ROBOTROLLING 3/2020:
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Riga [Latvia]
NATO Strategic Communications Centre of Excellence
2020
|
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | BSB01 |
Beschreibung: | Inauthentic activity in the Russian-language information space this quarter targeted NATO military exercises, peaking on 8 June with the commencement of BALTOPS in the Baltic Sea. Conversations amplified by both automated and anonymous accounts portrayed NATO’s summer exercises as exceptionally aggressive and demonstrative of the alliance’s ambitions to expand into Belarus and Ukraine. Throughout this quarter, we observed a significant increase in English-language bot activity. This flurry of activity was triggered by public statements suggesting the US move nuclear weapons, troops, and military equipment from Germany to Poland for permanent deployment. While the volume of Russian-language automated activity on both Twitter and VK shrunk this quarter, the percentage of conversations amplified by bot voices increased. Statebacked media outlets Sputnik and RT were popular sources of information among both English- and Russian-language audiences. The latter two sections of this report concentrate on the deleted account dataset published by Twitter in June 2020. First, we compare our list of previously identified bot accounts with those published by Twitter, which is visualised in Figure 5. Second, we evaluate Twitter’s capacity for combatting inauthentic activity on its platform, concluding that rates of identification, suspension, and deletion of accounts are unnecessarily slow |
Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource (1 p. 6) |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV047864255 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 220304s2020 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
035 | |a (ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol940624 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)1302323855 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV047864255 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e aacr | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-12 | ||
100 | 1 | |a Fredheim, Rolf |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a ROBOTROLLING 3/2020 |
264 | 1 | |a Riga [Latvia] |b NATO Strategic Communications Centre of Excellence |c 2020 | |
264 | 2 | |a Frankfurt M. |b CEEOL |c 2020 | |
300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (1 p. 6) | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Inauthentic activity in the Russian-language information space this quarter targeted NATO military exercises, peaking on 8 June with the commencement of BALTOPS in the Baltic Sea. Conversations amplified by both automated and anonymous accounts portrayed NATO’s summer exercises as exceptionally aggressive and demonstrative of the alliance’s ambitions to expand into Belarus and Ukraine. Throughout this quarter, we observed a significant increase in English-language bot activity. This flurry of activity was triggered by public statements suggesting the US move nuclear weapons, troops, and military equipment from Germany to Poland for permanent deployment. While the volume of Russian-language automated activity on both Twitter and VK shrunk this quarter, the percentage of conversations amplified by bot voices increased. Statebacked media outlets Sputnik and RT were popular sources of information among both English- and Russian-language audiences. The latter two sections of this report concentrate on the deleted account dataset published by Twitter in June 2020. First, we compare our list of previously identified bot accounts with those published by Twitter, which is visualised in Figure 5. Second, we evaluate Twitter’s capacity for combatting inauthentic activity on its platform, concluding that rates of identification, suspension, and deletion of accounts are unnecessarily slow | ||
650 | 4 | |a Media studies | |
650 | 4 | |a International relations/trade | |
650 | 4 | |a Security and defense | |
650 | 4 | |a Military policy | |
650 | 4 | |a Politics and communication | |
650 | 4 | |a Crowd Psychology: Mass phenomena and political interactions | |
650 | 4 | |a Geopolitics | |
700 | 1 | |a Van Sant, Kristina |4 aut | |
710 | 2 | |a Central and Eastern European Online Library |e Sonstige |4 oth | |
912 | |a ZDB-45-CGR | ||
940 | 1 | |n oe | |
940 | 1 | |q BSB_OE_CEEOL | |
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033246827 | ||
966 | e | |u https://www.ceeol.com/search/gray-literature-detail?id=940624 |l BSB01 |p ZDB-45-CGR |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804183438764277760 |
---|---|
adam_txt | |
any_adam_object | |
any_adam_object_boolean | |
author | Fredheim, Rolf Van Sant, Kristina |
author_facet | Fredheim, Rolf Van Sant, Kristina |
author_role | aut aut |
author_sort | Fredheim, Rolf |
author_variant | r f rf s k v sk skv |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV047864255 |
collection | ZDB-45-CGR |
ctrlnum | (ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol940624 (OCoLC)1302323855 (DE-599)BVBBV047864255 |
format | Electronic eBook |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02786nmm a2200433zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV047864255</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220304s2020 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-45-CGR)ceeol940624</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1302323855</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV047864255</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">aacr</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Fredheim, Rolf</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">ROBOTROLLING 3/2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Riga [Latvia]</subfield><subfield code="b">NATO Strategic Communications Centre of Excellence</subfield><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Frankfurt M.</subfield><subfield code="b">CEEOL</subfield><subfield code="c">2020</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (1 p. 6)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Inauthentic activity in the Russian-language information space this quarter targeted NATO military exercises, peaking on 8 June with the commencement of BALTOPS in the Baltic Sea. Conversations amplified by both automated and anonymous accounts portrayed NATO’s summer exercises as exceptionally aggressive and demonstrative of the alliance’s ambitions to expand into Belarus and Ukraine. Throughout this quarter, we observed a significant increase in English-language bot activity. This flurry of activity was triggered by public statements suggesting the US move nuclear weapons, troops, and military equipment from Germany to Poland for permanent deployment. While the volume of Russian-language automated activity on both Twitter and VK shrunk this quarter, the percentage of conversations amplified by bot voices increased. Statebacked media outlets Sputnik and RT were popular sources of information among both English- and Russian-language audiences. The latter two sections of this report concentrate on the deleted account dataset published by Twitter in June 2020. First, we compare our list of previously identified bot accounts with those published by Twitter, which is visualised in Figure 5. Second, we evaluate Twitter’s capacity for combatting inauthentic activity on its platform, concluding that rates of identification, suspension, and deletion of accounts are unnecessarily slow</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Media studies</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">International relations/trade</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Security and defense</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Military policy</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Politics and communication</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Crowd Psychology: Mass phenomena and political interactions</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Geopolitics</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Van Sant, Kristina</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="710" ind1="2" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Central and Eastern European Online Library</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-45-CGR</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">BSB_OE_CEEOL</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033246827</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://www.ceeol.com/search/gray-literature-detail?id=940624</subfield><subfield code="l">BSB01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-45-CGR</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | DE-604.BV047864255 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
index_date | 2024-07-03T19:18:41Z |
indexdate | 2024-07-10T09:23:27Z |
institution | BVB |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033246827 |
oclc_num | 1302323855 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-12 |
owner_facet | DE-12 |
physical | 1 Online-Ressource (1 p. 6) |
psigel | ZDB-45-CGR BSB_OE_CEEOL |
publishDate | 2020 |
publishDateSearch | 2020 |
publishDateSort | 2020 |
publisher | NATO Strategic Communications Centre of Excellence |
record_format | marc |
spelling | Fredheim, Rolf Verfasser aut ROBOTROLLING 3/2020 Riga [Latvia] NATO Strategic Communications Centre of Excellence 2020 Frankfurt M. CEEOL 2020 1 Online-Ressource (1 p. 6) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Inauthentic activity in the Russian-language information space this quarter targeted NATO military exercises, peaking on 8 June with the commencement of BALTOPS in the Baltic Sea. Conversations amplified by both automated and anonymous accounts portrayed NATO’s summer exercises as exceptionally aggressive and demonstrative of the alliance’s ambitions to expand into Belarus and Ukraine. Throughout this quarter, we observed a significant increase in English-language bot activity. This flurry of activity was triggered by public statements suggesting the US move nuclear weapons, troops, and military equipment from Germany to Poland for permanent deployment. While the volume of Russian-language automated activity on both Twitter and VK shrunk this quarter, the percentage of conversations amplified by bot voices increased. Statebacked media outlets Sputnik and RT were popular sources of information among both English- and Russian-language audiences. The latter two sections of this report concentrate on the deleted account dataset published by Twitter in June 2020. First, we compare our list of previously identified bot accounts with those published by Twitter, which is visualised in Figure 5. Second, we evaluate Twitter’s capacity for combatting inauthentic activity on its platform, concluding that rates of identification, suspension, and deletion of accounts are unnecessarily slow Media studies International relations/trade Security and defense Military policy Politics and communication Crowd Psychology: Mass phenomena and political interactions Geopolitics Van Sant, Kristina aut Central and Eastern European Online Library Sonstige oth |
spellingShingle | Fredheim, Rolf Van Sant, Kristina ROBOTROLLING 3/2020 Media studies International relations/trade Security and defense Military policy Politics and communication Crowd Psychology: Mass phenomena and political interactions Geopolitics |
title | ROBOTROLLING 3/2020 |
title_auth | ROBOTROLLING 3/2020 |
title_exact_search | ROBOTROLLING 3/2020 |
title_exact_search_txtP | ROBOTROLLING 3/2020 |
title_full | ROBOTROLLING 3/2020 |
title_fullStr | ROBOTROLLING 3/2020 |
title_full_unstemmed | ROBOTROLLING 3/2020 |
title_short | ROBOTROLLING 3/2020 |
title_sort | robotrolling 3 2020 |
topic | Media studies International relations/trade Security and defense Military policy Politics and communication Crowd Psychology: Mass phenomena and political interactions Geopolitics |
topic_facet | Media studies International relations/trade Security and defense Military policy Politics and communication Crowd Psychology: Mass phenomena and political interactions Geopolitics |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fredheimrolf robotrolling32020 AT vansantkristina robotrolling32020 AT centralandeasterneuropeanonlinelibrary robotrolling32020 |