Judicial law-making and judicial interpretation in Central European countries: how can courts strengthen or weaken the unity of law?
Gespeichert in:
Weitere Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Buch |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Praha
Wolters Kluwer
2021
|
Ausgabe: | 1st edition |
Schriftenreihe: | Legal monographs
|
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis |
Beschreibung: | XIV, 213 Seiten |
ISBN: | 9788076761834 9788382469905 9788057104124 9789635940066 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV047813483 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 20220215 | ||
007 | t | ||
008 | 220203s2021 xr |||| 10||| eng d | ||
020 | |a 9788076761834 |c print, Czech Republic |9 978-80-7676-183-4 | ||
020 | |a 9788382469905 |c print, Poland |9 978-83-8246-990-5 | ||
020 | |a 9788057104124 |c print, Slovakia |9 978-80-571-0412-4 | ||
020 | |a 9789635940066 |c print, Hungary |9 978-963-594-006-6 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)1292474399 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1786266660 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
044 | |a xr |c XA-CZ | ||
049 | |a DE-739 | ||
084 | |a PS 2420 |0 (DE-625)139712: |2 rvk | ||
100 | 1 | |a Ondřejek, Pavel |d 1982- |0 (DE-588)121281889X |4 edt | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Judicial law-making and judicial interpretation in Central European countries |b how can courts strengthen or weaken the unity of law? |c Pavel Ondřejek (ed.) |
250 | |a 1st edition | ||
264 | 1 | |a Praha |b Wolters Kluwer |c 2021 | |
300 | |a XIV, 213 Seiten | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 0 | |a Legal monographs | |
655 | 7 | |0 (DE-588)1071861417 |a Konferenzschrift |y 2019 |z Luzern |2 gnd-content | |
776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Online-Ausgabe, EPUB (Czech Republic) |z 978-80-7676-184-1 |
776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Online-Ausgabe, MOBI (Czech Republic) |z 978-80-7676-185-8 |
776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Online-Ausgabe, EPUB (Poland) |z 978-83-8246-991-2 |
776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Online-Ausgabe, MOBI (Poland) |z 978-83-8246-992-9 |
776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Online-Ausgabe, EPUB (Slovakia) |z 978-80-571-0413-1 |
776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Online-Ausgabe, EPUB (Hungary) |z 978-963-594-007-3 |
856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung UB Passau - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=033196936&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033196936 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804183351304650752 |
---|---|
adam_text | TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements.....................................................................................................IX About the contributors.............................................................................................XI Introduction: Unity of law achieved through judicial reasoning............ 1 Pavel Ondřejek 1 The changing role of courts in Central Europe................................................ 1 2 Structure of the book and overview of individual chapters.............................4 2.1 Theoretical and doctrinal foundations ofjudicial law-making in Central European countries...................................................................... 5 2.2 Pro-systemic and anti-systemic effects ofjudge made-law and judicial interpretation.................................................................................7 Part I THEORETICAL AND DOCTRINAL FOUNDATIONS OF JUDICIAL LAW-MAKING IN CENTRAL EUROPEAN COUNTRIES......................13 Ekklesia and Dikasterion—which body is considered to be kyrion panton? (Is it the right question to be asked?) Recent dimensions of an old problem................................................................................................ 15 Alexander Bröst! 1 Introduction / Εισαγωγή................................................................................... 16 2 On the Relationship Between εκκλησία and δικαστηριον in the Athenian Democracy....................................................................................................... 17 3 Strengthening the Judicial Power: The
Birth of the Constitutional Review in the United States of America (Marbury v. Madison).................. 25 4 Who Should Be the Guard of the Constitution?............................................27 5 The Sword of Damocles Hanging Over Constitutional Amendments........... 29 Legal decision-making in the view of cognitive sciences: Between systematic and casuistic approaches to law................................................. 36 Tomáš Gábriš 1 Introduction..................................................................................................... 37 2 Systematic versus Casuistic Approach to Law: On the Benefits of Legal Casuistry......................................................................................................... 38 2.1 Problems with the Systematic Approach to Law...................................38 2.2 Casuistic Jurisprudence.......................................................................... 41 2.3 On the Use of Casuistry in Post-Positivist Legal Thought.................... 42 3 Cognitive Science and Legal Problem-Solving..............................................43 V
Table of contents 3.1 Judgment and Decision-Making from a Traditional View of Philosophy and Psychology.....................................................................44 3.2 Judgment and Decision-Making in View of Cognitive Sciences.......... 45 3.3 Implications for Legal Thinking (Judgment and Decision-Making of Lawyers)............................................................................................. 47 4 Conclusions..................................................................................................... 50 Beyond the coherence of legal rules.............................................................. 52 Martin Abel 1 2 3 4 The context of interpretation...........................................................................53 Beyond discovering......................................................................................... 56 The pretence of deduction...............................................................................58 The place of induction..................................................................................... 63 Sources of law and settled administrative practice................................... 67 Zdeněk Kühn 1 Position of established (settled) administrative practices within the dogmatics of sources of law.............................................................................68 2 Case law of the Constitutional Court.............................................................. 70 3 Case law of the Supreme Administrative Court.............................................. 72 Part II PRO-SYSTEMIC
AND ANTI-SYSTEMIC EFFECTS OF JUDGE MADE-LAW AND JUDICIAL INTERPRETATION............................ 77 Judicial interpretation as a competence........................................................ 79 Karel Beran 1 Introduction..................................................................................................... 80 2 What is interpretation of the law and in what ways it differs from interpretation in general?................................................................................. 81 3 Interpretation as part of the process of application of the law........................83 4 What competences are required for interpreting the law?.............................. 87 5 Conclusion....................................................................................................... 92 How the legislator and jurisprudence can increase the pro-systemic nature of judicial interpretation and application of the law?................. 95 Katarzyna Žák Krzyžanková 1 Introduction..................................................................................................... 96 2 On the legislator’s options to influence the pro-systemic nature of judicial decision-making.................................................................................99 3 On the ability of jurisprudence to influence the pro-systemic nature of judicial decision-making............................................................................... 110 4 Conclusion...................................................................................................... 117 VI
Table of contents Maximalism and minimalism injudicial decision-making: How can courts strengthen or weaken the unity of a legal system?... 119 Pavel Ondřejek 1 2 3 4 Introduction................................................................................................... 120 Minimalism and maximalism in judicial decision-making..........................123 Integrity in law and Janus model of the effects of case law...................... 126 Pro- and anti-systemic characteristics of a judicial decision in terms of width and depth of arguments.......................................................................128 4.1 Pro-systemic minimalism.......................................................................129 4.2 Pro-systemic maximalism.....................................................................130 4.3 Anti-systemic minimalism.....................................................................132 4.4 Anti-systemic maximalism.....................................................................132 5 Summary........................................................................................................134 (Trans)Forming the applicable norm by the German type constitutional complaint—The case of Hungary....................................... 136 Fruzsina Gárdos-Orosz 1 Introduction—the problem of judicial law making...................................... 137 2 The norm, the court and the German type constitutional complaint in Hungary..........................................................................................................140 3
Finding and revising the norm created by the ordinary judiciary—the spotlight of the constitutional complaint procedure...................................... 145 4 The Fundamental Law and the Constitutional Court case law in ordinary jurisprudence................................................................................................. 150 4.1 Further thoughts on the constitutional change...................................... 150 4.2 References to CC decisions...................................................................152 5 The result: examples where the norm created by the ordinary court was changed by the Constitutional Court by constitutional complaint review procedure........................................................................................................154 6 Conclusions................................................................................................... 157 Legitimacy of retrospective effects in judicial decision-making process.................................................................................................................. 159 Jan Tryzna 1 2 3 4 5 6 Introduction................................................................................................... 160 Significance ofjudicial decision-making for legal order..............................160 Retroactive/retrospective judicial decision making...................................... 168 Reasons for retrospective judicial decision making...................................... 169 Prospective effect ofjudicial
decisions........................................................ 170 Conclusion..................................................................................................... 171 VII
Table of contents Evolutive vs. static interpretation: Unity or fragmentation in the intertemporal interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights?............................................................................................ 173 Lisa Sonnleitner 1 Introduction....................................................................................................174 2 The European Convention on Human Rights as a “Living Instrument”... 175 2.1 A History of Evolutive Interpretation of the ECHR.............................. 175 2.2 The Brighton Process as an Obstacle to Evolutive Interpretation? ... 177 2.3 Unity versus Fragmentation in the Intertemporal Interpretation of the ECHR............................................................................................... 178 3 Static and Evolutive Interpretation and the ECHR Constitution..................179 3.1 The Constitutional Triangle of the ECHR............................................ 179 3.2 The Roots of Static and Evolutive Interpretation in the Constitutional Triangle........................................................................... 182 4 Evolutive and Static Interpretation in Balance............................................ 184 4.1 The Constitutional Values of the ECHR as Principles.......................... 184 4.2 Resolving the Conflict Between Static and Evolutive Interpretation: Cornerstones of a Balancing Model.......................................................185 5
Conclusions....................................................................................................187 Summary............................................................................................................... 189 Bibliography...................................................................................................... 191 List of case law....................................................................................................... 205 Index........................................................................................................................209 VIII
|
adam_txt |
TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements.IX About the contributors.XI Introduction: Unity of law achieved through judicial reasoning. 1 Pavel Ondřejek 1 The changing role of courts in Central Europe. 1 2 Structure of the book and overview of individual chapters.4 2.1 Theoretical and doctrinal foundations ofjudicial law-making in Central European countries. 5 2.2 Pro-systemic and anti-systemic effects ofjudge made-law and judicial interpretation.7 Part I THEORETICAL AND DOCTRINAL FOUNDATIONS OF JUDICIAL LAW-MAKING IN CENTRAL EUROPEAN COUNTRIES.13 Ekklesia and Dikasterion—which body is considered to be kyrion panton? (Is it the right question to be asked?) Recent dimensions of an old problem. 15 Alexander Bröst! 1 Introduction / Εισαγωγή. 16 2 On the Relationship Between εκκλησία and δικαστηριον in the Athenian Democracy. 17 3 Strengthening the Judicial Power: The
Birth of the Constitutional Review in the United States of America (Marbury v. Madison). 25 4 Who Should Be the Guard of the Constitution?.27 5 The Sword of Damocles Hanging Over Constitutional Amendments. 29 Legal decision-making in the view of cognitive sciences: Between systematic and casuistic approaches to law. 36 Tomáš Gábriš 1 Introduction. 37 2 Systematic versus Casuistic Approach to Law: On the Benefits of Legal Casuistry. 38 2.1 Problems with the Systematic Approach to Law.38 2.2 Casuistic Jurisprudence. 41 2.3 On the Use of Casuistry in Post-Positivist Legal Thought. 42 3 Cognitive Science and Legal Problem-Solving.43 V
Table of contents 3.1 Judgment and Decision-Making from a Traditional View of Philosophy and Psychology.44 3.2 Judgment and Decision-Making in View of Cognitive Sciences. 45 3.3 Implications for Legal Thinking (Judgment and Decision-Making of Lawyers). 47 4 Conclusions. 50 Beyond the coherence of legal rules. 52 Martin Abel 1 2 3 4 The context of interpretation.53 Beyond discovering. 56 The pretence of deduction.58 The place of induction. 63 Sources of law and settled administrative practice. 67 Zdeněk Kühn 1 Position of established (settled) administrative practices within the dogmatics of sources of law.68 2 Case law of the Constitutional Court. 70 3 Case law of the Supreme Administrative Court. 72 Part II PRO-SYSTEMIC
AND ANTI-SYSTEMIC EFFECTS OF JUDGE MADE-LAW AND JUDICIAL INTERPRETATION. 77 Judicial interpretation as a competence. 79 Karel Beran 1 Introduction. 80 2 What is interpretation of the law and in what ways it differs from interpretation in general?. 81 3 Interpretation as part of the process of application of the law.83 4 What competences are required for interpreting the law?. 87 5 Conclusion. 92 How the legislator and jurisprudence can increase the pro-systemic nature of judicial interpretation and application of the law?. 95 Katarzyna Žák Krzyžanková 1 Introduction. 96 2 On the legislator’s options to influence the pro-systemic nature of judicial decision-making.99 3 On the ability of jurisprudence to influence the pro-systemic nature of judicial decision-making. 110 4 Conclusion. 117 VI
Table of contents Maximalism and minimalism injudicial decision-making: How can courts strengthen or weaken the unity of a legal system?. 119 Pavel Ondřejek 1 2 3 4 Introduction. 120 Minimalism and maximalism in judicial decision-making.123 Integrity in law and Janus model of the effects of case law. 126 Pro- and anti-systemic characteristics of a judicial decision in terms of width and depth of arguments.128 4.1 Pro-systemic minimalism.129 4.2 Pro-systemic maximalism.130 4.3 Anti-systemic minimalism.132 4.4 Anti-systemic maximalism.132 5 Summary.134 (Trans)Forming the applicable norm by the German type constitutional complaint—The case of Hungary. 136 Fruzsina Gárdos-Orosz 1 Introduction—the problem of judicial law making. 137 2 The norm, the court and the German type constitutional complaint in Hungary.140 3
Finding and revising the norm created by the ordinary judiciary—the spotlight of the constitutional complaint procedure. 145 4 The Fundamental Law and the Constitutional Court case law in ordinary jurisprudence. 150 4.1 Further thoughts on the constitutional change. 150 4.2 References to CC decisions.152 5 The result: examples where the norm created by the ordinary court was changed by the Constitutional Court by constitutional complaint review procedure.154 6 Conclusions. 157 Legitimacy of retrospective effects in judicial decision-making process. 159 Jan Tryzna 1 2 3 4 5 6 Introduction. 160 Significance ofjudicial decision-making for legal order.160 Retroactive/retrospective judicial decision making. 168 Reasons for retrospective judicial decision making. 169 Prospective effect ofjudicial
decisions. 170 Conclusion. 171 VII
Table of contents Evolutive vs. static interpretation: Unity or fragmentation in the intertemporal interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights?. 173 Lisa Sonnleitner 1 Introduction.174 2 The European Convention on Human Rights as a “Living Instrument”. 175 2.1 A History of Evolutive Interpretation of the ECHR. 175 2.2 The Brighton Process as an Obstacle to Evolutive Interpretation? . 177 2.3 Unity versus Fragmentation in the Intertemporal Interpretation of the ECHR. 178 3 Static and Evolutive Interpretation and the ECHR Constitution.179 3.1 The Constitutional Triangle of the ECHR. 179 3.2 The Roots of Static and Evolutive Interpretation in the Constitutional Triangle. 182 4 Evolutive and Static Interpretation in Balance. 184 4.1 The Constitutional Values of the ECHR as Principles. 184 4.2 Resolving the Conflict Between Static and Evolutive Interpretation: Cornerstones of a Balancing Model.185 5
Conclusions.187 Summary. 189 Bibliography. 191 List of case law. 205 Index.209 VIII |
any_adam_object | 1 |
any_adam_object_boolean | 1 |
author2 | Ondřejek, Pavel 1982- |
author2_role | edt |
author2_variant | p o po |
author_GND | (DE-588)121281889X |
author_facet | Ondřejek, Pavel 1982- |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV047813483 |
classification_rvk | PS 2420 |
ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1292474399 (DE-599)KXP1786266660 |
discipline | Rechtswissenschaft |
discipline_str_mv | Rechtswissenschaft |
edition | 1st edition |
format | Book |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02059nam a2200433 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV047813483</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220215 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220203s2021 xr |||| 10||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9788076761834</subfield><subfield code="c">print, Czech Republic</subfield><subfield code="9">978-80-7676-183-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9788382469905</subfield><subfield code="c">print, Poland</subfield><subfield code="9">978-83-8246-990-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9788057104124</subfield><subfield code="c">print, Slovakia</subfield><subfield code="9">978-80-571-0412-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9789635940066</subfield><subfield code="c">print, Hungary</subfield><subfield code="9">978-963-594-006-6</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1292474399</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)KXP1786266660</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="044" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">xr</subfield><subfield code="c">XA-CZ</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-739</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">PS 2420</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)139712:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Ondřejek, Pavel</subfield><subfield code="d">1982-</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)121281889X</subfield><subfield code="4">edt</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Judicial law-making and judicial interpretation in Central European countries</subfield><subfield code="b">how can courts strengthen or weaken the unity of law?</subfield><subfield code="c">Pavel Ondřejek (ed.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="250" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1st edition</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Praha</subfield><subfield code="b">Wolters Kluwer</subfield><subfield code="c">2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">XIV, 213 Seiten</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Legal monographs</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1071861417</subfield><subfield code="a">Konferenzschrift</subfield><subfield code="y">2019</subfield><subfield code="z">Luzern</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd-content</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Online-Ausgabe, EPUB (Czech Republic)</subfield><subfield code="z">978-80-7676-184-1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Online-Ausgabe, MOBI (Czech Republic)</subfield><subfield code="z">978-80-7676-185-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Online-Ausgabe, EPUB (Poland)</subfield><subfield code="z">978-83-8246-991-2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Online-Ausgabe, MOBI (Poland)</subfield><subfield code="z">978-83-8246-992-9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Online-Ausgabe, EPUB (Slovakia)</subfield><subfield code="z">978-80-571-0413-1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Online-Ausgabe, EPUB (Hungary)</subfield><subfield code="z">978-963-594-007-3</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung UB Passau - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=033196936&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033196936</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
genre | (DE-588)1071861417 Konferenzschrift 2019 Luzern gnd-content |
genre_facet | Konferenzschrift 2019 Luzern |
id | DE-604.BV047813483 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
index_date | 2024-07-03T19:05:54Z |
indexdate | 2024-07-10T09:22:04Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 9788076761834 9788382469905 9788057104124 9789635940066 |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033196936 |
oclc_num | 1292474399 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-739 |
owner_facet | DE-739 |
physical | XIV, 213 Seiten |
publishDate | 2021 |
publishDateSearch | 2021 |
publishDateSort | 2021 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer |
record_format | marc |
series2 | Legal monographs |
spelling | Ondřejek, Pavel 1982- (DE-588)121281889X edt Judicial law-making and judicial interpretation in Central European countries how can courts strengthen or weaken the unity of law? Pavel Ondřejek (ed.) 1st edition Praha Wolters Kluwer 2021 XIV, 213 Seiten txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Legal monographs (DE-588)1071861417 Konferenzschrift 2019 Luzern gnd-content Erscheint auch als Online-Ausgabe, EPUB (Czech Republic) 978-80-7676-184-1 Erscheint auch als Online-Ausgabe, MOBI (Czech Republic) 978-80-7676-185-8 Erscheint auch als Online-Ausgabe, EPUB (Poland) 978-83-8246-991-2 Erscheint auch als Online-Ausgabe, MOBI (Poland) 978-83-8246-992-9 Erscheint auch als Online-Ausgabe, EPUB (Slovakia) 978-80-571-0413-1 Erscheint auch als Online-Ausgabe, EPUB (Hungary) 978-963-594-007-3 Digitalisierung UB Passau - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=033196936&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis |
spellingShingle | Judicial law-making and judicial interpretation in Central European countries how can courts strengthen or weaken the unity of law? |
subject_GND | (DE-588)1071861417 |
title | Judicial law-making and judicial interpretation in Central European countries how can courts strengthen or weaken the unity of law? |
title_auth | Judicial law-making and judicial interpretation in Central European countries how can courts strengthen or weaken the unity of law? |
title_exact_search | Judicial law-making and judicial interpretation in Central European countries how can courts strengthen or weaken the unity of law? |
title_exact_search_txtP | Judicial law-making and judicial interpretation in Central European countries how can courts strengthen or weaken the unity of law? |
title_full | Judicial law-making and judicial interpretation in Central European countries how can courts strengthen or weaken the unity of law? Pavel Ondřejek (ed.) |
title_fullStr | Judicial law-making and judicial interpretation in Central European countries how can courts strengthen or weaken the unity of law? Pavel Ondřejek (ed.) |
title_full_unstemmed | Judicial law-making and judicial interpretation in Central European countries how can courts strengthen or weaken the unity of law? Pavel Ondřejek (ed.) |
title_short | Judicial law-making and judicial interpretation in Central European countries |
title_sort | judicial law making and judicial interpretation in central european countries how can courts strengthen or weaken the unity of law |
title_sub | how can courts strengthen or weaken the unity of law? |
topic_facet | Konferenzschrift 2019 Luzern |
url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=033196936&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ondrejekpavel judiciallawmakingandjudicialinterpretationincentraleuropeancountrieshowcancourtsstrengthenorweakentheunityoflaw |