We need to talk: how cross-party dialogue reduces affective polarization
Americans today are affectively polarized: they dislike and distrust those from the opposing political party more than they did in the past, with damaging consequences for their democracy. This Element tests one strategy for ameliorating such animus: having ordinary Democrats and Republicans come to...
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
| Sprache: | English |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Cambridge
Cambridge University Press
2021
|
| Schriftenreihe: | Elements in experimental political science
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | DE-12 DE-188 DE-473 Volltext |
| Zusammenfassung: | Americans today are affectively polarized: they dislike and distrust those from the opposing political party more than they did in the past, with damaging consequences for their democracy. This Element tests one strategy for ameliorating such animus: having ordinary Democrats and Republicans come together for cross-party political discussions. Building on intergroup contact theory, the authors argue that such discussions will mitigate partisan animosity. Using an original experiment, they find strong support for this hypothesis - affective polarization falls substantially among subjects who participate in heterogeneous discussion (relative to those who participate in either homogeneous political discussion or an apolitical control). This Element also provides evidence for several of the mechanisms underlying these effects, and shows that they persist for at least one week after the initial experiment. These findings have considerable importance for efforts to ameliorate animus in the mass public, and for understanding American politics more broadly |
| Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource (69 Seiten) |
| ISBN: | 9781009042192 |
| DOI: | 10.1017/9781009042192 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV047657344 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20240916 | ||
| 007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220103s2021 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
| 020 | |a 9781009042192 |c Online |9 978-1-00-904219-2 | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1017/9781009042192 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (ZDB-20-CBO)CR9781009042192 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1291619338 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV047657344 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 |a DE-473 |a DE-188 | ||
| 082 | 0 | |a 306.0973 | |
| 100 | 1 | |a Levendusky, Matthew |d 1979- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1055052992 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a We need to talk |b how cross-party dialogue reduces affective polarization |c Matthew S. Levendusky (University of Pennsylvania), Dominik A. Stecula (Colorado State University) |
| 264 | 1 | |a Cambridge |b Cambridge University Press |c 2021 | |
| 300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (69 Seiten) | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a Elements in experimental political science | |
| 520 | |a Americans today are affectively polarized: they dislike and distrust those from the opposing political party more than they did in the past, with damaging consequences for their democracy. This Element tests one strategy for ameliorating such animus: having ordinary Democrats and Republicans come together for cross-party political discussions. Building on intergroup contact theory, the authors argue that such discussions will mitigate partisan animosity. Using an original experiment, they find strong support for this hypothesis - affective polarization falls substantially among subjects who participate in heterogeneous discussion (relative to those who participate in either homogeneous political discussion or an apolitical control). This Element also provides evidence for several of the mechanisms underlying these effects, and shows that they persist for at least one week after the initial experiment. These findings have considerable importance for efforts to ameliorate animus in the mass public, and for understanding American politics more broadly | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Polarization (Social sciences) / United States | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Opposition (Political science) / United States | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Political culture / United States | |
| 651 | 4 | |a United States / Politics and government / 2021- | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Stecula, Dominik |d ca. 20./21. Jh. |e Sonstige |0 (DE-588)1248677420 |4 oth | |
| 776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druck-Ausgabe, Paperback |z 978-1-00-904544-5 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009042192 |x Verlag |z URL des Erstveröffentlichers |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a ZDB-20-CBO | ||
| 943 | 1 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033042245 | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009042192 |l DE-12 |p ZDB-20-CBO |q BSB_PDA_CBO |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009042192 |l DE-188 |p ZDB-20-CBO |q ZDB-20-CBO 2022 |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
| 966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009042192 |l DE-473 |p ZDB-20-CBO |q UBG_PDA_CBO |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1810361556595113984 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | |
| adam_txt | |
| any_adam_object | |
| any_adam_object_boolean | |
| author | Levendusky, Matthew 1979- |
| author_GND | (DE-588)1055052992 (DE-588)1248677420 |
| author_facet | Levendusky, Matthew 1979- |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Levendusky, Matthew 1979- |
| author_variant | m l ml |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV047657344 |
| collection | ZDB-20-CBO |
| ctrlnum | (ZDB-20-CBO)CR9781009042192 (OCoLC)1291619338 (DE-599)BVBBV047657344 |
| dewey-full | 306.0973 |
| dewey-hundreds | 300 - Social sciences |
| dewey-ones | 306 - Culture and institutions |
| dewey-raw | 306.0973 |
| dewey-search | 306.0973 |
| dewey-sort | 3306.0973 |
| dewey-tens | 300 - Social sciences |
| discipline | Soziologie |
| discipline_str_mv | Soziologie |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1017/9781009042192 |
| format | Electronic eBook |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>00000nmm a2200000zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV047657344</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240916</controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">220103s2021 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9781009042192</subfield><subfield code="c">Online</subfield><subfield code="9">978-1-00-904219-2</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.1017/9781009042192</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-20-CBO)CR9781009042192</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1291619338</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV047657344</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-473</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-188</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">306.0973</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Levendusky, Matthew</subfield><subfield code="d">1979-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1055052992</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">We need to talk</subfield><subfield code="b">how cross-party dialogue reduces affective polarization</subfield><subfield code="c">Matthew S. Levendusky (University of Pennsylvania), Dominik A. Stecula (Colorado State University)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Cambridge</subfield><subfield code="b">Cambridge University Press</subfield><subfield code="c">2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (69 Seiten)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Elements in experimental political science</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Americans today are affectively polarized: they dislike and distrust those from the opposing political party more than they did in the past, with damaging consequences for their democracy. This Element tests one strategy for ameliorating such animus: having ordinary Democrats and Republicans come together for cross-party political discussions. Building on intergroup contact theory, the authors argue that such discussions will mitigate partisan animosity. Using an original experiment, they find strong support for this hypothesis - affective polarization falls substantially among subjects who participate in heterogeneous discussion (relative to those who participate in either homogeneous political discussion or an apolitical control). This Element also provides evidence for several of the mechanisms underlying these effects, and shows that they persist for at least one week after the initial experiment. These findings have considerable importance for efforts to ameliorate animus in the mass public, and for understanding American politics more broadly</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Polarization (Social sciences) / United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Opposition (Political science) / United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Political culture / United States</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">United States / Politics and government / 2021-</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Stecula, Dominik</subfield><subfield code="d">ca. 20./21. Jh.</subfield><subfield code="e">Sonstige</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1248677420</subfield><subfield code="4">oth</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Druck-Ausgabe, Paperback</subfield><subfield code="z">978-1-00-904544-5</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009042192</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">URL des Erstveröffentlichers</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="943" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033042245</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009042192</subfield><subfield code="l">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield><subfield code="q">BSB_PDA_CBO</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009042192</subfield><subfield code="l">DE-188</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield><subfield code="q">ZDB-20-CBO 2022</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009042192</subfield><subfield code="l">DE-473</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-20-CBO</subfield><subfield code="q">UBG_PDA_CBO</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| geographic | United States / Politics and government / 2021- |
| geographic_facet | United States / Politics and government / 2021- |
| id | DE-604.BV047657344 |
| illustrated | Not Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T18:51:28Z |
| indexdate | 2024-09-16T14:01:59Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9781009042192 |
| language | English |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033042245 |
| oclc_num | 1291619338 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-188 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 DE-473 DE-BY-UBG DE-188 |
| physical | 1 Online-Ressource (69 Seiten) |
| psigel | ZDB-20-CBO ZDB-20-CBO BSB_PDA_CBO ZDB-20-CBO ZDB-20-CBO 2022 ZDB-20-CBO UBG_PDA_CBO |
| publishDate | 2021 |
| publishDateSearch | 2021 |
| publishDateSort | 2021 |
| publisher | Cambridge University Press |
| record_format | marc |
| series2 | Elements in experimental political science |
| spelling | Levendusky, Matthew 1979- Verfasser (DE-588)1055052992 aut We need to talk how cross-party dialogue reduces affective polarization Matthew S. Levendusky (University of Pennsylvania), Dominik A. Stecula (Colorado State University) Cambridge Cambridge University Press 2021 1 Online-Ressource (69 Seiten) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Elements in experimental political science Americans today are affectively polarized: they dislike and distrust those from the opposing political party more than they did in the past, with damaging consequences for their democracy. This Element tests one strategy for ameliorating such animus: having ordinary Democrats and Republicans come together for cross-party political discussions. Building on intergroup contact theory, the authors argue that such discussions will mitigate partisan animosity. Using an original experiment, they find strong support for this hypothesis - affective polarization falls substantially among subjects who participate in heterogeneous discussion (relative to those who participate in either homogeneous political discussion or an apolitical control). This Element also provides evidence for several of the mechanisms underlying these effects, and shows that they persist for at least one week after the initial experiment. These findings have considerable importance for efforts to ameliorate animus in the mass public, and for understanding American politics more broadly Polarization (Social sciences) / United States Opposition (Political science) / United States Political culture / United States United States / Politics and government / 2021- Stecula, Dominik ca. 20./21. Jh. Sonstige (DE-588)1248677420 oth Erscheint auch als Druck-Ausgabe, Paperback 978-1-00-904544-5 https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009042192 Verlag URL des Erstveröffentlichers Volltext |
| spellingShingle | Levendusky, Matthew 1979- We need to talk how cross-party dialogue reduces affective polarization Polarization (Social sciences) / United States Opposition (Political science) / United States Political culture / United States |
| title | We need to talk how cross-party dialogue reduces affective polarization |
| title_auth | We need to talk how cross-party dialogue reduces affective polarization |
| title_exact_search | We need to talk how cross-party dialogue reduces affective polarization |
| title_exact_search_txtP | We need to talk how cross-party dialogue reduces affective polarization |
| title_full | We need to talk how cross-party dialogue reduces affective polarization Matthew S. Levendusky (University of Pennsylvania), Dominik A. Stecula (Colorado State University) |
| title_fullStr | We need to talk how cross-party dialogue reduces affective polarization Matthew S. Levendusky (University of Pennsylvania), Dominik A. Stecula (Colorado State University) |
| title_full_unstemmed | We need to talk how cross-party dialogue reduces affective polarization Matthew S. Levendusky (University of Pennsylvania), Dominik A. Stecula (Colorado State University) |
| title_short | We need to talk |
| title_sort | we need to talk how cross party dialogue reduces affective polarization |
| title_sub | how cross-party dialogue reduces affective polarization |
| topic | Polarization (Social sciences) / United States Opposition (Political science) / United States Political culture / United States |
| topic_facet | Polarization (Social sciences) / United States Opposition (Political science) / United States Political culture / United States United States / Politics and government / 2021- |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009042192 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT levenduskymatthew weneedtotalkhowcrosspartydialoguereducesaffectivepolarization AT steculadominik weneedtotalkhowcrosspartydialoguereducesaffectivepolarization |