Architecture as diplomatic instrument?: the multi-layered meaning of the Belgian embassy in New Delhi (1947-83)
In recent decades, the topic of embassy architecture has increasingly drawn the attention of architectural historians. Whereas scholars have already shed light on the building policy of the United States, Great Britain and France, the architectural approach of small state actors such as Belgium has...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Elektronisch Artikel |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
2021-10-06
|
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | kostenfrei |
Zusammenfassung: | In recent decades, the topic of embassy architecture has increasingly drawn the attention of architectural historians. Whereas scholars have already shed light on the building policy of the United States, Great Britain and France, the architectural approach of small state actors such as Belgium has largely remained untouched. The Belgian purpose-built embassy (1980–83) in New Delhi was designed by the Indian artist-architect Satish Gujral. While the unusual design, with its references to indigenous Indian architecture, is often mentioned in the literature on Chanakyapuri, New Delhi’s diplomatic neighbourhood, scholars have not addressed the Belgian rationale for constructing an embassy whose architecture paid more tribute to India than to Belgium. Examining the architectural and political meaning of this project in the context of both the receiving and the sending states, this article asks to what extent Belgium approached this diplomatic building project as an opportunity to cement its bilateral relationship with India. This embassy design was the result of not so much a well-considered building policy of Belgium but rather Gujral’s personal stand with regard to the postmodernist debate in India’s architecture scene at the time. In doing so, we make the case that purpose-built embassies – even the most expressive ones architecturally – are often more complex projects than closely monitored designs upon which governments project ideological and national visions. |
Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource (16 Seiten) Illustrationen |
ISSN: | 2050-5833 |
DOI: | 10.5334/ah.496 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nma a2200000 c 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV047828921 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 20220405 | ||
007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 220209s2021 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.5334/ah.496 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV047828921 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-Y3 |a DE-255 |a DE-Y7 |a DE-Y2 | ||
100 | 1 | |a De Maeyer, Bram |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Architecture as diplomatic instrument? |b the multi-layered meaning of the Belgian embassy in New Delhi (1947-83) |c Bram De Maeyer, Fredie Floré and Anne-Françoise Morel |
264 | 1 | |c 2021-10-06 | |
300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (16 Seiten) |b Illustrationen | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | 3 | |a In recent decades, the topic of embassy architecture has increasingly drawn the attention of architectural historians. Whereas scholars have already shed light on the building policy of the United States, Great Britain and France, the architectural approach of small state actors such as Belgium has largely remained untouched. The Belgian purpose-built embassy (1980–83) in New Delhi was designed by the Indian artist-architect Satish Gujral. While the unusual design, with its references to indigenous Indian architecture, is often mentioned in the literature on Chanakyapuri, New Delhi’s diplomatic neighbourhood, scholars have not addressed the Belgian rationale for constructing an embassy whose architecture paid more tribute to India than to Belgium. Examining the architectural and political meaning of this project in the context of both the receiving and the sending states, this article asks to what extent Belgium approached this diplomatic building project as an opportunity to cement its bilateral relationship with India. This embassy design was the result of not so much a well-considered building policy of Belgium but rather Gujral’s personal stand with regard to the postmodernist debate in India’s architecture scene at the time. In doing so, we make the case that purpose-built embassies – even the most expressive ones architecturally – are often more complex projects than closely monitored designs upon which governments project ideological and national visions. | |
600 | 1 | 7 | |a Gujral, Satish |d 1925- |0 (DE-588)121240959 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
648 | 7 | |a Geschichte |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
648 | 7 | |a Geschichte 1980-1983 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Botschaft |0 (DE-588)4191416-8 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Botschaftsgebäude |0 (DE-588)4132226-5 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Architektur |0 (DE-588)4002851-3 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
651 | 7 | |a Belgien |0 (DE-588)4005406-8 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
651 | 7 | |a Delhi |0 (DE-588)4011371-1 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
689 | 0 | 0 | |a Gujral, Satish |d 1925- |0 (DE-588)121240959 |D p |
689 | 0 | 1 | |a Delhi |0 (DE-588)4011371-1 |D g |
689 | 0 | 2 | |a Belgien |0 (DE-588)4005406-8 |D g |
689 | 0 | 3 | |a Botschaftsgebäude |0 (DE-588)4132226-5 |D s |
689 | 0 | 4 | |a Geschichte 1980-1983 |A z |
689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
689 | 1 | 0 | |a Architektur |0 (DE-588)4002851-3 |D s |
689 | 1 | 1 | |a Geschichte |A z |
689 | 1 | 2 | |a Delhi |0 (DE-588)4011371-1 |D g |
689 | 1 | 3 | |a Botschaft |0 (DE-588)4191416-8 |D s |
689 | 1 | |5 DE-604 | |
700 | 1 | |a Floré, Fredie |d 1974- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1081571713 |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Morel, Anne-Françoise |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)119031990X |4 aut | |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:9 |g number:1 |g year:2021 |
773 | 0 | 8 | |t Architectural histories / European Architectural History Network, EAHN |d London, 2021 |g Band 9, Heft 1 (2021) |w (DE-604)BV041185030 |x 2050-5833 |o (DE-600)2726365-4 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |q text/html |u https://doi.org/10.5334/ah.496 |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
941 | |b 9 |h 1 |j 2021 | ||
943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033212195 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1806960332495650816 |
---|---|
adam_text | |
adam_txt | |
any_adam_object | |
any_adam_object_boolean | |
article_link | (DE-604)BV041185030 |
author | De Maeyer, Bram Floré, Fredie 1974- Morel, Anne-Françoise |
author_GND | (DE-588)1081571713 (DE-588)119031990X |
author_facet | De Maeyer, Bram Floré, Fredie 1974- Morel, Anne-Françoise |
author_role | aut aut aut |
author_sort | De Maeyer, Bram |
author_variant | m b d mb mbd f f ff a f m afm |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV047828921 |
ctrlnum | (DE-599)BVBBV047828921 |
doi_str_mv | 10.5334/ah.496 |
era | Geschichte gnd Geschichte 1980-1983 gnd |
era_facet | Geschichte Geschichte 1980-1983 |
format | Electronic Article |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nma a2200000 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV047828921</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220405</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220209s2021 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.5334/ah.496</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV047828921</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-Y3</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-255</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-Y7</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-Y2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">De Maeyer, Bram</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Architecture as diplomatic instrument?</subfield><subfield code="b">the multi-layered meaning of the Belgian embassy in New Delhi (1947-83)</subfield><subfield code="c">Bram De Maeyer, Fredie Floré and Anne-Françoise Morel</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="c">2021-10-06</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (16 Seiten)</subfield><subfield code="b">Illustrationen</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In recent decades, the topic of embassy architecture has increasingly drawn the attention of architectural historians. Whereas scholars have already shed light on the building policy of the United States, Great Britain and France, the architectural approach of small state actors such as Belgium has largely remained untouched. The Belgian purpose-built embassy (1980–83) in New Delhi was designed by the Indian artist-architect Satish Gujral. While the unusual design, with its references to indigenous Indian architecture, is often mentioned in the literature on Chanakyapuri, New Delhi’s diplomatic neighbourhood, scholars have not addressed the Belgian rationale for constructing an embassy whose architecture paid more tribute to India than to Belgium. Examining the architectural and political meaning of this project in the context of both the receiving and the sending states, this article asks to what extent Belgium approached this diplomatic building project as an opportunity to cement its bilateral relationship with India. This embassy design was the result of not so much a well-considered building policy of Belgium but rather Gujral’s personal stand with regard to the postmodernist debate in India’s architecture scene at the time. In doing so, we make the case that purpose-built embassies – even the most expressive ones architecturally – are often more complex projects than closely monitored designs upon which governments project ideological and national visions.</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="600" ind1="1" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Gujral, Satish</subfield><subfield code="d">1925-</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)121240959</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="648" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Geschichte</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="648" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Geschichte 1980-1983</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Botschaft</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4191416-8</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Botschaftsgebäude</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4132226-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Architektur</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4002851-3</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Belgien</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4005406-8</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Delhi</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4011371-1</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Gujral, Satish</subfield><subfield code="d">1925-</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)121240959</subfield><subfield code="D">p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Delhi</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4011371-1</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Belgien</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4005406-8</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Botschaftsgebäude</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4132226-5</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Geschichte 1980-1983</subfield><subfield code="A">z</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Architektur</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4002851-3</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Geschichte</subfield><subfield code="A">z</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Delhi</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4011371-1</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Botschaft</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4191416-8</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Floré, Fredie</subfield><subfield code="d">1974-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1081571713</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Morel, Anne-Françoise</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)119031990X</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="1" ind2="8"><subfield code="g">volume:9</subfield><subfield code="g">number:1</subfield><subfield code="g">year:2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="t">Architectural histories / European Architectural History Network, EAHN</subfield><subfield code="d">London, 2021</subfield><subfield code="g">Band 9, Heft 1 (2021)</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-604)BV041185030</subfield><subfield code="x">2050-5833</subfield><subfield code="o">(DE-600)2726365-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="q">text/html</subfield><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.5334/ah.496</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">kostenfrei</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="941" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">9</subfield><subfield code="h">1</subfield><subfield code="j">2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033212195</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
geographic | Belgien (DE-588)4005406-8 gnd Delhi (DE-588)4011371-1 gnd |
geographic_facet | Belgien Delhi |
id | DE-604.BV047828921 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
index_date | 2024-07-03T19:08:47Z |
indexdate | 2024-08-10T01:00:59Z |
institution | BVB |
issn | 2050-5833 |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033212195 |
open_access_boolean | 1 |
owner | DE-Y3 DE-255 DE-Y7 DE-Y2 |
owner_facet | DE-Y3 DE-255 DE-Y7 DE-Y2 |
physical | 1 Online-Ressource (16 Seiten) Illustrationen |
publishDate | 2021 |
publishDateSearch | 2021 |
publishDateSort | 2021 |
record_format | marc |
spelling | De Maeyer, Bram Verfasser aut Architecture as diplomatic instrument? the multi-layered meaning of the Belgian embassy in New Delhi (1947-83) Bram De Maeyer, Fredie Floré and Anne-Françoise Morel 2021-10-06 1 Online-Ressource (16 Seiten) Illustrationen txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier In recent decades, the topic of embassy architecture has increasingly drawn the attention of architectural historians. Whereas scholars have already shed light on the building policy of the United States, Great Britain and France, the architectural approach of small state actors such as Belgium has largely remained untouched. The Belgian purpose-built embassy (1980–83) in New Delhi was designed by the Indian artist-architect Satish Gujral. While the unusual design, with its references to indigenous Indian architecture, is often mentioned in the literature on Chanakyapuri, New Delhi’s diplomatic neighbourhood, scholars have not addressed the Belgian rationale for constructing an embassy whose architecture paid more tribute to India than to Belgium. Examining the architectural and political meaning of this project in the context of both the receiving and the sending states, this article asks to what extent Belgium approached this diplomatic building project as an opportunity to cement its bilateral relationship with India. This embassy design was the result of not so much a well-considered building policy of Belgium but rather Gujral’s personal stand with regard to the postmodernist debate in India’s architecture scene at the time. In doing so, we make the case that purpose-built embassies – even the most expressive ones architecturally – are often more complex projects than closely monitored designs upon which governments project ideological and national visions. Gujral, Satish 1925- (DE-588)121240959 gnd rswk-swf Geschichte gnd rswk-swf Geschichte 1980-1983 gnd rswk-swf Botschaft (DE-588)4191416-8 gnd rswk-swf Botschaftsgebäude (DE-588)4132226-5 gnd rswk-swf Architektur (DE-588)4002851-3 gnd rswk-swf Belgien (DE-588)4005406-8 gnd rswk-swf Delhi (DE-588)4011371-1 gnd rswk-swf Gujral, Satish 1925- (DE-588)121240959 p Delhi (DE-588)4011371-1 g Belgien (DE-588)4005406-8 g Botschaftsgebäude (DE-588)4132226-5 s Geschichte 1980-1983 z DE-604 Architektur (DE-588)4002851-3 s Geschichte z Botschaft (DE-588)4191416-8 s Floré, Fredie 1974- Verfasser (DE-588)1081571713 aut Morel, Anne-Françoise Verfasser (DE-588)119031990X aut volume:9 number:1 year:2021 Architectural histories / European Architectural History Network, EAHN London, 2021 Band 9, Heft 1 (2021) (DE-604)BV041185030 2050-5833 (DE-600)2726365-4 text/html https://doi.org/10.5334/ah.496 Verlag kostenfrei Volltext |
spellingShingle | De Maeyer, Bram Floré, Fredie 1974- Morel, Anne-Françoise Architecture as diplomatic instrument? the multi-layered meaning of the Belgian embassy in New Delhi (1947-83) Gujral, Satish 1925- (DE-588)121240959 gnd Botschaft (DE-588)4191416-8 gnd Botschaftsgebäude (DE-588)4132226-5 gnd Architektur (DE-588)4002851-3 gnd |
subject_GND | (DE-588)121240959 (DE-588)4191416-8 (DE-588)4132226-5 (DE-588)4002851-3 (DE-588)4005406-8 (DE-588)4011371-1 |
title | Architecture as diplomatic instrument? the multi-layered meaning of the Belgian embassy in New Delhi (1947-83) |
title_auth | Architecture as diplomatic instrument? the multi-layered meaning of the Belgian embassy in New Delhi (1947-83) |
title_exact_search | Architecture as diplomatic instrument? the multi-layered meaning of the Belgian embassy in New Delhi (1947-83) |
title_exact_search_txtP | Architecture as diplomatic instrument? the multi-layered meaning of the Belgian embassy in New Delhi (1947-83) |
title_full | Architecture as diplomatic instrument? the multi-layered meaning of the Belgian embassy in New Delhi (1947-83) Bram De Maeyer, Fredie Floré and Anne-Françoise Morel |
title_fullStr | Architecture as diplomatic instrument? the multi-layered meaning of the Belgian embassy in New Delhi (1947-83) Bram De Maeyer, Fredie Floré and Anne-Françoise Morel |
title_full_unstemmed | Architecture as diplomatic instrument? the multi-layered meaning of the Belgian embassy in New Delhi (1947-83) Bram De Maeyer, Fredie Floré and Anne-Françoise Morel |
title_short | Architecture as diplomatic instrument? |
title_sort | architecture as diplomatic instrument the multi layered meaning of the belgian embassy in new delhi 1947 83 |
title_sub | the multi-layered meaning of the Belgian embassy in New Delhi (1947-83) |
topic | Gujral, Satish 1925- (DE-588)121240959 gnd Botschaft (DE-588)4191416-8 gnd Botschaftsgebäude (DE-588)4132226-5 gnd Architektur (DE-588)4002851-3 gnd |
topic_facet | Gujral, Satish 1925- Botschaft Botschaftsgebäude Architektur Belgien Delhi |
url | https://doi.org/10.5334/ah.496 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT demaeyerbram architectureasdiplomaticinstrumentthemultilayeredmeaningofthebelgianembassyinnewdelhi194783 AT florefredie architectureasdiplomaticinstrumentthemultilayeredmeaningofthebelgianembassyinnewdelhi194783 AT morelannefrancoise architectureasdiplomaticinstrumentthemultilayeredmeaningofthebelgianembassyinnewdelhi194783 |