At the Margins of Law: Adjudicating Muslim Families in Contemporary Delhi:
This dissertation explores questions of religion, law and gender in contemporary Delhi. The dissertation is based on eighteen months of fieldwork I conducted in four types of Muslim family law institutions: sharia courts (dar ul qaza institutions), women's arbitration centers (mahila panchayats...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Abschlussarbeit Buch |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Berkeley
eScholarship, University of California
2010-01-01
|
Schlagworte: | |
Zusammenfassung: | This dissertation explores questions of religion, law and gender in contemporary Delhi. The dissertation is based on eighteen months of fieldwork I conducted in four types of Muslim family law institutions: sharia courts (dar ul qaza institutions), women's arbitration centers (mahila panchayats), a mufti's authoritative legal advice (fatawa), and a mufti's healing practice. All of these institutions adjudicate cases and attend to problems that fall under the definition of "Personal Law." According to the Indian legal system, Personal Law covers matters of marriage, divorce, maintenance, inheritance, succession, and adoption. Within the state's legal system, secular judges adjudicate Personal Law cases according to a codified version of the religious law of the disputants. Although the institutions I studied hear cases that fall within the sphere of Personal Law, and are thereby shaped by the Indian state's legal structure, they are run by Muslim clerics and lay Muslims rather than by lawyers, and their judgments are not considered binding by the state. Their judgments cannot be appealed in the state's courts nor can they be enforced by the coercive arm of the state. Detailing the methods of hearing and responding to cases particular to each of these institutions, I show that each draws on and refigures a broader discursive Islamic legal tradition even as it works within and in dialogue with state law. The first major argument of the dissertation emerges from this analysis: although these institutions are technically extra-legal, together with the state institutions they constitute a form of legal pluralism and are, therefore, a significant part of the legal landscape for Delhi Muslims. For historical and structural reasons I analyze in the dissertation, the institutions I studied primarily adjudicate Personal Law matters. Women and men both approach these institutions with complaints, but women in particular have a high success rate. Women's presentations of their c |
Beschreibung: | [184 pages] |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV047662973 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 00000000000000.0 | ||
007 | t | ||
008 | 220110s2010 m||| 00||| eng d | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)1291615675 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV047662973 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-29 | ||
100 | 1 | |a Lemons, Katherine |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1185493069 |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a At the Margins of Law: Adjudicating Muslim Families in Contemporary Delhi |
264 | 1 | |a Berkeley |b eScholarship, University of California |c 2010-01-01 | |
300 | |a [184 pages] | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
502 | |b Dissertation |c University of California Press |d 2010 | ||
520 | 3 | |a This dissertation explores questions of religion, law and gender in contemporary Delhi. The dissertation is based on eighteen months of fieldwork I conducted in four types of Muslim family law institutions: sharia courts (dar ul qaza institutions), women's arbitration centers (mahila panchayats), a mufti's authoritative legal advice (fatawa), and a mufti's healing practice. All of these institutions adjudicate cases and attend to problems that fall under the definition of "Personal Law." According to the Indian legal system, Personal Law covers matters of marriage, divorce, maintenance, inheritance, succession, and adoption. Within the state's legal system, secular judges adjudicate Personal Law cases according to a codified version of the religious law of the disputants. | |
520 | 3 | |a Although the institutions I studied hear cases that fall within the sphere of Personal Law, and are thereby shaped by the Indian state's legal structure, they are run by Muslim clerics and lay Muslims rather than by lawyers, and their judgments are not considered binding by the state. Their judgments cannot be appealed in the state's courts nor can they be enforced by the coercive arm of the state. Detailing the methods of hearing and responding to cases particular to each of these institutions, I show that each draws on and refigures a broader discursive Islamic legal tradition even as it works within and in dialogue with state law. The first major argument of the dissertation emerges from this analysis: although these institutions are technically extra-legal, together with the state institutions they constitute a form of legal pluralism and are, therefore, a significant part of the legal landscape for Delhi Muslims. | |
520 | 3 | |a For historical and structural reasons I analyze in the dissertation, the institutions I studied primarily adjudicate Personal Law matters. Women and men both approach these institutions with complaints, but women in particular have a high success rate. Women's presentations of their c | |
653 | |a Cultural anthropology | ||
653 | |a Law | ||
653 | |a South Asian studies | ||
653 | |a Gender | ||
653 | |a India | ||
653 | |a Islam | ||
653 | |a Law | ||
653 | 6 | |a publication | |
655 | 7 | |0 (DE-588)4113937-9 |a Hochschulschrift |2 gnd-content | |
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033047751 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804183135468912640 |
---|---|
adam_txt | |
any_adam_object | |
any_adam_object_boolean | |
author | Lemons, Katherine |
author_GND | (DE-588)1185493069 |
author_facet | Lemons, Katherine |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Lemons, Katherine |
author_variant | k l kl |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV047662973 |
ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1291615675 (DE-599)BVBBV047662973 |
format | Thesis Book |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03114nam a2200397 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV047662973</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">00000000000000.0</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220110s2010 m||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1291615675</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV047662973</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-29</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Lemons, Katherine</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1185493069</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">At the Margins of Law: Adjudicating Muslim Families in Contemporary Delhi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Berkeley</subfield><subfield code="b">eScholarship, University of California</subfield><subfield code="c">2010-01-01</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">[184 pages]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="502" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">Dissertation</subfield><subfield code="c">University of California Press</subfield><subfield code="d">2010</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">This dissertation explores questions of religion, law and gender in contemporary Delhi. The dissertation is based on eighteen months of fieldwork I conducted in four types of Muslim family law institutions: sharia courts (dar ul qaza institutions), women's arbitration centers (mahila panchayats), a mufti's authoritative legal advice (fatawa), and a mufti's healing practice. All of these institutions adjudicate cases and attend to problems that fall under the definition of "Personal Law." According to the Indian legal system, Personal Law covers matters of marriage, divorce, maintenance, inheritance, succession, and adoption. Within the state's legal system, secular judges adjudicate Personal Law cases according to a codified version of the religious law of the disputants. </subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Although the institutions I studied hear cases that fall within the sphere of Personal Law, and are thereby shaped by the Indian state's legal structure, they are run by Muslim clerics and lay Muslims rather than by lawyers, and their judgments are not considered binding by the state. Their judgments cannot be appealed in the state's courts nor can they be enforced by the coercive arm of the state. Detailing the methods of hearing and responding to cases particular to each of these institutions, I show that each draws on and refigures a broader discursive Islamic legal tradition even as it works within and in dialogue with state law. The first major argument of the dissertation emerges from this analysis: although these institutions are technically extra-legal, together with the state institutions they constitute a form of legal pluralism and are, therefore, a significant part of the legal landscape for Delhi Muslims. </subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">For historical and structural reasons I analyze in the dissertation, the institutions I studied primarily adjudicate Personal Law matters. Women and men both approach these institutions with complaints, but women in particular have a high success rate. Women's presentations of their c</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Cultural anthropology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">South Asian studies</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Gender</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">India</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Islam</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Law</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="6"><subfield code="a">publication</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="655" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4113937-9</subfield><subfield code="a">Hochschulschrift</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd-content</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033047751</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
genre | (DE-588)4113937-9 Hochschulschrift gnd-content |
genre_facet | Hochschulschrift |
id | DE-604.BV047662973 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
index_date | 2024-07-03T18:53:04Z |
indexdate | 2024-07-10T09:18:38Z |
institution | BVB |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033047751 |
oclc_num | 1291615675 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-29 |
owner_facet | DE-29 |
physical | [184 pages] |
publishDate | 2010 |
publishDateSearch | 2010 |
publishDateSort | 2010 |
publisher | eScholarship, University of California |
record_format | marc |
spelling | Lemons, Katherine Verfasser (DE-588)1185493069 aut At the Margins of Law: Adjudicating Muslim Families in Contemporary Delhi Berkeley eScholarship, University of California 2010-01-01 [184 pages] txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Dissertation University of California Press 2010 This dissertation explores questions of religion, law and gender in contemporary Delhi. The dissertation is based on eighteen months of fieldwork I conducted in four types of Muslim family law institutions: sharia courts (dar ul qaza institutions), women's arbitration centers (mahila panchayats), a mufti's authoritative legal advice (fatawa), and a mufti's healing practice. All of these institutions adjudicate cases and attend to problems that fall under the definition of "Personal Law." According to the Indian legal system, Personal Law covers matters of marriage, divorce, maintenance, inheritance, succession, and adoption. Within the state's legal system, secular judges adjudicate Personal Law cases according to a codified version of the religious law of the disputants. Although the institutions I studied hear cases that fall within the sphere of Personal Law, and are thereby shaped by the Indian state's legal structure, they are run by Muslim clerics and lay Muslims rather than by lawyers, and their judgments are not considered binding by the state. Their judgments cannot be appealed in the state's courts nor can they be enforced by the coercive arm of the state. Detailing the methods of hearing and responding to cases particular to each of these institutions, I show that each draws on and refigures a broader discursive Islamic legal tradition even as it works within and in dialogue with state law. The first major argument of the dissertation emerges from this analysis: although these institutions are technically extra-legal, together with the state institutions they constitute a form of legal pluralism and are, therefore, a significant part of the legal landscape for Delhi Muslims. For historical and structural reasons I analyze in the dissertation, the institutions I studied primarily adjudicate Personal Law matters. Women and men both approach these institutions with complaints, but women in particular have a high success rate. Women's presentations of their c Cultural anthropology Law South Asian studies Gender India Islam publication (DE-588)4113937-9 Hochschulschrift gnd-content |
spellingShingle | Lemons, Katherine At the Margins of Law: Adjudicating Muslim Families in Contemporary Delhi |
subject_GND | (DE-588)4113937-9 |
title | At the Margins of Law: Adjudicating Muslim Families in Contemporary Delhi |
title_auth | At the Margins of Law: Adjudicating Muslim Families in Contemporary Delhi |
title_exact_search | At the Margins of Law: Adjudicating Muslim Families in Contemporary Delhi |
title_exact_search_txtP | At the Margins of Law: Adjudicating Muslim Families in Contemporary Delhi |
title_full | At the Margins of Law: Adjudicating Muslim Families in Contemporary Delhi |
title_fullStr | At the Margins of Law: Adjudicating Muslim Families in Contemporary Delhi |
title_full_unstemmed | At the Margins of Law: Adjudicating Muslim Families in Contemporary Delhi |
title_short | At the Margins of Law: Adjudicating Muslim Families in Contemporary Delhi |
title_sort | at the margins of law adjudicating muslim families in contemporary delhi |
topic_facet | Hochschulschrift |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lemonskatherine atthemarginsoflawadjudicatingmuslimfamiliesincontemporarydelhi |