Tempting Fate: Why Nonnuclear States Confront Nuclear Opponents
Why would countries without nuclear weapons even think about fighting nuclear-armed opponents? A simple answer is that no one believes nuclear weapons will be used. But that answer fails to consider why nonnuclear state leaders would believe that in the first place. In this superb unpacking of the d...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Ithaca, NY
Cornell University Press
[2019]
|
| Schriftenreihe: | Cornell Studies in Security Affairs
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | FAW01 FAB01 FCO01 FHA01 FKE01 FLA01 UPA01 UBG01 Volltext |
| Zusammenfassung: | Why would countries without nuclear weapons even think about fighting nuclear-armed opponents? A simple answer is that no one believes nuclear weapons will be used. But that answer fails to consider why nonnuclear state leaders would believe that in the first place. In this superb unpacking of the dynamics of conflict under conditions of nuclear monopoly, Paul C. Avey argues that the costs and benefits of using nuclear weapons create openings that weak nonnuclear actors can exploit.Tempting Fate uses four case studies to show the key strategies available to nonnuclear states: Iraqi decision-making under Saddam Hussein in confrontations with the United States; Egyptian leaders' thinking about the Israeli nuclear arsenal during wars in 1969-70 and 1973; Chinese confrontations with the United States in 1950, 1954, and 1958; and a dispute that never escalated to war, the Soviet-United States tensions between 1946 and 1948 that culminated in the Berlin Blockade. Those strategies include limiting the scope of the conflict, holding chemical and biological weapons in reserve, seeking outside support, and leveraging international non-use norms. Counterintuitively, conventionally weak nonnuclear states are better positioned to pursue these strategies than strong ones, so that wars are unlikely when the nonnuclear state is powerful relative to its nuclear opponent. Avey demonstrates clearly that nuclear weapons cast a definite but limited shadow, and while the world continues to face various nuclear challenges, understanding conflict in nuclear monopoly will remain a pressing concern for analysts and policymakers |
| Beschreibung: | Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 21. Jun 2021) |
| Beschreibung: | 1 online resource (252 pages) 17 charts |
| ISBN: | 9781501740398 |
| DOI: | 10.1515/9781501740398 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV047667440 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220112s2019 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9781501740398 |9 978-1-5017-4039-8 | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1515/9781501740398 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (ZDB-23-DGG)9781501740398 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1137820458 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV047667440 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-1046 |a DE-1043 |a DE-858 |a DE-Aug4 |a DE-859 |a DE-860 |a DE-739 |a DE-473 | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 355.02 |2 23 | |
| 100 | 1 | |a Avey, Paul C. |e Verfasser |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Tempting Fate |b Why Nonnuclear States Confront Nuclear Opponents |c Paul C. Avey |
| 264 | 1 | |a Ithaca, NY |b Cornell University Press |c [2019] | |
| 264 | 4 | |c © 2019 | |
| 300 | |a 1 online resource (252 pages) |b 17 charts | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a Cornell Studies in Security Affairs | |
| 500 | |a Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 21. Jun 2021) | ||
| 520 | |a Why would countries without nuclear weapons even think about fighting nuclear-armed opponents? A simple answer is that no one believes nuclear weapons will be used. But that answer fails to consider why nonnuclear state leaders would believe that in the first place. In this superb unpacking of the dynamics of conflict under conditions of nuclear monopoly, Paul C. Avey argues that the costs and benefits of using nuclear weapons create openings that weak nonnuclear actors can exploit.Tempting Fate uses four case studies to show the key strategies available to nonnuclear states: Iraqi decision-making under Saddam Hussein in confrontations with the United States; Egyptian leaders' thinking about the Israeli nuclear arsenal during wars in 1969-70 and 1973; Chinese confrontations with the United States in 1950, 1954, and 1958; and a dispute that never escalated to war, the Soviet-United States tensions between 1946 and 1948 that culminated in the Berlin Blockade. Those strategies include limiting the scope of the conflict, holding chemical and biological weapons in reserve, seeking outside support, and leveraging international non-use norms. Counterintuitively, conventionally weak nonnuclear states are better positioned to pursue these strategies than strong ones, so that wars are unlikely when the nonnuclear state is powerful relative to its nuclear opponent. Avey demonstrates clearly that nuclear weapons cast a definite but limited shadow, and while the world continues to face various nuclear challenges, understanding conflict in nuclear monopoly will remain a pressing concern for analysts and policymakers | ||
| 546 | |a In English | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a International Studies | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Political Science & Political History | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Security Studies | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Abschreckung |2 gnd | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Staat |2 gnd | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Strategie |2 gnd | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Kernwaffenfreie Zone |2 gnd | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Atommacht |2 gnd | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Glaubwürdigkeit |2 gnd | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Nukleare Abschreckung |2 gnd | |
| 650 | 7 | |a POLITICAL SCIENCE / Security (National & International) |2 bisacsh | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Asymmetric warfare |v Case studies | |
| 650 | 4 | |a No first use (Nuclear strategy) |v Case studies | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Nuclear weapons |x Government policy |v Case studies | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Security, International |v Case studies | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501740398 |x Verlag |z URL des Erstveröffentlichers |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a ZDB-23-DGG | ||
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033052161 | ||
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501740398 |l FAW01 |p ZDB-23-DGG |q FAW_PDA_DGG |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501740398 |l FAB01 |p ZDB-23-DGG |q FAB_PDA_DGG |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501740398 |l FCO01 |p ZDB-23-DGG |q FCO_PDA_DGG |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501740398 |l FHA01 |p ZDB-23-DGG |q FHA_PDA_DGG |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501740398 |l FKE01 |p ZDB-23-DGG |q FKE_PDA_DGG |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501740398 |l FLA01 |p ZDB-23-DGG |q FLA_PDA_DGG |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501740398 |l UPA01 |p ZDB-23-DGG |q UPA_PDA_DGG |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501740398 |l UBG01 |p ZDB-23-DGG |q UBG_PDA_DGG |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804183144011661312 |
|---|---|
| adam_txt | |
| any_adam_object | |
| any_adam_object_boolean | |
| author | Avey, Paul C. |
| author_facet | Avey, Paul C. |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Avey, Paul C. |
| author_variant | p c a pc pca |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV047667440 |
| collection | ZDB-23-DGG |
| ctrlnum | (ZDB-23-DGG)9781501740398 (OCoLC)1137820458 (DE-599)BVBBV047667440 |
| dewey-full | 355.02 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 355 - Military science |
| dewey-raw | 355.02 |
| dewey-search | 355.02 |
| dewey-sort | 3355.02 |
| dewey-tens | 350 - Public administration and military science |
| discipline | Militärwissenschaft |
| discipline_str_mv | Militärwissenschaft |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1515/9781501740398 |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>04467nmm a2200649zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV047667440</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220112s2019 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781501740398</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-5017-4039-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1515/9781501740398</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-23-DGG)9781501740398</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1137820458</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV047667440</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-1046</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-1043</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-858</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-Aug4</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-859</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-860</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-739</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-473</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">355.02</subfield><subfield code="2">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Avey, Paul C.</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Tempting Fate</subfield><subfield code="b">Why Nonnuclear States Confront Nuclear Opponents</subfield><subfield code="c">Paul C. Avey</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Ithaca, NY</subfield><subfield code="b">Cornell University Press</subfield><subfield code="c">[2019]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="c">© 2019</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 online resource (252 pages)</subfield><subfield code="b">17 charts</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cornell Studies in Security Affairs</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 21. Jun 2021)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Why would countries without nuclear weapons even think about fighting nuclear-armed opponents? A simple answer is that no one believes nuclear weapons will be used. But that answer fails to consider why nonnuclear state leaders would believe that in the first place. In this superb unpacking of the dynamics of conflict under conditions of nuclear monopoly, Paul C. Avey argues that the costs and benefits of using nuclear weapons create openings that weak nonnuclear actors can exploit.Tempting Fate uses four case studies to show the key strategies available to nonnuclear states: Iraqi decision-making under Saddam Hussein in confrontations with the United States; Egyptian leaders' thinking about the Israeli nuclear arsenal during wars in 1969-70 and 1973; Chinese confrontations with the United States in 1950, 1954, and 1958; and a dispute that never escalated to war, the Soviet-United States tensions between 1946 and 1948 that culminated in the Berlin Blockade. Those strategies include limiting the scope of the conflict, holding chemical and biological weapons in reserve, seeking outside support, and leveraging international non-use norms. Counterintuitively, conventionally weak nonnuclear states are better positioned to pursue these strategies than strong ones, so that wars are unlikely when the nonnuclear state is powerful relative to its nuclear opponent. Avey demonstrates clearly that nuclear weapons cast a definite but limited shadow, and while the world continues to face various nuclear challenges, understanding conflict in nuclear monopoly will remain a pressing concern for analysts and policymakers</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="546" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">In English</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">International Studies</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Political Science & Political History</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Security Studies</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Abschreckung</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Staat</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Strategie</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Kernwaffenfreie Zone</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Atommacht</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Glaubwürdigkeit</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Nukleare Abschreckung</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">POLITICAL SCIENCE / Security (National & International)</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Asymmetric warfare</subfield><subfield code="v">Case studies</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">No first use (Nuclear strategy)</subfield><subfield code="v">Case studies</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Nuclear weapons</subfield><subfield code="x">Government policy</subfield><subfield code="v">Case studies</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Security, International</subfield><subfield code="v">Case studies</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501740398</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">URL des Erstveröffentlichers</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033052161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501740398</subfield><subfield code="l">FAW01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield><subfield code="q">FAW_PDA_DGG</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501740398</subfield><subfield code="l">FAB01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield><subfield code="q">FAB_PDA_DGG</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501740398</subfield><subfield code="l">FCO01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield><subfield code="q">FCO_PDA_DGG</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501740398</subfield><subfield code="l">FHA01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield><subfield code="q">FHA_PDA_DGG</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501740398</subfield><subfield code="l">FKE01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield><subfield code="q">FKE_PDA_DGG</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501740398</subfield><subfield code="l">FLA01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield><subfield code="q">FLA_PDA_DGG</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501740398</subfield><subfield code="l">UPA01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield><subfield code="q">UPA_PDA_DGG</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501740398</subfield><subfield code="l">UBG01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield><subfield code="q">UBG_PDA_DGG</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| id | DE-604.BV047667440 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T18:54:16Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T09:18:46Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9781501740398 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033052161 |
| oclc_num | 1137820458 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-1046 DE-1043 DE-858 DE-Aug4 DE-859 DE-860 DE-739 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG |
| owner_facet | DE-1046 DE-1043 DE-858 DE-Aug4 DE-859 DE-860 DE-739 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG |
| physical | 1 online resource (252 pages) 17 charts |
| psigel | ZDB-23-DGG ZDB-23-DGG FAW_PDA_DGG ZDB-23-DGG FAB_PDA_DGG ZDB-23-DGG FCO_PDA_DGG ZDB-23-DGG FHA_PDA_DGG ZDB-23-DGG FKE_PDA_DGG ZDB-23-DGG FLA_PDA_DGG ZDB-23-DGG UPA_PDA_DGG ZDB-23-DGG UBG_PDA_DGG |
| publishDate | 2019 |
| publishDateSearch | 2019 |
| publishDateSort | 2019 |
| publisher | Cornell University Press |
| record_format | marc |
| series2 | Cornell Studies in Security Affairs |
| spelling | Avey, Paul C. Verfasser aut Tempting Fate Why Nonnuclear States Confront Nuclear Opponents Paul C. Avey Ithaca, NY Cornell University Press [2019] © 2019 1 online resource (252 pages) 17 charts txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Cornell Studies in Security Affairs Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 21. Jun 2021) Why would countries without nuclear weapons even think about fighting nuclear-armed opponents? A simple answer is that no one believes nuclear weapons will be used. But that answer fails to consider why nonnuclear state leaders would believe that in the first place. In this superb unpacking of the dynamics of conflict under conditions of nuclear monopoly, Paul C. Avey argues that the costs and benefits of using nuclear weapons create openings that weak nonnuclear actors can exploit.Tempting Fate uses four case studies to show the key strategies available to nonnuclear states: Iraqi decision-making under Saddam Hussein in confrontations with the United States; Egyptian leaders' thinking about the Israeli nuclear arsenal during wars in 1969-70 and 1973; Chinese confrontations with the United States in 1950, 1954, and 1958; and a dispute that never escalated to war, the Soviet-United States tensions between 1946 and 1948 that culminated in the Berlin Blockade. Those strategies include limiting the scope of the conflict, holding chemical and biological weapons in reserve, seeking outside support, and leveraging international non-use norms. Counterintuitively, conventionally weak nonnuclear states are better positioned to pursue these strategies than strong ones, so that wars are unlikely when the nonnuclear state is powerful relative to its nuclear opponent. Avey demonstrates clearly that nuclear weapons cast a definite but limited shadow, and while the world continues to face various nuclear challenges, understanding conflict in nuclear monopoly will remain a pressing concern for analysts and policymakers In English International Studies Political Science & Political History Security Studies Abschreckung gnd Staat gnd Strategie gnd Kernwaffenfreie Zone gnd Atommacht gnd Glaubwürdigkeit gnd Nukleare Abschreckung gnd POLITICAL SCIENCE / Security (National & International) bisacsh Asymmetric warfare Case studies No first use (Nuclear strategy) Case studies Nuclear weapons Government policy Case studies Security, International Case studies https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501740398 Verlag URL des Erstveröffentlichers Volltext |
| spellingShingle | Avey, Paul C. Tempting Fate Why Nonnuclear States Confront Nuclear Opponents International Studies Political Science & Political History Security Studies Abschreckung gnd Staat gnd Strategie gnd Kernwaffenfreie Zone gnd Atommacht gnd Glaubwürdigkeit gnd Nukleare Abschreckung gnd POLITICAL SCIENCE / Security (National & International) bisacsh Asymmetric warfare Case studies No first use (Nuclear strategy) Case studies Nuclear weapons Government policy Case studies Security, International Case studies |
| title | Tempting Fate Why Nonnuclear States Confront Nuclear Opponents |
| title_auth | Tempting Fate Why Nonnuclear States Confront Nuclear Opponents |
| title_exact_search | Tempting Fate Why Nonnuclear States Confront Nuclear Opponents |
| title_exact_search_txtP | Tempting Fate Why Nonnuclear States Confront Nuclear Opponents |
| title_full | Tempting Fate Why Nonnuclear States Confront Nuclear Opponents Paul C. Avey |
| title_fullStr | Tempting Fate Why Nonnuclear States Confront Nuclear Opponents Paul C. Avey |
| title_full_unstemmed | Tempting Fate Why Nonnuclear States Confront Nuclear Opponents Paul C. Avey |
| title_short | Tempting Fate |
| title_sort | tempting fate why nonnuclear states confront nuclear opponents |
| title_sub | Why Nonnuclear States Confront Nuclear Opponents |
| topic | International Studies Political Science & Political History Security Studies Abschreckung gnd Staat gnd Strategie gnd Kernwaffenfreie Zone gnd Atommacht gnd Glaubwürdigkeit gnd Nukleare Abschreckung gnd POLITICAL SCIENCE / Security (National & International) bisacsh Asymmetric warfare Case studies No first use (Nuclear strategy) Case studies Nuclear weapons Government policy Case studies Security, International Case studies |
| topic_facet | International Studies Political Science & Political History Security Studies Abschreckung Staat Strategie Kernwaffenfreie Zone Atommacht Glaubwürdigkeit Nukleare Abschreckung POLITICAL SCIENCE / Security (National & International) Asymmetric warfare Case studies No first use (Nuclear strategy) Case studies Nuclear weapons Government policy Case studies Security, International Case studies |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501740398 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT aveypaulc temptingfatewhynonnuclearstatesconfrontnuclearopponents |