Verfügbarkeit: The commodification gap

The commodification gap: gentrification and public policy in London, Berlin and St. Petersburg

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. Verfasser:	Bernt, Matthias 1970- (VerfasserIn)
Format:	Buch
Sprache:	English
Veröffentlicht:	Hoboken, NJ Wiley 2022
Schriftenreihe:	IJURR-SUSC
Schlagworte:	Stadtplanung Gentrifizierung Berlin London Sankt Petersburg Gentrification / England / London Gentrification / Germany / Berlin Gentrification / Russia (Federation) / Saint Petersburg Gentrification England / London Germany / Berlin Russia (Federation) / Saint Petersburg
Online-Zugang:	Inhaltsverzeichnis Literaturverzeichnis Register // Gemischte Register
Beschreibung:	Bibliographische Angaben und Index Seite [235]-258
Beschreibung:	xiii, 258 Seiten Illustrationen, Diagramme (schwarz-weiß)
ISBN:	9781119603047 9781119603054

Internformat

MARC


LEADER	00000nam a2200000 c 4500
001	BV047836549
003	DE-604
005	20230210
007	t\|
008	220215s2022 xx a\|\|\| \|\|\|\| 00\|\|\| eng d
020			\|a 9781119603047 \|c hbk. \|9 978-1-119-60304-7
020			\|a 9781119603054 \|c pbk. \|9 978-1-119-60305-4
035			\|a (OCoLC)1298745736
035			\|a (DE-599)BVBBV047836549
040			\|a DE-604 \|b ger \|e rda
041	0		\|a eng
049			\|a DE-188 \|a DE-739 \|a DE-11 \|a DE-12 \|a DE-20
084			\|a OST \|q DE-12 \|2 fid
084			\|a RB 10642 \|0 (DE-625)142220:12806 \|2 rvk
084			\|a RC 10642 \|0 (DE-625)142222:12806 \|2 rvk
084			\|a RF 96642 \|0 (DE-625)142306:12806 \|2 rvk
084			\|a RN 75642 \|0 (DE-625)142381:12806 \|2 rvk
084			\|a RQ 40642 \|0 (DE-625)142415:12806 \|2 rvk
100	1		\|a Bernt, Matthias \|d 1970- \|e Verfasser \|0 (DE-588)1023926830 \|4 aut
245	1	0	\|a The commodification gap \|b gentrification and public policy in London, Berlin and St. Petersburg \|c Matthias Bernt
264		1	\|a Hoboken, NJ \|b Wiley \|c 2022
300			\|a xiii, 258 Seiten \|b Illustrationen, Diagramme (schwarz-weiß)
336			\|b txt \|2 rdacontent
337			\|b n \|2 rdamedia
338			\|b nc \|2 rdacarrier
490	0		\|a IJURR-SUSC
500			\|a Bibliographische Angaben und Index Seite [235]-258
650	0	7	\|a Stadtplanung \|0 (DE-588)4056754-0 \|2 gnd \|9 rswk-swf
650	0	7	\|a Gentrifizierung \|0 (DE-588)4291675-6 \|2 gnd \|9 rswk-swf
651		7	\|a Berlin \|0 (DE-588)4005728-8 \|2 gnd \|9 rswk-swf
651		7	\|a London \|0 (DE-588)4074335-4 \|2 gnd \|9 rswk-swf
651		7	\|a Sankt Petersburg \|0 (DE-588)4267026-3 \|2 gnd \|9 rswk-swf
653		0	\|a Gentrification / England / London
653		0	\|a Gentrification / Germany / Berlin
653		0	\|a Gentrification / Russia (Federation) / Saint Petersburg
653		0	\|a Gentrification
653		2	\|a England / London
653		2	\|a Germany / Berlin
653		2	\|a Russia (Federation) / Saint Petersburg
689	0	0	\|a Berlin \|0 (DE-588)4005728-8 \|D g
689	0	1	\|a London \|0 (DE-588)4074335-4 \|D g
689	0	2	\|a Sankt Petersburg \|0 (DE-588)4267026-3 \|D g
689	0	3	\|a Gentrifizierung \|0 (DE-588)4291675-6 \|D s
689	0	4	\|a Stadtplanung \|0 (DE-588)4056754-0 \|D s
689	0		\|5 DE-604
776	0	8	\|i Erscheint auch als \|n Online-Ausgabe, PDF \|z 9781119603085
776	0	8	\|i Erscheint auch als \|n Online-Ausgabe, EPUB \|z 9781119603078
856	4	2	\|m Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment \|q application/pdf \|u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=033219711&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA \|3 Inhaltsverzeichnis
856	4	2	\|m Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment \|q application/pdf \|u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=033219711&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA \|3 Literaturverzeichnis
856	4	2	\|m Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment \|q application/pdf \|u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=033219711&sequence=000005&line_number=0003&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA \|3 Register // Gemischte Register
940	1		\|n oe
940	1		\|q BSB_NED_20230210
942	1	1	\|c 306.09 \|e 22/bsb \|f 090512 \|g 43155
942	1	1	\|c 306.09 \|e 22/bsb \|f 090512 \|g 41
942	1	1	\|c 910 \|e 22/bsb \|f 090512 \|g 471
942	1	1	\|c 306.09 \|e 22/bsb \|f 090512 \|g 471
943	1		\|a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033219711

Datensatz im Suchindex

_version_	1817598239590842368
adam_text	Contents List ofFigures List of Tables Series Editors’ Preface Preface 1 ix x xi xii Introduction 1 Gentrification Between Universality and Particularity 1 How to Compare? Why Compare? 8 Concepts and Causation 11 Design of this Study 15 Notes 22 2 Why the Rent Gap isn’t Enough 25 Where the Rent Gap Works Well 25 Where the Rent Gap Falls Short 30 When and Why does Capital Flow? 32 At Which Scale is the Rent Gap Positioned? 34 Which Rent? 37 Property as Control? 40 How is the Rent Gap Realised? 43 Embedding Gentrification 48 Economy, Society and States 48 The Commodification Gap 51 Notes 3 Three Countries, Three Housing Systems The British Experience 54 57 57 From Private Landlordism to a Dual Market 58 The Thatcherite Revolution 60 New Labour: More of the Same? 65 Austerity and New ‘Class War Conservatism’ Under the Coalition Government 70 Conclusion: Neoliberalism, Tenurial Transformation and Gentrification 73 vi Contents The German Experience 77 From the Controlled Housing Economy to the Lücke Plan 77 The Design of Tenant Protections 84 The Conservative Wende 86 Reunification and Neoliberal Consensus 89 Conclusion: Gentrification Between Regulation and Deregulation 91 The Russian Experience Housing in the Soviet Union From Shock Therapy to Failing Markets 98 99 102 Restricted State Capacities and Opportunity Planning 110 Conclusion: Gentrification in a Dysfunctional Market 112 State Intervention in Housing: Setting the Parameters for Gentrification 118 Notes 124 4 Barnsbury: Gentrification and the Policies of Tenure 129 The Making of Early Gentrification 129 The Right to Buy: Pouring Fuel on the Fire 137 The New Economy of Gentrification 141 Capital Gains Instead of Owner-Occupation 142 Penalty Renting 145 From Value Gap to Super-gentrification 150 Notes 154 5 Prenzlauer Berg: Gentrification Between Regulation and Deregulation 157 From Plan to Market 158 Rolling out the Market, Weakening Public Control 162 Since 2000: Privately Financed Refiirbishments, Condominium Boom and No Regulation 164 New Build Gentrification and Energy Efficient Displacement 167 Between Deregulation and Re-regulation 171 Gentrification with Brakes? 174 Notes 179 6 Splintered Gentrification: St Petersburg, Russia 181 Unpredictable Regeneration Schemes 183 World Heritage vs. Gentrification 186 The Dissolution of Kommunalki Flats 192 Contents vii State-run Repair and Renewal 198 Pro and Contra Gentrification 202 Notes 206 7 The Commodification Gap 207 Universality vs. Particularity Revisited 207 Gentrification and Decommodification 216 Meeting the Challenge: New Directions for Research and Politics 217 Notes 221 Appendix A Compulsory Purchase in Barnsbury 223 Appendix В Residents in NS-SeC Classes 1and 2 229 References 235 Index 257 References Aalbers, M.В. (2012). Subprime Cities: The Political Economy of Mortgage Markets. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell. Aalbers, M.B. (2016). The Financialization ofHousing: A Political Economy Approach. London: Routledge. Aalbers, M.B. (2019). Financial Geographies of Real Estate and the City. A Literature Review (Financial Geography Working Paper #21). http://www.fingeo.net/ wo rdpress/wp-content/uploads/2019/0 l/FinGeoWP_Aalbers-2019-2.pdf (accessed 23 March 2021). AHML. Agency for Housing and Mortgage Lending Research Centre (2015). Housing and the Mortgage Lending Market. Results for 2014. http://www.ahml. ru/common/img/ uploaded/files/agency/reporting/ quarterly/report4q2014_ en.pdf (accessed 21 June 2016; webpage no longer available). Alkon, A.H. and Cadji, J. (2020). Sowing seeds of displacement: Gentrification and food justice in Oakland, CA. InternationalJournal of Urban and Regional Research 44: 108-123. Allen, C. (2008). Housing Market Renewal and Social Class. London: Routledge. Andrusz, G.D. (1987). The built environment in Soviet theory and practice. InternationalJournal of Urban and Regional Research 11 (4): 478-499. Arbaci, S. (2019). Paradoxes of Segregation: Housing Systems, Welfare Regimes and Ethnic Residential Change in Southern European Cities. Oxford: Wiley. ASUM. Angewandte Sozialforschung und Urbanes Management GmbH (2012). Endbericht zur Sozialstudie Sanierungsgebiet Prenzlauer Berg - Helmhoitzplatz 2012 [Final Report on the Study of Social Structures in the Urban Renewal Area Prenzlauer Berg - Hemholtzplatz 2012]. https://www.berlin.de/imperia/ md/content/bapankow/stapl/sozialstudie_helmholtzplatz_2012.pdf (accessed 10 June 2016; webpage no longer available). Atkinson, R., Parker, S., and Burrows, R. (2017). Elite formation, power and space in contemporary London. Theory, Culture ԺSociety 34(5-6): 179-200. Axënov, К. (2011). Social segregation of personal activity spaces in a post transformation metropolis (case study of St. Petersburg). Regional Research of Russia 1(1): 52-61. Badcock, B. (1989). An Australian view of the rent gap hypothesis. Annah of the Association ofAmerican Geographers 79(1): 125-145. The Commodification Gap: Gentrification and Public Policy in London, Berlin and St Petersburg, First Edition. Matthias Bernt. © 2022 John Wiley Sons Ltd. Published 2022 by John Wiley Sons Ltd. 236 References Badcock, В. (1990). On the nonexistence of the rent gap, a reply. Annals of the Association ofAmerican Geographers 80(3): 459-461. Badyina, A. and Golubchikov, O. (2005). Gentrification in central Moscow - A market process or deliberate policy? Money, power and people in housing regen eration in Ostozhenka. Geografiska Annaler: Series В Human Geography 87(2): 113-129. Balchin, P. (1996). Housing Policy in Europe. London: Routledge. Ball, Μ. (1977). Differential rent and the role of landed property. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 1(1-4): 380-403. Ball, Μ. (1985a) Land rent and the construction industry. In: Land Rent: Housing and Urban Planning (eds. Μ. Ball, V. Bentivegna, and Μ. Edwards), 71-86. London: Groom Helm. Ball, Μ. (1985b). The urban rent question. Environment and Planning A 17: 503525. Ball, Μ. (1987). Rent and social relations: A reply to Clark. Environment and Planning A 19: 269-272. Ball, Μ. (1998). Institutions in British property research: A review. Urban Studies 35(9): 1501-1517. Barlow, J. and Duncan, S. (1994). Success and Failure in Housing Provision: European Systems Compared. Oxford: Pergamon. Bartholomai, R. (2004) .Die Entwicklung des Politikfeldes Wohnen [The development of housing policy]. In: Housing Policy in Germany. Positions, Agents, Instruments (eds. B. Egner, H. Georgakis, H. Heinelt, and R Bartholomäi), 15—34. Kassel: Schader Stiftung. Bater, J.H. (1980). The Soviet City: Ideal and Reality. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Bater, J.H. (2006). Central St. Petersburg: Continuity and change in privilege and place. Eurasian Geography and Economics 47(1): 4-27. Beauregard, R.A. (1986). The chaos and complexity of gentrification. In: Gentrifica tion of the City (eds. N. Smith and P. Williams), 35-55. Winchester: Allen and Unwin. Beauregard, R.A. (2003). City ofsuperlatives. City and Community 2(3): 183-199. Becker, R. (1988). Subventionen fur den Wohnungssektor [Subsidies for the housing sector]. In: Sozialer Wohnungsbau im internationalen Vergleich [Social Housing in International Comparison] (eds. W. Prigge and W. Kaib), 94-122. Frankfurt a.M.: Vervuert Verlag. Bengtsson, B. (2015). Between structure and Thatcher: Towards a research agenda for theory-informed actor-related analysis of housing politics. Housing Studies 30(5): 677-693. Bernt, Μ. (1998). Stadterneuerung unter Aufwertungsdruck [Urban Renewal and Up grading Pressure]. Bad Sinzheim: Pro-Universitate-Verlag. Bernt, Μ. (2003). Rübergeklappt: Die ‘Behutsame Stadterneuerung’ im Berlin der 1990er Jahre [Flipped. Careful Urban Renewal in Berlin in the 1990s], Berlin: Schelzky Jeep. References 237 Bernt, Μ. (2009). Partnerships for demolition: The governance of urban renewal in East Germany’s shrinking cities. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 33(4): 754-769. Bernt, Μ. (2012). The ‘double movements’ of neighbourhood change: Gentrifica tion and public policy in Harlem and Prenzlauer Berg. Urban Studies 49(14): 3045-3062. Bernt, Μ. (2015). Stadterneuerung zwischen Entstaatlichung und politischer Ein flußnahme. Zu schwach, zu spät, zu unentschlossen [Urban renewal between state-withdrawal and political interventionism. Too late, too weak, too indeci sive] . In: Eine Stadt verändert sich. Berlin-Pankow 25 Jahre Stadterneuerung [A city changes. Berlin-Pankow 25 years of Urban Renewal] (ed. Bezirksamt Pankow. Abteilung Stadtentwicklung), 150-161. Berlin: Nicolai. Bernt, Μ. (2016a). Very particular, or rather universal? Gentrification through the lenses of Ghertner and López-Morales. City 20(4): 637-644. Bernt, Μ. (2016b). How post-socialist is gentrification? Observations in East Berlin and Saint Petersburg. Eurasian Geography and Economics 57(4-5): 565-587. Bernt, Μ. (2017). Phased out, demolished and privatized: Social housing in an East German shrinking city. In: Social Housing and Urban Renewal: A Cross-National Perspective (eds. P. Watt and P. Smets), 253-276. Oxford: Emerald Publishing Ltd. Bernt, Μ. and Holm, A. (2005). Exploring the substance and style of gentrification: Berlin’s ‘Prenziberg.’ In: Gentrification in a Global Perspective: The New Urban Colonialism (eds. R. Atkinson and G. Bridge), 106-120. Milton Park: Routledge. Bernt, Μ. and Holm, A. (2009). Is it, or is not? The conceptualisation of gentrifica tion and displacement and its political implications in the case of Berlin Pren zlauer Berg. City 13(2-3): 312—324. Bernt, Μ., Colini, L., and Förste, D. (2017). Privatization, financialization and state restructuring in East Germany: The case of Am Südpark. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 41 (4): 555-571. Betancur, J. (2014). Gentrification in Latin America: Overview and critical analysis. Urban Studies Research, http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/986961. Bezirksamt Pankow. Abteilung Stadtentwicklung (2015). Eine Stadt verändert sich. Berlin-Pankow 25 Jahre Stadterneuerung [A city changes. Berlin-Pankow 25years of Urban Renewal]. Berlin: Nicolai. Bhaskar, R. (1975). A Realist Theory ofScience. Leeds: Leeds Books. Binney, Μ. (2012). Introduction. In: Sankt Peterburg: nasledye pod ugrozoy [St Pe tersburg: Heritage at Risk] (eds. C. Cecil and E. Minchenok), 13-15. Moscow: MAPS. Blomley, N. (2003). Law, property, and the geography of violence: The frontier, the survey, and the grid. Annah of the Association of American Geographers 93(1): 121-141. Blomley, N. (2004). Unsettling the City: Urban Land and the Politics of Property. New York, NY: Routledge. 238 References Blomley, N. (2005). Flowers in the bathtub: Boundary crossings at the public-private divide. Geoforum 36(3): 281-296. Bodenschatz, H. (1987). Platzfreifür das neue Berlin! Geschichte der Stadterneuerung in der ‘größten Mietskasernenstadt der Welt’ seit 1871 [Give Way to the New Berlin! A History of Urban Renewal in the ‘Biggest Tenement City of the World’]. Berlin: Transit. Bondi, L. (1999). Between the woof and the weft: A response to Loretta Lees. Envi ronment and Planning D: Society and Space 17(3): 125-145. Bonefeld, W. (2012). Freedom and the strong state: On German ordoliberalism. New Political Economy 17(5): 633-656. Borst, R. (1996): Volkswohnungsbestand in Spekulantenhand? [Peoples homes for speculators?]. In: Stadtentwicklung in Ostdeutschland [Urban development in East Germanyftàs. H. Häußermann and R. Neef), 107-128. Opladen: West deutscher Verlag. Bourassa, S.C. (1993). The rent gap debunked. Urban Studies 30(10): 1731-1744. Bowie, D. (2016). The Radical and Socialist Tradition in British Planning: From Puri tan Colonies to Garden Cities. London: Routledge. Bowie, D. (2017). Beyond the compact city: A London case study - Spatial impacts, social polarisation, sustainable development and social justice (International Eco-Cities Initiative 1), https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324080429_ Beyond_the_compact_city_a_London_case_study_-_spatial_impacts_social_ polarisation_sustainable_development_and_social_justice (accessed 23 October 2020). Brenner, N. (2003). Stereotypes, archetypes and prototypes: Three uses of superla tives in contemporary urban studies. City and Community 2(3): 205-216. Brenner, N. and Theodore, N. (2002). Cities and the geographies of‘actually existing neoliberalism’. Antipode 34(3): 349-379. Bridge, G. and Dowling, R. (2001). Microgeographies of retailing and gentrification. Australian Geographer 32(1): 93-107. Bridge, G., Butler, T, and Lees, L. (2012). Mixed Communities. Gentrification by Stealth? Bristol: Policy Press. Brown-Saracino, J. (2010). The Gentrification Debates. New York, NY: Routledge. Bugler, J. (1968). The invaders of Islington. New Society, 15 August. Butler, S.B., Nayyar-Stone, R., and O’Leary, S. (1999). The law and economics of historic preservation in St. Petersburg, Russia. Review of Urban Regional Development Studies 11 (1): 24֊—44. Butler,T. (2007). For gentrification? Environment and Planning A 39(1): 162—181. Butler, T. and Lees, L. (2006). Super-gentrification in Barnsbury, London: Globaliza tion and gentrifying global elites at the neighbourhood level. Transactions ofthe Institute ofBritish Geographers 31: 467-487. Butler, T. and Robson, G. (2003). London Calling. The Middle Classes and the Re Making ofInner London. Oxford: Berg. Calbet I Elias, L. (2018). Financialised rent gaps and the public interest in Ber lin’s housing crisis. Reflections on N. Smith’s generalised gentrification’. In: References 239 Gentrification as a Global Strategy. Neil Smith and Beyond (eds. A. Albet and N. Benach), 165-176. London and New York, NY: Routledge. Callon, Μ. (1998). The Laws ofthe Markets. London: Blackwell Publishers. Castles, EG. (1998). Comparative Public Policy. Patterns Post-War Transformation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Castles, EG. (2005). The Kemeny thesis revisited. Housing, Theory and Society 22(2): 84-86. Chakrabarty, D. (2000) Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Chambers, P.A.B. (1974) The process of gentrification in Inner London. M.Phil. the sis. School of Environmental Studies, University College of London. Choi, N. (2016). Metro Manila through the gentrification lens: Disparities in urban planning and displacement risks. Urban Studies 53(3) (Special issue: Locating gentrification in East Asia): 577-592. Clark, E. (1987). The Rent Gap and Urban Change: Case Studies in Malmö, 18601985. Lund: Lund University Press. Clark, E. (1988). The rent gap and the transformation of the built environment: Case studies in Malmö 1860-1985. Geografiska Annaler BT0: 241—254. Clark, E. (1992). On gaps in gentrification theory. Housing Studies 7(1): 16-26. Clark, E. (2005). The order and simplicity of gentrification — A political challenge. In: Gentrification in a Global Context. The New Urban Colonialism (eds. R. Atkin son and G. Bridge), 256-264. London: Routledge. Clarke, S. and Ginsburg, N. (n.d.) The Political Economy of Housing, https:// homepages.warwick.ac.uk/--syrbe/pubs/ClarkeGinsburg.pdf (accessed 1 April 2017). Colomb, C. (2007). Unpacking New Labours urban renaissance’ agenda. Towards a socially sustainable reurbanization of British cities? Planning Practice and Research 22(1): 1-24. Cook, L.J. (2007). Postcommunist Welfare States. Reform Politics in Russia and Eastern Europe. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Copley, T. (2014). From Right to Buy to Buy to Let. Ed. Greater London Authority, http :/1tomcopley.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01 /From-Right-to-Buy-to-Buyto-Let-Jan-2014.pdf (accessed 15 February 2015; webpage no longer available). Corbett, S. and Walker, A. (2012). The big society: Back to the future. The Political Quarterly 83(3): 487-493. Crook, T. and Kemp, P.A. (2011). Transforming Private Landlords. Housing, Market and Public Policy. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell. Crouch, C. and Streeck, W. (1997). Political Economy ofModern Capitalism. London: Sage. Cummings, J. (2016). Confronting favela chic. The gentrification of informal set tlements in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. In: Global Gentrifications (eds. L. Lees, H.B. Shin, and E. López-Morales), 81—100. Bristol and Chicago, IL: Policy Press. Czada, R. (1985). Neokorporatistische Politikentwicklung in Westeuropa. Politische Verbändeeinbindung und wirtschaftspolitische Strategien im internationalen 240 References Vergleich [Neocorporatist Policy Development in Western Europe], Research report given to Stiftung Volkswagenwerk. http://www.politik.uni-osnabrueck.de/ POLSYS/publications.html (accessed 20 November 2017). Czada, R. (2000). Konkordanz, Korporatismus und Politikverflechtung: Dimen sionen der Verhandlungsdemokratie [Concordance, corporatism and joint decision-making: Dimensions of the negotiating democracy]. In: Zwischen Wettbewerbs- und Verha.ndlungsdemokra.tie. Analysen zum Regierungssystem der Bundesrepublik Deutschland [Between Competition and Negotiations. Analyses on the Governance Regime ofthe Federal Republic ofGermany] (eds. E. Holtmann and H. Voelzkow), 23-52. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag. Czada, R. (2003). Der Begriff der Verhandlungsdemokratie und die vergleichende Policy-Forschung [lhe concept of a negotiating democracy in comparative policy research]. In: Die Reformierbarkeit der Demokratie. Innovationen und Blockaden [The Reformability ofDemocracy. Innovations and Blockades] (eds. R. Mayntz and W. Streeck), 173—203. Frankfurt: Campus. Czada, R. and Schmidt, M.G. (1993). Verhandlungsdemokratie, Interessenvermittlung, Regierbarkeit [Negotiating Democracy, Mediation of Interests and Governability]. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag. Daunton, MJ. (1987). A Property-Owning Democracy? Housing in Britain. London and Boston, MA: Faber and Faber. Davidson, Μ. and Lees, L. (2005). New-build gentrification and Londons riverside renaissance. Environment and Planning A 37: 1160-1195. Davidson, Μ. and Lees, L. (2010). New-build gentrification. Its histories, trajec tories, and critical geographies. Population, Space and Place 16: 395-411. Davis, J. (2001). Rents and race in 1960s London: New light on Rachmanism. Twen tieth Century British History 12(1): 69—92. DCH. Defend Council Housing. (2008). Briefing. The Case Against Trans fer. http://www.defendcouncilhousing.org.uk/dch/resources/StockTransfer/ DCHStockTransferbriefing.pdf (accessed 20 May 2014). Delgadillo, V. (2015). Selective modernization of Mexico City and its historic center. Gentrification without displacement? Urban Geography 37(8) (Special Issue: Latin American gentrifications): 1154-1174. DETR. Department of Environment, Transport and the Regions. (2000). Quality and Choice: A Decent Home for All. The Housing Green Paper. London: HSMO. Diamond, L. (2002). Thinking about hybrid regimes. Tournai ofDemocracy 13(2): 21-35. Diappi, L. and Dolchi, P. (2008). Smiths rent gap theory and local real estate dynamics: A multi-agent model. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 32: 6-18. Dieser, H. (1996). Restitution - was ist sie und was bewirkt sie? [Restitution - what is it and what does it affect?]. In: Stadtentwicklung in Ostdeutschland: Soziale und Räumliche Tendenzen [Urban development in East Germany. Social and spatial ten dencies] (eds. H. Häußermann and R. Neef), 107-128. Berlin: Leske Budrich. References 241 DoE. Department of the Environment. (1977). Housing Policy. A Consultative Doc ument. London: HSMO. Dörfler, T. (2010). Gentrification in Prenzlauer Berg?Milieuwandel eines Berliner Sozi alraums seit 1989 [Gentrification in Prenzlauer Berg? The Change ofSocial Milieux in a Neighbourhood in Berlin], Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag. Doling, J. (1997). Comparative Housing Policy. Government and Housing in Advanced Industrialized Countries. London: Macmillan. Donnison, D. (1967). The Government ofHousing. Harmondsworth: Penguin. Doshi, S. (2013) The politics of the evicted: Redevelopment, subjectivity, and difference in Mumbai’s slum frontier. Antipode 45(4): 844—865. Doshi, S. (2015). Rethinking gentrification in India: Displacement, dispossession and the spectre of development. In: Gentrifications Global (eds. L. Lees, H.B. Shin, and E. López-Morales), 101-120. Bristol and Chicago, IL: Policy Press. Edwards, Μ. (2016). The housing crisis and London. City 20(2): 222-237. Egner, В. (2014). Wohnungspolitik seit 1945 [Housing policy since V)45\. Aus Poli tik und Zeitgeschichte 20—21: 13-19. Egner, В., Georgakis, H., Heinelt, H., and Bartholomäi, R. (2004). Housing Policy in Germany. Positions, Agents, Instruments. Kassel: Schader Stiftung. Engels, В. (1994). Capital flows, redlining, and gentrification: The pattern of mort gage lending and social change in Glebe, Sydney, 1960-1984. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 18(4): 628—657. Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The Three Worlds ofWelfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Pol ity Press. Etzioni, A. (1996). The New Golden Rule: Community and Morality in a Democratic Society. New York, NY: Basic Books. Evans, P. (1995). Embedded Autonomy. States and Industrial Transformation. Princ eton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Fairclough, N. (2000). New Labour, New Language? London: Routledge. Ferris, J. (1972). Participation in Urban Planning: The Barnsbury Case. Occasional Papers in Social Administration, No. 48. London: G. Bell and Sons. Fligstein, N. (1990). The Transformation of Corporate Control. Cambridge, MA: Har vard University Press. Fligstein, N. (2001). The Architecture of Markets. An Economic Sociology of TwentyFirst-Century Capitalist Societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Fligstein, N. and Calder, R. (2015). Architecture of markets. In: Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences (eds. R.A. Scott and S.M. Kosslyn). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. Fligstein, N. and Dioun, C., (2015). Economic sociology. In: International Encyclope dia ofthe Social Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed. Vol. 7 (ed.-in-chiefJ.D. Wright), 67—72. Oxford: Elsevier. Forrest, R. and Mûrie, A. (1983). Residualization and council housing: Aspects of the changing social relations of housing tenure. Journal of Social Policy, 12(4): 453-468. 242 References Forrest, R. and Mûrie, A. (1988). Selling the Welfare State. The Privatisation ofPublic Housing. London: Routledge. French, R.A. (1995). Plans, Pragmatism and People: The Legacy ofSoviet Planningfor Todays Cities. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press. French, R.A. and Hamilton, F.E.I. (1979). The Socialist City: Spatial Structure and Urban Policy. London: John Wiley. Führer, K.C. (1995). Mieter, Hausbesitzer, Staat und Wohnungsmarkt. Wohnungsman gel und Wohnungszwangswirtschaft in Deutschland 1914-1960 [Tenant, Landlord, State and Housing Market. Housing Shortage and Controlled Housing Economy in Germany 1914-1960]. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag. Furman, D. (2008). Imitation democracies: The post-Soviet penumbra. New Left Review, 54: 29-47. Gentile, Μ., Salukvadze, J., and Gogishvili, D. (2015). Newbuild gentrification, tele urbanization and urban growth: Placing the cities of the post-communist South in the gentrification debate. Geografie 120(2): 134—163. Gerasimova, E.Y. (2000). Sovietskaya kommunalnaya kvartira kak sotsialnyi institut: istoriko-sotsiologicheskii analiz material Petrograda-Leningrada 1917—1991 [The Soviet Communal Apartment as a Social Institution: Historical-Sociological Analysis of Material from Petrograd-Leningrad 1917—1991]. http://www. dissercat.com/content/sovetskaya-kommunalnaya-kvartira-kak-sotsialnyiinstitut-istoriko-sotsiologicheskii-analiz-n (accessed 5 May 2016). Gewos (2016). Bericht der Expertengruppe zur Reform des Sozialen Wohnungsbaus in Berlin [Report of the Experts’ Commission on the Reform of Social Housing in Berlin]. http://www.stadtentwicklung.berlin.de/wohnen/sozialer_wohnungsbau/ reform/download/teilOl.pdf (accessed 20 March 2017). Ghertner, D.A. (2014). Indias urban revolution: Geographies of displacement beyond gentrification. Environment and Planning A 46(7): 1554-1571. Ghertner, D.A. (2015). Why gentrification theory fails in ‘much of the world’. City 19(4): 546-556. Giddens, A. (1998). The Third Way: The Renewal of Social Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press. Giddens, A. (2000). The Third Way and its Critics. Cambridge: Polity Press. Gillespie, T. (2020). The real estate frontier. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 44(4): 599-616. Ginsburg, N. (1989). The Housing Act, 1988 and its policy context: A critical com mentary. Critical Social Policy 9(25): 56-81. Ginsburg, N. (1999). Housing and housing policy in the 20th century. In: British Social Welfare in the Twentieth Century (eds. R. Page and R. Silburn), 226—235. UK: Palgrave Macmillan. Ginsburg, N. (2005). The privatization of council housing. Critical Social Policy 25(1): 115-135. Glass, R. (1964). London: Aspects of Change. London: McGibbon and Kee. Glock, B. and Häußermann, H. (2004). New trends in urban development and pub lic policy in eastern Germany: Dealing with the vacant housing problem at the local level. InternationalJournal of Urban and Regional Research 28(4): 919-929. References 243 Glucksberg, L. (2016). A view from the top. City 20(2): 238-255. Glucksberg, L., Atkinson, R., Burrows, R. et al. (2016). Minimum city? A critical assessment of some of the deeper impacts of the super-rich’ on urban life. In: Cit ies and the Super-Rich: Real Estate, Elite Practices, and Urban Political Economies (eds. R. Forrest, S. Yee Koh, and B. Wissink), 253-272. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. Goldschmidt, N. (2013). Walter Euckens place in the history of ideas. The Review of Austrian Economics 26: 127-147'. Golubchikov, O. (2004). Urban planning in Russia: Towards the market. European Planning Studies 12(2): 229—247. Gonzalez, S. and Waley, P. (2013). Traditional retail markets: The new gentrification frontier? Antipode 45(4): 965-983. Goodchild, R. and Munton, R. (1985). Development and the Landowner. London: Allen Unwin. Gotham, K.F. (2005). Tourism gentrification: The case of New Orleans’ Vieux Carre (French Quarter). Urban Studies 42(7): 1099-1121. Gotham, K.F. (2009). Creating liquidity out of spatial fixity: The secondary circuit of capital and the subprime mortgage crisis. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 33(2): 355-371. Graham N. (2011). Lawscape: Property, Environment, Law. New York, NY: Rout ledge. Gramsci, A. (1971). Selection from the Prison Notebooks. London: Lawrence and Wis hart. Granovetter, Μ. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of em beddedness. American Journal ofSociology 91: 481-510. Gutzon Larsen, H. and Lund Hansen, A. (2008). Gentrification - Gentle or trau matic? Urban renewal policies and socioeconomic transformations in Copenha gen. Urban Studies 45(12): 2429-2448. Hackworth J. and Smith, N. (2001). The changing state of gentrification. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 92(4): 464-477. Haila, A. (1990). The theory of land rent at the crossroads. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 8(3): 275-296. Haila, A. (2016). Urban Land Rent. Singapore as a Property State. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell. Hale, H.E. (2011). Hybrid regimes: When democracy and autocracy mix. In: Dynamics of Democratization (ed. N. Brown), 23—45. Baltimore, MA: Johns Hopkins University Press. Hall, P. (1986). Governing the Economy. The Politics ofState Intervention in Britain and France. New York, NY and Oxford: Oxford University Press. Hall, P. and Soskice, D. (2001). Varieties of Capitalism. The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford and New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Hall, S. (1998). The great moving nowhere show. Marxism Today. Special edition (November/December): 9-14. Hammel, D.J. (1999a). Re-establishing the rent gap: An alternative view of capital ised land rent. Urban Studies 36(8): 1283-1293. 244 References Hammel, D.J. (1999b). Gentrification and land rent: A historical view of the rent gap in Minneapolis. Urban Geography 20(2): 116-145. Hamnett, C. (1973). Improvement grants as an indicator of gentrification in Inner London. Area 5(4): 252-261. Hamnett, C. (1976). Social change and residential segregation in Inner London 1961-1971. Urban Studies 13(3): 261-271. Hamnett, C. (1991). The blind men and the elephant: The explanation of gentrifica tion. Transactions ofthe Institute ofBritish Geographers 16(2): 173-189. Hamnett, C. (1992). Gentrifiers or lemmings? A response to Neil Smith. Transactions ofthe Institute ofBritish Geographers 17(1): 116-119. Hamnett, C. (2003). Unequal City: London in the Global Arena. London: Routledge. Hamnett, C. (2009). Spatially displaced demand and the changing geography of house prices in London, 1995-2006. Housing Studies 24(3): 301-320. Hamnett, C. (2010). Moving the poor out of London? The implications of the coa lition government 2010 cuts to housing benefits. Environment and Planning A 42: 2809-2819. Hamnett, C. and Randolph, B. (1988). Cities, Housing and Profit: Flat Break-Up and the Decline ofPrivate Renting. London: Hutchinson. Hamnett, C. and Randolph, W. ( 1984). The role oflandlord disinvestment in housing market transformation: An analysis of the flat break-up market in Central Lon don. Transactions ofthe Institute ofBritish Geographers 9(3): 259—279. Hamnett, C. and Williams, P. (1979). Gentrification in London 1961—71. An Empirical and Theoretical Analysis of Social Change. (CURS Research Memoran dum 71). Birmingham: Joint Centre for Regional, Urban and Local Government Studies. Harré, R. (1986). Varieties ofRealism. Oxford: Blackwell. Harvey, D. (1973). SocialJustice and the City. London: Edward Arnold. Harvey, D. (1974). Class-monopoly rent, finance capital and the urban revolution. Regional Studies 8(3-4): 239-255. Harvey, D. (1982). The Limits to Capital. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Harvey, D. (1985). The Urbanization of Capital. Studies in the History and Theory of Capitalist Urbanization. Baltimore, MA: Johns Hopkins University Press. Harvey, B. (1994). Europe’s homeless people and the role of housing. In: Housing — Social integration and exclusion (eds. H. Kristensen and J. Quigley). Horsholm: Danish Building Research Institute. Harvey, D. (2010). The Enigma of Capital and the Crisis of Capitalism. London: Pro file Books. Häußermann, H. (1995). Von der sozialistischen’ zur ‘kapitalistischen Stadt [From the ‘socialist’ to the ‘capitalist’ city]. Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte В 12: 3—15. Häußermann, Н. and Kapphan, A. (2002). Berlin: Von der geteilten zur gespaltenen Stadt? Sozialräumlicher Wandel seit 1990 [Berlin: From the Divided to the Separated City. Socio-Spatial Change Since 1990]. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Häußermann, H., Holm, A., and Zunzer, D. (2002). Stadterneuerung in der Berliner Republik [Urban Renewal in the New Republic], Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag. References 245 He, S. (2019), Three waves of state-led gentrification in China. Tijdschrift voor econo mische en sociale Geografie 110(1): 26—34. Healey, P. and Barrett, S. (1990). Structure and agency in land and property development processes: Some ideas for research. Urban Studies 2՜!(1): 89-103. Heller, M.A. (1999). The boundaries of property. Yale Law Journal 108(5): 11631223. Heller, M.A. (1998). The tragedy of the anticommons. Property in the transition from Marx to markets. Harvard Law Review 111 (3): 621-688. Helms, H.G. (1992). Die Stadt ah Gabentisch. Beobachtungen der aktuellen Städte bauentwicklung [The City as a Table for Presents. Observation in Recent Urban Developments]. Leipzig: Reclam. Heywood, A. (2012). London for sale? An Assessment of the Private Housing Mar ket in London and the Impact of Growing Overseas Investment. http://www. smith-institute.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/London-for-sale.pdf (accessed 6 January 2022). Hjödestrand, T. (2009). Needed by Nobody: Homelessness, Humiliation and Human ness in Post-Socialist Russia. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. HM Government. (2011). Laying the Foundations: A Housing Strategy for England. London: DETR. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/ system/uploads/attachment_data/file/7532/2033676.pdf (accessed 6 January 2022). Hodkinson, S. (2011a). Housing regeneration and the private finance initiative in England: Unstitching the neoliberal urban straitjacket. Antipode 43: 358-383. Hodkinson, S. (2011b). The private finance initiative in English council housing regeneration: A privatisation too far? Housing studies 26(6): 911—932. Hodkinson, S. (2012). The new urban enclosure. City 16: 500-518. Hodkinson, S. and Robbins, G. (2013). The return of class war conservatism? Housing under the UK Coalition government. Critical Social Policy 33(1): 57-77 Hodkinson, S., Watt, P., and Mooney, G. (2013). Neoliberal housing policy-Time for a critical re-appraisal. Critical Social Policy 33(1): 3-16. Holm A. (2006). Die Restrukturierung des Raumes: Machtverhältnisse in der Stadterneuerung der 90er Jahre in Ostberlin [The Restructuring of Space: Power Relations in the Urban Renewal ofthe 1990s in East Berlin]. Bielefeld: Transcript-Verlag. Holm, A. (2010). Townhouses, Urban Village, Car Loft. Berliner Luxuswohnanlagen als ‘dritte Welle’ der Gentrification [Townhouses, urban village, car Loft. Berlins luxury housing as a ‘third wave’ of gentrification]. Geographische Zeitschrift 98(2): 100-115. Holm, A., Hamann, U,, and Kaltenborn, S. (2016). Die Legende vom Sozialen Woh nungbau. Berlin: Berliner Hefte zu Geschichte und Gegenwart der Stadt. Holmans, A.E. (1987). Housing Policy in Britain. London: Croom Helm. Honoré, A.M. (1961). Ownership. In: Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence (ed. A.G. Guest), 107-147. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Hope, A., Kato, Y, and J. Sbieca (2020). A Recipefor Gentrification. Food, Power, and Resistance in the City. New York, NY: New York University Press. 246 References Housing Committee of St. Petersburg. (2014). Gosudarstvennaya programma SanktPeterburga: Obespechenyie dostupným zhilyem I zhilishzno-kommunalnymi usluga mi zhiteley Sankt-Peterburga na 2015—2020 /State Programme for the Provision of Sufficient Housing and Housing Services for the Citizens of St. Petersburg 2015-2020. Proposal to the Resolution of the City of St. Petersburg No. 84, 18.2.2014]. http://46.182.26.58/SpbGovSearch/Document/7101.pdf (accessed 30 June 2017; webpage no longer available). Imrie, R. and Raco, Μ. (2003). Community and the changing nature of urban pol icy. In: Urban Renaissance? New Labour, Community and Urban Policy (eds. R Imrie and R. Mike), 3-36. Bristol: Policy Press. Islam, T. and Sakızhoğlu, В. (2015) The making of, and resistance to, state-led gen trification in Istanbul, Turkey. In: Global Gentrifications (eds. L. Lees, H.B. Shin, and E. López-Morales), 245-264. Bristol and Chicago, IL: Policy Press. Jackson, B. (2012). Property-owning democracy: A short history. In: PropertyOwning Democracy: Rawb and Beyond (eds. Μ. O’Neill and T. Williamson), 33—52. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell. Jaedicke, W. and Wollmann, H. (1991). Wohnungspolitik und Regierungswechsel [Housing policies and changes of government]. In: Die alte Bundesrepublik. Kon tinuität und Wandel [The old Federal Republic of Germany. Continuity and change]. Leviathan. Special Issue 12/1991 (eds. B. Blanke and H. Wollmann), 420-436. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. Jäger, J. (2003). Urban land rent theory: A regulationist perspective. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 27(2): 233-249. Jessop, B. (1990). State Theory. Putting the Capitalist State in Its Place. Cambridge: Polity Press. Jessop, B. (2002). The Future ofthe Capitalist State. Cambridge: Polity Press. Jessop, B. (2015). The State: Past, Present and Future. Cambridge: Polity Press. Jones, C. and Mûrie, A. (2006). The Right to Buy. Analysis Evaluation ofa Housing Policy. Oxford: Blackwell. Kaliin, H. and Slater, T. (2014). Activating territorial stigma: Gentrifying marginal ity on Edinburgh’s other’ fringe. Environment and Planning A 46: 1351-1368. Kary, К. (1988). The gentrification of Toronto and the rent gap theory. In: The Changing Canadian Inner City (eds. T. Bunting and P. Filion), 53-72. Waterloo: Department of Geography, University of Waterloo. Katz, L. (2008). Exclusion and exclusivity in property law. University ofToronto Law Journal 5M$}: 275-315. Kémény, J. (1995)· From Public Housing to the Social Market. London: Routledge. Kémény, J. (2005)· ‘The really big trade off between home ownership and welfare: Castles’ evaluation of the 1980 thesis, and a reformulation 25 years on. Housing, Theory and Society 22(2): 59-75. Kémény, J. (2006). Corporatism and housing regimes. Housing Theory and Society 23(1): 1-18. Kemeny, J and Lowe, S. (1998). Schools of comparative housing research. From con vergence to divergence. Housing Studies 13(2): 161-176. References 247 Kemp, P. (1997). A Comparative Study of Housing Allowance. London: Department of Social Security. King, P. (2001). Understanding Housing Finance. London: Routledge. Kivell, P. (1993). Land and the City. London: Routledge Knight Frank. Residential Research (2014). The Rental Revolution. Examining the Private Rented Sector 2014. http://my.knightfrank.co.uk/research-reports/ private-rented-sector-report-2168.aspx (accessed 30 June 2014; webpage no longer available). Kofner, St. (2004). Wohnungsmarkt und Wohnungswirtschaft [Housing Market and Housing Economy]. Munich: De Gruyter Oldenbourg. Kollegova, A. (2011). Changes in Russian Housing Policy after the Crisis 2008. Paper presented at the New Housing Researchers’ Day, July 4, 2011, European Network of Housing Researchers, Toulouse. Kononenko, V. and Moshes A. eds. (2011). Russia as a Network State. What Works in Russia When State Institutions Do Noti New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. Kornev, N. (2004). Segregatsya po-peterburgskyi - poysky realnosty [Segregation in St. Petersburg- The retrieval of realities}. Pereskop N.2/2004. http://teleskopjournal.spb.ru/files/dir_l/article_contentl 197390715339144file.pdf (accessed 30 June 2017). Kosareva, N.B. and Struyk, R. (1993). Housing privatization in the Russian Federa tion. Housing Policy Debate 4(1): 81-100. Krätke, S. (1995). Stadt ֊ Raum - Ökonomie, Einführung in aktuelle Problemfelder der Stadtökonomie und Wirtschaftsgeographie [City-Space-Economy. An Introduction into Current Problems of Urban and Economic Geographies], Basel; Boston, MA; and Berlin: Birkhäuser. Krijnen, Μ. (2018). Gentrification and the creation and formation of rent gaps. City 22(3): 437-446. Kuhnert, J. and Leps, О. (2017). Neue Wohnungsgemeinnützigkeit. Wege zu langfristig preiswertem und zukunftsgerechtem Wohnraum [New Limited-Profit Housing. Ways Towards Long-Term Affordable and Sustainable Housing!. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Lambert, C. (2002). Transforming the city: Post-recession gentrification and re urbanisation. XVI AESOP Congress, Volos, Greece, 10-15 July 2002. http:// eprints.uwe.ac.uk/9594 (accessed 23 November 2017). Lapavitsas, C. (2013). Profiting Without Producing: How Finance Exploits Us All. New York, NY: Verso. Lasswell, H.D. (1936). Politics: Who Gets What, When, How. New York, NY: Whit tlesey House. Ledeneva, A. (2006). How Russia Really Works: The Informal Practices that Shaped Post-Soviet Politics and Business. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Lees, L. (1994). Gentrification in London and New York: An Atlantic gap? Housing Studies 9(2): 199-217. Lees, L. (2003). Super-gentrification: The case of Brooklyn Heights, New York City. Urban Studies 40(12): 2487-2509. 248 References Lees, L. (2008). Gentrification and social mixing: Towards an inclusive urban renais sance? Urban Studies 45(J2J 2449-2470. Lees, L. (2014). The urban injustices of New Labours new urban renewal’: The case of the Aylesbury Estate in London. Antipode 46(4): 921—947. Lees, L. and Ferreri, Μ. (2016). Resisting gentrification on its final frontiers: Lessons from the Heygate Estate in London (1974—2013). Cities 57՛. 14-24. Lees, L., Shin, H.B., and López-Morales, E. (eds.) (2015) Global Gentrifications: Uneven Development and Displacement. Bristol: Policy Press Lees, L., Shin, H.B., and Lopez-Morales, E. (2016): Planetary Gentrification. Cam bridge: Polity Press. Lees, L., Slater, T, and Wyly, E. (2008). Gentrification. New York, NY: Routledge. Lehmbruch, G. (1976). Parteienwettbewerb im Bundesstaat [Party Competition in the Federal State]. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer. Lehmbruch, G. (1996). Die korporative Verhandlungsdemokratie in Westmitteleu ropa [The corporative negotiating democracy in Western Central Europe]. Swiss Political Science Review 2: 1-24. Lemański C. (2014). Hybrid gentrification in South Africa: Theorising across southern and northern cities. Urban Studies 51(14): 2943-2960. Levitas, R. (1998). The Inclusive Society? Social Exclusion and New Labour. Basing stoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Ley, D. (1986). Alternative explanations for inner-city gentrification: A Canadian assessment. Annab ofthe Association ofAmerican Geographers 76(4): 521-535. Ley, D. (1996). The New Middle Class and the Remaking ofthe Central City. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Lijphart, A. (1971). Comparative politics and the comparative method. American Political Science Review 65 (September): 682-693. Lijphart, A. (1977). Democracy in Plural Societies: A Comparative Exploration. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Lijphart, A. (1999). Patterns ofDemocracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Limonov L.E. (2011). Land market and urban development in Russia. In: Regional Development and Policy — Challenges, Choices and Recipients (ed. Regional Studies Association). Newcastle: Annual International Conference of the Regional Studies Association: 102-103. Lind, H. (2001). Rent regulation: A conceptual and comparative analysis. InternationalJournal ofHousing Policy 1(1): 41-57. London Assembly, Housing and Regeneration Committee (2013). Rent Reform. Making Londons Private Rented Sector Fit for Purpose June 2013. https://www. london.gov.uk/about-us/london-assembly/london-assembly-publications/rentreform-making-londons-private-rented (accessed 6 January 2022). López-Morales, E. (2011). Gentrification by ground rent dispossession: Ihe shadows cast by large-scale urban renewal in Santiago de Chile. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 35: 330-357. López-Morales, E., Shin, H.B., and Lees, L. (2016) Latin American gentrifications. Urban Geography, 37(8): 1091—1108. References 249 Lowe, S. (2004). Housing Policy Analysis. British Housing in Cultural and Comparative Context. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Lowe, S. (2011). The Housing Debate. Bristol: The Policy Press. Lowndes, V. and Pratchett, L. (2012). Local governance under the coalition government: Austerity, localism and the ‘big society.’ Local Government Studies 38(1): 21-40. Lundquist, L. (1992). Dislodging the Welfare State? Housing and Privatisation in Four European Countries. Delft: Delft University Press. Makhrova, A.G. and Golubchikov, O. (2012). Rossiyski go rod v uslovyach kapitalzma: sotsyalnaya transformatzya vnutrygorodskogo prostranstva [The Russian city under the conditions of capitalism: Social transformation and the transformation of the urban environment]. Vestnik Moskovskoga Universiteta. Seria 5: Geografa 2: 26-31. Maloutas, T. (2007). Segregation, social polarization and immigration in Athens dur ing the 1990s: Theoretical expectations and contextual difference. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 31 (4): 733-758. Maloutas, T. (2012). Contextual diversity in gentrification research. Critical Sociology 38(1): 33-48. Maloutas, T. (2018). Travelling concepts and universal particularisms: A reappraisal of gentrification’s global reach. European Urban and Regional Studies 25(3): 250265. Malpass, P (2003). The wobbly pillar? Housing policy and the British postwar wel fare state. Journal ofSocial Policy 32(4): 589-606. Malpass, P. (2005). Housing the Welfare State. The Development ofHousing Policy in Britain. Houndsmill: Palgrave Macmillan. Malpass, P. and Victory, C. (2010). The modernisation of social housing in England. InternationalJournal ofHousing Policy 10(1): 3—18. Marcińczak, S., Gentile, Μ., and Stępniak, Μ. (2013). Paradoxes of (post)socialist segregation: Metropolitan sociospatial divisions under socialism and after in Poland. Urban Geography 34(3): 327-352. Marcuse, P. (1986). Abandonment, gentrification, and displacement: The linkages in New York City. In: Gentrification of the City (eds. N. Smith and P. Williams), 153-177. London: Unwin Hyman. Marshall, Т.Н. (1950). Citizenship and Social Class: And Other Essays. Cambridge: University Press. Marx, K. (1971 [1894]). Capital, Volume III. Moscow: Progress Publishers. Massey, D. and Catalano, A. (1978). Capital and Land, Landownership by Capital in Great Britain. London: Edward Arnold. Mau, St. (2003). The Moral Economy of Welfare States: Britain and Germany Com pared. London: Routledge. Mayer, A. (1998). Theorie und Politik des Wohnungsmarktes [Theory and Policy of the Housing Market]. Berlin: Duncker Humblot. McFarlane, C. (2010). The comparative city: Knowledge, learning, urbanism. InternationalJournal of Urban and Regional Research 34(4): 725-742. 250 References Merrett, S. (1979). State Housing in Britain. London: Routledge Kegan Paul. Merrett, S. and Gray, E (1982). Owner Occupation in Britain. London: Routledge Kegan Paul. Merrill, T.W. and Smith, H.E. (2001). What happened to property in law and eco nomics? The Yale Law Journal 111 (2): 357-398. Mints, V. (2000). Selecting a housing finance system for Russia. Housing Finance International 15: 49-57. Mints, V. (2004). Strategies of transitional countries to establish a housing finance system. The Russian experience. Housing Finance International 19(2): 25-37. Mitchell, D. (2003). The Right to the City: SocialJustice and the Fightfor Public Space. New York, NY: Guilford Press. Modan, G.G. (2007). Turf Wars, Discourse, Diversity, and the Politics of Place. Mal den, NIA: Blackwell. Nikonov, P. (2012). Narusheniya ochranogo zakonodetyelstva. XXI wek [Breaking conservation laws. 21st century]. In: Sankt Peterburg: nasledye pod ugrozoy [St. Pe tersburg: Heritage at Risk] (eds. C. Cecil and E. Minchenok), 157-163. Moscow: MAPS. Novy, K. (1990). Gewinner und Verlierer im Kampf um Deregulierungsrenten. Skiz ze zur wohnungspolitischen Lage in der Bundesrepublik [Winners and losers in the struggle for deregulation-rents. A sketch on the situation of housing policies in Germany]. In: Soziale Wohnungspolitik in den 90erJahren. Probleme und Hand lungsansätze aus britisch-deutscher Sicht [Social Housing Policy in the 90s. Problems and Approachesfrom a British-German Perspective] (eds. K. Novy and A. Norton), 29-46. Basel: Birkhäuser. O’Sullivan, D. (2002). Toward micro- scale spatial modeling of gentrification. Journal of Geographical Systems 4(3): 251-274. Paccoud, A. (2016). Buy-to-let gentrification: Extending social change through ten ure shifts. Environment and Planning A 49(4): 839—856. Park, J. (2014). Land rent theory revisited. Science Society 78(1): 88-109. Patterson, D. (1996). A Companion to Philosophy ofLaw and Legal Theory. Oxford: Blackwell. Pawson, H. and Mullins, D. (2010). After Council Housing. Britain’s New Social Landlords. Houndsmill: Palgrave Macmillan. Penner, J.E. (2009). Property, community, and the problem of distributive justice. Theoretical Inquiries in Law 10(1): 194-216. Petrov, N., Lipman, Μ., and Hale, H.E. (2014). Three dilemmas of hybrid regime governance: Russia 848 from Putin to Putin. Post-Soviet Affairs 30(1): 1-26. Phillips, Μ. (1993). Rural gentrification and the process of class colonization. Journal of Rural Studies 9(2): 123—140. Phillips, Μ. (2004). Other geographies of gentrification. Progress in Human Geogra phy 28(1): 5-30. Pitt, J. (1977). Gentrification in Islington. The Return ofthe Middle Classes to an Inner London Borough and the Subsequent Effects on Housing. London: Barnsbury People Forum. References 251 Polanyi, К. (1957 [1944]). The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. Boston, MA: Beacon Press. Porter L. and Shaw K. (2009). Whose Urban Renaissance? An International Comparison of Urban Regeneration Strategies. London: Routledge. Porter, Μ. (2012). The rent gap at the metropolitan scale: New York City’s land value valleys, 1990-2006. Urban Geography 31(3): 385-405. Poulantzas, N. (2000 [1978]). State, Power, Socialism. London: Verso. Power, A. (1972). A Battle Lost. Barnsbury. London: Friends House. Power, A. (1973). David and Goliath. Barnsbury 1973. London: Holloway Law Cen tre and the Barnsbury Forum on Developments in Barnsbury. Przeworski, A. and Teune, H. (1970). The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry. New York, NY: Wiley. Putnam, R.D. (1993). Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Putnam, R.D. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York, NY: Simon Schuster. Puzanov, A. (2012). Russia: The persistence of the socialist legacy. In: Social Housing in Transition Countries (eds. J. Hegedűs, M. Lux, and N. Teller), 225-241. Lon don: Routledge. Ragin, C. (1987). The Comparative Method. Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. Ravetz, A. (2001). Council Housing and Culture. The History ofa Social Experiment. London: Routledge. Reimann B. (2000). Städtische Wohnquartiere [Urban Residential Quarters]. Opladen: Leske Budrich. Reulecke, J. (1985). Geschichte der Urbanisierung in Deutschland [The History of Urbanization in Germany]. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp. Robinson, J. (2006). Ordinary Cities. London: Routledge. Robinson, J. (2016). Thinking cities through elsewhere: Comparative tactics for a more global urban studies. Progress in Human Geography 40(1): 3—29. Rolnik, R (2013). Late neoliberalism: The financializarion ofhomeownership and housing rights. InternationalJournal ofUrban and Regional Research 37(3): 1058—1066. Rose, C.M. (1994). Property as Persuasion: Essays, on the History, Theory, and Rhetoric of Ownership. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. Sakwa, R. (2010). The dual state in Russia. Post-Soviet Affairs 26(3): 185-206. Sakwa, R. (2011). The Crisis ofRussian Democracy. The Dual State, Factionalism and the Medvedev Succession. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Sartori, G. (1970). Concept misformation in comparative politics. The American Political Science Review 64(4): 1033—1053. Sartori, G. (1991). Comparing and miscomparing. Journal of Theoretical Politics 3(3): 243-257. Savills World Research, UK Residential. (2013). Spotlight. The World in London. http://pdf.euro.savills.co.uk/residential—other/spot-worldlondon-lr. pdf (accessed 14 June 2014). 252 References Savini, E and Aalbers, M.В. (2016). The de-contextualisation of land use planning through financiálisadon: Urban redevelopment in Milan. European Urban and Regional Studies 23(4): 878-894. Sayer, A. (1992). Method in Social Science. A Realist Approach. London: Routledge. Sayer, A. (2000). Realism and Social Science. London: Sage. Scanlon, K., Fernandez, Μ., and Whitehead, C. (2014). A Lifestyle Choice for Fam ilies? Private Renting in London, New York, Berlin and the Randstad. London: Get Living London. Scanlon, K. and Whitehead, C. ed. (2008). Social Housing in Europe II-A Review of Policies and Outcomes. London: London School of Economics. Scharpf, EW. (1985). Die Politikverflechtungs-Falle: Europäische Integration und deutscher Föderalismus im Vergleich [The joint decision-making trap. European integration and German federalism compared]. Politische Vierteljahresschrift 26: 323-356. Schiebe, C. (2016). Verdrängung durch energetische Sanierung in Berlin [Dis placement through energy-saving regeneration in Berlin]. https://blogs. hu-berlin.de/wohnenberlin/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/2016/08/Schiebe_ Verdr%C3%A4ngung-von-Bestandsmieterinnen.pdf (accessed 12 November 2017). Schmid, C., Karaman, O., Hanakata, N.C. et al. (2018). Towards a new vocabulary of urbanisation processes: A comparative approach. Urban Studies 55(1): 19-52. Schönig, В. (2013). Die neue Wohnungsfrage [The new housing question]. Blätter für deutsche und internationale Politik 2/2013: 17—20. Schulz, G. (1986). Kontinuitäten und Brüche in der Wohnungspolitik von der Wei marer Zeit bis zur Bundesrepublik [Continuities and ruptures in housing policies from the Weimar Republic to the Federal Republic of Germany]. In: Stadtwachstum, Industrialisierung Sozialer Wandel. Beiträge zur Erforschung der Urbanisier ung im 19. und 20. Jahrhundert [Urban Growth, Industrialization, Social Change. Contributions on Urbanization in the 19th and 20th Century] (ed. HJ. Teuteberg), 135-174. Berlin: Duncker Humblot. Schwartz, H. and Seabrooke, L. (2008). Varieties of residential capitalism in the in ternational political economy: Old welfare states and the new politics of housing. Comparative European Politics 6(3): 237-261. Seeger, H. (1995). Wohnungswirtschaft im Wahlzyklus der Politik [Housing Business and Electoral Cycles], Bad Sinzheim: Pro Universitate Verlag. Senatsverwaltung fur Bau- und Wohnungswesen von Berlin (1993). Leitsätze zur Stadterneuerung in Berlin vom 31.August 1993 [Guiding Principles for Urban Renewal in Berlin as of 31 August 1993]. http://www.stadtentwicklung.berlin. de/staedtebau/foerderprogramme/stadterneuerung/de/download/Ieitsaetze.pdf (accessed 12 November 2017). SEU. Social Exclusion Unit. ( 1998). Bringing Britain Together. A National Strategyfor Neighbourhood Renewal. Cm. 4045, London: HMSO. Sharafutdinova, G. (2010). Political Consequences of Crony Capitalism Inside Russia. Paris: Notre Dame University Press. References 253 Shatkin, G. (2017). Cities for Profit. The Real Estate Turn in Asia’s Urban Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Shevtsova, L. (2001). Ten years after the Soviet breakup: Russia’s hybrid regime. Tournai ofDemocracy 12(4): 65-70. Shin, H.B. and Kim, S.H. (2016). The developmental state, speculative urbanization and the politics of displacement in gentrifying Seoul. Urban Studies 53(3): 540-559. Shin, H.B. and López-Morales, E. (2018). Beyond Anglo-American gentrification theory. In: Handbook of Gentrification Studies (eds. L. Lees and Μ. Phillips), 1325. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Shin, H.B., Lees, L., and López-Morales, E. (2016) Introduction: Locating gentrifi cation in the global East. Urban Studies 53(3): 455-47. Shomina, E.S. (2010). Kvartyrosemchyki ~ nashe ‘zhilishnoye menshesto’: rossyskiyi i zarubezhnyiv opyt razvitiiya arendnogo zhilya [Tenants — Our “Housing Minority: ” Russian and Foreign Experiences in the Development ofRental Housing!. Moscow: State University-Higher School of Economics Publishers. Shomina, E.S. (2014). Wedomstvoye zhilye: Problemyi I perspektiviy [Departmental housing: Problems and perspectives]. Munitsipalnaya wlast4-5: 84-92. Singer, J. W. (2000). Entitlement: The Paradoxes of Property. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Skocpol, T. (1979). States and Social Revolutions. A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia and China. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Skocpol, T. and Somers, Μ. (1980). The uses of comparative history in macrosocial inquiry. Comparative Studies in Society and History 22(2): 174-197. Slater, T. (2017). Planetary rent gaps. Antipode 49: 114-137. Slater, T. (2018). Rent gaps. In: Handbook of Gentrification Studies (eds. L. Lees and Μ. Phillips), 119-133. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Smart, A. and Smart, J. (2017). Ain’t talkin’ ’bout gentrification: The erasure of alternative idioms of displacement resulting from Anglo American academic hegemony. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 41(3): 518-525. Smeiser, N. (1976). Comparative Methods in the Social Sciences. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Smeiser, N. and Swedberg R. (2005). The Handbook of Economic Sociology (2nd expanded ed.). New York, NY and Princeton, NJ: Russell Sage Foundation and Princeton University Press. Smith, D.P. and Holt, L. (2007). Studentification and apprentice’ gentrifiers within Britain’s provincial towns and cities: Extending the meaning of gentrification. Environment and Planning A 39(1): 142—161. Smith, N. (1977). TLie return from the suburbs and the structuring of urban space: State involvement in Society Hill, Philadelphia. Unpublished BSc thesis. Univer sity of St Andrews. Smith, N. (1979). Towards a theory of gentrification. A back to the city movement by capital, not people. Journal ofthe American Planning Association 45(4): 538-548. Smith, N. (1982). Gentrification and uneven development. Economic Geography 58(2): 139-155. 254 References Smith, N. (1984): Uneven Development: Nature, Capital, and the Production ofSpace. Oxford: Blackwell. Smith, N. (1996). The New Urban Frontier: Gentrification and the Revanchist City. London: Routledge. Smith, N. (2010). Toward a theory of gentrification. A back to the city movement by capital, not people . In: The Gentrification Reader (box 3) (eds. L. Lees,T. Slater, and E. Wyly), 97-98. New York, NY: Routledge. Stedman Jones, D. (2012). Masters ofthe Universe: Hayek, Friedman, and the Birth of Neoliberal Politics, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Stephens, Μ. and Whitehead, C. (2013). Rental housing policy in England: Post crisis adjustment or long term trend? Journal of Housing and the Built Environ ment 29: 201-220. Stones, R. (1996). Sociological Reasoning: Towards a Post Modern Sociology. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press. Struyk, R.J. and Kosareva, N.B. (1993). The Russian Housing Market in Transition (The Urban Institute Project Report), http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/pnabq331 . pdf (accessed 6 June 2017). Swedberg, R. (2004). The toolkit for economic sociology. CSES Working Paper Series Paper #22, Cornell University. Swenarton, Μ. (1981). Homes Fit for Heroes. The Politics and Architecture of Early State Housing in Britain, London: Routledge. Sýkora, L. (1993). City in transition: The role of rent gaps in Prague’s revitalization. Tijdschjrifi voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 84(4): 281-293. Szelenyi, I. (1983). Urban Inequalities Under State Socialism. New York, ΝΎ: Oxford University Press. Szelenyi, I. (1996). Cities under socialism - and after. In: Cities After Socialism (eds. G. Andrusz, Μ. Harloe, and I. Szelenyi), 286-317. Oxford and Cambridge: Blackwell. Tang, W. (2017). Beyond gentrification: Hegemonic redevelopment in Hong Kong. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 41(3): 487—499. Taşan-Кок, T. (2006). Institutional and spatial change. In: The Urban Mosaic ofPost Socialist Europe: Space, Institutions, and Policy (eds. S. Tsenkova and Z. NedovićBudić), 51-70. Dordrecht: Springer. Thomas, R. (2014). What is the New Normal’? Mortgage Lending in 2014-15 and the March Back to a Sustainable Market (Intermediary Mortgage Lenders Association Annual Report). http.7/www.imla.org.uk/perch/resources/imla-what֊is-the-newnormal-mortgage-lending-in-2014-15-published.pdf (accessed 28 June 2014). Tilly, C. (1984). Big Structures, Large Processes, Huge Comparisons. New York, NY: Sage. Torgersen, U. (1987). Housing: The wobbly pillar under the welfare state. In: Between State and Market: Housing in the Post-industrial Era (eds. B. Turner, J. Kemeny, and L. Lundqvist), 116-126. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wicksell International. Trumbull, N.S. (2012). Redevelopment and conservation in the built fabric of post socialist St. Petersburg. Urban Geography 33(3): 370-400. References 255 Turner, В. and Elsinga, Μ. (2005). Housing allowances: Finding a balance between social justice and market incentives. International Journal ofHousing Policy 5(2): 103-109. Tykhanova, E. and Kholova, A. (2015). Gorodskoy politicheskyj rezhym v SanktPeterburgye: rol realjnych I voobrozhayemych mashin rosta’ v borbye za gorodskoye prostranstvo [Urban political regimes in St. Petersburg. The role of a real and a perceived growth machine” in struggles around the urban environment]. Zhurnal isledovanyi sotsyjalnoypolitiky 13(2): 241—256. UNUCE. United Nations, Economic Commission for Europe (2004). Country Pro file on the Housing Sector. Russian Federation. Geneva: United Nations. Valle, M.M. (2021), Globalizing the sociology of gentrification. City Community. https://d0i.0rg/l 0.1111 /cico. 12507. van Gent, W. and Boterman, W. (2019). Gentrification of the changing state. Tijdschjrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 110(1): 35^6. van Weesep, J. and Musterd, S. (1991). Urban Housingfor the Better-Off. Gentrifica tion in Europe. Utrecht: Stedelijke Netwerken. Vesper, Dieter (1997). Berliner Finanzpolitik in einem fast ausweglosen Dilemma aktuelle Tendenzen im Landeshaushalt von Berlin [Berlins financial politics in an unsolvable dilemma. Recent tendencies in the state budget of Berlin], DIW Wochenbericht 39/1997: 697-708. Vesper, Dieter (1999). Kann sich Berlin aus seinem Finanzdilemma befreien? Zur Entwicklung des Landeshaushalts von Berlin [Can Berlin liberate itself from its financial dilemma? On the development of the state budget of Berlin], DIW Wochenbericht 22: 389-397. Vihavainen, R. (2009). Homeowners’ Associations in Russia — After the 2005 Housing Reform. Helsinki: Kikimore Publications. http://www.iut.nu/members/Russia/ HomeownerAssociations_Russia_2009.pdf (accessed 6 June 2016). Vorobyev, D. and Campbell, T. (2009). Gentrification in Petersburg: A New City for a New Gentry. http://www.cisr.ru/files/publ/Vorobyev/berlin7.pdf (accessed 6 June 2016). Walker, R (1974). Urban ground rent: Building a new conceptual theory. Antipode 6(1): 51-58. Wallace, A. (2016). Remaking Community? New Labour and the Governance ofPoor Neighbourhoods. London: Routledge. Ward, C. and Aalbers, M.B. (2016) ‘The shitty rent business’: What’s the point of land rent theory? Urban Studies 53(9): 1760—1783. Watt, P. (2001). The Dynamics ofSocial Class and Housing: A Study ofLocal Authority Tenants in the London Borough ofCamden. Unpublished PhD Thesis. Department of Geography, King’s College. London: University of London. Watt, P. (2009a). Housing stock transfer, regeneration and state-led gentrification in London. Urban Policy and Research 27(3): 229-242. Watt, P. (2009b). Social housing and regeneration in London. In: Regenerating London. Governance, Sustainability and Community in a Global City (eds. R. Imrie, L. Lees, and M. Raco), 212—236. London: Routledge. 256 References Watt, E (2013). ‘Its not for us’: Regeneration, the 2012 Olympics and the gentrifica tion of East London. City 17(1): 99-118 Watt P. and Jacobs, K. (2000). Discourses of social exclusion. An analysis of bringing Britain together: A national strategy for neighbourhood renewal. Housing, Theory and Society 17(1): 14—26. Watt, E and Minton, A. (2016). Londons housing crisis and its activisms. City 20(2): 204-221. Welch Guerra, Μ. (2016). Mietpreisbindung als Dauerrecht [Rent control as a permanent right]. Mieterecho 384 (Octoberlő): 17-20. Whitehead, C. (2012). Owner-occupation in an increasingly uncertain world: The English experience. In: Beyond Home Ownership. Housing, Welfare and Society (eds. R. Ronald and Μ. Elsinga), 108-129. Milton Park: Routledge. Whitehead, C. and Scanlon, K. (2007). Social Housing in Europe. London: London School of Economics and Political Science. Williams, ER. (1976). The role of institutions in the Inner London housing mar ket: The case of Islington. Transactions ofthe Institute ofBritish Geographers 1(1): 72-82. Williams, ER. (1978). Building societies and the inner city. Transactions ofthe Insti tute ofBritish Geographers 3(1): 23-34. Wilson, J. and Johnson, J. (2013). The Future of London’s Private Rented Sector (Future of London, Series Summary), https://www.landlordzone.co.uk/reports/ future-of-londons-private-rented-sector.pdf (accessed 6 January 2022). Winters, T. (1997). Erst Dinks, dann Kids? [First Dinks, then Kids?]. VorOrt. Bauen und Wohnen in Prenzlauer Berg. Yeung, H.W. (1997). Critical realism and realist research in human geography: A method or a philosophy in search of a method? Progress in Human Geography 21(1): 51-74. Yung, C.F. and King, R.J. (1998). Some tests for the rent gap theory. Environment and Planning A 30: 523—542. Zavisca, J.R. (2008). Property without markets: Housing policy and politics in postSoviet Russia, 1992—2007. Comparative European Politics 6: 365—386. Zavisca, J.R. (2012). Housing the New Russia. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Index Austerity, 70-73, 90, 165 Avariinyje doma, 189 Ball, Michaeli, 38-40,49 Barnsbury, 129-155,208-211 Compulsory purchase, 137, 223-227 Early gentrification, 129-136 Right to Buy, 137-142 Supergentrification, 143-145, 151 Behutsame Stadterneuerung, 158, 160, 162-164 Capital flows, 32-34 Careful urban renewal see aho Behutsame Stadterneuerung Commodification, 45-52, 216-217 commodification gap, 51-56, 118-124, 216-217 Comparison, 8-11, 15-16, 19-20, 219-220 concepts and causation, 11-15 types, 10-11 use of, 9 Controlled housing economy, 77-84 Council housing, 59-76, 130, 136, 139 Critical realism, 12-13 Damaged houses see aho Avariinyje doma Decommodification, 45-52, 212, 216-217 Derivative gap, 122, 211 Displacement, 17-18, 23, 43-48, 206-213 Dual state, 110-112 Germany Controlled housing economy, 77-84 East Germany, 89 German state, 94—96 Housing, 77-98 Social Housing, 87-90 Social market economy, 83-84, 94, 98 Tenant Protections, 84-86 Glass, Ruth, 1-2, 4, 130 Gramsci, Antonio, 49-50, 209 Ground rent, 37-40 absolute rent, 37, 38 class-monopoly rent, 37, 41 definition, 26 differential rent, 29, 37-38 idiosyncratic understanding of, 39-40 nomothetic understanding of, 38 Harvey, David, 28, 32-35, 37-42, 44, 55 Heritage protection, 185-192, 205 Homeownership, 46-47, 55, 133, 135, 146-152, 155 Housing allowances, 47 Housing privatisation in Russia, 103-107 in the UK, 61-63, 76 see aho Right To Buy Housing studies, 44-48 Housing Systems, 45, 73 Inflationary gap, 122, 153, 211 Eigenbedarf, 85 Embedded economy, 48-50 Jessop, Bob, 49-51 Financialisation, 35-36, 142-146, 219 Fragmented ownership, 105, 107 Kemeny, Jim, 45, 55, 73, 83, 209 Kommunalka, 100, 184, 192-193, 196, 204, 213 Gentrification as a concept, 12-14, 214—216 definition of, 12, 16-17 in the Global South, 6-7 research on, 1-8 Lees, Loretta, 5-8, 130-131, 136, 140, 150-154, 220-221 Legal Geography, 42-43 Legal Realism, 43 ¿wc Plan, Tl, 83,85,91 The Commodification Gap: Gentrification and Public Policy in London, Berlin and St Petersburg, First Edition. Matthias Bernt. © 2022 John Wiley Sons Ltd. Published 2022 by John Wiley Sons Ltd. 258 Index Marshall, Thomas H., 5, 124 Marx, Karl, 16, 29, 37, 40-41, 218 Mietspiegel, 85, 92, 94 Milieux Protection, 88, 96, 169 Modernisation, 86, 94-97 Modernisation gap, 97, 123, 169, 211, 214 New tenancy gap, 96-97, 123, 211, 213 Particularism, 10-11, 207-215 Personal use, Claiming of see aho Eigenbedarf Planning mistakes, 189, 205-206 Polanyi, Karl, 49 Poulantzas, Nikos, 49-52, 124, 210, 217 Prenzlauer Berg, 158-179 Milieux protection, 88, 96, 169 New build gentrification, 167-170 Restitution, 161, 175-177 Urban renewal area, 162-174 Privatisation gap, 122, 141, 153, 211 Property, 40—43 Property rights, 7, 41-43 Redevelopment gap, 123 Rental deregulation gap, 74, 122, 153, 211 Rent gap Concept, 25-55 and ground rent, 28-29, 32~34 Realization, 34-37, 43-48 Relation to commodification gaps, 52-53, 215-216,218 and scale, 29-30, 37-Л0 and uneven development, 26-30 Rent Index see aho Mietspiegel Rent regulation, 45-48 in Germany, 84-86, 91-94, 97-98, 163, 166, 173 in Russia, 115-117 in the United Kingdom, 60, 64, 145-150 Research design, 15-21 Restitution, 161, 175-177 Right of first refusal see aho Vorkaufirecht, 173 Right to Buy, 61-63, 65, 68, 72, 76, 103, 122, 137-141, 152-153, 195, 210, 221 Robinson, Jeniffer, 9, 19, 22 Russia Dual State, 111-112 Fragmentation of ownership, 105, 107 Housing, 98-118 Housing market, 112-118 Privatization, 102-109 Weak State, 110-112 Sanierungsgebiet, 162-174 Scales, 30, 34-37, 52, 175, 217 Shatkin, Gavin, 7, 54 Smith, Neil, 5, 7, 17, 25-33, 37,41-43,53, 118, 154,174, 218-220 Social exclusion, 66-67 Social housing, 45-46, 119-126 in Germany, 82-83, 87-91, 98, 179 in Russia, 106, 109 in the United Kingdom, 61-63, 68-76, 79 Social housing deregulation gap, 98, 153, 176, 211-212 Social market economy, 83-84, 94, 98 Social mix, 67 Soviet Union, Housing in, 99-102 Splintered gentrification, 181-205 State and economy, 48-50 Integral theory of the state, 50-51 St. Petersburg Gentrification, 202-205 Heritage Protection, 186-192 Kommunalki (dissolution of), 192-198 Regeneration, 183-186, 198-202 Super-Gentrification, 150, 152 Tenure conversion gap, 123 in Germany, 97—98 in Russia, 116-117 Thatcher, Margret, 60-61, 64, 66, 68, 71, 74, 103, 125 Third way, 65-66 Uneven development, 28-29, 32-34 United Kingdom Austerity, 70-73, 90, 165 Coalition government, 70-74 Dual housing market, 58-60 New Labour, 65-70 Tenure, 58, 73-76 Thatcherism, 60-71 Universalism, 10-11, 207-216 Urban renewal area, see aho Sanierungsgebiet Value gap, 31, 120, 122-123, 132-135, 137, 150-154, 208,210-215 voluntary stock transfers, 62 Vorkaufirecht, 173 Bayerische Staatsbibliothek Mönchen
adam_txt	Contents List ofFigures List of Tables Series Editors’ Preface Preface 1 ix x xi xii Introduction 1 Gentrification Between Universality and Particularity 1 How to Compare? Why Compare? 8 Concepts and Causation 11 Design of this Study 15 Notes 22 2 Why the Rent Gap isn’t Enough 25 Where the Rent Gap Works Well 25 Where the Rent Gap Falls Short 30 When and Why does Capital Flow? 32 At Which Scale is the Rent Gap Positioned? 34 Which Rent? 37 Property as Control? 40 How is the Rent Gap Realised? 43 Embedding Gentrification 48 Economy, Society and States 48 The Commodification Gap 51 Notes 3 Three Countries, Three Housing Systems The British Experience 54 57 57 From Private Landlordism to a Dual Market 58 The Thatcherite Revolution 60 New Labour: More of the Same? 65 Austerity and New ‘Class War Conservatism’ Under the Coalition Government 70 Conclusion: Neoliberalism, Tenurial Transformation and Gentrification 73 vi Contents The German Experience 77 From the Controlled Housing Economy to the Lücke Plan 77 The Design of Tenant Protections 84 The Conservative Wende 86 Reunification and Neoliberal Consensus 89 Conclusion: Gentrification Between Regulation and Deregulation 91 The Russian Experience Housing in the Soviet Union From Shock Therapy to Failing Markets 98 99 102 Restricted State Capacities and Opportunity Planning 110 Conclusion: Gentrification in a Dysfunctional Market 112 State Intervention in Housing: Setting the Parameters for Gentrification 118 Notes 124 4 Barnsbury: Gentrification and the Policies of Tenure 129 The Making of Early Gentrification 129 The Right to Buy: Pouring Fuel on the Fire 137 The New Economy of Gentrification 141 Capital Gains Instead of Owner-Occupation 142 Penalty Renting 145 From Value Gap to Super-gentrification 150 Notes 154 5 Prenzlauer Berg: Gentrification Between Regulation and Deregulation 157 From Plan to Market 158 Rolling out the Market, Weakening Public Control 162 Since 2000: Privately Financed Refiirbishments, Condominium Boom and No Regulation 164 New Build Gentrification and Energy Efficient Displacement 167 Between Deregulation and Re-regulation 171 Gentrification with Brakes? 174 Notes 179 6 Splintered Gentrification: St Petersburg, Russia 181 Unpredictable Regeneration Schemes 183 World Heritage vs. Gentrification 186 The Dissolution of Kommunalki Flats 192 Contents vii State-run Repair and Renewal 198 Pro and Contra Gentrification 202 Notes 206 7 The Commodification Gap 207 Universality vs. Particularity Revisited 207 Gentrification and Decommodification 216 Meeting the Challenge: New Directions for Research and Politics 217 Notes 221 Appendix A Compulsory Purchase in Barnsbury 223 Appendix В Residents in NS-SeC Classes 1and 2 229 References 235 Index 257 References Aalbers, M.В. (2012). Subprime Cities: The Political Economy of Mortgage Markets. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell. Aalbers, M.B. (2016). The Financialization ofHousing: A Political Economy Approach. London: Routledge. Aalbers, M.B. (2019). Financial Geographies of Real Estate and the City. A Literature Review (Financial Geography Working Paper #21). http://www.fingeo.net/ wo rdpress/wp-content/uploads/2019/0 l/FinGeoWP_Aalbers-2019-2.pdf (accessed 23 March 2021). AHML. Agency for Housing and Mortgage Lending Research Centre (2015). Housing and the Mortgage Lending Market. Results for 2014. http://www.ahml. ru/common/img/ uploaded/files/agency/reporting/ quarterly/report4q2014_ en.pdf (accessed 21 June 2016; webpage no longer available). Alkon, A.H. and Cadji, J. (2020). Sowing seeds of displacement: Gentrification and food justice in Oakland, CA. InternationalJournal of Urban and Regional Research 44: 108-123. Allen, C. (2008). Housing Market Renewal and Social Class. London: Routledge. Andrusz, G.D. (1987). The built environment in Soviet theory and practice. InternationalJournal of Urban and Regional Research 11 (4): 478-499. Arbaci, S. (2019). Paradoxes of Segregation: Housing Systems, Welfare Regimes and Ethnic Residential Change in Southern European Cities. Oxford: Wiley. ASUM. Angewandte Sozialforschung und Urbanes Management GmbH (2012). Endbericht zur Sozialstudie Sanierungsgebiet Prenzlauer Berg - Helmhoitzplatz 2012 [Final Report on the Study of Social Structures in the Urban Renewal Area Prenzlauer Berg - Hemholtzplatz 2012]. https://www.berlin.de/imperia/ md/content/bapankow/stapl/sozialstudie_helmholtzplatz_2012.pdf (accessed 10 June 2016; webpage no longer available). Atkinson, R., Parker, S., and Burrows, R. (2017). Elite formation, power and space in contemporary London. Theory, Culture ԺSociety 34(5-6): 179-200. Axënov, К. (2011). Social segregation of personal activity spaces in a post transformation metropolis (case study of St. Petersburg). Regional Research of Russia 1(1): 52-61. Badcock, B. (1989). An Australian view of the rent gap hypothesis. Annah of the Association ofAmerican Geographers 79(1): 125-145. The Commodification Gap: Gentrification and Public Policy in London, Berlin and St Petersburg, First Edition. Matthias Bernt. © 2022 John Wiley Sons Ltd. Published 2022 by John Wiley Sons Ltd. 236 References Badcock, В. (1990). On the nonexistence of the rent gap, a reply. Annals of the Association ofAmerican Geographers 80(3): 459-461. Badyina, A. and Golubchikov, O. (2005). Gentrification in central Moscow - A market process or deliberate policy? Money, power and people in housing regen eration in Ostozhenka. Geografiska Annaler: Series В Human Geography 87(2): 113-129. Balchin, P. (1996). Housing Policy in Europe. London: Routledge. Ball, Μ. (1977). Differential rent and the role of landed property. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 1(1-4): 380-403. Ball, Μ. (1985a) Land rent and the construction industry. In: Land Rent: Housing and Urban Planning (eds. Μ. Ball, V. Bentivegna, and Μ. Edwards), 71-86. London: Groom Helm. Ball, Μ. (1985b). The urban rent question. Environment and Planning A 17: 503525. Ball, Μ. (1987). Rent and social relations: A reply to Clark. Environment and Planning A 19: 269-272. Ball, Μ. (1998). Institutions in British property research: A review. Urban Studies 35(9): 1501-1517. Barlow, J. and Duncan, S. (1994). Success and Failure in Housing Provision: European Systems Compared. Oxford: Pergamon. Bartholomai, R. (2004) .Die Entwicklung des Politikfeldes Wohnen [The development of housing policy]. In: Housing Policy in Germany. Positions, Agents, Instruments (eds. B. Egner, H. Georgakis, H. Heinelt, and R Bartholomäi), 15—34. Kassel: Schader Stiftung. Bater, J.H. (1980). The Soviet City: Ideal and Reality. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Bater, J.H. (2006). Central St. Petersburg: Continuity and change in privilege and place. Eurasian Geography and Economics 47(1): 4-27. Beauregard, R.A. (1986). The chaos and complexity of gentrification. In: Gentrifica tion of the City (eds. N. Smith and P. Williams), 35-55. Winchester: Allen and Unwin. Beauregard, R.A. (2003). City ofsuperlatives. City and Community 2(3): 183-199. Becker, R. (1988). Subventionen fur den Wohnungssektor [Subsidies for the housing sector]. In: Sozialer Wohnungsbau im internationalen Vergleich [Social Housing in International Comparison] (eds. W. Prigge and W. Kaib), 94-122. Frankfurt a.M.: Vervuert Verlag. Bengtsson, B. (2015). Between structure and Thatcher: Towards a research agenda for theory-informed actor-related analysis of housing politics. Housing Studies 30(5): 677-693. Bernt, Μ. (1998). Stadterneuerung unter Aufwertungsdruck [Urban Renewal and Up grading Pressure]. Bad Sinzheim: Pro-Universitate-Verlag. Bernt, Μ. (2003). Rübergeklappt: Die ‘Behutsame Stadterneuerung’ im Berlin der 1990er Jahre [Flipped. Careful Urban Renewal in Berlin in the 1990s], Berlin: Schelzky Jeep. References 237 Bernt, Μ. (2009). Partnerships for demolition: The governance of urban renewal in East Germany’s shrinking cities. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 33(4): 754-769. Bernt, Μ. (2012). The ‘double movements’ of neighbourhood change: Gentrifica tion and public policy in Harlem and Prenzlauer Berg. Urban Studies 49(14): 3045-3062. Bernt, Μ. (2015). Stadterneuerung zwischen Entstaatlichung und politischer Ein flußnahme. Zu schwach, zu spät, zu unentschlossen [Urban renewal between state-withdrawal and political interventionism. Too late, too weak, too indeci sive] . In: Eine Stadt verändert sich. Berlin-Pankow 25 Jahre Stadterneuerung [A city changes. Berlin-Pankow 25 years of Urban Renewal] (ed. Bezirksamt Pankow. Abteilung Stadtentwicklung), 150-161. Berlin: Nicolai. Bernt, Μ. (2016a). Very particular, or rather universal? Gentrification through the lenses of Ghertner and López-Morales. City 20(4): 637-644. Bernt, Μ. (2016b). How post-socialist is gentrification? Observations in East Berlin and Saint Petersburg. Eurasian Geography and Economics 57(4-5): 565-587. Bernt, Μ. (2017). Phased out, demolished and privatized: Social housing in an East German shrinking city. In: Social Housing and Urban Renewal: A Cross-National Perspective (eds. P. Watt and P. Smets), 253-276. Oxford: Emerald Publishing Ltd. Bernt, Μ. and Holm, A. (2005). Exploring the substance and style of gentrification: Berlin’s ‘Prenziberg.’ In: Gentrification in a Global Perspective: The New Urban Colonialism (eds. R. Atkinson and G. Bridge), 106-120. Milton Park: Routledge. Bernt, Μ. and Holm, A. (2009). Is it, or is not? The conceptualisation of gentrifica tion and displacement and its political implications in the case of Berlin Pren zlauer Berg. City 13(2-3): 312—324. Bernt, Μ., Colini, L., and Förste, D. (2017). Privatization, financialization and state restructuring in East Germany: The case of Am Südpark. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 41 (4): 555-571. Betancur, J. (2014). Gentrification in Latin America: Overview and critical analysis. Urban Studies Research, http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/986961. Bezirksamt Pankow. Abteilung Stadtentwicklung (2015). Eine Stadt verändert sich. Berlin-Pankow 25 Jahre Stadterneuerung [A city changes. Berlin-Pankow 25years of Urban Renewal]. Berlin: Nicolai. Bhaskar, R. (1975). A Realist Theory ofScience. Leeds: Leeds Books. Binney, Μ. (2012). Introduction. In: Sankt Peterburg: nasledye pod ugrozoy [St Pe tersburg: Heritage at Risk] (eds. C. Cecil and E. Minchenok), 13-15. Moscow: MAPS. Blomley, N. (2003). Law, property, and the geography of violence: The frontier, the survey, and the grid. Annah of the Association of American Geographers 93(1): 121-141. Blomley, N. (2004). Unsettling the City: Urban Land and the Politics of Property. New York, NY: Routledge. 238 References Blomley, N. (2005). Flowers in the bathtub: Boundary crossings at the public-private divide. Geoforum 36(3): 281-296. Bodenschatz, H. (1987). Platzfreifür das neue Berlin! Geschichte der Stadterneuerung in der ‘größten Mietskasernenstadt der Welt’ seit 1871 [Give Way to the New Berlin! A History of Urban Renewal in the ‘Biggest Tenement City of the World’]. Berlin: Transit. Bondi, L. (1999). Between the woof and the weft: A response to Loretta Lees. Envi ronment and Planning D: Society and Space 17(3): 125-145. Bonefeld, W. (2012). Freedom and the strong state: On German ordoliberalism. New Political Economy 17(5): 633-656. Borst, R. (1996): Volkswohnungsbestand in Spekulantenhand? [Peoples homes for speculators?]. In: Stadtentwicklung in Ostdeutschland [Urban development in East Germanyftàs. H. Häußermann and R. Neef), 107-128. Opladen: West deutscher Verlag. Bourassa, S.C. (1993). The rent gap debunked. Urban Studies 30(10): 1731-1744. Bowie, D. (2016). The Radical and Socialist Tradition in British Planning: From Puri tan Colonies to Garden Cities. London: Routledge. Bowie, D. (2017). Beyond the compact city: A London case study - Spatial impacts, social polarisation, sustainable development and social justice (International Eco-Cities Initiative 1), https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324080429_ Beyond_the_compact_city_a_London_case_study_-_spatial_impacts_social_ polarisation_sustainable_development_and_social_justice (accessed 23 October 2020). Brenner, N. (2003). Stereotypes, archetypes and prototypes: Three uses of superla tives in contemporary urban studies. City and Community 2(3): 205-216. Brenner, N. and Theodore, N. (2002). Cities and the geographies of‘actually existing neoliberalism’. Antipode 34(3): 349-379. Bridge, G. and Dowling, R. (2001). Microgeographies of retailing and gentrification. Australian Geographer 32(1): 93-107. Bridge, G., Butler, T, and Lees, L. (2012). Mixed Communities. Gentrification by Stealth? Bristol: Policy Press. Brown-Saracino, J. (2010). The Gentrification Debates. New York, NY: Routledge. Bugler, J. (1968). The invaders of Islington. New Society, 15 August. Butler, S.B., Nayyar-Stone, R., and O’Leary, S. (1999). The law and economics of historic preservation in St. Petersburg, Russia. Review of Urban Regional Development Studies 11 (1): 24֊—44. Butler,T. (2007). For gentrification? Environment and Planning A 39(1): 162—181. Butler, T. and Lees, L. (2006). Super-gentrification in Barnsbury, London: Globaliza tion and gentrifying global elites at the neighbourhood level. Transactions ofthe Institute ofBritish Geographers 31: 467-487. Butler, T. and Robson, G. (2003). London Calling. The Middle Classes and the Re Making ofInner London. Oxford: Berg. Calbet I Elias, L. (2018). Financialised rent gaps and the public interest in Ber lin’s housing crisis. Reflections on N. Smith’s generalised gentrification’. In: References 239 Gentrification as a Global Strategy. Neil Smith and Beyond (eds. A. Albet and N. Benach), 165-176. London and New York, NY: Routledge. Callon, Μ. (1998). The Laws ofthe Markets. London: Blackwell Publishers. Castles, EG. (1998). Comparative Public Policy. Patterns Post-War Transformation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Castles, EG. (2005). The Kemeny thesis revisited. Housing, Theory and Society 22(2): 84-86. Chakrabarty, D. (2000) Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Chambers, P.A.B. (1974) The process of gentrification in Inner London. M.Phil. the sis. School of Environmental Studies, University College of London. Choi, N. (2016). Metro Manila through the gentrification lens: Disparities in urban planning and displacement risks. Urban Studies 53(3) (Special issue: Locating gentrification in East Asia): 577-592. Clark, E. (1987). The Rent Gap and Urban Change: Case Studies in Malmö, 18601985. Lund: Lund University Press. Clark, E. (1988). The rent gap and the transformation of the built environment: Case studies in Malmö 1860-1985. Geografiska Annaler BT0: 241—254. Clark, E. (1992). On gaps in gentrification theory. Housing Studies 7(1): 16-26. Clark, E. (2005). The order and simplicity of gentrification — A political challenge. In: Gentrification in a Global Context. The New Urban Colonialism (eds. R. Atkin son and G. Bridge), 256-264. London: Routledge. Clarke, S. and Ginsburg, N. (n.d.) The Political Economy of Housing, https:// homepages.warwick.ac.uk/--syrbe/pubs/ClarkeGinsburg.pdf (accessed 1 April 2017). Colomb, C. (2007). Unpacking New Labours urban renaissance’ agenda. Towards a socially sustainable reurbanization of British cities? Planning Practice and Research 22(1): 1-24. Cook, L.J. (2007). Postcommunist Welfare States. Reform Politics in Russia and Eastern Europe. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Copley, T. (2014). From Right to Buy to Buy to Let. Ed. Greater London Authority, http :/1tomcopley.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01 /From-Right-to-Buy-to-Buyto-Let-Jan-2014.pdf (accessed 15 February 2015; webpage no longer available). Corbett, S. and Walker, A. (2012). The big society: Back to the future. The Political Quarterly 83(3): 487-493. Crook, T. and Kemp, P.A. (2011). Transforming Private Landlords. Housing, Market and Public Policy. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell. Crouch, C. and Streeck, W. (1997). Political Economy ofModern Capitalism. London: Sage. Cummings, J. (2016). Confronting favela chic. The gentrification of informal set tlements in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. In: Global Gentrifications (eds. L. Lees, H.B. Shin, and E. López-Morales), 81—100. Bristol and Chicago, IL: Policy Press. Czada, R. (1985). Neokorporatistische Politikentwicklung in Westeuropa. Politische Verbändeeinbindung und wirtschaftspolitische Strategien im internationalen 240 References Vergleich [Neocorporatist Policy Development in Western Europe], Research report given to Stiftung Volkswagenwerk. http://www.politik.uni-osnabrueck.de/ POLSYS/publications.html (accessed 20 November 2017). Czada, R. (2000). Konkordanz, Korporatismus und Politikverflechtung: Dimen sionen der Verhandlungsdemokratie [Concordance, corporatism and joint decision-making: Dimensions of the negotiating democracy]. In: Zwischen Wettbewerbs- und Verha.ndlungsdemokra.tie. Analysen zum Regierungssystem der Bundesrepublik Deutschland [Between Competition and Negotiations. Analyses on the Governance Regime ofthe Federal Republic ofGermany] (eds. E. Holtmann and H. Voelzkow), 23-52. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag. Czada, R. (2003). Der Begriff der Verhandlungsdemokratie und die vergleichende Policy-Forschung [lhe concept of a negotiating democracy in comparative policy research]. In: Die Reformierbarkeit der Demokratie. Innovationen und Blockaden [The Reformability ofDemocracy. Innovations and Blockades] (eds. R. Mayntz and W. Streeck), 173—203. Frankfurt: Campus. Czada, R. and Schmidt, M.G. (1993). Verhandlungsdemokratie, Interessenvermittlung, Regierbarkeit [Negotiating Democracy, Mediation of Interests and Governability]. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag. Daunton, MJ. (1987). A Property-Owning Democracy? Housing in Britain. London and Boston, MA: Faber and Faber. Davidson, Μ. and Lees, L. (2005). New-build gentrification and Londons riverside renaissance. Environment and Planning A 37: 1160-1195. Davidson, Μ. and Lees, L. (2010). New-build gentrification. Its histories, trajec tories, and critical geographies. Population, Space and Place 16: 395-411. Davis, J. (2001). Rents and race in 1960s London: New light on Rachmanism. Twen tieth Century British History 12(1): 69—92. DCH. Defend Council Housing. (2008). Briefing. The Case Against Trans fer. http://www.defendcouncilhousing.org.uk/dch/resources/StockTransfer/ DCHStockTransferbriefing.pdf (accessed 20 May 2014). Delgadillo, V. (2015). Selective modernization of Mexico City and its historic center. Gentrification without displacement? Urban Geography 37(8) (Special Issue: Latin American gentrifications): 1154-1174. DETR. Department of Environment, Transport and the Regions. (2000). Quality and Choice: A Decent Home for All. The Housing Green Paper. London: HSMO. Diamond, L. (2002). Thinking about hybrid regimes. Tournai ofDemocracy 13(2): 21-35. Diappi, L. and Dolchi, P. (2008). Smiths rent gap theory and local real estate dynamics: A multi-agent model. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 32: 6-18. Dieser, H. (1996). Restitution - was ist sie und was bewirkt sie? [Restitution - what is it and what does it affect?]. In: Stadtentwicklung in Ostdeutschland: Soziale und Räumliche Tendenzen [Urban development in East Germany. Social and spatial ten dencies] (eds. H. Häußermann and R. Neef), 107-128. Berlin: Leske Budrich. References 241 DoE. Department of the Environment. (1977). Housing Policy. A Consultative Doc ument. London: HSMO. Dörfler, T. (2010). Gentrification in Prenzlauer Berg?Milieuwandel eines Berliner Sozi alraums seit 1989 [Gentrification in Prenzlauer Berg? The Change ofSocial Milieux in a Neighbourhood in Berlin], Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag. Doling, J. (1997). Comparative Housing Policy. Government and Housing in Advanced Industrialized Countries. London: Macmillan. Donnison, D. (1967). The Government ofHousing. Harmondsworth: Penguin. Doshi, S. (2013) The politics of the evicted: Redevelopment, subjectivity, and difference in Mumbai’s slum frontier. Antipode 45(4): 844—865. Doshi, S. (2015). Rethinking gentrification in India: Displacement, dispossession and the spectre of development. In: Gentrifications Global (eds. L. Lees, H.B. Shin, and E. López-Morales), 101-120. Bristol and Chicago, IL: Policy Press. Edwards, Μ. (2016). The housing crisis and London. City 20(2): 222-237. Egner, В. (2014). Wohnungspolitik seit 1945 [Housing policy since V)45\. Aus Poli tik und Zeitgeschichte 20—21: 13-19. Egner, В., Georgakis, H., Heinelt, H., and Bartholomäi, R. (2004). Housing Policy in Germany. Positions, Agents, Instruments. Kassel: Schader Stiftung. Engels, В. (1994). Capital flows, redlining, and gentrification: The pattern of mort gage lending and social change in Glebe, Sydney, 1960-1984. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 18(4): 628—657. Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The Three Worlds ofWelfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Pol ity Press. Etzioni, A. (1996). The New Golden Rule: Community and Morality in a Democratic Society. New York, NY: Basic Books. Evans, P. (1995). Embedded Autonomy. States and Industrial Transformation. Princ eton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Fairclough, N. (2000). New Labour, New Language? London: Routledge. Ferris, J. (1972). Participation in Urban Planning: The Barnsbury Case. Occasional Papers in Social Administration, No. 48. London: G. Bell and Sons. Fligstein, N. (1990). The Transformation of Corporate Control. Cambridge, MA: Har vard University Press. Fligstein, N. (2001). The Architecture of Markets. An Economic Sociology of TwentyFirst-Century Capitalist Societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Fligstein, N. and Calder, R. (2015). Architecture of markets. In: Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences (eds. R.A. Scott and S.M. Kosslyn). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. Fligstein, N. and Dioun, C., (2015). Economic sociology. In: International Encyclope dia ofthe Social Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed. Vol. 7 (ed.-in-chiefJ.D. Wright), 67—72. Oxford: Elsevier. Forrest, R. and Mûrie, A. (1983). Residualization and council housing: Aspects of the changing social relations of housing tenure. Journal of Social Policy, 12(4): 453-468. 242 References Forrest, R. and Mûrie, A. (1988). Selling the Welfare State. The Privatisation ofPublic Housing. London: Routledge. French, R.A. (1995). Plans, Pragmatism and People: The Legacy ofSoviet Planningfor Todays Cities. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press. French, R.A. and Hamilton, F.E.I. (1979). The Socialist City: Spatial Structure and Urban Policy. London: John Wiley. Führer, K.C. (1995). Mieter, Hausbesitzer, Staat und Wohnungsmarkt. Wohnungsman gel und Wohnungszwangswirtschaft in Deutschland 1914-1960 [Tenant, Landlord, State and Housing Market. Housing Shortage and Controlled Housing Economy in Germany 1914-1960]. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag. Furman, D. (2008). Imitation democracies: The post-Soviet penumbra. New Left Review, 54: 29-47. Gentile, Μ., Salukvadze, J., and Gogishvili, D. (2015). Newbuild gentrification, tele urbanization and urban growth: Placing the cities of the post-communist South in the gentrification debate. Geografie 120(2): 134—163. Gerasimova, E.Y. (2000). Sovietskaya kommunalnaya kvartira kak sotsialnyi institut: istoriko-sotsiologicheskii analiz material Petrograda-Leningrada 1917—1991 [The Soviet Communal Apartment as a Social Institution: Historical-Sociological Analysis of Material from Petrograd-Leningrad 1917—1991]. http://www. dissercat.com/content/sovetskaya-kommunalnaya-kvartira-kak-sotsialnyiinstitut-istoriko-sotsiologicheskii-analiz-n (accessed 5 May 2016). Gewos (2016). Bericht der Expertengruppe zur Reform des Sozialen Wohnungsbaus in Berlin [Report of the Experts’ Commission on the Reform of Social Housing in Berlin]. http://www.stadtentwicklung.berlin.de/wohnen/sozialer_wohnungsbau/ reform/download/teilOl.pdf (accessed 20 March 2017). Ghertner, D.A. (2014). Indias urban revolution: Geographies of displacement beyond gentrification. Environment and Planning A 46(7): 1554-1571. Ghertner, D.A. (2015). Why gentrification theory fails in ‘much of the world’. City 19(4): 546-556. Giddens, A. (1998). The Third Way: The Renewal of Social Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press. Giddens, A. (2000). The Third Way and its Critics. Cambridge: Polity Press. Gillespie, T. (2020). The real estate frontier. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 44(4): 599-616. Ginsburg, N. (1989). The Housing Act, 1988 and its policy context: A critical com mentary. Critical Social Policy 9(25): 56-81. Ginsburg, N. (1999). Housing and housing policy in the 20th century. In: British Social Welfare in the Twentieth Century (eds. R. Page and R. Silburn), 226—235. UK: Palgrave Macmillan. Ginsburg, N. (2005). The privatization of council housing. Critical Social Policy 25(1): 115-135. Glass, R. (1964). London: Aspects of Change. London: McGibbon and Kee. Glock, B. and Häußermann, H. (2004). New trends in urban development and pub lic policy in eastern Germany: Dealing with the vacant housing problem at the local level. InternationalJournal of Urban and Regional Research 28(4): 919-929. References 243 Glucksberg, L. (2016). A view from the top. City 20(2): 238-255. Glucksberg, L., Atkinson, R., Burrows, R. et al. (2016). Minimum city? A critical assessment of some of the deeper impacts of the super-rich’ on urban life. In: Cit ies and the Super-Rich: Real Estate, Elite Practices, and Urban Political Economies (eds. R. Forrest, S. Yee Koh, and B. Wissink), 253-272. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. Goldschmidt, N. (2013). Walter Euckens place in the history of ideas. The Review of Austrian Economics 26: 127-147'. Golubchikov, O. (2004). Urban planning in Russia: Towards the market. European Planning Studies 12(2): 229—247. Gonzalez, S. and Waley, P. (2013). Traditional retail markets: The new gentrification frontier? Antipode 45(4): 965-983. Goodchild, R. and Munton, R. (1985). Development and the Landowner. London: Allen Unwin. Gotham, K.F. (2005). Tourism gentrification: The case of New Orleans’ Vieux Carre (French Quarter). Urban Studies 42(7): 1099-1121. Gotham, K.F. (2009). Creating liquidity out of spatial fixity: The secondary circuit of capital and the subprime mortgage crisis. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 33(2): 355-371. Graham N. (2011). Lawscape: Property, Environment, Law. New York, NY: Rout ledge. Gramsci, A. (1971). Selection from the Prison Notebooks. London: Lawrence and Wis hart. Granovetter, Μ. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of em beddedness. American Journal ofSociology 91: 481-510. Gutzon Larsen, H. and Lund Hansen, A. (2008). Gentrification - Gentle or trau matic? Urban renewal policies and socioeconomic transformations in Copenha gen. Urban Studies 45(12): 2429-2448. Hackworth J. and Smith, N. (2001). The changing state of gentrification. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 92(4): 464-477. Haila, A. (1990). The theory of land rent at the crossroads. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 8(3): 275-296. Haila, A. (2016). Urban Land Rent. Singapore as a Property State. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell. Hale, H.E. (2011). Hybrid regimes: When democracy and autocracy mix. In: Dynamics of Democratization (ed. N. Brown), 23—45. Baltimore, MA: Johns Hopkins University Press. Hall, P. (1986). Governing the Economy. The Politics ofState Intervention in Britain and France. New York, NY and Oxford: Oxford University Press. Hall, P. and Soskice, D. (2001). Varieties of Capitalism. The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford and New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Hall, S. (1998). The great moving nowhere show. Marxism Today. Special edition (November/December): 9-14. Hammel, D.J. (1999a). Re-establishing the rent gap: An alternative view of capital ised land rent. Urban Studies 36(8): 1283-1293. 244 References Hammel, D.J. (1999b). Gentrification and land rent: A historical view of the rent gap in Minneapolis. Urban Geography 20(2): 116-145. Hamnett, C. (1973). Improvement grants as an indicator of gentrification in Inner London. Area 5(4): 252-261. Hamnett, C. (1976). Social change and residential segregation in Inner London 1961-1971. Urban Studies 13(3): 261-271. Hamnett, C. (1991). The blind men and the elephant: The explanation of gentrifica tion. Transactions ofthe Institute ofBritish Geographers 16(2): 173-189. Hamnett, C. (1992). Gentrifiers or lemmings? A response to Neil Smith. Transactions ofthe Institute ofBritish Geographers 17(1): 116-119. Hamnett, C. (2003). Unequal City: London in the Global Arena. London: Routledge. Hamnett, C. (2009). Spatially displaced demand and the changing geography of house prices in London, 1995-2006. Housing Studies 24(3): 301-320. Hamnett, C. (2010). Moving the poor out of London? The implications of the coa lition government 2010 cuts to housing benefits. Environment and Planning A 42: 2809-2819. Hamnett, C. and Randolph, B. (1988). Cities, Housing and Profit: Flat Break-Up and the Decline ofPrivate Renting. London: Hutchinson. Hamnett, C. and Randolph, W. ( 1984). The role oflandlord disinvestment in housing market transformation: An analysis of the flat break-up market in Central Lon don. Transactions ofthe Institute ofBritish Geographers 9(3): 259—279. Hamnett, C. and Williams, P. (1979). Gentrification in London 1961—71. An Empirical and Theoretical Analysis of Social Change. (CURS Research Memoran dum 71). Birmingham: Joint Centre for Regional, Urban and Local Government Studies. Harré, R. (1986). Varieties ofRealism. Oxford: Blackwell. Harvey, D. (1973). SocialJustice and the City. London: Edward Arnold. Harvey, D. (1974). Class-monopoly rent, finance capital and the urban revolution. Regional Studies 8(3-4): 239-255. Harvey, D. (1982). The Limits to Capital. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Harvey, D. (1985). The Urbanization of Capital. Studies in the History and Theory of Capitalist Urbanization. Baltimore, MA: Johns Hopkins University Press. Harvey, B. (1994). Europe’s homeless people and the role of housing. In: Housing — Social integration and exclusion (eds. H. Kristensen and J. Quigley). Horsholm: Danish Building Research Institute. Harvey, D. (2010). The Enigma of Capital and the Crisis of Capitalism. London: Pro file Books. Häußermann, H. (1995). Von der sozialistischen’ zur ‘kapitalistischen Stadt [From the ‘socialist’ to the ‘capitalist’ city]. Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte В 12: 3—15. Häußermann, Н. and Kapphan, A. (2002). Berlin: Von der geteilten zur gespaltenen Stadt? Sozialräumlicher Wandel seit 1990 [Berlin: From the Divided to the Separated City. Socio-Spatial Change Since 1990]. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Häußermann, H., Holm, A., and Zunzer, D. (2002). Stadterneuerung in der Berliner Republik [Urban Renewal in the New Republic], Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag. References 245 He, S. (2019), Three waves of state-led gentrification in China. Tijdschrift voor econo mische en sociale Geografie 110(1): 26—34. Healey, P. and Barrett, S. (1990). Structure and agency in land and property development processes: Some ideas for research. Urban Studies 2՜!(1): 89-103. Heller, M.A. (1999). The boundaries of property. Yale Law Journal 108(5): 11631223. Heller, M.A. (1998). The tragedy of the anticommons. Property in the transition from Marx to markets. Harvard Law Review 111 (3): 621-688. Helms, H.G. (1992). Die Stadt ah Gabentisch. Beobachtungen der aktuellen Städte bauentwicklung [The City as a Table for Presents. Observation in Recent Urban Developments]. Leipzig: Reclam. Heywood, A. (2012). London for sale? An Assessment of the Private Housing Mar ket in London and the Impact of Growing Overseas Investment. http://www. smith-institute.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/London-for-sale.pdf (accessed 6 January 2022). Hjödestrand, T. (2009). Needed by Nobody: Homelessness, Humiliation and Human ness in Post-Socialist Russia. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. HM Government. (2011). Laying the Foundations: A Housing Strategy for England. London: DETR. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/ system/uploads/attachment_data/file/7532/2033676.pdf (accessed 6 January 2022). Hodkinson, S. (2011a). Housing regeneration and the private finance initiative in England: Unstitching the neoliberal urban straitjacket. Antipode 43: 358-383. Hodkinson, S. (2011b). The private finance initiative in English council housing regeneration: A privatisation too far? Housing studies 26(6): 911—932. Hodkinson, S. (2012). The new urban enclosure. City 16: 500-518. Hodkinson, S. and Robbins, G. (2013). The return of class war conservatism? Housing under the UK Coalition government. Critical Social Policy 33(1): 57-77 Hodkinson, S., Watt, P., and Mooney, G. (2013). Neoliberal housing policy-Time for a critical re-appraisal. Critical Social Policy 33(1): 3-16. Holm A. (2006). Die Restrukturierung des Raumes: Machtverhältnisse in der Stadterneuerung der 90er Jahre in Ostberlin [The Restructuring of Space: Power Relations in the Urban Renewal ofthe 1990s in East Berlin]. Bielefeld: Transcript-Verlag. Holm, A. (2010). Townhouses, Urban Village, Car Loft. Berliner Luxuswohnanlagen als ‘dritte Welle’ der Gentrification [Townhouses, urban village, car Loft. Berlins luxury housing as a ‘third wave’ of gentrification]. Geographische Zeitschrift 98(2): 100-115. Holm, A., Hamann, U,, and Kaltenborn, S. (2016). Die Legende vom Sozialen Woh nungbau. Berlin: Berliner Hefte zu Geschichte und Gegenwart der Stadt. Holmans, A.E. (1987). Housing Policy in Britain. London: Croom Helm. Honoré, A.M. (1961). Ownership. In: Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence (ed. A.G. Guest), 107-147. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Hope, A., Kato, Y, and J. Sbieca (2020). A Recipefor Gentrification. Food, Power, and Resistance in the City. New York, NY: New York University Press. 246 References Housing Committee of St. Petersburg. (2014). Gosudarstvennaya programma SanktPeterburga: Obespechenyie dostupným zhilyem I zhilishzno-kommunalnymi usluga mi zhiteley Sankt-Peterburga na 2015—2020 /State Programme for the Provision of Sufficient Housing and Housing Services for the Citizens of St. Petersburg 2015-2020. Proposal to the Resolution of the City of St. Petersburg No. 84, 18.2.2014]. http://46.182.26.58/SpbGovSearch/Document/7101.pdf (accessed 30 June 2017; webpage no longer available). Imrie, R. and Raco, Μ. (2003). Community and the changing nature of urban pol icy. In: Urban Renaissance? New Labour, Community and Urban Policy (eds. R Imrie and R. Mike), 3-36. Bristol: Policy Press. Islam, T. and Sakızhoğlu, В. (2015) The making of, and resistance to, state-led gen trification in Istanbul, Turkey. In: Global Gentrifications (eds. L. Lees, H.B. Shin, and E. López-Morales), 245-264. Bristol and Chicago, IL: Policy Press. Jackson, B. (2012). Property-owning democracy: A short history. In: PropertyOwning Democracy: Rawb and Beyond (eds. Μ. O’Neill and T. Williamson), 33—52. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell. Jaedicke, W. and Wollmann, H. (1991). Wohnungspolitik und Regierungswechsel [Housing policies and changes of government]. In: Die alte Bundesrepublik. Kon tinuität und Wandel [The old Federal Republic of Germany. Continuity and change]. Leviathan. Special Issue 12/1991 (eds. B. Blanke and H. Wollmann), 420-436. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. Jäger, J. (2003). Urban land rent theory: A regulationist perspective. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 27(2): 233-249. Jessop, B. (1990). State Theory. Putting the Capitalist State in Its Place. Cambridge: Polity Press. Jessop, B. (2002). The Future ofthe Capitalist State. Cambridge: Polity Press. Jessop, B. (2015). The State: Past, Present and Future. Cambridge: Polity Press. Jones, C. and Mûrie, A. (2006). The Right to Buy. Analysis Evaluation ofa Housing Policy. Oxford: Blackwell. Kaliin, H. and Slater, T. (2014). Activating territorial stigma: Gentrifying marginal ity on Edinburgh’s other’ fringe. Environment and Planning A 46: 1351-1368. Kary, К. (1988). The gentrification of Toronto and the rent gap theory. In: The Changing Canadian Inner City (eds. T. Bunting and P. Filion), 53-72. Waterloo: Department of Geography, University of Waterloo. Katz, L. (2008). Exclusion and exclusivity in property law. University ofToronto Law Journal 5M$}: 275-315. Kémény, J. (1995)· From Public Housing to the Social Market. London: Routledge. Kémény, J. (2005)· ‘The really big trade off between home ownership and welfare: Castles’ evaluation of the 1980 thesis, and a reformulation 25 years on. Housing, Theory and Society 22(2): 59-75. Kémény, J. (2006). Corporatism and housing regimes. Housing Theory and Society 23(1): 1-18. Kemeny, J and Lowe, S. (1998). Schools of comparative housing research. From con vergence to divergence. Housing Studies 13(2): 161-176. References 247 Kemp, P. (1997). A Comparative Study of Housing Allowance. London: Department of Social Security. King, P. (2001). Understanding Housing Finance. London: Routledge. Kivell, P. (1993). Land and the City. London: Routledge Knight Frank. Residential Research (2014). The Rental Revolution. Examining the Private Rented Sector 2014. http://my.knightfrank.co.uk/research-reports/ private-rented-sector-report-2168.aspx (accessed 30 June 2014; webpage no longer available). Kofner, St. (2004). Wohnungsmarkt und Wohnungswirtschaft [Housing Market and Housing Economy]. Munich: De Gruyter Oldenbourg. Kollegova, A. (2011). Changes in Russian Housing Policy after the Crisis 2008. Paper presented at the New Housing Researchers’ Day, July 4, 2011, European Network of Housing Researchers, Toulouse. Kononenko, V. and Moshes A. eds. (2011). Russia as a Network State. What Works in Russia When State Institutions Do Noti New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. Kornev, N. (2004). Segregatsya po-peterburgskyi - poysky realnosty [Segregation in St. Petersburg- The retrieval of realities}. Pereskop N.2/2004. http://teleskopjournal.spb.ru/files/dir_l/article_contentl 197390715339144file.pdf (accessed 30 June 2017). Kosareva, N.B. and Struyk, R. (1993). Housing privatization in the Russian Federa tion. Housing Policy Debate 4(1): 81-100. Krätke, S. (1995). Stadt ֊ Raum - Ökonomie, Einführung in aktuelle Problemfelder der Stadtökonomie und Wirtschaftsgeographie [City-Space-Economy. An Introduction into Current Problems of Urban and Economic Geographies], Basel; Boston, MA; and Berlin: Birkhäuser. Krijnen, Μ. (2018). Gentrification and the creation and formation of rent gaps. City 22(3): 437-446. Kuhnert, J. and Leps, О. (2017). Neue Wohnungsgemeinnützigkeit. Wege zu langfristig preiswertem und zukunftsgerechtem Wohnraum [New Limited-Profit Housing. Ways Towards Long-Term Affordable and Sustainable Housing!. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. Lambert, C. (2002). Transforming the city: Post-recession gentrification and re urbanisation. XVI AESOP Congress, Volos, Greece, 10-15 July 2002. http:// eprints.uwe.ac.uk/9594 (accessed 23 November 2017). Lapavitsas, C. (2013). Profiting Without Producing: How Finance Exploits Us All. New York, NY: Verso. Lasswell, H.D. (1936). Politics: Who Gets What, When, How. New York, NY: Whit tlesey House. Ledeneva, A. (2006). How Russia Really Works: The Informal Practices that Shaped Post-Soviet Politics and Business. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Lees, L. (1994). Gentrification in London and New York: An Atlantic gap? Housing Studies 9(2): 199-217. Lees, L. (2003). Super-gentrification: The case of Brooklyn Heights, New York City. Urban Studies 40(12): 2487-2509. 248 References Lees, L. (2008). Gentrification and social mixing: Towards an inclusive urban renais sance? Urban Studies 45(J2J 2449-2470. Lees, L. (2014). The urban injustices of New Labours new urban renewal’: The case of the Aylesbury Estate in London. Antipode 46(4): 921—947. Lees, L. and Ferreri, Μ. (2016). Resisting gentrification on its final frontiers: Lessons from the Heygate Estate in London (1974—2013). Cities 57՛. 14-24. Lees, L., Shin, H.B., and López-Morales, E. (eds.) (2015) Global Gentrifications: Uneven Development and Displacement. Bristol: Policy Press Lees, L., Shin, H.B., and Lopez-Morales, E. (2016): Planetary Gentrification. Cam bridge: Polity Press. Lees, L., Slater, T, and Wyly, E. (2008). Gentrification. New York, NY: Routledge. Lehmbruch, G. (1976). Parteienwettbewerb im Bundesstaat [Party Competition in the Federal State]. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer. Lehmbruch, G. (1996). Die korporative Verhandlungsdemokratie in Westmitteleu ropa [The corporative negotiating democracy in Western Central Europe]. Swiss Political Science Review 2: 1-24. Lemański C. (2014). Hybrid gentrification in South Africa: Theorising across southern and northern cities. Urban Studies 51(14): 2943-2960. Levitas, R. (1998). The Inclusive Society? Social Exclusion and New Labour. Basing stoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Ley, D. (1986). Alternative explanations for inner-city gentrification: A Canadian assessment. Annab ofthe Association ofAmerican Geographers 76(4): 521-535. Ley, D. (1996). The New Middle Class and the Remaking ofthe Central City. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Lijphart, A. (1971). Comparative politics and the comparative method. American Political Science Review 65 (September): 682-693. Lijphart, A. (1977). Democracy in Plural Societies: A Comparative Exploration. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Lijphart, A. (1999). Patterns ofDemocracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Limonov L.E. (2011). Land market and urban development in Russia. In: Regional Development and Policy — Challenges, Choices and Recipients (ed. Regional Studies Association). Newcastle: Annual International Conference of the Regional Studies Association: 102-103. Lind, H. (2001). Rent regulation: A conceptual and comparative analysis. InternationalJournal ofHousing Policy 1(1): 41-57. London Assembly, Housing and Regeneration Committee (2013). Rent Reform. Making Londons Private Rented Sector Fit for Purpose June 2013. https://www. london.gov.uk/about-us/london-assembly/london-assembly-publications/rentreform-making-londons-private-rented (accessed 6 January 2022). López-Morales, E. (2011). Gentrification by ground rent dispossession: Ihe shadows cast by large-scale urban renewal in Santiago de Chile. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 35: 330-357. López-Morales, E., Shin, H.B., and Lees, L. (2016) Latin American gentrifications. Urban Geography, 37(8): 1091—1108. References 249 Lowe, S. (2004). Housing Policy Analysis. British Housing in Cultural and Comparative Context. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Lowe, S. (2011). The Housing Debate. Bristol: The Policy Press. Lowndes, V. and Pratchett, L. (2012). Local governance under the coalition government: Austerity, localism and the ‘big society.’ Local Government Studies 38(1): 21-40. Lundquist, L. (1992). Dislodging the Welfare State? Housing and Privatisation in Four European Countries. Delft: Delft University Press. Makhrova, A.G. and Golubchikov, O. (2012). Rossiyski go rod v uslovyach kapitalzma: sotsyalnaya transformatzya vnutrygorodskogo prostranstva [The Russian city under the conditions of capitalism: Social transformation and the transformation of the urban environment]. Vestnik Moskovskoga Universiteta. Seria 5: Geografa 2: 26-31. Maloutas, T. (2007). Segregation, social polarization and immigration in Athens dur ing the 1990s: Theoretical expectations and contextual difference. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 31 (4): 733-758. Maloutas, T. (2012). Contextual diversity in gentrification research. Critical Sociology 38(1): 33-48. Maloutas, T. (2018). Travelling concepts and universal particularisms: A reappraisal of gentrification’s global reach. European Urban and Regional Studies 25(3): 250265. Malpass, P (2003). The wobbly pillar? Housing policy and the British postwar wel fare state. Journal ofSocial Policy 32(4): 589-606. Malpass, P. (2005). Housing the Welfare State. The Development ofHousing Policy in Britain. Houndsmill: Palgrave Macmillan. Malpass, P. and Victory, C. (2010). The modernisation of social housing in England. InternationalJournal ofHousing Policy 10(1): 3—18. Marcińczak, S., Gentile, Μ., and Stępniak, Μ. (2013). Paradoxes of (post)socialist segregation: Metropolitan sociospatial divisions under socialism and after in Poland. Urban Geography 34(3): 327-352. Marcuse, P. (1986). Abandonment, gentrification, and displacement: The linkages in New York City. In: Gentrification of the City (eds. N. Smith and P. Williams), 153-177. London: Unwin Hyman. Marshall, Т.Н. (1950). Citizenship and Social Class: And Other Essays. Cambridge: University Press. Marx, K. (1971 [1894]). Capital, Volume III. Moscow: Progress Publishers. Massey, D. and Catalano, A. (1978). Capital and Land, Landownership by Capital in Great Britain. London: Edward Arnold. Mau, St. (2003). The Moral Economy of Welfare States: Britain and Germany Com pared. London: Routledge. Mayer, A. (1998). Theorie und Politik des Wohnungsmarktes [Theory and Policy of the Housing Market]. Berlin: Duncker Humblot. McFarlane, C. (2010). The comparative city: Knowledge, learning, urbanism. InternationalJournal of Urban and Regional Research 34(4): 725-742. 250 References Merrett, S. (1979). State Housing in Britain. London: Routledge Kegan Paul. Merrett, S. and Gray, E (1982). Owner Occupation in Britain. London: Routledge Kegan Paul. Merrill, T.W. and Smith, H.E. (2001). What happened to property in law and eco nomics? The Yale Law Journal 111 (2): 357-398. Mints, V. (2000). Selecting a housing finance system for Russia. Housing Finance International 15: 49-57. Mints, V. (2004). Strategies of transitional countries to establish a housing finance system. The Russian experience. Housing Finance International 19(2): 25-37. Mitchell, D. (2003). The Right to the City: SocialJustice and the Fightfor Public Space. New York, NY: Guilford Press. Modan, G.G. (2007). Turf Wars, Discourse, Diversity, and the Politics of Place. Mal den, NIA: Blackwell. Nikonov, P. (2012). Narusheniya ochranogo zakonodetyelstva. XXI wek [Breaking conservation laws. 21st century]. In: Sankt Peterburg: nasledye pod ugrozoy [St. Pe tersburg: Heritage at Risk] (eds. C. Cecil and E. Minchenok), 157-163. Moscow: MAPS. Novy, K. (1990). Gewinner und Verlierer im Kampf um Deregulierungsrenten. Skiz ze zur wohnungspolitischen Lage in der Bundesrepublik [Winners and losers in the struggle for deregulation-rents. A sketch on the situation of housing policies in Germany]. In: Soziale Wohnungspolitik in den 90erJahren. Probleme und Hand lungsansätze aus britisch-deutscher Sicht [Social Housing Policy in the 90s. Problems and Approachesfrom a British-German Perspective] (eds. K. Novy and A. Norton), 29-46. Basel: Birkhäuser. O’Sullivan, D. (2002). Toward micro- scale spatial modeling of gentrification. Journal of Geographical Systems 4(3): 251-274. Paccoud, A. (2016). Buy-to-let gentrification: Extending social change through ten ure shifts. Environment and Planning A 49(4): 839—856. Park, J. (2014). Land rent theory revisited. Science Society 78(1): 88-109. Patterson, D. (1996). A Companion to Philosophy ofLaw and Legal Theory. Oxford: Blackwell. Pawson, H. and Mullins, D. (2010). After Council Housing. Britain’s New Social Landlords. Houndsmill: Palgrave Macmillan. Penner, J.E. (2009). Property, community, and the problem of distributive justice. Theoretical Inquiries in Law 10(1): 194-216. Petrov, N., Lipman, Μ., and Hale, H.E. (2014). Three dilemmas of hybrid regime governance: Russia 848 from Putin to Putin. Post-Soviet Affairs 30(1): 1-26. Phillips, Μ. (1993). Rural gentrification and the process of class colonization. Journal of Rural Studies 9(2): 123—140. Phillips, Μ. (2004). Other geographies of gentrification. Progress in Human Geogra phy 28(1): 5-30. Pitt, J. (1977). Gentrification in Islington. The Return ofthe Middle Classes to an Inner London Borough and the Subsequent Effects on Housing. London: Barnsbury People Forum. References 251 Polanyi, К. (1957 [1944]). The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. Boston, MA: Beacon Press. Porter L. and Shaw K. (2009). Whose Urban Renaissance? An International Comparison of Urban Regeneration Strategies. London: Routledge. Porter, Μ. (2012). The rent gap at the metropolitan scale: New York City’s land value valleys, 1990-2006. Urban Geography 31(3): 385-405. Poulantzas, N. (2000 [1978]). State, Power, Socialism. London: Verso. Power, A. (1972). A Battle Lost. Barnsbury. London: Friends House. Power, A. (1973). David and Goliath. Barnsbury 1973. London: Holloway Law Cen tre and the Barnsbury Forum on Developments in Barnsbury. Przeworski, A. and Teune, H. (1970). The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry. New York, NY: Wiley. Putnam, R.D. (1993). Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Putnam, R.D. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York, NY: Simon Schuster. Puzanov, A. (2012). Russia: The persistence of the socialist legacy. In: Social Housing in Transition Countries (eds. J. Hegedűs, M. Lux, and N. Teller), 225-241. Lon don: Routledge. Ragin, C. (1987). The Comparative Method. Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. Ravetz, A. (2001). Council Housing and Culture. The History ofa Social Experiment. London: Routledge. Reimann B. (2000). Städtische Wohnquartiere [Urban Residential Quarters]. Opladen: Leske Budrich. Reulecke, J. (1985). Geschichte der Urbanisierung in Deutschland [The History of Urbanization in Germany]. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp. Robinson, J. (2006). Ordinary Cities. London: Routledge. Robinson, J. (2016). Thinking cities through elsewhere: Comparative tactics for a more global urban studies. Progress in Human Geography 40(1): 3—29. Rolnik, R (2013). Late neoliberalism: The financializarion ofhomeownership and housing rights. InternationalJournal ofUrban and Regional Research 37(3): 1058—1066. Rose, C.M. (1994). Property as Persuasion: Essays, on the History, Theory, and Rhetoric of Ownership. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. Sakwa, R. (2010). The dual state in Russia. Post-Soviet Affairs 26(3): 185-206. Sakwa, R. (2011). The Crisis ofRussian Democracy. The Dual State, Factionalism and the Medvedev Succession. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Sartori, G. (1970). Concept misformation in comparative politics. The American Political Science Review 64(4): 1033—1053. Sartori, G. (1991). Comparing and miscomparing. Journal of Theoretical Politics 3(3): 243-257. Savills World Research, UK Residential. (2013). Spotlight. The World in London. http://pdf.euro.savills.co.uk/residential—other/spot-worldlondon-lr. pdf (accessed 14 June 2014). 252 References Savini, E and Aalbers, M.В. (2016). The de-contextualisation of land use planning through financiálisadon: Urban redevelopment in Milan. European Urban and Regional Studies 23(4): 878-894. Sayer, A. (1992). Method in Social Science. A Realist Approach. London: Routledge. Sayer, A. (2000). Realism and Social Science. London: Sage. Scanlon, K., Fernandez, Μ., and Whitehead, C. (2014). A Lifestyle Choice for Fam ilies? Private Renting in London, New York, Berlin and the Randstad. London: Get Living London. Scanlon, K. and Whitehead, C. ed. (2008). Social Housing in Europe II-A Review of Policies and Outcomes. London: London School of Economics. Scharpf, EW. (1985). Die Politikverflechtungs-Falle: Europäische Integration und deutscher Föderalismus im Vergleich [The joint decision-making trap. European integration and German federalism compared]. Politische Vierteljahresschrift 26: 323-356. Schiebe, C. (2016). Verdrängung durch energetische Sanierung in Berlin [Dis placement through energy-saving regeneration in Berlin]. https://blogs. hu-berlin.de/wohnenberlin/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/2016/08/Schiebe_ Verdr%C3%A4ngung-von-Bestandsmieterinnen.pdf (accessed 12 November 2017). Schmid, C., Karaman, O., Hanakata, N.C. et al. (2018). Towards a new vocabulary of urbanisation processes: A comparative approach. Urban Studies 55(1): 19-52. Schönig, В. (2013). Die neue Wohnungsfrage [The new housing question]. Blätter für deutsche und internationale Politik 2/2013: 17—20. Schulz, G. (1986). Kontinuitäten und Brüche in der Wohnungspolitik von der Wei marer Zeit bis zur Bundesrepublik [Continuities and ruptures in housing policies from the Weimar Republic to the Federal Republic of Germany]. In: Stadtwachstum, Industrialisierung Sozialer Wandel. Beiträge zur Erforschung der Urbanisier ung im 19. und 20. Jahrhundert [Urban Growth, Industrialization, Social Change. Contributions on Urbanization in the 19th and 20th Century] (ed. HJ. Teuteberg), 135-174. Berlin: Duncker Humblot. Schwartz, H. and Seabrooke, L. (2008). Varieties of residential capitalism in the in ternational political economy: Old welfare states and the new politics of housing. Comparative European Politics 6(3): 237-261. Seeger, H. (1995). Wohnungswirtschaft im Wahlzyklus der Politik [Housing Business and Electoral Cycles], Bad Sinzheim: Pro Universitate Verlag. Senatsverwaltung fur Bau- und Wohnungswesen von Berlin (1993). Leitsätze zur Stadterneuerung in Berlin vom 31.August 1993 [Guiding Principles for Urban Renewal in Berlin as of 31 August 1993]. http://www.stadtentwicklung.berlin. de/staedtebau/foerderprogramme/stadterneuerung/de/download/Ieitsaetze.pdf (accessed 12 November 2017). SEU. Social Exclusion Unit. ( 1998). Bringing Britain Together. A National Strategyfor Neighbourhood Renewal. Cm. 4045, London: HMSO. Sharafutdinova, G. (2010). Political Consequences of Crony Capitalism Inside Russia. Paris: Notre Dame University Press. References 253 Shatkin, G. (2017). Cities for Profit. The Real Estate Turn in Asia’s Urban Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Shevtsova, L. (2001). Ten years after the Soviet breakup: Russia’s hybrid regime. Tournai ofDemocracy 12(4): 65-70. Shin, H.B. and Kim, S.H. (2016). The developmental state, speculative urbanization and the politics of displacement in gentrifying Seoul. Urban Studies 53(3): 540-559. Shin, H.B. and López-Morales, E. (2018). Beyond Anglo-American gentrification theory. In: Handbook of Gentrification Studies (eds. L. Lees and Μ. Phillips), 1325. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Shin, H.B., Lees, L., and López-Morales, E. (2016) Introduction: Locating gentrifi cation in the global East. Urban Studies 53(3): 455-47. Shomina, E.S. (2010). Kvartyrosemchyki ~ nashe ‘zhilishnoye menshesto’: rossyskiyi i zarubezhnyiv opyt razvitiiya arendnogo zhilya [Tenants — Our “Housing Minority: ” Russian and Foreign Experiences in the Development ofRental Housing!. Moscow: State University-Higher School of Economics Publishers. Shomina, E.S. (2014). Wedomstvoye zhilye: Problemyi I perspektiviy [Departmental housing: Problems and perspectives]. Munitsipalnaya wlast4-5: 84-92. Singer, J. W. (2000). Entitlement: The Paradoxes of Property. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Skocpol, T. (1979). States and Social Revolutions. A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia and China. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Skocpol, T. and Somers, Μ. (1980). The uses of comparative history in macrosocial inquiry. Comparative Studies in Society and History 22(2): 174-197. Slater, T. (2017). Planetary rent gaps. Antipode 49: 114-137. Slater, T. (2018). Rent gaps. In: Handbook of Gentrification Studies (eds. L. Lees and Μ. Phillips), 119-133. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Smart, A. and Smart, J. (2017). Ain’t talkin’ ’bout gentrification: The erasure of alternative idioms of displacement resulting from Anglo American academic hegemony. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 41(3): 518-525. Smeiser, N. (1976). Comparative Methods in the Social Sciences. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Smeiser, N. and Swedberg R. (2005). The Handbook of Economic Sociology (2nd expanded ed.). New York, NY and Princeton, NJ: Russell Sage Foundation and Princeton University Press. Smith, D.P. and Holt, L. (2007). Studentification and apprentice’ gentrifiers within Britain’s provincial towns and cities: Extending the meaning of gentrification. Environment and Planning A 39(1): 142—161. Smith, N. (1977). TLie return from the suburbs and the structuring of urban space: State involvement in Society Hill, Philadelphia. Unpublished BSc thesis. Univer sity of St Andrews. Smith, N. (1979). Towards a theory of gentrification. A back to the city movement by capital, not people. Journal ofthe American Planning Association 45(4): 538-548. Smith, N. (1982). Gentrification and uneven development. Economic Geography 58(2): 139-155. 254 References Smith, N. (1984): Uneven Development: Nature, Capital, and the Production ofSpace. Oxford: Blackwell. Smith, N. (1996). The New Urban Frontier: Gentrification and the Revanchist City. London: Routledge. Smith, N. (2010). Toward a theory of gentrification. A back to the city movement by capital, not people . In: The Gentrification Reader (box 3) (eds. L. Lees,T. Slater, and E. Wyly), 97-98. New York, NY: Routledge. Stedman Jones, D. (2012). Masters ofthe Universe: Hayek, Friedman, and the Birth of Neoliberal Politics, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Stephens, Μ. and Whitehead, C. (2013). Rental housing policy in England: Post crisis adjustment or long term trend? Journal of Housing and the Built Environ ment 29: 201-220. Stones, R. (1996). Sociological Reasoning: Towards a Post Modern Sociology. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press. Struyk, R.J. and Kosareva, N.B. (1993). The Russian Housing Market in Transition (The Urban Institute Project Report), http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/pnabq331 . pdf (accessed 6 June 2017). Swedberg, R. (2004). The toolkit for economic sociology. CSES Working Paper Series Paper #22, Cornell University. Swenarton, Μ. (1981). Homes Fit for Heroes. The Politics and Architecture of Early State Housing in Britain, London: Routledge. Sýkora, L. (1993). City in transition: The role of rent gaps in Prague’s revitalization. Tijdschjrifi voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 84(4): 281-293. Szelenyi, I. (1983). Urban Inequalities Under State Socialism. New York, ΝΎ: Oxford University Press. Szelenyi, I. (1996). Cities under socialism - and after. In: Cities After Socialism (eds. G. Andrusz, Μ. Harloe, and I. Szelenyi), 286-317. Oxford and Cambridge: Blackwell. Tang, W. (2017). Beyond gentrification: Hegemonic redevelopment in Hong Kong. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 41(3): 487—499. Taşan-Кок, T. (2006). Institutional and spatial change. In: The Urban Mosaic ofPost Socialist Europe: Space, Institutions, and Policy (eds. S. Tsenkova and Z. NedovićBudić), 51-70. Dordrecht: Springer. Thomas, R. (2014). What is the New Normal’? Mortgage Lending in 2014-15 and the March Back to a Sustainable Market (Intermediary Mortgage Lenders Association Annual Report). http.7/www.imla.org.uk/perch/resources/imla-what֊is-the-newnormal-mortgage-lending-in-2014-15-published.pdf (accessed 28 June 2014). Tilly, C. (1984). Big Structures, Large Processes, Huge Comparisons. New York, NY: Sage. Torgersen, U. (1987). Housing: The wobbly pillar under the welfare state. In: Between State and Market: Housing in the Post-industrial Era (eds. B. Turner, J. Kemeny, and L. Lundqvist), 116-126. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wicksell International. Trumbull, N.S. (2012). Redevelopment and conservation in the built fabric of post socialist St. Petersburg. Urban Geography 33(3): 370-400. References 255 Turner, В. and Elsinga, Μ. (2005). Housing allowances: Finding a balance between social justice and market incentives. International Journal ofHousing Policy 5(2): 103-109. Tykhanova, E. and Kholova, A. (2015). Gorodskoy politicheskyj rezhym v SanktPeterburgye: rol realjnych I voobrozhayemych mashin rosta’ v borbye za gorodskoye prostranstvo [Urban political regimes in St. Petersburg. The role of a real and a perceived growth machine” in struggles around the urban environment]. Zhurnal isledovanyi sotsyjalnoypolitiky 13(2): 241—256. UNUCE. United Nations, Economic Commission for Europe (2004). Country Pro file on the Housing Sector. Russian Federation. Geneva: United Nations. Valle, M.M. (2021), Globalizing the sociology of gentrification. City Community. https://d0i.0rg/l 0.1111 /cico. 12507. van Gent, W. and Boterman, W. (2019). Gentrification of the changing state. Tijdschjrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 110(1): 35^6. van Weesep, J. and Musterd, S. (1991). Urban Housingfor the Better-Off. Gentrifica tion in Europe. Utrecht: Stedelijke Netwerken. Vesper, Dieter (1997). Berliner Finanzpolitik in einem fast ausweglosen Dilemma aktuelle Tendenzen im Landeshaushalt von Berlin [Berlins financial politics in an unsolvable dilemma. Recent tendencies in the state budget of Berlin], DIW Wochenbericht 39/1997: 697-708. Vesper, Dieter (1999). Kann sich Berlin aus seinem Finanzdilemma befreien? Zur Entwicklung des Landeshaushalts von Berlin [Can Berlin liberate itself from its financial dilemma? On the development of the state budget of Berlin], DIW Wochenbericht 22: 389-397. Vihavainen, R. (2009). Homeowners’ Associations in Russia — After the 2005 Housing Reform. Helsinki: Kikimore Publications. http://www.iut.nu/members/Russia/ HomeownerAssociations_Russia_2009.pdf (accessed 6 June 2016). Vorobyev, D. and Campbell, T. (2009). Gentrification in Petersburg: A New City for a New Gentry. http://www.cisr.ru/files/publ/Vorobyev/berlin7.pdf (accessed 6 June 2016). Walker, R (1974). Urban ground rent: Building a new conceptual theory. Antipode 6(1): 51-58. Wallace, A. (2016). Remaking Community? New Labour and the Governance ofPoor Neighbourhoods. London: Routledge. Ward, C. and Aalbers, M.B. (2016) ‘The shitty rent business’: What’s the point of land rent theory? Urban Studies 53(9): 1760—1783. Watt, P. (2001). The Dynamics ofSocial Class and Housing: A Study ofLocal Authority Tenants in the London Borough ofCamden. Unpublished PhD Thesis. Department of Geography, King’s College. London: University of London. Watt, P. (2009a). Housing stock transfer, regeneration and state-led gentrification in London. Urban Policy and Research 27(3): 229-242. Watt, P. (2009b). Social housing and regeneration in London. In: Regenerating London. Governance, Sustainability and Community in a Global City (eds. R. Imrie, L. Lees, and M. Raco), 212—236. London: Routledge. 256 References Watt, E (2013). ‘Its not for us’: Regeneration, the 2012 Olympics and the gentrifica tion of East London. City 17(1): 99-118 Watt P. and Jacobs, K. (2000). Discourses of social exclusion. An analysis of bringing Britain together: A national strategy for neighbourhood renewal. Housing, Theory and Society 17(1): 14—26. Watt, E and Minton, A. (2016). Londons housing crisis and its activisms. City 20(2): 204-221. Welch Guerra, Μ. (2016). Mietpreisbindung als Dauerrecht [Rent control as a permanent right]. Mieterecho 384 (Octoberlő): 17-20. Whitehead, C. (2012). Owner-occupation in an increasingly uncertain world: The English experience. In: Beyond Home Ownership. Housing, Welfare and Society (eds. R. Ronald and Μ. Elsinga), 108-129. Milton Park: Routledge. Whitehead, C. and Scanlon, K. (2007). Social Housing in Europe. London: London School of Economics and Political Science. Williams, ER. (1976). The role of institutions in the Inner London housing mar ket: The case of Islington. Transactions ofthe Institute ofBritish Geographers 1(1): 72-82. Williams, ER. (1978). Building societies and the inner city. Transactions ofthe Insti tute ofBritish Geographers 3(1): 23-34. Wilson, J. and Johnson, J. (2013). The Future of London’s Private Rented Sector (Future of London, Series Summary), https://www.landlordzone.co.uk/reports/ future-of-londons-private-rented-sector.pdf (accessed 6 January 2022). Winters, T. (1997). Erst Dinks, dann Kids? [First Dinks, then Kids?]. VorOrt. Bauen und Wohnen in Prenzlauer Berg. Yeung, H.W. (1997). Critical realism and realist research in human geography: A method or a philosophy in search of a method? Progress in Human Geography 21(1): 51-74. Yung, C.F. and King, R.J. (1998). Some tests for the rent gap theory. Environment and Planning A 30: 523—542. Zavisca, J.R. (2008). Property without markets: Housing policy and politics in postSoviet Russia, 1992—2007. Comparative European Politics 6: 365—386. Zavisca, J.R. (2012). Housing the New Russia. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Index Austerity, 70-73, 90, 165 Avariinyje doma, 189 Ball, Michaeli, 38-40,49 Barnsbury, 129-155,208-211 Compulsory purchase, 137, 223-227 Early gentrification, 129-136 Right to Buy, 137-142 Supergentrification, 143-145, 151 Behutsame Stadterneuerung, 158, 160, 162-164 Capital flows, 32-34 Careful urban renewal see aho Behutsame Stadterneuerung Commodification, 45-52, 216-217 commodification gap, 51-56, 118-124, 216-217 Comparison, 8-11, 15-16, 19-20, 219-220 concepts and causation, 11-15 types, 10-11 use of, 9 Controlled housing economy, 77-84 Council housing, 59-76, 130, 136, 139 Critical realism, 12-13 Damaged houses see aho Avariinyje doma Decommodification, 45-52, 212, 216-217 Derivative gap, 122, 211 Displacement, 17-18, 23, 43-48, 206-213 Dual state, 110-112 Germany Controlled housing economy, 77-84 East Germany, 89 German state, 94—96 Housing, 77-98 Social Housing, 87-90 Social market economy, 83-84, 94, 98 Tenant Protections, 84-86 Glass, Ruth, 1-2, 4, 130 Gramsci, Antonio, 49-50, 209 Ground rent, 37-40 absolute rent, 37, 38 class-monopoly rent, 37, 41 definition, 26 differential rent, 29, 37-38 idiosyncratic understanding of, 39-40 nomothetic understanding of, 38 Harvey, David, 28, 32-35, 37-42, 44, 55 Heritage protection, 185-192, 205 Homeownership, 46-47, 55, 133, 135, 146-152, 155 Housing allowances, 47 Housing privatisation in Russia, 103-107 in the UK, 61-63, 76 see aho Right To Buy Housing studies, 44-48 Housing Systems, 45, 73 Inflationary gap, 122, 153, 211 Eigenbedarf, 85 Embedded economy, 48-50 Jessop, Bob, 49-51 Financialisation, 35-36, 142-146, 219 Fragmented ownership, 105, 107 Kemeny, Jim, 45, 55, 73, 83, 209 Kommunalka, 100, 184, 192-193, 196, 204, 213 Gentrification as a concept, 12-14, 214—216 definition of, 12, 16-17 in the Global South, 6-7 research on, 1-8 Lees, Loretta, 5-8, 130-131, 136, 140, 150-154, 220-221 Legal Geography, 42-43 Legal Realism, 43 ¿wc Plan, Tl, 83,85,91 The Commodification Gap: Gentrification and Public Policy in London, Berlin and St Petersburg, First Edition. Matthias Bernt. © 2022 John Wiley Sons Ltd. Published 2022 by John Wiley Sons Ltd. 258 Index Marshall, Thomas H., 5, 124 Marx, Karl, 16, 29, 37, 40-41, 218 Mietspiegel, 85, 92, 94 Milieux Protection, 88, 96, 169 Modernisation, 86, 94-97 Modernisation gap, 97, 123, 169, 211, 214 New tenancy gap, 96-97, 123, 211, 213 Particularism, 10-11, 207-215 Personal use, Claiming of see aho Eigenbedarf Planning mistakes, 189, 205-206 Polanyi, Karl, 49 Poulantzas, Nikos, 49-52, 124, 210, 217 Prenzlauer Berg, 158-179 Milieux protection, 88, 96, 169 New build gentrification, 167-170 Restitution, 161, 175-177 Urban renewal area, 162-174 Privatisation gap, 122, 141, 153, 211 Property, 40—43 Property rights, 7, 41-43 Redevelopment gap, 123 Rental deregulation gap, 74, 122, 153, 211 Rent gap Concept, 25-55 and ground rent, 28-29, 32~34 Realization, 34-37, 43-48 Relation to commodification gaps, 52-53, 215-216,218 and scale, 29-30, 37-Л0 and uneven development, 26-30 Rent Index see aho Mietspiegel Rent regulation, 45-48 in Germany, 84-86, 91-94, 97-98, 163, 166, 173 in Russia, 115-117 in the United Kingdom, 60, 64, 145-150 Research design, 15-21 Restitution, 161, 175-177 Right of first refusal see aho Vorkaufirecht, 173 Right to Buy, 61-63, 65, 68, 72, 76, 103, 122, 137-141, 152-153, 195, 210, 221 Robinson, Jeniffer, 9, 19, 22 Russia Dual State, 111-112 Fragmentation of ownership, 105, 107 Housing, 98-118 Housing market, 112-118 Privatization, 102-109 Weak State, 110-112 Sanierungsgebiet, 162-174 Scales, 30, 34-37, 52, 175, 217 Shatkin, Gavin, 7, 54 Smith, Neil, 5, 7, 17, 25-33, 37,41-43,53, 118, 154,174, 218-220 Social exclusion, 66-67 Social housing, 45-46, 119-126 in Germany, 82-83, 87-91, 98, 179 in Russia, 106, 109 in the United Kingdom, 61-63, 68-76, 79 Social housing deregulation gap, 98, 153, 176, 211-212 Social market economy, 83-84, 94, 98 Social mix, 67 Soviet Union, Housing in, 99-102 Splintered gentrification, 181-205 State and economy, 48-50 Integral theory of the state, 50-51 St. Petersburg Gentrification, 202-205 Heritage Protection, 186-192 Kommunalki (dissolution of), 192-198 Regeneration, 183-186, 198-202 Super-Gentrification, 150, 152 Tenure conversion gap, 123 in Germany, 97—98 in Russia, 116-117 Thatcher, Margret, 60-61, 64, 66, 68, 71, 74, 103, 125 Third way, 65-66 Uneven development, 28-29, 32-34 United Kingdom Austerity, 70-73, 90, 165 Coalition government, 70-74 Dual housing market, 58-60 New Labour, 65-70 Tenure, 58, 73-76 Thatcherism, 60-71 Universalism, 10-11, 207-216 Urban renewal area, see aho Sanierungsgebiet Value gap, 31, 120, 122-123, 132-135, 137, 150-154, 208,210-215 voluntary stock transfers, 62 Vorkaufirecht, 173 Bayerische Staatsbibliothek Mönchen
any_adam_object	1
any_adam_object_boolean	1
author	Bernt, Matthias 1970-
author_GND	(DE-588)1023926830
author_facet	Bernt, Matthias 1970-
author_role	aut
author_sort	Bernt, Matthias 1970-
author_variant	m b mb
building	Verbundindex
bvnumber	BV047836549
classification_rvk	RB 10642 RC 10642 RF 96642 RN 75642 RQ 40642
ctrlnum	(OCoLC)1298745736 (DE-599)BVBBV047836549
discipline	Geographie
discipline_str_mv	Geographie
format	Book
fullrecord	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nam a2200000 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV047836549</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230210</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t\|</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220215s2022 xx a\|\|\| \|\|\|\| 00\|\|\| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781119603047</subfield><subfield code="c">hbk.</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-119-60304-7</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781119603054</subfield><subfield code="c">pbk.</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-119-60305-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1298745736</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV047836549</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-188</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-739</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-11</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-20</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">OST</subfield><subfield code="q">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="2">fid</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">RB 10642</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)142220:12806</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">RC 10642</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)142222:12806</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">RF 96642</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)142306:12806</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">RN 75642</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)142381:12806</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">RQ 40642</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)142415:12806</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bernt, Matthias</subfield><subfield code="d">1970-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1023926830</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">The commodification gap</subfield><subfield code="b">gentrification and public policy in London, Berlin and St. Petersburg</subfield><subfield code="c">Matthias Bernt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Hoboken, NJ</subfield><subfield code="b">Wiley</subfield><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">xiii, 258 Seiten</subfield><subfield code="b">Illustrationen, Diagramme (schwarz-weiß)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">IJURR-SUSC</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Bibliographische Angaben und Index Seite [235]-258</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Stadtplanung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4056754-0</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Gentrifizierung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4291675-6</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Berlin</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4005728-8</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">London</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4074335-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Sankt Petersburg</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4267026-3</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Gentrification / England / London</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Gentrification / Germany / Berlin</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Gentrification / Russia (Federation) / Saint Petersburg</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Gentrification</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">England / London</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Germany / Berlin</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Russia (Federation) / Saint Petersburg</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Berlin</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4005728-8</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">London</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4074335-4</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Sankt Petersburg</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4267026-3</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Gentrifizierung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4291675-6</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Stadtplanung</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4056754-0</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Online-Ausgabe, PDF</subfield><subfield code="z">9781119603085</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Online-Ausgabe, EPUB</subfield><subfield code="z">9781119603078</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=033219711&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=033219711&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Literaturverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=033219711&sequence=000005&line_number=0003&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Register // Gemischte Register</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">BSB_NED_20230210</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">306.09</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">090512</subfield><subfield code="g">43155</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">306.09</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">090512</subfield><subfield code="g">41</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">910</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">090512</subfield><subfield code="g">471</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">306.09</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">090512</subfield><subfield code="g">471</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033219711</subfield></datafield></record></collection>
geographic	Berlin (DE-588)4005728-8 gnd London (DE-588)4074335-4 gnd Sankt Petersburg (DE-588)4267026-3 gnd
geographic_facet	Berlin London Sankt Petersburg
id	DE-604.BV047836549
illustrated	Illustrated
index_date	2024-07-03T19:10:40Z
indexdate	2024-12-05T11:05:58Z
institution	BVB
isbn	9781119603047 9781119603054
language	English
oai_aleph_id	oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033219711
oclc_num	1298745736
open_access_boolean
owner	DE-188 DE-739 DE-11 DE-12 DE-20
owner_facet	DE-188 DE-739 DE-11 DE-12 DE-20
physical	xiii, 258 Seiten Illustrationen, Diagramme (schwarz-weiß)
psigel	BSB_NED_20230210
publishDate	2022
publishDateSearch	2022
publishDateSort	2022
publisher	Wiley
record_format	marc
series2	IJURR-SUSC
spelling	Bernt, Matthias 1970- Verfasser (DE-588)1023926830 aut The commodification gap gentrification and public policy in London, Berlin and St. Petersburg Matthias Bernt Hoboken, NJ Wiley 2022 xiii, 258 Seiten Illustrationen, Diagramme (schwarz-weiß) txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier IJURR-SUSC Bibliographische Angaben und Index Seite [235]-258 Stadtplanung (DE-588)4056754-0 gnd rswk-swf Gentrifizierung (DE-588)4291675-6 gnd rswk-swf Berlin (DE-588)4005728-8 gnd rswk-swf London (DE-588)4074335-4 gnd rswk-swf Sankt Petersburg (DE-588)4267026-3 gnd rswk-swf Gentrification / England / London Gentrification / Germany / Berlin Gentrification / Russia (Federation) / Saint Petersburg Gentrification England / London Germany / Berlin Russia (Federation) / Saint Petersburg Berlin (DE-588)4005728-8 g London (DE-588)4074335-4 g Sankt Petersburg (DE-588)4267026-3 g Gentrifizierung (DE-588)4291675-6 s Stadtplanung (DE-588)4056754-0 s DE-604 Erscheint auch als Online-Ausgabe, PDF 9781119603085 Erscheint auch als Online-Ausgabe, EPUB 9781119603078 Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=033219711&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=033219711&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Literaturverzeichnis Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=033219711&sequence=000005&line_number=0003&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Register // Gemischte Register
spellingShingle	Bernt, Matthias 1970- The commodification gap gentrification and public policy in London, Berlin and St. Petersburg Stadtplanung (DE-588)4056754-0 gnd Gentrifizierung (DE-588)4291675-6 gnd
subject_GND	(DE-588)4056754-0 (DE-588)4291675-6 (DE-588)4005728-8 (DE-588)4074335-4 (DE-588)4267026-3
title	The commodification gap gentrification and public policy in London, Berlin and St. Petersburg
title_auth	The commodification gap gentrification and public policy in London, Berlin and St. Petersburg
title_exact_search	The commodification gap gentrification and public policy in London, Berlin and St. Petersburg
title_exact_search_txtP	The commodification gap gentrification and public policy in London, Berlin and St. Petersburg
title_full	The commodification gap gentrification and public policy in London, Berlin and St. Petersburg Matthias Bernt
title_fullStr	The commodification gap gentrification and public policy in London, Berlin and St. Petersburg Matthias Bernt
title_full_unstemmed	The commodification gap gentrification and public policy in London, Berlin and St. Petersburg Matthias Bernt
title_short	The commodification gap
title_sort	the commodification gap gentrification and public policy in london berlin and st petersburg
title_sub	gentrification and public policy in London, Berlin and St. Petersburg
topic	Stadtplanung (DE-588)4056754-0 gnd Gentrifizierung (DE-588)4291675-6 gnd
topic_facet	Stadtplanung Gentrifizierung Berlin London Sankt Petersburg
url	http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=033219711&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=033219711&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=033219711&sequence=000005&line_number=0003&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA
work_keys_str_mv	AT berntmatthias thecommodificationgapgentrificationandpublicpolicyinlondonberlinandstpetersburg

Verfügbarkeit

Es ist kein Print-Exemplar vorhanden.

Fernleihe Bestellen Achtung: Nicht im THWS-Bestand! Inhaltsverzeichnis

MARC

Datensatz im Suchindex

Es ist kein Print-Exemplar vorhanden.

Ähnliche Einträge