Old Style: Unoriginality and Its Uses in Nineteenth-Century U.S. Literature
An aesthetic of unoriginality shaped literary style and reader taste for decades of the nineteenth century. While critics in the twentieth century and beyond have upheld originality and innovation as essential characteristics of literary achievement, they were not features particularly prized by ear...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Elektronisch E-Book |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Philadelphia
University of Pennsylvania Press
[2021]
|
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | BSB01 FHA01 Volltext |
Zusammenfassung: | An aesthetic of unoriginality shaped literary style and reader taste for decades of the nineteenth century. While critics in the twentieth century and beyond have upheld originality and innovation as essential characteristics of literary achievement, they were not features particularly prized by earlier American audiences, Claudia Stokes contends. On the contrary, readers were taught to value familiarity, traditionalism, and regularity. Literary originality was often seen as a mark of vulgar sensationalism and poor quality.In Old Style Stokes offers the first dedicated study of a forgotten nineteenth-century aesthetic, explicating the forms, practices, conventions, and uses of unoriginality. She focuses in particular on the second quarter of the century, when improvements in printing and distribution caused literary markets to become flooded with new material, and longstanding reading practices came under threat. As readers began to prefer novelty to traditional forms, advocates openly extolled unoriginality in an effort to preserve the old literary ways. Old Style examines this era of significant literary change, during which a once-dominant aesthetic started to give way to modern preferences.If writing in the old style came to be associated with elite conservatism-a linkage that contributed to its decline in the twentieth century-it also, paradoxically provided marginalized writers-people of color, white women, and members of the working class-the literary credentials they needed to enter print. Writing in the old style could affirm an aspiring author's training, command of convention, and respectability. In dismissing unoriginality as the literary purview of the untalented or unambitious, Stokes cautions, we risk overlooking something of vital importance to generations of American writers and readers |
Beschreibung: | Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 29. Nov 2021) |
Beschreibung: | 1 Online-Ressource (288 pages) |
ISBN: | 9780812298161 |
DOI: | 10.9783/9780812298161 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nmm a2200000zc 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV047641317 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 20240215 | ||
007 | cr|uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 211215s2021 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d | ||
020 | |a 9780812298161 |9 978-0-8122-9816-1 | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.9783/9780812298161 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (ZDB-23-DGG)9780812298161 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)1289765746 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV047641317 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-12 |a DE-Aug4 | ||
082 | 0 | |a 810.9/003 |2 23 | |
100 | 1 | |a Stokes, Claudia |d 1970- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)133136825 |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Old Style |b Unoriginality and Its Uses in Nineteenth-Century U.S. Literature |c Claudia Stokes |
264 | 1 | |a Philadelphia |b University of Pennsylvania Press |c [2021] | |
264 | 4 | |c © 2022 | |
300 | |a 1 Online-Ressource (288 pages) | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 29. Nov 2021) | ||
520 | |a An aesthetic of unoriginality shaped literary style and reader taste for decades of the nineteenth century. While critics in the twentieth century and beyond have upheld originality and innovation as essential characteristics of literary achievement, they were not features particularly prized by earlier American audiences, Claudia Stokes contends. On the contrary, readers were taught to value familiarity, traditionalism, and regularity. Literary originality was often seen as a mark of vulgar sensationalism and poor quality.In Old Style Stokes offers the first dedicated study of a forgotten nineteenth-century aesthetic, explicating the forms, practices, conventions, and uses of unoriginality. She focuses in particular on the second quarter of the century, when improvements in printing and distribution caused literary markets to become flooded with new material, and longstanding reading practices came under threat. As readers began to prefer novelty to traditional forms, advocates openly extolled unoriginality in an effort to preserve the old literary ways. Old Style examines this era of significant literary change, during which a once-dominant aesthetic started to give way to modern preferences.If writing in the old style came to be associated with elite conservatism-a linkage that contributed to its decline in the twentieth century-it also, paradoxically provided marginalized writers-people of color, white women, and members of the working class-the literary credentials they needed to enter print. Writing in the old style could affirm an aspiring author's training, command of convention, and respectability. In dismissing unoriginality as the literary purview of the untalented or unambitious, Stokes cautions, we risk overlooking something of vital importance to generations of American writers and readers | ||
650 | 7 | |a LITERARY CRITICISM / American / General |2 bisacsh | |
650 | 4 | |a American literature |y 19th century |x History and criticism | |
650 | 4 | |a Conservatism and literature |z United States |x History |y 19th century | |
650 | 4 | |a Conservatism in literature | |
650 | 4 | |a Imitation in literature | |
650 | 4 | |a Influence (Literary, artistic, etc.) | |
650 | 4 | |a Originality in literature | |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.9783/9780812298161 |x Verlag |z URL des Erstveröffentlichers |3 Volltext |
912 | |a ZDB-23-DGG | ||
940 | 1 | |q ZDB-23-DGG21 | |
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033025519 | ||
966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.9783/9780812298161 |l BSB01 |p ZDB-23-DGG |q BSB_DGG_UniversityofPennsylvaniaPress |x Verlag |3 Volltext | |
966 | e | |u https://doi.org/10.9783/9780812298161 |l FHA01 |p ZDB-23-DGG |q FHA_PDA_DGG |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804183096200790016 |
---|---|
adam_txt | |
any_adam_object | |
any_adam_object_boolean | |
author | Stokes, Claudia 1970- |
author_GND | (DE-588)133136825 |
author_facet | Stokes, Claudia 1970- |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Stokes, Claudia 1970- |
author_variant | c s cs |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV047641317 |
collection | ZDB-23-DGG |
ctrlnum | (ZDB-23-DGG)9780812298161 (OCoLC)1289765746 (DE-599)BVBBV047641317 |
dewey-full | 810.9/003 |
dewey-hundreds | 800 - Literature (Belles-lettres) and rhetoric |
dewey-ones | 810 - American literature in English |
dewey-raw | 810.9/003 |
dewey-search | 810.9/003 |
dewey-sort | 3810.9 13 |
dewey-tens | 810 - American literature in English |
discipline | Anglistik / Amerikanistik |
discipline_str_mv | Anglistik / Amerikanistik |
doi_str_mv | 10.9783/9780812298161 |
format | Electronic eBook |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>03733nmm a2200469zc 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV047641317</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20240215 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">cr|uuu---uuuuu</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">211215s2021 |||| o||u| ||||||eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780812298161</subfield><subfield code="9">978-0-8122-9816-1</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">10.9783/9780812298161</subfield><subfield code="2">doi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(ZDB-23-DGG)9780812298161</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1289765746</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV047641317</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield><subfield code="a">DE-Aug4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">810.9/003</subfield><subfield code="2">23</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Stokes, Claudia</subfield><subfield code="d">1970-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)133136825</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Old Style</subfield><subfield code="b">Unoriginality and Its Uses in Nineteenth-Century U.S. Literature</subfield><subfield code="c">Claudia Stokes</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Philadelphia</subfield><subfield code="b">University of Pennsylvania Press</subfield><subfield code="c">[2021]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="c">© 2022</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">1 Online-Ressource (288 pages)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">c</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">cr</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 29. Nov 2021)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">An aesthetic of unoriginality shaped literary style and reader taste for decades of the nineteenth century. While critics in the twentieth century and beyond have upheld originality and innovation as essential characteristics of literary achievement, they were not features particularly prized by earlier American audiences, Claudia Stokes contends. On the contrary, readers were taught to value familiarity, traditionalism, and regularity. Literary originality was often seen as a mark of vulgar sensationalism and poor quality.In Old Style Stokes offers the first dedicated study of a forgotten nineteenth-century aesthetic, explicating the forms, practices, conventions, and uses of unoriginality. She focuses in particular on the second quarter of the century, when improvements in printing and distribution caused literary markets to become flooded with new material, and longstanding reading practices came under threat. As readers began to prefer novelty to traditional forms, advocates openly extolled unoriginality in an effort to preserve the old literary ways. Old Style examines this era of significant literary change, during which a once-dominant aesthetic started to give way to modern preferences.If writing in the old style came to be associated with elite conservatism-a linkage that contributed to its decline in the twentieth century-it also, paradoxically provided marginalized writers-people of color, white women, and members of the working class-the literary credentials they needed to enter print. Writing in the old style could affirm an aspiring author's training, command of convention, and respectability. In dismissing unoriginality as the literary purview of the untalented or unambitious, Stokes cautions, we risk overlooking something of vital importance to generations of American writers and readers</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">LITERARY CRITICISM / American / General</subfield><subfield code="2">bisacsh</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">American literature</subfield><subfield code="y">19th century</subfield><subfield code="x">History and criticism</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Conservatism and literature</subfield><subfield code="z">United States</subfield><subfield code="x">History</subfield><subfield code="y">19th century</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Conservatism in literature</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Imitation in literature</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Influence (Literary, artistic, etc.)</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="a">Originality in literature</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0"><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.9783/9780812298161</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="z">URL des Erstveröffentlichers</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">ZDB-23-DGG21</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033025519</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.9783/9780812298161</subfield><subfield code="l">BSB01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield><subfield code="q">BSB_DGG_UniversityofPennsylvaniaPress</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="966" ind1="e" ind2=" "><subfield code="u">https://doi.org/10.9783/9780812298161</subfield><subfield code="l">FHA01</subfield><subfield code="p">ZDB-23-DGG</subfield><subfield code="q">FHA_PDA_DGG</subfield><subfield code="x">Verlag</subfield><subfield code="3">Volltext</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | DE-604.BV047641317 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
index_date | 2024-07-03T18:47:53Z |
indexdate | 2024-07-10T09:18:00Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 9780812298161 |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033025519 |
oclc_num | 1289765746 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-12 DE-Aug4 |
owner_facet | DE-12 DE-Aug4 |
physical | 1 Online-Ressource (288 pages) |
psigel | ZDB-23-DGG ZDB-23-DGG21 ZDB-23-DGG BSB_DGG_UniversityofPennsylvaniaPress ZDB-23-DGG FHA_PDA_DGG |
publishDate | 2021 |
publishDateSearch | 2021 |
publishDateSort | 2021 |
publisher | University of Pennsylvania Press |
record_format | marc |
spelling | Stokes, Claudia 1970- Verfasser (DE-588)133136825 aut Old Style Unoriginality and Its Uses in Nineteenth-Century U.S. Literature Claudia Stokes Philadelphia University of Pennsylvania Press [2021] © 2022 1 Online-Ressource (288 pages) txt rdacontent c rdamedia cr rdacarrier Description based on online resource; title from PDF title page (publisher's Web site, viewed 29. Nov 2021) An aesthetic of unoriginality shaped literary style and reader taste for decades of the nineteenth century. While critics in the twentieth century and beyond have upheld originality and innovation as essential characteristics of literary achievement, they were not features particularly prized by earlier American audiences, Claudia Stokes contends. On the contrary, readers were taught to value familiarity, traditionalism, and regularity. Literary originality was often seen as a mark of vulgar sensationalism and poor quality.In Old Style Stokes offers the first dedicated study of a forgotten nineteenth-century aesthetic, explicating the forms, practices, conventions, and uses of unoriginality. She focuses in particular on the second quarter of the century, when improvements in printing and distribution caused literary markets to become flooded with new material, and longstanding reading practices came under threat. As readers began to prefer novelty to traditional forms, advocates openly extolled unoriginality in an effort to preserve the old literary ways. Old Style examines this era of significant literary change, during which a once-dominant aesthetic started to give way to modern preferences.If writing in the old style came to be associated with elite conservatism-a linkage that contributed to its decline in the twentieth century-it also, paradoxically provided marginalized writers-people of color, white women, and members of the working class-the literary credentials they needed to enter print. Writing in the old style could affirm an aspiring author's training, command of convention, and respectability. In dismissing unoriginality as the literary purview of the untalented or unambitious, Stokes cautions, we risk overlooking something of vital importance to generations of American writers and readers LITERARY CRITICISM / American / General bisacsh American literature 19th century History and criticism Conservatism and literature United States History 19th century Conservatism in literature Imitation in literature Influence (Literary, artistic, etc.) Originality in literature https://doi.org/10.9783/9780812298161 Verlag URL des Erstveröffentlichers Volltext |
spellingShingle | Stokes, Claudia 1970- Old Style Unoriginality and Its Uses in Nineteenth-Century U.S. Literature LITERARY CRITICISM / American / General bisacsh American literature 19th century History and criticism Conservatism and literature United States History 19th century Conservatism in literature Imitation in literature Influence (Literary, artistic, etc.) Originality in literature |
title | Old Style Unoriginality and Its Uses in Nineteenth-Century U.S. Literature |
title_auth | Old Style Unoriginality and Its Uses in Nineteenth-Century U.S. Literature |
title_exact_search | Old Style Unoriginality and Its Uses in Nineteenth-Century U.S. Literature |
title_exact_search_txtP | Old Style Unoriginality and Its Uses in Nineteenth-Century U.S. Literature |
title_full | Old Style Unoriginality and Its Uses in Nineteenth-Century U.S. Literature Claudia Stokes |
title_fullStr | Old Style Unoriginality and Its Uses in Nineteenth-Century U.S. Literature Claudia Stokes |
title_full_unstemmed | Old Style Unoriginality and Its Uses in Nineteenth-Century U.S. Literature Claudia Stokes |
title_short | Old Style |
title_sort | old style unoriginality and its uses in nineteenth century u s literature |
title_sub | Unoriginality and Its Uses in Nineteenth-Century U.S. Literature |
topic | LITERARY CRITICISM / American / General bisacsh American literature 19th century History and criticism Conservatism and literature United States History 19th century Conservatism in literature Imitation in literature Influence (Literary, artistic, etc.) Originality in literature |
topic_facet | LITERARY CRITICISM / American / General American literature 19th century History and criticism Conservatism and literature United States History 19th century Conservatism in literature Imitation in literature Influence (Literary, artistic, etc.) Originality in literature |
url | https://doi.org/10.9783/9780812298161 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stokesclaudia oldstyleunoriginalityanditsusesinnineteenthcenturyusliterature |