A case for necessitarianism:
"This book is the first detailed and focused defense of necessitarianism. The author's original account of necessitarianism encourages a re-examination of commonly held metaphysical positions as well as important issues in other, related areas of philosophy. Necessitarianism is the view th...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Buch |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
New York ; London
Routledge
2022
|
Ausgabe: | first published |
Schriftenreihe: | Routledge studies in metaphysics
[22] |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis |
Zusammenfassung: | "This book is the first detailed and focused defense of necessitarianism. The author's original account of necessitarianism encourages a re-examination of commonly held metaphysical positions as well as important issues in other, related areas of philosophy. Necessitarianism is the view that absolutely nothing about the world could have been otherwise in any way, whatsoever. Most philosophers believe that necessitarianism is just plain false and presume that some things could have been otherwise than what they are. In this book, the author argues that necessitarianism is true and the view that some things in the word are contingent-what the author terms contingentarianism-is false. The author assesses various theories of contingency, including the possible worlds theory, combinatorialism, and dispositionalism and argues that no theory can successfully explain why an entity is such as it is rather than not. She then lays out a case for necessitarianism and provides responses to various objections. The book concludes with an explanation of the ways in which necessitarianism is relevant to issues in ethics, philosophy of mind, and social philosophy. A Case for Necessitarianism will be of interest to scholars and advanced students working in metaphysics, logic, and philosophy of science"-- |
Beschreibung: | xii, 178 Seiten |
ISBN: | 9781032026169 9781032033174 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 cb4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV047666666 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 20220608 | ||
007 | t | ||
008 | 220112s2022 b||| 00||| eng d | ||
020 | |a 9781032026169 |c hbk |9 978-1-03-202616-9 | ||
020 | |a 9781032033174 |c pbk |9 978-1-032-03317-4 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)1296328272 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV047666666 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-11 |a DE-19 |a DE-12 | ||
084 | |a CC 6000 |0 (DE-625)17650: |2 rvk | ||
100 | 1 | |a Karofsky, Amy |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1257802690 |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a A case for necessitarianism |c Amy Karofsky |
250 | |a first published | ||
264 | 1 | |a New York ; London |b Routledge |c 2022 | |
300 | |a xii, 178 Seiten | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
490 | 1 | |a Routledge studies in metaphysics |v [22] | |
520 | 3 | |a "This book is the first detailed and focused defense of necessitarianism. The author's original account of necessitarianism encourages a re-examination of commonly held metaphysical positions as well as important issues in other, related areas of philosophy. Necessitarianism is the view that absolutely nothing about the world could have been otherwise in any way, whatsoever. Most philosophers believe that necessitarianism is just plain false and presume that some things could have been otherwise than what they are. In this book, the author argues that necessitarianism is true and the view that some things in the word are contingent-what the author terms contingentarianism-is false. The author assesses various theories of contingency, including the possible worlds theory, combinatorialism, and dispositionalism and argues that no theory can successfully explain why an entity is such as it is rather than not. She then lays out a case for necessitarianism and provides responses to various objections. The book concludes with an explanation of the ways in which necessitarianism is relevant to issues in ethics, philosophy of mind, and social philosophy. A Case for Necessitarianism will be of interest to scholars and advanced students working in metaphysics, logic, and philosophy of science"-- | |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Kontingenz |0 (DE-588)4032290-7 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Philosophie |0 (DE-588)4045791-6 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
650 | 0 | 7 | |a Notwendigkeit |0 (DE-588)4139945-6 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
653 | 0 | |a Necessity (Philosophy) | |
653 | 0 | |a Contingency (Philosophy) | |
653 | 0 | |a Contingency (Philosophy) | |
653 | 0 | |a Necessity (Philosophy) | |
689 | 0 | 0 | |a Notwendigkeit |0 (DE-588)4139945-6 |D s |
689 | 0 | 1 | |a Kontingenz |0 (DE-588)4032290-7 |D s |
689 | 0 | 2 | |a Philosophie |0 (DE-588)4045791-6 |D s |
689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
775 | 0 | 8 | |i Äquivalent |n Druck-Ausgabe, Paperback |z 978-1-032-03317-4 |
776 | 0 | 8 | |i Online version |z 978-1-003-18672-4 |a Karofsky, Amy |t Case for necessitarianism |d New York, NY : Routledge, 2022 |
830 | 0 | |a Routledge studies in metaphysics |v [22] |w (DE-604)BV036511578 |9 22 | |
856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=033051389&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033051389 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804183141924995072 |
---|---|
adam_text | Contents A Case for Necessitarianism Preface Introduction Introduction 1 Contingency and Necessity 2 Necessitarianism 5 Some Moments in the History of Necessitarianism and Contingentarianism 7 Some Ancient and Early Medieval Philosophers 8 Some Medieval and Modern Philosophers 10 Some Late Modern and Contemporary Philosophers 13 The Present and the Future of Modal Metaphysics IS Outline of the Book 16 An Exhortation 17 1 The (Seriously Lacking) Justification for Contingency Introduction 21 1.1 Experience 21 1.2 Probabilities and Indeterminades 31 1.3 Intuition 34 1.4 Majority Opinion 41 1.5 Contingency-Talk 42 1.6 Conclusion 44 2 Theories of Contingency Assessed Introduction 47 2.1 Theories of Contingency 48
vi Contents 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.9 2.10 2.11 2.12 2.13 2.14 2.15 2.16 2.17 2.18 2.19 2.20 2.21 2.22 2.23 3 Sbalkowski’s Two Conditions for an Adequate Theory of Modality SO Armstrong’s Combinatorialism and Brute Contingent Entities 52 Indeterminate Entities as Brute Contingencies 57 No Contingency Can Be Fundamental or Brute 59 Contingencies All the Way Down? 59 Radical Contingentarianism 61 Dispositionalism 62 Tötendes and Unrealized Possibilities 63 The Dispositionalist’s Claim That Universals Concern the Ways Things Could Be 66 Indeterminate Property Manifestations: Propensities 67 The Dispositionalist’s Claim That There Is No Determining Cause 68 Probability Need Not Entail Indeterminacy 69 Indeterminism May Be Inconsistent with Dispositionalism 70 Different Initial Conditions, Different Fundamental Properties, Different Laws 71 The Meaningfulness of Disposition-Statements and the Truth of Counterfactuals 73 Dispositionalists Need Not Endorse Contingentarianism 74 Entities That Are Partly Contingent and Partly Necessary 76 The Possible Worlds Theory 77 Lewis’s Reductive Account of Modalities 78 Superessentialism and Necessitarianism 80 Contingency Cannot Be Rooted in Necessity 81 Some Findings 82 Support for Necessitarianism Introduction 90 3.1 The Main Argument 91 3.2 A Thing Is All the Ways That It Is 92 3.3 Unactualized Possibility Is Contradictory 98
Contents vii 3.4 3.5 3.6 The Uncontainable Contagion of Contingency 100 Ockham’s Razor and the Principle of Simplicity 102 Let’s Get Real 105 Objections and Replies Introduction 108 4.1 Counterfactual Conditionals 109 4.2 Degrees, Types, and Varieties of Necessity 125 4.3 No Modalities? 134 4.4 The Commitment to Monism: О Happy Metaphysician! 137 4.5 Whence Does Necessity Come? 144 4.6 Change, Free Will, and Moral Responsibility 152 4.7 Why Do So Many Philosophers Reject Necessitarianismf 158 108 Bibliography Index 166 175
|
adam_txt |
Contents A Case for Necessitarianism Preface Introduction Introduction 1 Contingency and Necessity 2 Necessitarianism 5 Some Moments in the History of Necessitarianism and Contingentarianism 7 Some Ancient and Early Medieval Philosophers 8 Some Medieval and Modern Philosophers 10 Some Late Modern and Contemporary Philosophers 13 The Present and the Future of Modal Metaphysics IS Outline of the Book 16 An Exhortation 17 1 The (Seriously Lacking) Justification for Contingency Introduction 21 1.1 Experience 21 1.2 Probabilities and Indeterminades 31 1.3 Intuition 34 1.4 Majority Opinion 41 1.5 Contingency-Talk 42 1.6 Conclusion 44 2 Theories of Contingency Assessed Introduction 47 2.1 Theories of Contingency 48
vi Contents 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.9 2.10 2.11 2.12 2.13 2.14 2.15 2.16 2.17 2.18 2.19 2.20 2.21 2.22 2.23 3 Sbalkowski’s Two Conditions for an Adequate Theory of Modality SO Armstrong’s Combinatorialism and Brute Contingent Entities 52 Indeterminate Entities as Brute Contingencies 57 No Contingency Can Be Fundamental or Brute 59 Contingencies All the Way Down? 59 Radical Contingentarianism 61 Dispositionalism 62 Tötendes and Unrealized Possibilities 63 The Dispositionalist’s Claim That Universals Concern the Ways Things Could Be 66 Indeterminate Property Manifestations: Propensities 67 The Dispositionalist’s Claim That There Is No Determining Cause 68 Probability Need Not Entail Indeterminacy 69 Indeterminism May Be Inconsistent with Dispositionalism 70 Different Initial Conditions, Different Fundamental Properties, Different Laws 71 The Meaningfulness of Disposition-Statements and the Truth of Counterfactuals 73 Dispositionalists Need Not Endorse Contingentarianism 74 Entities That Are Partly Contingent and Partly Necessary 76 The Possible Worlds Theory 77 Lewis’s Reductive Account of Modalities 78 Superessentialism and Necessitarianism 80 Contingency Cannot Be Rooted in Necessity 81 Some Findings 82 Support for Necessitarianism Introduction 90 3.1 The Main Argument 91 3.2 A Thing Is All the Ways That It Is 92 3.3 Unactualized Possibility Is Contradictory 98
Contents vii 3.4 3.5 3.6 The Uncontainable Contagion of Contingency 100 Ockham’s Razor and the Principle of Simplicity 102 Let’s Get Real 105 Objections and Replies Introduction 108 4.1 Counterfactual Conditionals 109 4.2 Degrees, Types, and Varieties of Necessity 125 4.3 No Modalities? 134 4.4 The Commitment to Monism: О Happy Metaphysician! 137 4.5 Whence Does Necessity Come? 144 4.6 Change, Free Will, and Moral Responsibility 152 4.7 Why Do So Many Philosophers Reject Necessitarianismf 158 108 Bibliography Index 166 175 |
any_adam_object | 1 |
any_adam_object_boolean | 1 |
author | Karofsky, Amy |
author_GND | (DE-588)1257802690 |
author_facet | Karofsky, Amy |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Karofsky, Amy |
author_variant | a k ak |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV047666666 |
classification_rvk | CC 6000 |
ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1296328272 (DE-599)BVBBV047666666 |
discipline | Philosophie |
discipline_str_mv | Philosophie |
edition | first published |
format | Book |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03326nam a2200493 cb4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV047666666</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20220608 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220112s2022 b||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781032026169</subfield><subfield code="c">hbk</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-03-202616-9</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781032033174</subfield><subfield code="c">pbk</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-032-03317-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1296328272</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV047666666</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-11</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-19</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">CC 6000</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)17650:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Karofsky, Amy</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1257802690</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">A case for necessitarianism</subfield><subfield code="c">Amy Karofsky</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="250" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">first published</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">New York ; London</subfield><subfield code="b">Routledge</subfield><subfield code="c">2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">xii, 178 Seiten</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Routledge studies in metaphysics</subfield><subfield code="v">[22]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"This book is the first detailed and focused defense of necessitarianism. The author's original account of necessitarianism encourages a re-examination of commonly held metaphysical positions as well as important issues in other, related areas of philosophy. Necessitarianism is the view that absolutely nothing about the world could have been otherwise in any way, whatsoever. Most philosophers believe that necessitarianism is just plain false and presume that some things could have been otherwise than what they are. In this book, the author argues that necessitarianism is true and the view that some things in the word are contingent-what the author terms contingentarianism-is false. The author assesses various theories of contingency, including the possible worlds theory, combinatorialism, and dispositionalism and argues that no theory can successfully explain why an entity is such as it is rather than not. She then lays out a case for necessitarianism and provides responses to various objections. The book concludes with an explanation of the ways in which necessitarianism is relevant to issues in ethics, philosophy of mind, and social philosophy. A Case for Necessitarianism will be of interest to scholars and advanced students working in metaphysics, logic, and philosophy of science"--</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Kontingenz</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4032290-7</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Philosophie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4045791-6</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Notwendigkeit</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4139945-6</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Necessity (Philosophy)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Contingency (Philosophy)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Contingency (Philosophy)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Necessity (Philosophy)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Notwendigkeit</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4139945-6</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Kontingenz</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4032290-7</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Philosophie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4045791-6</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="775" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Äquivalent</subfield><subfield code="n">Druck-Ausgabe, Paperback</subfield><subfield code="z">978-1-032-03317-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Online version</subfield><subfield code="z">978-1-003-18672-4</subfield><subfield code="a">Karofsky, Amy</subfield><subfield code="t">Case for necessitarianism</subfield><subfield code="d">New York, NY : Routledge, 2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="830" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Routledge studies in metaphysics</subfield><subfield code="v">[22]</subfield><subfield code="w">(DE-604)BV036511578</subfield><subfield code="9">22</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=033051389&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033051389</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | DE-604.BV047666666 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
index_date | 2024-07-03T18:54:14Z |
indexdate | 2024-07-10T09:18:44Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 9781032026169 9781032033174 |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033051389 |
oclc_num | 1296328272 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-11 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-12 |
owner_facet | DE-11 DE-19 DE-BY-UBM DE-12 |
physical | xii, 178 Seiten |
publishDate | 2022 |
publishDateSearch | 2022 |
publishDateSort | 2022 |
publisher | Routledge |
record_format | marc |
series | Routledge studies in metaphysics |
series2 | Routledge studies in metaphysics |
spelling | Karofsky, Amy Verfasser (DE-588)1257802690 aut A case for necessitarianism Amy Karofsky first published New York ; London Routledge 2022 xii, 178 Seiten txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Routledge studies in metaphysics [22] "This book is the first detailed and focused defense of necessitarianism. The author's original account of necessitarianism encourages a re-examination of commonly held metaphysical positions as well as important issues in other, related areas of philosophy. Necessitarianism is the view that absolutely nothing about the world could have been otherwise in any way, whatsoever. Most philosophers believe that necessitarianism is just plain false and presume that some things could have been otherwise than what they are. In this book, the author argues that necessitarianism is true and the view that some things in the word are contingent-what the author terms contingentarianism-is false. The author assesses various theories of contingency, including the possible worlds theory, combinatorialism, and dispositionalism and argues that no theory can successfully explain why an entity is such as it is rather than not. She then lays out a case for necessitarianism and provides responses to various objections. The book concludes with an explanation of the ways in which necessitarianism is relevant to issues in ethics, philosophy of mind, and social philosophy. A Case for Necessitarianism will be of interest to scholars and advanced students working in metaphysics, logic, and philosophy of science"-- Kontingenz (DE-588)4032290-7 gnd rswk-swf Philosophie (DE-588)4045791-6 gnd rswk-swf Notwendigkeit (DE-588)4139945-6 gnd rswk-swf Necessity (Philosophy) Contingency (Philosophy) Notwendigkeit (DE-588)4139945-6 s Kontingenz (DE-588)4032290-7 s Philosophie (DE-588)4045791-6 s DE-604 Äquivalent Druck-Ausgabe, Paperback 978-1-032-03317-4 Online version 978-1-003-18672-4 Karofsky, Amy Case for necessitarianism New York, NY : Routledge, 2022 Routledge studies in metaphysics [22] (DE-604)BV036511578 22 Digitalisierung BSB München - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=033051389&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis |
spellingShingle | Karofsky, Amy A case for necessitarianism Routledge studies in metaphysics Kontingenz (DE-588)4032290-7 gnd Philosophie (DE-588)4045791-6 gnd Notwendigkeit (DE-588)4139945-6 gnd |
subject_GND | (DE-588)4032290-7 (DE-588)4045791-6 (DE-588)4139945-6 |
title | A case for necessitarianism |
title_auth | A case for necessitarianism |
title_exact_search | A case for necessitarianism |
title_exact_search_txtP | A case for necessitarianism |
title_full | A case for necessitarianism Amy Karofsky |
title_fullStr | A case for necessitarianism Amy Karofsky |
title_full_unstemmed | A case for necessitarianism Amy Karofsky |
title_short | A case for necessitarianism |
title_sort | a case for necessitarianism |
topic | Kontingenz (DE-588)4032290-7 gnd Philosophie (DE-588)4045791-6 gnd Notwendigkeit (DE-588)4139945-6 gnd |
topic_facet | Kontingenz Philosophie Notwendigkeit |
url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=033051389&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
volume_link | (DE-604)BV036511578 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT karofskyamy acasefornecessitarianism |