-03T19:18:42Z |
indexdate | 2024-07-10T09:23:28Z |
institution | BVB |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033247088 |
oclc_num | 1302311116 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-12 |
owner_facet | DE-12 |
physical | 1 Online-Ressource (1 p. 2) |
psigel | ZDB-45-CGR BSB_OE_CEEOL |
publishDate | 2019 |
publishDateSearch | 2019 |
publishDateSort | 2019 |
publisher | IDIS VIITORUL Institutul pentru Dezoltare şi Initiative Sociale |
record_format | marc |
spelling | Tăbârță, Ion Verfasser aut From Bratislava to Bratislava – The Regulation Process of the Transnistrian Conflict is sliding back to Years 2002-2003 Ion Tăbârță Chisinau [Moldova, Republic of] IDIS VIITORUL Institutul pentru Dezoltare şi Initiative Sociale 2019 Frankfurt M. CEEOL 2019 1 Online-Ressource (1 p. 2) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier The accession to the government of PSRM, a political party with strong pro-Russian tendencies and which has openly stated more than once in the past that it is in the favor of achieving the settlement of the Transnistrian conflict through the federalization of the Republic of Moldova, has increased Russia’s influence in the political processes taking place in Chisinau. At the same time, the PSRM government, concentrated around President Igor Dodon, generated suppositions that in the near future we could expect the signing of a document which would regulate the Transnistrian conflict. These assumptions were fueled by the failed attempts to sign the Protocol of in the "5+2" format reunion on October 9-10, 2019 in Bratislava, and at the 8th Conference on strengthening the confidence in the Transnistrian conflict settlement process which took place in Munich on November 4-5, 2019. The belief the public space it was that the draft protocol could lead to the de fact federalization of the Republic of Moldova. The rumor in the political backstage was that the protocol was blocked by former Deputy Prime Minister for Reintegration, Vasile Șova, but also by the uncompromising position of not accepting this protocol and which was assumed by the former Prime Minister of the government, Maia Sandu International relations/trade Post-Communist Transformation Peace and Conflict Studies Central and Eastern European Online Library Sonstige oth |
spellingShingle | Tăbârță, Ion From Bratislava to Bratislava – The Regulation Process of the Transnistrian Conflict is sliding back to Years 2002-2003 International relations/trade Post-Communist Transformation Peace and Conflict Studies |
title | From Bratislava to Bratislava – The Regulation Process of the Transnistrian Conflict is sliding back to Years 2002-2003 |
title_auth | From Bratislava to Bratislava – The Regulation Process of the Transnistrian Conflict is sliding back to Years 2002-2003 |
title_exact_search | From Bratislava to Bratislava – The Regulation Process of the Transnistrian Conflict is sliding back to Years 2002-2003 |
title_exact_search_txtP | From Bratislava to Bratislava – The Regulation Process of the Transnistrian Conflict is sliding back to Years 2002-2003 |
title_full | From Bratislava to Bratislava – The Regulation Process of the Transnistrian Conflict is sliding back to Years 2002-2003 Ion Tăbârță |
title_fullStr | From Bratislava to Bratislava – The Regulation Process of the Transnistrian Conflict is sliding back to Years 2002-2003 Ion Tăbârță |
title_full_unstemmed | From Bratislava to Bratislava – The Regulation Process of the Transnistrian Conflict is sliding back to Years 2002-2003 Ion Tăbârță |
title_short | From Bratislava to Bratislava – The Regulation Process of the Transnistrian Conflict is sliding back to Years 2002-2003 |
title_sort | from bratislava to bratislava the regulation process of the transnistrian conflict is sliding back to years 2002 2003 |
topic | International relations/trade Post-Communist Transformation Peace and Conflict Studies |
topic_facet | International relations/trade Post-Communist Transformation Peace and Conflict Studies |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tabartaion frombratislavatobratislavatheregulationprocessofthetransnistrianconflictisslidingbacktoyears20022003 AT centralandeasterneuropeanonlinelibrary frombratislavatobratislavatheregulationprocessofthetransnistrianconflictisslidingbacktoyears20022003 |