Cosmologia carteziană:
Gespeichert in:
| 1. Verfasser: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buch |
| Sprache: | Romanian |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Bucureşti
Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti
2021
|
| Schriftenreihe: | Colecţia LCI - Limbi, culturi, identităţi
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Inhaltsverzeichnis Literaturverzeichnis |
| Beschreibung: | 147 Seiten Illustrationen |
| ISBN: | 9786061612284 6061612281 |
Internformat
MARC
| LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | BV047626786 | ||
| 003 | DE-604 | ||
| 005 | 20230202 | ||
| 007 | t | ||
| 008 | 211206s2021 a||| |||| 00||| rum d | ||
| 020 | |a 9786061612284 |9 978-606-16-1228-4 | ||
| 020 | |a 6061612281 |9 6061612281 | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1369551105 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV047626786 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a rum | |
| 049 | |a DE-12 | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Dobre, Mihnea |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1045056901 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Cosmologia carteziană |c Mihnea Dobre |
| 264 | 1 | |a Bucureşti |b Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti |c 2021 | |
| 300 | |a 147 Seiten |b Illustrationen | ||
| 336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 490 | 0 | |a Colecţia LCI - Limbi, culturi, identităţi | |
| 600 | 1 | 7 | |a Descartes, René |d 1596-1650 |0 (DE-588)118524844 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Cartesianismus |0 (DE-588)4147364-4 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Philosophie |0 (DE-588)4045791-6 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Kosmologie |0 (DE-588)4114294-9 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf |
| 651 | 7 | |a Frankreich |0 (DE-588)4018145-5 |2 gnd |9 rswk-swf | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Cosmology | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Cosmology | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |a Kosmologie |0 (DE-588)4114294-9 |D s |
| 689 | 0 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 689 | 1 | 0 | |a Descartes, René |d 1596-1650 |0 (DE-588)118524844 |D p |
| 689 | 1 | 1 | |a Kosmologie |0 (DE-588)4114294-9 |D s |
| 689 | 1 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 689 | 2 | 0 | |a Frankreich |0 (DE-588)4018145-5 |D g |
| 689 | 2 | 1 | |a Philosophie |0 (DE-588)4045791-6 |D s |
| 689 | 2 | 2 | |a Kosmologie |0 (DE-588)4114294-9 |D s |
| 689 | 2 | 3 | |a Cartesianismus |0 (DE-588)4147364-4 |D s |
| 689 | 2 | |5 DE-604 | |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB München 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=033011277&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Inhaltsverzeichnis |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |m Digitalisierung BSB München 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment |q application/pdf |u http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=033011277&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |3 Literaturverzeichnis |
| 940 | 1 | |n oe | |
| 940 | 1 | |q BSB_NED_20230202 | |
| 999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033011277 | ||
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 001.09 |e 22/bsb |f 0905 |g 498 |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 001.09 |e 22/bsb |f 09032 |g 44 |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 001.09 |e 22/bsb |f 0904 |g 498 |
| 942 | 1 | 1 | |c 001.09 |e 22/bsb |g 181 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
| _version_ | 1804183069403381760 |
|---|---|
| adam_text | Cuprins Abrevieri ............................................................................................... 7 Imagini................................................................................................... 9 Mulțumiri................................................................................................. 11 1. Proiectul cosmologic cartezian (și relația religie-știință).................. 13 1.1. Introducere generală: Descartes și problema cosmologiei.... 13 1.2. Ce este „cosmologia ? ........................................................... 17 1.3. Teoria carteziană a vârtejurilor ................................................ 20 1.4. Cosmologia ca expresie a cosmogonie! biblice ..................... 24 2. Descartes și proiectul cosmologic........................................................ 2.1. Proiectul unei noi fizici.......................................................... 2.2. Descartes si ficțiunea din Le Monde...................................... 2.3. Cazul Galileo Galilei și problema filosofico-teologică.......... 2.4. Descartes și cosmologia din Principii..................................... 27 27 32 46 51 3. Cosmologia carteziană după Descartes ........................................ 3.1. Cosmologia Creștină.............................................................. 3.2. Cordemoy și filosofia carteziană........................................... 3.3. Cordemoy și cosmologia carteziană...................................... 71 71 74 79 4. Concluzii
........................................................................................... 4.1. Scurtă observație metodologică ............................................ 4.2. Noua cosmologie în Philosophical Transactions...................... 4.3. Concluzii generale................................................................. 95 96 97 100 Anexă.................................................................................................... 105 Bibliografie............................................................................................ 129 5
Bibliografie Abiondi, Fred. 2005. Geraulă de Corăemoy. Atomist, Occasionatisi, Cartesian. Milwaukee: Marquette University Press. Agostini, Siegrid. 2018. „Cordemoy: Is He a Cartesian Outsider? Desgabets s Interpretation of Cordemoy s Atomism . Society and Politics 12 (1(23)): 101-26. Aitón, E. J. 1957. „The vortex theory of the planetary motions—I . Annals of Science 13 (4): 249-64. -------- . 1958a. „The vortex theory of the planetary motions—П . Annals of Science 14 (2): 132-47. -------- . 1958b. „The vortex theory of the planetary motions—III . Annals of Science 14 (3): 157-72. -------- . 1972. The Vortex Theory of Planetary Motions. London: MacDonald. Aït-Touati, Frédérique. 2011. Fictions of the Cosmos. Science and Literature in the Seventeenth Century. Chicago: Chicago University Press. Amerpoel, Johannes. 1669. Cartesius Mosaizans, seu ... conciliatio philosophise Cartesii cum historia creationis per Mosem tradita, etc. Leuven: n.p. Anstey, Peter. 2018. „Locke and Cartesian Cosmology . In Locke and Cartesian Philosophy, ediție de Philippe Hamou și Martine Pécharman. Oxford: Oxford University Press. D01:10.1093/oso/9780198815037.003.0003. Antoine-Mahut, Delphine, și Sophie Roux, eds. 2018. Physics and Metaphysics in Descartes and in his Reception. London: Routledge. Ariew, Roger. 1990. „Christopher Clavius and the Classification of Sciences . Synthese 83 (2): 293-300. -------- . 1996. „Les «Principia» en France et les condamnations du cartésianisme , în Descartes: Principia Philosophiae, 1644-1994, ediție de Jean-Robert Armogathe și Giulia Beigioioso, 625-39. Napoli:
Vivarium. -------- . 2011a. Descartes among the Scholastics. Leiden: Brill. -------- . 2011b. „The New Matter Theory and Its Epistemology. Descartes (and Late Scholastics) on Hypotheses and Moral Certainty . In Vanishing Matter and the Laws of Motion. Descartes and Beyond, ediție de Dana Jalobeanu și Peter Anstey, 31-46. London: Routledge. 129
--------. 2013. „Censorship, Condemnations, and the Spread of Cartesianism , în Cartesian Empiricisms, ediție de Mihnea Dobre și Tammy Nyden, 25-46. Dordrecht: Springer. --------. 2014. Descartes and the First Cartesians. Oxford: Oxford University Press. -------- . 2016. „The Mathematization of Nature in Descartes and the First Cartesians . ín The Language of Nature. Reassessing the Mathematization of Natural Philosophy in the Seventeenth Century, ediție de Geoffrey Gorham, Benjamin Hill, Edward Słowik, și C. Kenneth Waters, 112-33. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press. -------- . 2018. „Comments on John Schuster and Frédéric de Buzón concerning Physico-Mathematics and Mathesis in Descartes . JEMS 7 (1): 175-186. Ariew, Roger, și Alan Gabbey. 1998. „The scholastic background . In The Cambridge History of the Seventeenth-Century Philosophy, ediție de Daniel Garber și Michael Ayers, 425-53. Cambridge University Press. Armogathe, Jean-Robert. 1977. Theologia Cartesiana: L Explication physique de l Eucharistie chez Descartes et dom Desgabets. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. -------- . 2019. „Cartesianism and Eucharistic Physics . ín Oxford Handbook of Descartes and Cartesianism, ediție de Steven Nadler, Tad Μ. Schmaltz, și Delphine Antoine-Mahut, 547-64. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Armogathe, Jean-Robert, și Vincent Carraud. 2001. „La premiere condamnation des Oeuvres des Descartes, d après des documents inédits aux Archives du Saint-Office . Nouvelles de la République des Lettres 2:103-37. Atherton, Margaret. 2005. „Descartes among the British: the case of
the theory of vision . In Receptions of Descartes. Cartesianism and anti-Cartesianism in early modern Europe, ediție de Tad Schmaltz, 218֊34. London: Routledge. Baillet, Adrien. 1691. La Vie de Monsieur Descartes. 2 vol. Paris: Daniel Horthemels. Balz, Albert G. A. 1931. „Geraud de Cordemoy, 1600-1684 . The Philosophical Review 40 (3): 221M5. Bardout, Jean-Christophe. 2002. „Occasionalism: La Forge, Cordemoy, Guelincx . ín A Companion to Early Modern Philosophy, ediție de Steven Nadler, 140-51. Boston: Blackwell Publishing. Battail, Jean-François. 1973. L’Avocat Philosophe Géraud de Cordemoy (16261684). La Haye: Martinus Nijhoff. Băltăceanu, Maria Francisca, și Monica Broșteanu, eds. 2017. Biblia după textul ebraic. Geneza. București: Humanitás. Băltăceanu, Maria Francisca, Monica Broșteanu, eds. 2019. Biblia după textul ebraic. Exodul. Leviticul. București: Humanitás. Bellis, Delphine. 2009. „La fable du Monde chez Descartes . Alliage 65:36-48. 130
-------- . 2010a. „Le Monde de Descartes et la Genèse: une dialectique de la lecture du texte sacré et de l écriture du texte scientifique . în Textes sacrés et culture profane: de la révélation à la création, ediție de Mélanie Adda, 139-61. Bern: Peter Lang. --------. 2010b. „Le visible et l invisible dans la pensée cartésienne: figuration, imagination et vision dans la philosophie naturelle de René Descartes . Nijmegen: Radboud University Nijmegen. Bennett, J.A. 1991. „The challenge of practical mathematics . în Science, culture and popular belief in Renaissance Europe, ediție de Stephen Pumfrey, Paolo L. Rossi, și Maurice Slawinski, 176-90. Manchester: Manchester University Press. Berkel, Klaas van. 2000. „Descartes debt to Beeckman. Inspiration, cooperation, conflict . în Descartes Natural Philosophy, ediție de Stephen Gaukroger, John Schuster, si John Sutton, 46-59. Routledge. -------- . 2013. Isaac Beeckman on Matter and Motion. Mechanical Philosophy in the Making. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press. Biblia sau Sfânta Scriptură. 1997. București: Institutul Biblic și de Misiune al Bisericii Ortodoxe Române. Biener, Zvi. 2008. „The Unity of Science in Early-Modern Philosophy: Subalternation, Metaphysics and the Geometrical Manner in Scholasticism, Galileo and Descartes . Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh. Blackwell, Richard J. 2006. Behind the Scenes at Galileo s Trial. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press. Blair, Ann. 2000. „Mosaic Physics and the Search for a Pious Natural Philosophy in the Late Renaissance . Isis 91 (1): 32-58.
https://doi.org/10.2307/237557 . -------- . 2007. „Science and religion . ín The Cambridge History of Christianity, ediție de R. Po-chia Hsia, 425-43. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Boner, Patrick, ed. 2011. Change and Continuity in Early Modern Cosmology. Dordrecht: Springer. Brooke, John Hedley. 1991. Science and Religion: Some Historical Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Brown, G.I. 1991. „The Evolution of the Term «Mixed Mathematics» . Journal of the History ofldeas!8,127-45. Bujor, Ioana, forthcoming. „Johannes Amerpoel and Geraud de Cordemoy: The Meaning of nefesh in Two Cartesian Reconstructions of Genesis I . Buzón, Frédéric de. 2013. „Beeckman, Descartes and Physico-Mathematics . ín The Mechanization of Natural Philosophy, ediție de Daniel Garber și Sophie Roux, 143-58. Dordrecht: Springer. 131
Cellamare, Davide. 2019. „A theologian teaching Descartes at the Academy of Nijmegen (1655-1679): class notes on Christoph Wittich s course on the Meditations on First Philosophy . Intellectual History Review, decembrie, 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/17496977.2019.1698874. Chomsky, Noam. 1966. Cartesian Linguistics: A Chapter in the History of Rationalist Thought. New York: Harper and Row. Clair, Pierre. 1978. Jacques Rohault (1618-1672). Bio-Bibliographie. Paris: Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique. Cohen, Floris. 1994. The Scientific Revolution. A Historiographical Inquiry. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Cook, Harold John. 2018. The Young Descartes: Nobility, Rumor, and War. Chicago: Chicago University Press. Cordemoy, Géraud de. 1666. Le discernement du corps et de l âme en six discours: pour servir à l éclaircissement de la physique. Paris: Florentin Lambert. -------- . 1668. Discours physique de la parole. Paris: Florentin Lambert. -------- . 1968. Oeuvres philosophiques. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. -------- . 2015. Six Discourses on the Distinction between the Body and the Soul. Traducere de Steven Nadler. Oxford: Oxford University Press. -------- . 2016. Six Discours sur la distinction et l union du corps et de l âme. Discours physique de la parole. Paris: J. Vrin. Cormack, Lesley B., Steven A. Walton, și John A. Schuster, eds. 2017. Mathematical Practitioners and the Transformation of Natural Knowledge in Early Modern Europe. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 45. Dordrecht: Springer International Publishing. Cyrano de
Bergerac, Savinien de. 1657. Histoire comique: contenant les états et empires de la Lune. Paris: Charles de Sercy. D Alembert, Jean Le Rond, și Jean-Henri-Samuel Formey. 2017. „Cosmologie . In Encyclopédie, ou dictionnaire raisonné des sciences, des arts et des métiers, etc., ediție de Denis Diderot și Jean Le Rond D Alembert, University of Chicago: ARTFL Encyclopédie Project. Chicago: University of Chicago, http://encyclopedie.uchicago.edu/. Dear, Peter. 1995. Discipline and Experience: the mathematical way in the scientific revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. -------- . 2005. „Circular Argument. Descartes Vortices and Their Crafting as Explanations of Gravity . în The Science of Nature in the Seventeenth Century, ediție de Peter Anstey și John Schuster, 81-97. Dordrecht: Springer. 132
-------- . 2008. The Intelligibility of Nature: how science make sense of the world. University of Chicago Press. -------- . 2012. Inteligibilitatea naturii. Cum înțelege știința lumea. București: Herald. Del Prete, Antonella. 2015. „Le «De interpretatione» de Pierre-Daniel Huet: entre tradition humaniste et critique scripturaire . în La masque de l écriture. Philosophie et traduction de la Renaissance aux Lumières, 187202. Geneve: Droz. -------- . 2017. „Lire la Bible en cartésien. Lambert van Velthuysen et le mouvement de la Terre . în Chemins du cartésianisme, ediție de Antonella Del Prete și Raffaele Carbone, 19-34. Paris: Classiques Garnier. Des Chene, Dennis. 1996. Physiologia. Natural Philosophy in Late Aristotelian and Cartesian Thought. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press. -------- . 2000. Sprits and Clocks. Machine and Organism in Descartes. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press. Descartes, René. 1659. Lettres de Μ. Descartes. Vol. П. 3 vol. Paris: Charles Angot. -------- . 2000. Principiile filosofici. Traducere de Ioan Deac. București: IRL -------- . 2003. Lumea. Traducere de Ioan Deac. București: IRI. -------- . 2009. Tutte le lettere 1619-1650. Ediție de Giulia Beigioioso. Milano: Bompiani. -------- . 2014. Corespondența completă. Traducere de Vlad Alexandrescu, Robert Arnăutu, Robert Lazu, Călin Cristian Pop, Mihai-Dragoș Vadana, și Grigore Vida. Vol. 1. 3 vol. Iasi: Polirom. -------- . 2015. Corespondența completă. Ediție de Vlad Alexandrescu. Traducere de Vlad Alexandrescu, Robert Arnăutu, Călin Cristian Pop, Mihai-Dragoș Vadana, și Grigore
Vida. Voi. 2. 3 voi. Iași: Polirom. Dobre, Mihnea. forthcoming. „Depicting Cartesian Cosmology in the Seventeenth Century . -------- . 2009. „The Scientific Journals of the Seventeenth-Century: Cartesianism in Journal des Sçavans and Philosophical Transactions, 1665-1670 . In Branching off: The Early Moderns in Quest of the Unity of Knowledge, 33358. Foundations of Modern Thought 1. București: Zeta Books. -------- . 2011a. „Early Cartesianism and the Journal des Sçavans, 1665-1671 . Studium: Tijdschrift voor Wetenschaps- en Universiteits-geschiedenis I Revue d’Histoire des Sciences et des Universités 4 (4): 228-40. -------- . 2011b. „The Vanishing Nature of Body in Descartes s Natural Philosophy . în Vanishing Matter and the Laws of Motion. Descartes and 133
Beyond, ediție de Peter Anstey și Dana Jalobeanu, 11-30. London: Routledge. ---------. 2013. „Knowledge and Certainty in the Foundation of Cartesian Natural Philosophy . Revue Roumaine de Philosophie 57 (1): 95-110. --------- . 2016. „Experimental Cartesianism and the Problem of Space . în Boundaries, Extents and Circulations: Space and Spatiality in Early Modern Natural Philosophy, ediție de Koen Vermeir și Jonathan Regier, 153-78. Cham: Springer International Publishing. --------- . 2017. Descartes and Early French Cartesianism: between metaphysics and physics. Bucharest: Zeta Books. --------- . 2019. „Jacques Rohault and Cartesian Experimentalism . în Oxford Handbook of Descartes and Cartesianism, ediție de Steven Nadler, Delphine Antoine-Mahut, și Tad Schmaltz, 388^401. Oxford: Oxford University Press. --------- . 2020a. „Jacques Rohault s Mathematical Physics . HOPOS: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 10 (2). https://doi.org/10.1086/710179 . --------- . 2020b. „Cartesian Cosmological Illustrations . Virtual Exhibition. Cartesian Cosmological Illustrations, aprilie 2020. https://cartesia n.unibuc.ro/s/cosmologicalillustrations/ . Dobre, Mihnea, Ovidiu Babeș, și Ioana Bujor. 2020. „Cartesian Cosmological Illustrations: A Digital Approach . Zenodo. http://doi.org/10.528 l/zenodo.3878937. Dobre, Mihnea, și Tammy Nyden, eds. 2013. Cartesian Empiricisms. Dordrecht: Springer. Domski, Mary. 2019. „Imagination, metaphysics, mathematics: Descartes s arguments for the Vortex Hypothesis . Synthese 196: 3505-3526.
https://doi.org/10.1007/sll229-017-1533-6. Donahue, William. 2006. „Astronomy . în The Cambridge History of Science III: Early Modern Science, ediție de Katarine Park și Lorraine Daston, 3:562-95. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Feldhay, Rivka. 1995. Galileo and the Church: Political Inquisition or Critical Dialogue. New York: Cambridge University Press. Ferlin, Fabrice, și Hugues Chabot. 2020. „Vortex Theories in the Early Modern Period . în Encyclopedia of Early Modern Philosophy and the Sciences, ediție de Dana Jalobeanu și Charles T. Wolfe, 1-6. Cham: Springer International Publishing, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319- 20791-9_156-l. 134
Finocchiaro, Maurice A. 1989. The Galileo Affair. A Documentary History. Berkeley: University of California Press. ------- . 2005. Retrying Galileo, 1633-1992. Berkeley: University of California Press. ------- . 2010. Defending Copernicus and Galileo. Critical Reasoning in the Two Affairs. Dordrecht: Springer. Fontenelle, Bernard Le Bouyer de. 1686. Entretiens sur la pluralité des mondes. Paris: Blageart. ------- . 1752. Théorie des tourbillons cartésiens. Paris: Hippolyte-Louis Guerin. Forshaw, Peter R. 2014. „The Genesis of Christian Kabbalah: Early Modem Speculations on the Work of Creation . în Hidden Truths from Eden. Esoteric Readings of Genesis 1-3, ediție de Caroline Vander Stichele și Susanne Scholz, 121-44. Atlanta: Semeia Studies. Funkenstein, Amos. 1998. Teologie și imaginația științifică din evul mediu până în secolul al XVII-lea. București: Humanitás. Gabbey, Alan. 1982. „Philosophia Cartesiana Triumphata: Henry More (1646-1671) . în Problems of Cartesianism, ediție de Thomas Lennon, John Μ. Nicholas, și John Whitney Davis, 171-250. Kingston: McGillQueen s University Press. ------- . 1993. „Between ars and philosophia naturalis: Reflections on the Historiography of Early Modern Mechanics . în Renaissance and Revolution: Humanists, Scholars, Craftsmen and Natural Philosophers in Early Modern Europe, ediție de J. V. Field și F. A. J. L. James, 133-45. ------- . 1995. „Henry More lecteur de Descartes: philosophie naturelle et apologétique . Archives de philosophie 58: 355-69. ------- . 2001. „Mechanical Philosophies and Their Explanations . în Late Medieval and
Early Modern Corpuscular Matter Theories, ediție de Christoph Lüthy, John Emery Murdoch, și William Royall Newman, 441-66. Leiden: Brill. Gadroys, Claude. 1671. Discours sur les influences des astres selon les principes de Μ. Descartes. Paris: J.-B. Coignard. ------- . 1675. Le système du monde selon les trois hypothèses, où, conformément aux loix de la méchanique, l on explique dans la supposition du mouvement de la terre. Paris: G. Desprez. Galilei, Galileo. 2010. Scrisori Copernicane. București: Humanitás. ------- . 2018. Siderens Numcius sau Anunțul stelar. Traducere de Gheorghe Stratan. București: Humanitás. 135
Galilei, Galileo, și Christoph Scheiner. 2010. On Sunspots. Ediție și traducere de Eileen Reeves și Albert Van Helden. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Galison, Peter. 1984. „Descartes s Comparisons: From the Invisible to the Visible . Isis 75 (2): 311-26. Garber, Daniel. 1992. Descartes Metaphysical Physics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. -------- . 1996. „Descartes on Knowledge and Certainty: from the Discours to the Principia . în Descartes: Principia Philosophiae (1644-1994), ediție de Jean-Robert Armogathe și Giulia Beigioioso, 341-63. Napoli: Vivarium. -------- . 2015. „Descartes among the Novatores . Res Philosophica 92 (1): 1-19. Garber, Daniel, John Henry, Lynn Joy, și Alan Gabbey. 1998. „New doctrines of body and its powers, place, and space . In The Cambridge History of the Seventeenth-Century Philosophy, ediție de Daniel Garber și Michael Ayers, 553-623. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Gaukroger, Stephen. 1995. Descartes: An Intellectual Biography. Oxford: Clarendon Press. -------- . 2002. Descartes System of Natural Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. -------- . 2006. The Emergence of a Scientific Culture. Science and the Shaping of Modernity, 1210-1685. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Gaukroger, Stephen, și John Schuster. 2002. „The hydrostatic paradox and the origins of Cartesian dynamics . Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 33 (3): 535-72. Gaukroger, Stephen, John Andrew Schuster, și John Sutton, eds. 2000. Descartes natural philosophy. London; New York: Routledge. Georgescu, Laura, și Mădălina
Giurgea. 2012. „Redefining the Role of Experiment in Bacon s Natural History: How Baconian was Descartes before Emerging from His Cocoon? Early Science and Medicine 17 (1-2): 158-80. Gorham, Geoffrey. 2005. „The metaphysical roots of cartesian physics: The law of rectilinear motion . Perspectives on Science 13 (4): 431-51. Goudriaan, Aza. 2016. „Descartes, Cartesianism, and Early Modern Theology , în The Oxford Handbook of Early Modern Theology, 1600-1800, ediție de Ulrich L. Lehner, Richard A. Muller, și A. G. Roeber, 533-49. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Granada, Miguel Ángel. 2010. „Mersenne s Critique of Giordano Bruno s Conception of the Relation between God and the Universe: A Reappraisal . Perspectives on Science 18 (1): 26M9. 136
------- . 2018. „Giordano Bruno s Concept of Space: Cosmological and Theological Aspects . In Space, Imagination and the Cosmos from Antiquity to the Early Modern Period, ediție de Frederik Bakker, Delphine Bellis, și Carla Rita Palmerino, 157-78. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 48. Dordrecht: Springer. Grant, Edward. 1981. Much ado about nothing: Theories of space and vacuum from the middle ages to the scientific revolution. Cambridge University Press. ------- . 1984a. „In Defense of the Earth s Centrality and Immobility: Scholastic Reaction to Copernicanism in the Seventeenth Century . Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 74 (4): 1-69. https://doi.org/10.2307/1006444. ------- . 1984b. „Were there Significant Differences between Medieval and Early Modern Scholastic Natural Philosophy? The Case for Cosmology . Noils 18 (1): 5-14. https://doi.org/10.2307/2215015. ------- . 1985. „A New Look at Medieval Cosmology, 1200-1687 . Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 129 (4): 417-32. https://doi.org/10.2307/986937. ------- . 2007. A History of Natural Philosophy. From the Ancient World to the Nineteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Grégoire, François. 1954. „Le dernier défenseur des tourbillons: Fontenelle . Revue d’histoire des sciences et de leurs applications 7 (3): 220-46. Grene, Marjorie. 1995. „Animal Mechanism and the Cartesian Vision of Nature . în Physics, Philosophy and the Scientific Community, ediție de Kostas Gavroglu, John Stachel, și Marx Wartofsky, 189-204. Dordrecht: Springer. Hanegraaff, Wouter ƒ. 2013.
Western Esotericism. A guide for the perplexed. London: Bloomsbury Academic. Harrison, Edward. 2000. Cosmology. The Science of the Universe. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Harrison, Peter. 1998. The Bible, Protestantism, and the Rise of Natural Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ------- . 1999. „Subduing the Earth: Genesis 1, Early Modern Science, and the Exploitation of Nature . The Journal of Religion 79 (1): 86-109. https://doi.org/10.1086/490346. ------- . 2000. „The Influence of Cartesian Cosmology in England . In Descartes Natural Philosophy, ediție de Stephen Gaukroger, John Schuster, și John Sutton, 168-92. London: Routledge. 137
------- . 2006. „Having dominion: Genesis and the mastery of nature . în Environmental stewardship: Critical perspectives, past and present, ediție de R.J. Berry, 17-31. London: T T Clark International. ------- . 2007. „Philosophy and the crisis of religion . în The Cambridge Companion to Renaissance Philosophy, ediție de James Hankins, 234-49. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ------- . 2013. „Laws of Nature in Seventeenth-Century England . In The Divine Order, the Human Order, and the Order of Nature: Historical Perspectives, ediție de Eric Watkins, 127-48. New York: Oxford University Press. Hatfield, Gary. 1985. „First Philosophy and Natural Philosophy in Descartes . In Philosophy, Its History and Historiography, ediție de A. J. Holland, 149-64. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company. ------- . 1996. „Review Essay: The Importance of the History of Science for Philosophy in General (Review Essay: Garber (1992) Friedman (1992)) . Synthese 106:113-38. Hattab, Helen. 2005. „From Mechanics to Mechanism. The Quaestiones Mechanicae and Descartes Physics . In The Science of Nature in the Seventeenth Century. Patterns of Change in Early Modern Natural Philosophy, ediție de Peter Anstey și John A. Schuster, 99-130. Dordrecht: Springer. ------- . 2007. „Concurrence or Divergence? Reconciling Descartes s Physics with his Metaphysics . Journal of the History of Philosophy 45 (1): 49-78. ------- . 2009. Descartes on Forms and Mechanisms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Hawking, Stephen. 1995. Scurtă istorie a timpului. București: Humanitás. Henry, John. 1989. „The Matter
of Souls: medical theory and theology in seventeenth-century England . în The Medical Revolution of the Seventeenth Century, ediție de Roger French și Andrew Wear, 87-113. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ------- . 2004. „Metaphysics and the Origins of Modern Science: Descartes and the Importance of Laws of Nature . Early Science and Medicine 9 (2): 73-114. ------- . 2013. „The Reception of Cartesianism . în The Oxford Handbook of British Philosophy in the Seventeenth Century, ediție de Peter Anstey, 116-43. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Hooykaas, R. 1972. Religion and the rise of Modern Science. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press. 138
Howell, Kenneth. 1998. „The Role of biblical Interpretation in the Cosmology of Tycho Brahe . Studies in the History and Philosophy and Science 29 (4): 515-37. -------- . 2002. God s Two Books. Copernican Cosmology and Biblical Interpretation in Early Modern Science. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press. Jalobeanu, Dana, și Doina-Cristina Rusu, eds. 2015. Cosmologie filosofică 1. Renașterea și modernitatea timpurie. Vol. 1. Cosmologie filosofică. Bucuresti: Universitatea din Bucuresti. Janiak, Andrew. 2013. „Metaphysics and Natural Philosophy in Descartes and Newton . Foundations of Science 18 (3): 403-17. https://doi.Org/10.l 007/sl0699-011-9277-0. -------- . 2015a. „Space and motion in nature and Scripture: Galileo, Descartes, Newton . Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 51: 89-99. http://dx.doi.Org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2015.02.004. -------- . 2015b. „The Book of Nature, the Book of Scripture . The New Atlantis 44 (Winter): 95-103. Kelly, Henry Ansgar. 2017. „Galileo s Non-Trial (1616), Pre-Trial (16321633), and Trial (May 10, 1633): A Review of Procedure, Featuring Routine Violations of the Forum of Conscience . Church History 85 (4): 724-61. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0009640716001190. Koestier, Arthur. 1995. Lunaticii. Evoluția concepției despre univers de la Pitagora la Newton. București: Humanitás. Koyre, Alexandre. 1997. De la lumea închisă la universul infinit. București: Humanitás. La Forge, Louis de. 1666. Traité de l’esprit de l homme, de sesfacultez fonctions, de son union avec le corps, suivant les principes de René Descartes. Paris: Michel
Bobin and Nicolas Le Gras. Laudan, Larry. 1966. „The clock metaphor and probabilism: The impact of Descartes on English methodological thought, 1650-65 . Annals of Science 22 (2): 73-104. -------- . 1981. Science and Hypothesis: Historical Essays on Scientific Methodology. University of Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science 19. Dordrecht: D. Reidel. Le Ru, Véronique. 2003. La crise de la substance et de la causalité. Des petits écarts cartésiens au grand écart occasionaliste. Paris: CNRS Editions. Leclerc, Sébastien. 1706. Nouveau système du monde, conforme à l Écriture sainte. Paris: P. Giffart. 139
Leijenhorst, Cornelis Hendrik. 2001. „Place, Space and Matter in Calvinist Physics . The Monist 84 (4): 520-41. Lennon, Thomas. 1974. „Occasionalism and the Cartesian Metaphysics of Motion . Canadian Journal of Philosophy 1 (1): 29-40. Lindberg, David C., și Ronald L. Numbers, eds. 1986. God and Nature: Historical Essays on the Encounter between Christianity and Science. Berkeley: University of California Press. Lindberg, David C., și Robert S. Westman, eds. 1990. Reappraisals of the scientific revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Lüthy, Christoph. 2005. „The Confessionalization of Physics: Heresies, Facts, and the Travails of the Republic of Letters . In Heterodoxy in early modern science and religion, ediție de John Hedley Brooke și Ian Maclean, 81-114. Oxford: Oxford University Press. --------. 2006. „Where Logical Necessity Becomes Visual Persuasion: Descartes s Clear and Distinct Illustrations . în Transmitting Knowledge: Words, Images and Instruments in Early Modern Europe, ediție de Ian Maclean și Sachiko Kusukawa, 97-133. Oxford University Press. Lüthy, Christoph, John Emery Murdoch, și William Royall Newman, eds. 2001. Late Medieval and Early Modern Corpuscular Matter Theories. Medieval and early modern science 1. Leiden: Brill. Machamer, Peter K., și J. E. McGuire. 2006. „Descartes s changing mind . Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 37: 398^19. Marion, Jean-Luc. 1996. Questions cartésiennes IL Sur l ego et sur Dieu. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. McClaughlin, Trevor. 1975. „Sur les rapports entre la Compagnie de Thévenot et
l Académie royale des Sciences . Revue d histoire des sciences 28 (3): 235-42. -------- . 1979. „Censorship and Defenders of the Cartesian Faith in MidSeventeenth Century France . Journal of the History of Ideas 40 (4): 563-81. -------- . 1980. „Claude Clerselier s Attestation of Descartes s Religious Orthodoxy . Journal of Religious Studies 20:136-46. -------- . 1996. „Was there an empirical movement in mid-seventeenth century France? Experiments in Jacques Rohaulťs «Traité de physique» . Revue d histoire des sciences 49 (4): 459-81. McMullin, Ernán, ed. 2005. The Church and Galileo: Religion and Science. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press. 140
Mehl, Édouard. 2013. „La physique cartésienne et l interprétation de la Genèse. In Lire et interpréter. Les religions et leurs rapports aux textes fondateurs, ediție de Anne-Laure Zwilling, 135-49. Labor et Fides. ------- . 2016. „Les états de la matière solaire dans les Principia Philosophiae de Descartes . Archives internationales d histoire des sciences 66 (177): 399-413. https://doi.Org/10.1484/j.arihs.5.115066. ------- . 2019. Descartes et la fabrique du monde. Le problème cosmologique, de Copernic à Descartes. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. Meinel, Christoph. 1988. „Early Seventeenth-Century Atomism: Theory, Epistemology, and the Insufficiency of Experiment . Isis 79 (1): 68103. https://doi.org/10.2307/234441. Menn, Stephen. 1998. „The Intellectual Setting . In The Cambridge History of the Seventeenth-Century Philosophy, ediție de Daniel Garber și Michael Ayers, 1:33-86. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Methuen, Charlotte. 1996. „The Role of the Heavens in the Thought of Phillip Melanchthon . Journal of the History of Ideas 57 (3): 385-403. Mikkeli, Heikki. 2001. „The Aristotelian Classification of Knowledge in the Early Sixteenth Century . In Renaissance readings of the Corpus Aristotelicum : proceedings of the conference held in Copenhagen 23-25 April 1998, ediție de Marianne Pade, 103-27. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press, University of Copenhagen. Milani, Nausicaa Elena. 2015. „Motion and God in XVIIth Century Cartesian Manuals: Rohault, Régis, and Gadrois . Noctua 2 (1-2): 481-516. More, Henry. 1662. A Collection of Several Philosophical
Writings. London: James Flesher. Mosley, Adam. 2007. Bearing the Heavens: Tycho Brahe and the Astronomical Community of the Late Sixteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Nadler, Steven, ed. 1993. Causation in Early Modern Philosophy. Cartesianism, Occasionalism, and Preestablished Harmony. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press. ------- . 2005. „Cordemoy and Occasionalism . Journal of the History of Philosophy 43 (1): 37-54. ------- . 2015. „Introduction. Géraud de Cordemoy and Le Discernement du Corps et de l Ame . In Six Discourses on the Distinction between the Body and the Soul, de Géraud de Cordemoy, 1-53. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 141
Newton, Isaac. 2004. Philosophical Writings. Ediție de Andrew Janiak. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Numbers, Ronald L., ed. 2009. Galileo Goes to Jail and Other Myths about Science and Religion. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press. Oldenburg, Henry, ed. 1670. „An Account of Some Books . Philosophical Transactions 5:1051-54. https://doi.org/10.2307/101576. Omodeo, Pietro Daniel. 2014. Copernicus in the Cultural Debates of the Renaissance. Reception, Legacy, Transformation. Leiden: Brill. Ong-Van-Cung, Kim Sang. 2016. „Introduction . în Six Discours sur la distinction et l union du corps et de l âme. Discours physique de la parole, de Géraud de Cordemoy, 7-70. Paris: J. Vrin. Osler, Margaret. 1985. „Eternal Truths and the Laws of Nature: The Theological Foundations of Descartes Philosophy of Nature . Journal of the History of Ideas 46: 349-62. -------- , ed. 2008. Rethinking the Scientific Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Otegem, Matthijs Van. 2002. A Bibliography of the Works of Descartes (16371704). Zeno: The Leiden-Utrecht Research Institute of Philosophy. Palmerino, Carla Rita. 2006. „The Mathematical Character of Galileo s Book of Nature . In The Book of Nature in Early Modern and Modern History, ediție de Klaas Van Berkel și Arjo Vanderjagt, 27-44. Leuven: Peeters. -------- . 2007. „Bodies in water like planets in the skies: uses and abuses of analogical reasoning in the study of planetary motion . în Mechanics and Cosmology in the Medieval and Early Modern Period, ediție de Massimo Bucciantini, Michele Camerota, și Sophie Roux, 145-68.
Firenze: Leo S. Olischki. Pottin, Ange. 2017. „Mathématisme et tourbillons dans les «Principes de la Philosophie» de Descartes . Noctua 4 (1-2): 1-16. Prost, Joseph. 1907. Essai sur l atomisme et l occasionalisme dans la philosophie cartésienne. Paris: Paulin. Randles, W.G.L. 1999. The Unmaking of the Medieval Christian Cosmos, 15001760. From Solid Heavens to Boundless Æther. London: Routledge. Ribe, Neil. 1997. „Cartesian Optics and the Mastery of Nature . Isis 88 (1): 42-61. Rioux-Beaulne, Mitia. 2019. „What is Cartesianism? Fontenelle and the Subsequent Construction of Cartesian Philosophy . In The Oxford Handbook of Descartes and Cartesianism, ediție de Steven Nadler, Tad Μ. 142
Schmaltz, și Delphine Antoine-Mahut, 481-95. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Robbins, Frank Egleston. 1912. The Hexameral Literature. A study of the Greek and Latin commentaries on Genesis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Rodis-Lewis, Geneviève. 1996. „Lame et le corps chez Descartes et ses successeurs: la naissance de l occasionalisme . Les Études philosophiques, nr. 4: 437-52. ------- . 1999. Descartes. His life and thought. Traducere de Jane Marie Todd. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Roux, Sophie. 2000. „Descartes atomiste? în Atomismo e continuo nel 17. secolo: atti del Convegno internazionale Atomisme et continuum au 17. siècle, Napoli, 28-29-30 aprile 1997, ediție de Egidio Festa și Romano Gatto, 211-73. Naples: Vivarium. ------- . 2001. „Les lois de la nature au XVIIe siècle: le problème terminologique . Revue de synthèse 4 (2-3-4): 531-76. ------- . 2013. „Was There a Cartesian Experimentalism in 1660s France? în Cartesian Empiricisms, ediție de Mihnea Dobre și Tammy Nyden, 4788. Dordrecht: Springer. ------- . 2019. „The Condemnations of Cartesian Natural Philosophy Under Louis XIV (1661-91) . în The Oxford Handbook of Descartes and Cartesianism, ediție de Steven Nadler, Tad Schmaltz, și Delphine Antoine-Mahut, 755-79. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Roux, Sophie, și W. R. Laird, eds. 2008. Mechanics and Natural Philosophy before the Scientific Revolution. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science. New York, Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Ruler, Han van. 1995. The Crisis of Causality. Voet and Descartes on God, Nature and
Change. Leiden: Brill. Sahlins, Peter. 2017. 1668: The Year of the Animal in France. New York: Zone Books. Sailor, Danton B. 1964. „Moses and Atomism . Journal of the History of Ideas 25 (1): 3-16. Schmaltz, Tad. 2002. Radical Cartesianism. The French Reception of Descartes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ------- . 2017. Early Modern Cartesianisms: Dutch and French Constructions. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ------- . 2019. „Claude Clerselier and the Development of Cartesianism . ín The Oxford Handbook of Descartes and Cartesianism, ediție de Steven 143
Nadler, Tad Schmaltz, și Delphine Antoine-Mahut, 303-18. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Schuster, John. 2000. „Descartes opticien. The construction of the law of refraction and the manufacture of its physical rationales, 1618-29 . In Descartes Natural Philosophy, ediție de Stephen Gaukroger, John Schuster, și John Sutton, 258-312. London: Routledge. ------- . 2005. „«Waterworld»: Descartes Vortical Celestial Mechanics—A Gambit in the Natural Philosophical Contest of the Early Seventeenth Century . în The Science of Nature in the Seventeenth Century, ediție de Peter Anstey și John Schuster, 35-80. Dordrecht: Springer. ------- . 2012a. Descartes-Agonistes: Physico-mathematics, Method CorpuscularMechanism 1618-33. Dordrecht: Springer. ------- . 2012b. „Physico-Mathematics and the Search for Causes in Descartes Optics—1619-1637 . Synthese 185 (3): 467-99. ------- . 2015a. „Magnetism . ín The Cambridge Descartes Lexicon, ediție de Lawrence Nolan, 466-67. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ------- . 2015b. „Physico-Mathematics . ín The Cambridge Descartes Lexicon, ediție de Lawrence Nolan, 585-87. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Schuster, John, și Judit Brody. 2013. „Descartes and Sunspots: Matters of Fact and Systematizing Strategies in the Principia Philosophiae . Annals of Science 70 (1): 1-45. https://doi.org/10.1080/00033790.2012 .669703. Shank, J. B. 2008. The Newton wars and the beginning of the French Enlightenment. Chicago: The Chicago University Press. ------- . 2013. „What Exactly Was Torricelli s «Barometer?» ín Science in the Age of Baroque, ediție
de Ofer Gal și Raz Chen-Morris, 161-95. Archives of the History of Ideas 208. Dordrecht: Springer. ------- . 2018. Before Voltaire: The French Origins of Newtonian Mechanics, 1680-1715. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Shapin, Steven, și Simon Schaffer. 1985. Leviathan and the Air-Pump. Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Shapiro, Barbara. 1983. Probability and Certainty in Seventeenth-Century England. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Shapiro, Lisa. 2019. „Princess Elisabeth of Bohemia as a Cartesian . In The Oxford Handbook of Descartes and Cartesianism, ediție de Steven Nadler, Tad Schmaltz, și Delphine Antoine-Mahut, 287-302. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 144
Shea, William. 1970. „Galileo, Scheiner, and the Interpretation of Sunspots . Isis 61 (4): 498-519. Shea, William, și Mariano Artigas. 2003. Galileo in Rome: The Rise and Fall of a Troublesome Genius. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Słowik, Edward. 2002. Cartesian Spacetime. Descartes Physics and the Relational Theory of Space and Motion. International Archives for the History of Ideas 181. Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Smith, Justin E. H., ed. 2006. The Problem of Animal Generation in Early Modern Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ------- . 2019. „Gabriel Daniel: Descartes Through the Mirror of Fiction . în The Oxford Handbook of Descartes and Cartesianism, ediție de Steven Nadler, Tad Μ. Schmaltz, și Delphine Antoine-Mahut, 791-803. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Spink, Aaron. 2018. „Claude Gadroys and a Cartesian Astrology . Journal of Early Modern Studies 7 (1): 151-71. Strazzoni, Andrea. 2019. Dutch Cartesianism and the Birth of Philosophy of Science: from Regius to s Gravesande. Boston: De Gruyter. Strickland, Lloyd. 2015. „The Use of Scripture in the Beast-Machine Controversy . în Knowing Nature in Early Modern Europe, ediție de David Beck, 65-81. London: Routledge. Sytsma, David S. 2015. „Calvin, Daneau, and Physica Mosaica . Church History and Religious Culture 95 (4): 457-76. https://doi.org/10.1163/1871242809504005. Thijssen-Schoute, Caroline L. 1989. Nederlands Cartésianisme: avec sommaire et table des matières en français. Utrecht: HES Uitg. Välieriäni, Matteo, eds. 2017. The Structures of Practical Knowledge.
Dordrecht: Springer. Vanden Broecke, Steven. 2015. „Copernicanism as a religious challange after 1616. Self-discipline and the imagination in Libertus Fromondus anti-Copernican writings (1631-1634) . Lias 42 (1): 67-88. Vermij, Rienk. 2002. The Calvinist Copernicans. The reception of the new astronomy in the Dutch Republic, 1575-1750. Amsterdam: Koninlijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen. Vida, Grigore, forthcoming. „Newton s «De Gravitatione» and the DescartesMore Correspondence . ------- . 2018. „Evoluția concepției cosmologice newtoniene și interacțiunea dintre teologie și știința naturii . în Metafizică și știință, ediție de 145
Mircea Dumitru, Mircea Flonta, și Valentin Mureșan, 271-300. București: Editura Universității din București. Vogel, Klaus. 2006. „Cosmography . în Cambridge History of Science: Early Modern Science, editie de Katherine Park si Lorraine Daston, traducere de Alisha Rankin, 3:469-72. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Volpe, Tony. 2008. Science et théologie dans les débats savants de la seconde moitié du XVIIe siècle. La Genèse dans les „Philosophical Transactions et le „Journal des savants (1665-1710). Turnhout: Brepols Publishers. Watson, Richard. 1966. The Downfall of Cartesianism. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. Westfall, Richard S. 1977. The construction of modern science: mechanisms and mechanics. History of science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Westman, Robert S. 2011. The Copernican Question: Prognostication, Skepticism, and Celestial Order. Berkeley: University of California Press. Wilkins, John. 1638. The discovery of a world in the moone, or, A discourse tending to prove, that tis probable there may be another habitable world in that planet. London: Michael Sparke. Wilson, Catherine. 2008. Epicureanism at the origins of modernity. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Zittel, Claus. 2008. „Descartes as Bricoleur . în Philosophies of Technology. Francis Bacon and his Contemporaries, ediție de Claus Zittel, Gisela Engel, Romano Nanni, și Nicole C. Karafyllis, 337-72. Leiden: Brill. f Bayerische Staatsbibliothek Münchsn 146
|
| adam_txt |
Cuprins Abrevieri . 7 Imagini. 9 Mulțumiri. 11 1. Proiectul cosmologic cartezian (și relația religie-știință). 13 1.1. Introducere generală: Descartes și problema cosmologiei. 13 1.2. Ce este „cosmologia"? . 17 1.3. Teoria carteziană a vârtejurilor . 20 1.4. Cosmologia ca expresie a cosmogonie! biblice . 24 2. Descartes și proiectul cosmologic. 2.1. Proiectul unei noi fizici. 2.2. Descartes si ficțiunea din Le Monde. 2.3. Cazul Galileo Galilei și problema filosofico-teologică. 2.4. Descartes și cosmologia din Principii. 27 27 32 46 51 3. Cosmologia carteziană după Descartes . 3.1. Cosmologia Creștină. 3.2. Cordemoy și filosofia carteziană. 3.3. Cordemoy și cosmologia carteziană. 71 71 74 79 4. Concluzii
. 4.1. Scurtă observație metodologică . 4.2. Noua cosmologie în Philosophical Transactions. 4.3. Concluzii generale. 95 96 97 100 Anexă. 105 Bibliografie. 129 5
Bibliografie Abiondi, Fred. 2005. Geraulă de Corăemoy. Atomist, Occasionatisi, Cartesian. Milwaukee: Marquette University Press. Agostini, Siegrid. 2018. „Cordemoy: Is He a Cartesian Outsider? Desgabets's Interpretation of Cordemoy's Atomism". Society and Politics 12 (1(23)): 101-26. Aitón, E. J. 1957. „The vortex theory of the planetary motions—I". Annals of Science 13 (4): 249-64. -------- . 1958a. „The vortex theory of the planetary motions—П". Annals of Science 14 (2): 132-47. -------- . 1958b. „The vortex theory of the planetary motions—III". Annals of Science 14 (3): 157-72. -------- . 1972. The Vortex Theory of Planetary Motions. London: MacDonald. Aït-Touati, Frédérique. 2011. Fictions of the Cosmos. Science and Literature in the Seventeenth Century. Chicago: Chicago University Press. Amerpoel, Johannes. 1669. Cartesius Mosaizans, seu . conciliatio philosophise Cartesii cum historia creationis per Mosem tradita, etc. Leuven: n.p. Anstey, Peter. 2018. „Locke and Cartesian Cosmology". In Locke and Cartesian Philosophy, ediție de Philippe Hamou și Martine Pécharman. Oxford: Oxford University Press. D01:10.1093/oso/9780198815037.003.0003. Antoine-Mahut, Delphine, și Sophie Roux, eds. 2018. Physics and Metaphysics in Descartes and in his Reception. London: Routledge. Ariew, Roger. 1990. „Christopher Clavius and the Classification of Sciences". Synthese 83 (2): 293-300. -------- . 1996. „Les «Principia» en France et les condamnations du cartésianisme", în Descartes: Principia Philosophiae, 1644-1994, ediție de Jean-Robert Armogathe și Giulia Beigioioso, 625-39. Napoli:
Vivarium. -------- . 2011a. Descartes among the Scholastics. Leiden: Brill. -------- . 2011b. „The New Matter Theory and Its Epistemology. Descartes (and Late Scholastics) on Hypotheses and Moral Certainty". In Vanishing Matter and the Laws of Motion. Descartes and Beyond, ediție de Dana Jalobeanu și Peter Anstey, 31-46. London: Routledge. 129
--------. 2013. „Censorship, Condemnations, and the Spread of Cartesianism", în Cartesian Empiricisms, ediție de Mihnea Dobre și Tammy Nyden, 25-46. Dordrecht: Springer. --------. 2014. Descartes and the First Cartesians. Oxford: Oxford University Press. -------- . 2016. „The Mathematization of Nature in Descartes and the First Cartesians". ín The Language of Nature. Reassessing the Mathematization of Natural Philosophy in the Seventeenth Century, ediție de Geoffrey Gorham, Benjamin Hill, Edward Słowik, și C. Kenneth Waters, 112-33. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press. -------- . 2018. „Comments on John Schuster and Frédéric de Buzón concerning Physico-Mathematics and Mathesis in Descartes". JEMS 7 (1): 175-186. Ariew, Roger, și Alan Gabbey. 1998. „The scholastic background". In The Cambridge History of the Seventeenth-Century Philosophy, ediție de Daniel Garber și Michael Ayers, 425-53. Cambridge University Press. Armogathe, Jean-Robert. 1977. Theologia Cartesiana: L'Explication physique de l'Eucharistie chez Descartes et dom Desgabets. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. -------- . 2019. „Cartesianism and Eucharistic Physics". ín Oxford Handbook of Descartes and Cartesianism, ediție de Steven Nadler, Tad Μ. Schmaltz, și Delphine Antoine-Mahut, 547-64. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Armogathe, Jean-Robert, și Vincent Carraud. 2001. „La premiere condamnation des Oeuvres des Descartes, d'après des documents inédits aux Archives du Saint-Office". Nouvelles de la République des Lettres 2:103-37. Atherton, Margaret. 2005. „Descartes among the British: the case of
the theory of vision". In Receptions of Descartes. Cartesianism and anti-Cartesianism in early modern Europe, ediție de Tad Schmaltz, 218֊34. London: Routledge. Baillet, Adrien. 1691. La Vie de Monsieur Descartes. 2 vol. Paris: Daniel Horthemels. Balz, Albert G. A. 1931. „Geraud de Cordemoy, 1600-1684". The Philosophical Review 40 (3): 221M5. Bardout, Jean-Christophe. 2002. „Occasionalism: La Forge, Cordemoy, Guelincx". ín A Companion to Early Modern Philosophy, ediție de Steven Nadler, 140-51. Boston: Blackwell Publishing. Battail, Jean-François. 1973. L’Avocat Philosophe Géraud de Cordemoy (16261684). La Haye: Martinus Nijhoff. Băltăceanu, Maria Francisca, și Monica Broșteanu, eds. 2017. Biblia după textul ebraic. Geneza. București: Humanitás. Băltăceanu, Maria Francisca, Monica Broșteanu, eds. 2019. Biblia după textul ebraic. Exodul. Leviticul. București: Humanitás. Bellis, Delphine. 2009. „La fable du Monde chez Descartes". Alliage 65:36-48. 130
-------- . 2010a. „Le Monde de Descartes et la Genèse: une dialectique de la lecture du texte sacré et de l'écriture du texte scientifique". în Textes sacrés et culture profane: de la révélation à la création, ediție de Mélanie Adda, 139-61. Bern: Peter Lang. --------. 2010b. „Le visible et l'invisible dans la pensée cartésienne: figuration, imagination et vision dans la philosophie naturelle de René Descartes". Nijmegen: Radboud University Nijmegen. Bennett, J.A. 1991. „The challenge of practical mathematics". în Science, culture and popular belief in Renaissance Europe, ediție de Stephen Pumfrey, Paolo L. Rossi, și Maurice Slawinski, 176-90. Manchester: Manchester University Press. Berkel, Klaas van. 2000. „Descartes' debt to Beeckman. Inspiration, cooperation, conflict". în Descartes' Natural Philosophy, ediție de Stephen Gaukroger, John Schuster, si John Sutton, 46-59. Routledge. -------- . 2013. Isaac Beeckman on Matter and Motion. Mechanical Philosophy in the Making. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press. Biblia sau Sfânta Scriptură. 1997. București: Institutul Biblic și de Misiune al Bisericii Ortodoxe Române. Biener, Zvi. 2008. „The Unity of Science in Early-Modern Philosophy: Subalternation, Metaphysics and the Geometrical Manner in Scholasticism, Galileo and Descartes". Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh. Blackwell, Richard J. 2006. Behind the Scenes at Galileo's Trial. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press. Blair, Ann. 2000. „Mosaic Physics and the Search for a Pious Natural Philosophy in the Late Renaissance". Isis 91 (1): 32-58.
https://doi.org/10.2307/237557 . -------- . 2007. „Science and religion". ín The Cambridge History of Christianity, ediție de R. Po-chia Hsia, 425-43. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Boner, Patrick, ed. 2011. Change and Continuity in Early Modern Cosmology. Dordrecht: Springer. Brooke, John Hedley. 1991. Science and Religion: Some Historical Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Brown, G.I. 1991. „The Evolution of the Term «Mixed Mathematics»". Journal of the History ofldeas!8,127-45. Bujor, Ioana, forthcoming. „Johannes Amerpoel and Geraud de Cordemoy: The Meaning of nefesh in Two Cartesian Reconstructions of Genesis I". Buzón, Frédéric de. 2013. „Beeckman, Descartes and Physico-Mathematics". ín The Mechanization of Natural Philosophy, ediție de Daniel Garber și Sophie Roux, 143-58. Dordrecht: Springer. 131
Cellamare, Davide. 2019. „A theologian teaching Descartes at the Academy of Nijmegen (1655-1679): class notes on Christoph Wittich's course on the Meditations on First Philosophy". Intellectual History Review, decembrie, 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/17496977.2019.1698874. Chomsky, Noam. 1966. Cartesian Linguistics: A Chapter in the History of Rationalist Thought. New York: Harper and Row. Clair, Pierre. 1978. Jacques Rohault (1618-1672). Bio-Bibliographie. Paris: Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique. Cohen, Floris. 1994. The Scientific Revolution. A Historiographical Inquiry. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Cook, Harold John. 2018. The Young Descartes: Nobility, Rumor, and War. Chicago: Chicago University Press. Cordemoy, Géraud de. 1666. Le discernement du corps et de l'âme en six discours: pour servir à l'éclaircissement de la physique. Paris: Florentin Lambert. -------- . 1668. Discours physique de la parole. Paris: Florentin Lambert. -------- . 1968. Oeuvres philosophiques. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. -------- . 2015. Six Discourses on the Distinction between the Body and the Soul. Traducere de Steven Nadler. Oxford: Oxford University Press. -------- . 2016. Six Discours sur la distinction et l'union du corps et de l'âme. Discours physique de la parole. Paris: J. Vrin. Cormack, Lesley B., Steven A. Walton, și John A. Schuster, eds. 2017. Mathematical Practitioners and the Transformation of Natural Knowledge in Early Modern Europe. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 45. Dordrecht: Springer International Publishing. Cyrano de
Bergerac, Savinien de. 1657. Histoire comique: contenant les états et empires de la Lune. Paris: Charles de Sercy. D'Alembert, Jean Le Rond, și Jean-Henri-Samuel Formey. 2017. „Cosmologie". In Encyclopédie, ou dictionnaire raisonné des sciences, des arts et des métiers, etc., ediție de Denis Diderot și Jean Le Rond D'Alembert, University of Chicago: ARTFL Encyclopédie Project. Chicago: University of Chicago, http://encyclopedie.uchicago.edu/. Dear, Peter. 1995. Discipline and Experience: the mathematical way in the scientific revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. -------- . 2005. „Circular Argument. Descartes' Vortices and Their Crafting as Explanations of Gravity". în The Science of Nature in the Seventeenth Century, ediție de Peter Anstey și John Schuster, 81-97. Dordrecht: Springer. 132
-------- . 2008. The Intelligibility of Nature: how science make sense of the world. University of Chicago Press. -------- . 2012. Inteligibilitatea naturii. Cum înțelege știința lumea. București: Herald. Del Prete, Antonella. 2015. „Le «De interpretatione» de Pierre-Daniel Huet: entre tradition humaniste et critique scripturaire". în La masque de l'écriture. Philosophie et traduction de la Renaissance aux Lumières, 187202. Geneve: Droz. -------- . 2017. „Lire la Bible en cartésien. Lambert van Velthuysen et le mouvement de la Terre". în Chemins du cartésianisme, ediție de Antonella Del Prete și Raffaele Carbone, 19-34. Paris: Classiques Garnier. Des Chene, Dennis. 1996. Physiologia. Natural Philosophy in Late Aristotelian and Cartesian Thought. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press. -------- . 2000. Sprits and Clocks. Machine and Organism in Descartes. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press. Descartes, René. 1659. Lettres de Μ. Descartes. Vol. П. 3 vol. Paris: Charles Angot. -------- . 2000. Principiile filosofici. Traducere de Ioan Deac. București: IRL -------- . 2003. Lumea. Traducere de Ioan Deac. București: IRI. -------- . 2009. Tutte le lettere 1619-1650. Ediție de Giulia Beigioioso. Milano: Bompiani. -------- . 2014. Corespondența completă. Traducere de Vlad Alexandrescu, Robert Arnăutu, Robert Lazu, Călin Cristian Pop, Mihai-Dragoș Vadana, și Grigore Vida. Vol. 1. 3 vol. Iasi: Polirom. -------- . 2015. Corespondența completă. Ediție de Vlad Alexandrescu. Traducere de Vlad Alexandrescu, Robert Arnăutu, Călin Cristian Pop, Mihai-Dragoș Vadana, și Grigore
Vida. Voi. 2. 3 voi. Iași: Polirom. Dobre, Mihnea. forthcoming. „Depicting Cartesian Cosmology in the Seventeenth Century". -------- . 2009. „The Scientific Journals of the Seventeenth-Century: Cartesianism in Journal des Sçavans and Philosophical Transactions, 1665-1670". In Branching off: The Early Moderns in Quest of the Unity of Knowledge, 33358. Foundations of Modern Thought 1. București: Zeta Books. -------- . 2011a. „Early Cartesianism and the Journal des Sçavans, 1665-1671". Studium: Tijdschrift voor Wetenschaps- en Universiteits-geschiedenis I Revue d’Histoire des Sciences et des Universités 4 (4): 228-40. -------- . 2011b. „The Vanishing Nature of Body in Descartes's Natural Philosophy". în Vanishing Matter and the Laws of Motion. Descartes and 133
Beyond, ediție de Peter Anstey și Dana Jalobeanu, 11-30. London: Routledge. ---------. 2013. „Knowledge and Certainty in the Foundation of Cartesian Natural Philosophy". Revue Roumaine de Philosophie 57 (1): 95-110. --------- . 2016. „Experimental Cartesianism and the Problem of Space". în Boundaries, Extents and Circulations: Space and Spatiality in Early Modern Natural Philosophy, ediție de Koen Vermeir și Jonathan Regier, 153-78. Cham: Springer International Publishing. --------- . 2017. Descartes and Early French Cartesianism: between metaphysics and physics. Bucharest: Zeta Books. --------- . 2019. „Jacques Rohault and Cartesian Experimentalism". în Oxford Handbook of Descartes and Cartesianism, ediție de Steven Nadler, Delphine Antoine-Mahut, și Tad Schmaltz, 388^401. Oxford: Oxford University Press. --------- . 2020a. „Jacques Rohault's Mathematical Physics". HOPOS: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 10 (2). https://doi.org/10.1086/710179 . --------- . 2020b. „Cartesian Cosmological Illustrations". Virtual Exhibition. Cartesian Cosmological Illustrations, aprilie 2020. https://cartesia n.unibuc.ro/s/cosmologicalillustrations/ . Dobre, Mihnea, Ovidiu Babeș, și Ioana Bujor. 2020. „Cartesian Cosmological Illustrations: A Digital Approach". Zenodo. http://doi.org/10.528 l/zenodo.3878937. Dobre, Mihnea, și Tammy Nyden, eds. 2013. Cartesian Empiricisms. Dordrecht: Springer. Domski, Mary. 2019. „Imagination, metaphysics, mathematics: Descartes's arguments for the Vortex Hypothesis". Synthese 196: 3505-3526.
https://doi.org/10.1007/sll229-017-1533-6. Donahue, William. 2006. „Astronomy". în The Cambridge History of Science III: Early Modern Science, ediție de Katarine Park și Lorraine Daston, 3:562-95. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Feldhay, Rivka. 1995. Galileo and the Church: Political Inquisition or Critical Dialogue. New York: Cambridge University Press. Ferlin, Fabrice, și Hugues Chabot. 2020. „Vortex Theories in the Early Modern Period". în Encyclopedia of Early Modern Philosophy and the Sciences, ediție de Dana Jalobeanu și Charles T. Wolfe, 1-6. Cham: Springer International Publishing, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319- 20791-9_156-l. 134
Finocchiaro, Maurice A. 1989. The Galileo Affair. A Documentary History. Berkeley: University of California Press. ------- . 2005. Retrying Galileo, 1633-1992. Berkeley: University of California Press. ------- . 2010. Defending Copernicus and Galileo. Critical Reasoning in the Two Affairs. Dordrecht: Springer. Fontenelle, Bernard Le Bouyer de. 1686. Entretiens sur la pluralité des mondes. Paris: Blageart. ------- . 1752. Théorie des tourbillons cartésiens. Paris: Hippolyte-Louis Guerin. Forshaw, Peter R. 2014. „The Genesis of Christian Kabbalah: Early Modem Speculations on the Work of Creation". în Hidden Truths from Eden. Esoteric Readings of Genesis 1-3, ediție de Caroline Vander Stichele și Susanne Scholz, 121-44. Atlanta: Semeia Studies. Funkenstein, Amos. 1998. Teologie și imaginația științifică din evul mediu până în secolul al XVII-lea. București: Humanitás. Gabbey, Alan. 1982. „Philosophia Cartesiana Triumphata: Henry More (1646-1671)". în Problems of Cartesianism, ediție de Thomas Lennon, John Μ. Nicholas, și John Whitney Davis, 171-250. Kingston: McGillQueen's University Press. ------- . 1993. „Between ars and philosophia naturalis: Reflections on the Historiography of Early Modern Mechanics". în Renaissance and Revolution: Humanists, Scholars, Craftsmen and Natural Philosophers in Early Modern Europe, ediție de J. V. Field și F. A. J. L. James, 133-45. ------- . 1995. „Henry More lecteur de Descartes: philosophie naturelle et apologétique". Archives de philosophie 58: 355-69. ------- . 2001. „Mechanical Philosophies and Their Explanations". în Late Medieval and
Early Modern Corpuscular Matter Theories, ediție de Christoph Lüthy, John Emery Murdoch, și William Royall Newman, 441-66. Leiden: Brill. Gadroys, Claude. 1671. Discours sur les influences des astres selon les principes de Μ. Descartes. Paris: J.-B. Coignard. ------- . 1675. Le système du monde selon les trois hypothèses, où, conformément aux loix de la méchanique, l'on explique dans la supposition du mouvement de la terre. Paris: G. Desprez. Galilei, Galileo. 2010. Scrisori Copernicane. București: Humanitás. ------- . 2018. Siderens Numcius sau Anunțul stelar. Traducere de Gheorghe Stratan. București: Humanitás. 135
Galilei, Galileo, și Christoph Scheiner. 2010. On Sunspots. Ediție și traducere de Eileen Reeves și Albert Van Helden. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Galison, Peter. 1984. „Descartes's Comparisons: From the Invisible to the Visible". Isis 75 (2): 311-26. Garber, Daniel. 1992. Descartes' Metaphysical Physics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. -------- . 1996. „Descartes on Knowledge and Certainty: from the Discours to the Principia". în Descartes: Principia Philosophiae (1644-1994), ediție de Jean-Robert Armogathe și Giulia Beigioioso, 341-63. Napoli: Vivarium. -------- . 2015. „Descartes among the Novatores". Res Philosophica 92 (1): 1-19. Garber, Daniel, John Henry, Lynn Joy, și Alan Gabbey. 1998. „New doctrines of body and its powers, place, and space". In The Cambridge History of the Seventeenth-Century Philosophy, ediție de Daniel Garber și Michael Ayers, 553-623. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Gaukroger, Stephen. 1995. Descartes: An Intellectual Biography. Oxford: Clarendon Press. -------- . 2002. Descartes' System of Natural Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. -------- . 2006. The Emergence of a Scientific Culture. Science and the Shaping of Modernity, 1210-1685. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Gaukroger, Stephen, și John Schuster. 2002. „The hydrostatic paradox and the origins of Cartesian dynamics". Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 33 (3): 535-72. Gaukroger, Stephen, John Andrew Schuster, și John Sutton, eds. 2000. Descartes' natural philosophy. London; New York: Routledge. Georgescu, Laura, și Mădălina
Giurgea. 2012. „Redefining the Role of Experiment in Bacon's Natural History: How Baconian was Descartes before Emerging from His Cocoon?" Early Science and Medicine 17 (1-2): 158-80. Gorham, Geoffrey. 2005. „The metaphysical roots of cartesian physics: The law of rectilinear motion". Perspectives on Science 13 (4): 431-51. Goudriaan, Aza. 2016. „Descartes, Cartesianism, and Early Modern Theology", în The Oxford Handbook of Early Modern Theology, 1600-1800, ediție de Ulrich L. Lehner, Richard A. Muller, și A. G. Roeber, 533-49. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Granada, Miguel Ángel. 2010. „Mersenne's Critique of Giordano Bruno's Conception of the Relation between God and the Universe: A Reappraisal". Perspectives on Science 18 (1): 26M9. 136
------- . 2018. „Giordano Bruno's Concept of Space: Cosmological and Theological Aspects". In Space, Imagination and the Cosmos from Antiquity to the Early Modern Period, ediție de Frederik Bakker, Delphine Bellis, și Carla Rita Palmerino, 157-78. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 48. Dordrecht: Springer. Grant, Edward. 1981. Much ado about nothing: Theories of space and vacuum from the middle ages to the scientific revolution. Cambridge University Press. ------- . 1984a. „In Defense of the Earth's Centrality and Immobility: Scholastic Reaction to Copernicanism in the Seventeenth Century". Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 74 (4): 1-69. https://doi.org/10.2307/1006444. ------- . 1984b. „Were there Significant Differences between Medieval and Early Modern Scholastic Natural Philosophy? The Case for Cosmology". Noils 18 (1): 5-14. https://doi.org/10.2307/2215015. ------- . 1985. „A New Look at Medieval Cosmology, 1200-1687". Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 129 (4): 417-32. https://doi.org/10.2307/986937. ------- . 2007. A History of Natural Philosophy. From the Ancient World to the Nineteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Grégoire, François. 1954. „Le dernier défenseur des tourbillons: Fontenelle". Revue d’histoire des sciences et de leurs applications 7 (3): 220-46. Grene, Marjorie. 1995. „Animal Mechanism and the Cartesian Vision of Nature". în Physics, Philosophy and the Scientific Community, ediție de Kostas Gavroglu, John Stachel, și Marx Wartofsky, 189-204. Dordrecht: Springer. Hanegraaff, Wouter ƒ. 2013.
Western Esotericism. A guide for the perplexed. London: Bloomsbury Academic. Harrison, Edward. 2000. Cosmology. The Science of the Universe. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Harrison, Peter. 1998. The Bible, Protestantism, and the Rise of Natural Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ------- . 1999. „Subduing the Earth: Genesis 1, Early Modern Science, and the Exploitation of Nature". The Journal of Religion 79 (1): 86-109. https://doi.org/10.1086/490346. ------- . 2000. „The Influence of Cartesian Cosmology in England". In Descartes' Natural Philosophy, ediție de Stephen Gaukroger, John Schuster, și John Sutton, 168-92. London: Routledge. 137
------- . 2006. „Having dominion: Genesis and the mastery of nature". în Environmental stewardship: Critical perspectives, past and present, ediție de R.J. Berry, 17-31. London: T T Clark International. ------- . 2007. „Philosophy and the crisis of religion". în The Cambridge Companion to Renaissance Philosophy, ediție de James Hankins, 234-49. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ------- . 2013. „Laws of Nature in Seventeenth-Century England". In The Divine Order, the Human Order, and the Order of Nature: Historical Perspectives, ediție de Eric Watkins, 127-48. New York: Oxford University Press. Hatfield, Gary. 1985. „First Philosophy and Natural Philosophy in Descartes". In Philosophy, Its History and Historiography, ediție de A. J. Holland, 149-64. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company. ------- . 1996. „Review Essay: The Importance of the History of Science for Philosophy in General (Review Essay: Garber (1992) Friedman (1992))". Synthese 106:113-38. Hattab, Helen. 2005. „From Mechanics to Mechanism. The Quaestiones Mechanicae and Descartes' Physics". In The Science of Nature in the Seventeenth Century. Patterns of Change in Early Modern Natural Philosophy, ediție de Peter Anstey și John A. Schuster, 99-130. Dordrecht: Springer. ------- . 2007. „Concurrence or Divergence? Reconciling Descartes's Physics with his Metaphysics". Journal of the History of Philosophy 45 (1): 49-78. ------- . 2009. Descartes on Forms and Mechanisms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Hawking, Stephen. 1995. Scurtă istorie a timpului. București: Humanitás. Henry, John. 1989. „The Matter
of Souls: medical theory and theology in seventeenth-century England". în The Medical Revolution of the Seventeenth Century, ediție de Roger French și Andrew Wear, 87-113. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ------- . 2004. „Metaphysics and the Origins of Modern Science: Descartes and the Importance of Laws of Nature". Early Science and Medicine 9 (2): 73-114. ------- . 2013. „The Reception of Cartesianism". în The Oxford Handbook of British Philosophy in the Seventeenth Century, ediție de Peter Anstey, 116-43. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Hooykaas, R. 1972. Religion and the rise of Modern Science. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press. 138
Howell, Kenneth. 1998. „The Role of biblical Interpretation in the Cosmology of Tycho Brahe". Studies in the History and Philosophy and Science 29 (4): 515-37. -------- . 2002. God's Two Books. Copernican Cosmology and Biblical Interpretation in Early Modern Science. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press. Jalobeanu, Dana, și Doina-Cristina Rusu, eds. 2015. Cosmologie filosofică 1. Renașterea și modernitatea timpurie. Vol. 1. Cosmologie filosofică. Bucuresti: Universitatea din Bucuresti. Janiak, Andrew. 2013. „Metaphysics and Natural Philosophy in Descartes and Newton". Foundations of Science 18 (3): 403-17. https://doi.Org/10.l 007/sl0699-011-9277-0. -------- . 2015a. „Space and motion in nature and Scripture: Galileo, Descartes, Newton". Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 51: 89-99. http://dx.doi.Org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2015.02.004. -------- . 2015b. „The Book of Nature, the Book of Scripture". The New Atlantis 44 (Winter): 95-103. Kelly, Henry Ansgar. 2017. „Galileo's Non-Trial (1616), Pre-Trial (16321633), and Trial (May 10, 1633): A Review of Procedure, Featuring Routine Violations of the Forum of Conscience". Church History 85 (4): 724-61. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0009640716001190. Koestier, Arthur. 1995. Lunaticii. Evoluția concepției despre univers de la Pitagora la Newton. București: Humanitás. Koyre, Alexandre. 1997. De la lumea închisă la universul infinit. București: Humanitás. La Forge, Louis de. 1666. Traité de l’esprit de l'homme, de sesfacultez fonctions, de son union avec le corps, suivant les principes de René Descartes. Paris: Michel
Bobin and Nicolas Le Gras. Laudan, Larry. 1966. „The clock metaphor and probabilism: The impact of Descartes on English methodological thought, 1650-65". Annals of Science 22 (2): 73-104. -------- . 1981. Science and Hypothesis: Historical Essays on Scientific Methodology. University of Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science 19. Dordrecht: D. Reidel. Le Ru, Véronique. 2003. La crise de la substance et de la causalité. Des petits écarts cartésiens au grand écart occasionaliste. Paris: CNRS Editions. Leclerc, Sébastien. 1706. Nouveau système du monde, conforme à l'Écriture sainte. Paris: P. Giffart. 139
Leijenhorst, Cornelis Hendrik. 2001. „Place, Space and Matter in Calvinist Physics". The Monist 84 (4): 520-41. Lennon, Thomas. 1974. „Occasionalism and the Cartesian Metaphysics of Motion". Canadian Journal of Philosophy 1 (1): 29-40. Lindberg, David C., și Ronald L. Numbers, eds. 1986. God and Nature: Historical Essays on the Encounter between Christianity and Science. Berkeley: University of California Press. Lindberg, David C., și Robert S. Westman, eds. 1990. Reappraisals of the scientific revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Lüthy, Christoph. 2005. „The Confessionalization of Physics: Heresies, Facts, and the Travails of the Republic of Letters". In Heterodoxy in early modern science and religion, ediție de John Hedley Brooke și Ian Maclean, 81-114. Oxford: Oxford University Press. --------. 2006. „Where Logical Necessity Becomes Visual Persuasion: Descartes's Clear and Distinct Illustrations". în Transmitting Knowledge: Words, Images and Instruments in Early Modern Europe, ediție de Ian Maclean și Sachiko Kusukawa, 97-133. Oxford University Press. Lüthy, Christoph, John Emery Murdoch, și William Royall Newman, eds. 2001. Late Medieval and Early Modern Corpuscular Matter Theories. Medieval and early modern science 1. Leiden: Brill. Machamer, Peter K., și J. E. McGuire. 2006. „Descartes's changing mind". Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 37: 398^19. Marion, Jean-Luc. 1996. Questions cartésiennes IL Sur l'ego et sur Dieu. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. McClaughlin, Trevor. 1975. „Sur les rapports entre la Compagnie de Thévenot et
l'Académie royale des Sciences". Revue d'histoire des sciences 28 (3): 235-42. -------- . 1979. „Censorship and Defenders of the Cartesian Faith in MidSeventeenth Century France". Journal of the History of Ideas 40 (4): 563-81. -------- . 1980. „Claude Clerselier's Attestation of Descartes's Religious Orthodoxy". Journal of Religious Studies 20:136-46. -------- . 1996. „Was there an empirical movement in mid-seventeenth century France? Experiments in Jacques Rohaulťs «Traité de physique»". Revue d'histoire des sciences 49 (4): 459-81. McMullin, Ernán, ed. 2005. The Church and Galileo: Religion and Science. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press. 140
Mehl, Édouard. 2013. „La physique cartésienne et l'interprétation de la Genèse." In Lire et interpréter. Les religions et leurs rapports aux textes fondateurs, ediție de Anne-Laure Zwilling, 135-49. Labor et Fides. ------- . 2016. „Les états de la matière solaire dans les Principia Philosophiae de Descartes". Archives internationales d'histoire des sciences 66 (177): 399-413. https://doi.Org/10.1484/j.arihs.5.115066. ------- . 2019. Descartes et la fabrique du monde. Le problème cosmologique, de Copernic à Descartes. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. Meinel, Christoph. 1988. „Early Seventeenth-Century Atomism: Theory, Epistemology, and the Insufficiency of Experiment". Isis 79 (1): 68103. https://doi.org/10.2307/234441. Menn, Stephen. 1998. „The Intellectual Setting". In The Cambridge History of the Seventeenth-Century Philosophy, ediție de Daniel Garber și Michael Ayers, 1:33-86. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Methuen, Charlotte. 1996. „The Role of the Heavens in the Thought of Phillip Melanchthon". Journal of the History of Ideas 57 (3): 385-403. Mikkeli, Heikki. 2001. „The Aristotelian Classification of Knowledge in the Early Sixteenth Century". In Renaissance readings of the "Corpus Aristotelicum": proceedings of the conference held in Copenhagen 23-25 April 1998, ediție de Marianne Pade, 103-27. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press, University of Copenhagen. Milani, Nausicaa Elena. 2015. „Motion and God in XVIIth Century Cartesian Manuals: Rohault, Régis, and Gadrois". Noctua 2 (1-2): 481-516. More, Henry. 1662. A Collection of Several Philosophical
Writings. London: James Flesher. Mosley, Adam. 2007. Bearing the Heavens: Tycho Brahe and the Astronomical Community of the Late Sixteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Nadler, Steven, ed. 1993. Causation in Early Modern Philosophy. Cartesianism, Occasionalism, and Preestablished Harmony. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press. ------- . 2005. „Cordemoy and Occasionalism". Journal of the History of Philosophy 43 (1): 37-54. ------- . 2015. „Introduction. Géraud de Cordemoy and Le Discernement du Corps et de l'Ame". In Six Discourses on the Distinction between the Body and the Soul, de Géraud de Cordemoy, 1-53. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 141
Newton, Isaac. 2004. Philosophical Writings. Ediție de Andrew Janiak. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Numbers, Ronald L., ed. 2009. Galileo Goes to Jail and Other Myths about Science and Religion. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press. Oldenburg, Henry, ed. 1670. „An Account of Some Books". Philosophical Transactions 5:1051-54. https://doi.org/10.2307/101576. Omodeo, Pietro Daniel. 2014. Copernicus in the Cultural Debates of the Renaissance. Reception, Legacy, Transformation. Leiden: Brill. Ong-Van-Cung, Kim Sang. 2016. „Introduction". în Six Discours sur la distinction et l'union du corps et de l'âme. Discours physique de la parole, de Géraud de Cordemoy, 7-70. Paris: J. Vrin. Osler, Margaret. 1985. „Eternal Truths and the Laws of Nature: The Theological Foundations of Descartes' Philosophy of Nature". Journal of the History of Ideas 46: 349-62. -------- , ed. 2008. Rethinking the Scientific Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Otegem, Matthijs Van. 2002. A Bibliography of the Works of Descartes (16371704). Zeno: The Leiden-Utrecht Research Institute of Philosophy. Palmerino, Carla Rita. 2006. „The Mathematical Character of Galileo's Book of Nature". In The Book of Nature in Early Modern and Modern History, ediție de Klaas Van Berkel și Arjo Vanderjagt, 27-44. Leuven: Peeters. -------- . 2007. „Bodies in water like planets in the skies: uses and abuses of analogical reasoning in the study of planetary motion". în Mechanics and Cosmology in the Medieval and Early Modern Period, ediție de Massimo Bucciantini, Michele Camerota, și Sophie Roux, 145-68.
Firenze: Leo S. Olischki. Pottin, Ange. 2017. „Mathématisme et tourbillons dans les «Principes de la Philosophie» de Descartes". Noctua 4 (1-2): 1-16. Prost, Joseph. 1907. Essai sur l'atomisme et l'occasionalisme dans la philosophie cartésienne. Paris: Paulin. Randles, W.G.L. 1999. The Unmaking of the Medieval Christian Cosmos, 15001760. From Solid Heavens to Boundless Æther. London: Routledge. Ribe, Neil. 1997. „Cartesian Optics and the Mastery of Nature". Isis 88 (1): 42-61. Rioux-Beaulne, Mitia. 2019. „What is Cartesianism? Fontenelle and the Subsequent Construction of Cartesian Philosophy". In The Oxford Handbook of Descartes and Cartesianism, ediție de Steven Nadler, Tad Μ. 142
Schmaltz, și Delphine Antoine-Mahut, 481-95. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Robbins, Frank Egleston. 1912. The Hexameral Literature. A study of the Greek and Latin commentaries on Genesis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Rodis-Lewis, Geneviève. 1996. „Lame et le corps chez Descartes et ses successeurs: la naissance de l'occasionalisme". Les Études philosophiques, nr. 4: 437-52. ------- . 1999. Descartes. His life and thought. Traducere de Jane Marie Todd. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Roux, Sophie. 2000. „Descartes atomiste?" în Atomismo e continuo nel 17. secolo: atti del Convegno internazionale Atomisme et continuum au 17. siècle, Napoli, 28-29-30 aprile 1997, ediție de Egidio Festa și Romano Gatto, 211-73. Naples: Vivarium. ------- . 2001. „Les lois de la nature au XVIIe siècle: le problème terminologique". Revue de synthèse 4 (2-3-4): 531-76. ------- . 2013. „Was There a Cartesian Experimentalism in 1660s France?" în Cartesian Empiricisms, ediție de Mihnea Dobre și Tammy Nyden, 4788. Dordrecht: Springer. ------- . 2019. „The Condemnations of Cartesian Natural Philosophy Under Louis XIV (1661-91)". în The Oxford Handbook of Descartes and Cartesianism, ediție de Steven Nadler, Tad Schmaltz, și Delphine Antoine-Mahut, 755-79. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Roux, Sophie, și W. R. Laird, eds. 2008. Mechanics and Natural Philosophy before the Scientific Revolution. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science. New York, Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Ruler, Han van. 1995. The Crisis of Causality. Voet and Descartes on God, Nature and
Change. Leiden: Brill. Sahlins, Peter. 2017. 1668: The Year of the Animal in France. New York: Zone Books. Sailor, Danton B. 1964. „Moses and Atomism". Journal of the History of Ideas 25 (1): 3-16. Schmaltz, Tad. 2002. Radical Cartesianism. The French Reception of Descartes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ------- . 2017. Early Modern Cartesianisms: Dutch and French Constructions. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ------- . 2019. „Claude Clerselier and the Development of Cartesianism". ín The Oxford Handbook of Descartes and Cartesianism, ediție de Steven 143
Nadler, Tad Schmaltz, și Delphine Antoine-Mahut, 303-18. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Schuster, John. 2000. „Descartes opticien. The construction of the law of refraction and the manufacture of its physical rationales, 1618-29". In Descartes' Natural Philosophy, ediție de Stephen Gaukroger, John Schuster, și John Sutton, 258-312. London: Routledge. ------- . 2005. „«Waterworld»: Descartes' Vortical Celestial Mechanics—A Gambit in the Natural Philosophical Contest of the Early Seventeenth Century". în The Science of Nature in the Seventeenth Century, ediție de Peter Anstey și John Schuster, 35-80. Dordrecht: Springer. ------- . 2012a. Descartes-Agonistes: Physico-mathematics, Method CorpuscularMechanism 1618-33. Dordrecht: Springer. ------- . 2012b. „Physico-Mathematics and the Search for Causes in Descartes' Optics—1619-1637". Synthese 185 (3): 467-99. ------- . 2015a. „Magnetism". ín The Cambridge Descartes Lexicon, ediție de Lawrence Nolan, 466-67. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ------- . 2015b. „Physico-Mathematics". ín The Cambridge Descartes Lexicon, ediție de Lawrence Nolan, 585-87. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Schuster, John, și Judit Brody. 2013. „Descartes and Sunspots: Matters of Fact and Systematizing Strategies in the Principia Philosophiae". Annals of Science 70 (1): 1-45. https://doi.org/10.1080/00033790.2012 .669703. Shank, J. B. 2008. The Newton wars and the beginning of the French Enlightenment. Chicago: The Chicago University Press. ------- . 2013. „What Exactly Was Torricelli's «Barometer?»" ín Science in the Age of Baroque, ediție
de Ofer Gal și Raz Chen-Morris, 161-95. Archives of the History of Ideas 208. Dordrecht: Springer. ------- . 2018. Before Voltaire: The French Origins of "Newtonian" Mechanics, 1680-1715. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Shapin, Steven, și Simon Schaffer. 1985. Leviathan and the Air-Pump. Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Shapiro, Barbara. 1983. Probability and Certainty in Seventeenth-Century England. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Shapiro, Lisa. 2019. „Princess Elisabeth of Bohemia as a Cartesian". In The Oxford Handbook of Descartes and Cartesianism, ediție de Steven Nadler, Tad Schmaltz, și Delphine Antoine-Mahut, 287-302. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 144
Shea, William. 1970. „Galileo, Scheiner, and the Interpretation of Sunspots". Isis 61 (4): 498-519. Shea, William, și Mariano Artigas. 2003. Galileo in Rome: The Rise and Fall of a Troublesome Genius. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Słowik, Edward. 2002. Cartesian Spacetime. Descartes' Physics and the Relational Theory of Space and Motion. International Archives for the History of Ideas 181. Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Smith, Justin E. H., ed. 2006. The Problem of Animal Generation in Early Modern Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ------- . 2019. „Gabriel Daniel: Descartes Through the Mirror of Fiction". în The Oxford Handbook of Descartes and Cartesianism, ediție de Steven Nadler, Tad Μ. Schmaltz, și Delphine Antoine-Mahut, 791-803. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Spink, Aaron. 2018. „Claude Gadroys and a Cartesian Astrology". Journal of Early Modern Studies 7 (1): 151-71. Strazzoni, Andrea. 2019. Dutch Cartesianism and the Birth of Philosophy of Science: from Regius to 's Gravesande. Boston: De Gruyter. Strickland, Lloyd. 2015. „The Use of Scripture in the Beast-Machine Controversy". în Knowing Nature in Early Modern Europe, ediție de David Beck, 65-81. London: Routledge. Sytsma, David S. 2015. „Calvin, Daneau, and Physica Mosaica". Church History and Religious Culture 95 (4): 457-76. https://doi.org/10.1163/1871242809504005. Thijssen-Schoute, Caroline L. 1989. Nederlands Cartésianisme: avec sommaire et table des matières en français. Utrecht: HES Uitg. Välieriäni, Matteo, eds. 2017. The Structures of Practical Knowledge.
Dordrecht: Springer. Vanden Broecke, Steven. 2015. „Copernicanism as a religious challange after 1616. Self-discipline and the imagination in Libertus Fromondus' anti-Copernican writings (1631-1634)". Lias 42 (1): 67-88. Vermij, Rienk. 2002. The Calvinist Copernicans. The reception of the new astronomy in the Dutch Republic, 1575-1750. Amsterdam: Koninlijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen. Vida, Grigore, forthcoming. „Newton's «De Gravitatione» and the DescartesMore Correspondence". ------- . 2018. „Evoluția concepției cosmologice newtoniene și interacțiunea dintre teologie și știința naturii". în Metafizică și știință, ediție de 145
Mircea Dumitru, Mircea Flonta, și Valentin Mureșan, 271-300. București: Editura Universității din București. Vogel, Klaus. 2006. „Cosmography". în Cambridge History of Science: Early Modern Science, editie de Katherine Park si Lorraine Daston, traducere de Alisha Rankin, 3:469-72. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Volpe, Tony. 2008. Science et théologie dans les débats savants de la seconde moitié du XVIIe siècle. La Genèse dans les „Philosophical Transactions" et le „Journal des savants" (1665-1710). Turnhout: Brepols Publishers. Watson, Richard. 1966. The Downfall of Cartesianism. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. Westfall, Richard S. 1977. The construction of modern science: mechanisms and mechanics. History of science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Westman, Robert S. 2011. The Copernican Question: Prognostication, Skepticism, and Celestial Order. Berkeley: University of California Press. Wilkins, John. 1638. The discovery of a world in the moone, or, A discourse tending to prove, that 'tis probable there may be another habitable world in that planet. London: Michael Sparke. Wilson, Catherine. 2008. Epicureanism at the origins of modernity. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Zittel, Claus. 2008. „Descartes as Bricoleur". în Philosophies of Technology. Francis Bacon and his Contemporaries, ediție de Claus Zittel, Gisela Engel, Romano Nanni, și Nicole C. Karafyllis, 337-72. Leiden: Brill. f Bayerische Staatsbibliothek Münchsn 146 |
| any_adam_object | 1 |
| any_adam_object_boolean | 1 |
| author | Dobre, Mihnea |
| author_GND | (DE-588)1045056901 |
| author_facet | Dobre, Mihnea |
| author_role | aut |
| author_sort | Dobre, Mihnea |
| author_variant | m d md |
| building | Verbundindex |
| bvnumber | BV047626786 |
| ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1369551105 (DE-599)BVBBV047626786 |
| format | Book |
| fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02442nam a2200577 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV047626786</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20230202 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">211206s2021 a||| |||| 00||| rum d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9786061612284</subfield><subfield code="9">978-606-16-1228-4</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">6061612281</subfield><subfield code="9">6061612281</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1369551105</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV047626786</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">rum</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-12</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Dobre, Mihnea</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1045056901</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Cosmologia carteziană</subfield><subfield code="c">Mihnea Dobre</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Bucureşti</subfield><subfield code="b">Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti</subfield><subfield code="c">2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">147 Seiten</subfield><subfield code="b">Illustrationen</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Colecţia LCI - Limbi, culturi, identităţi</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="600" ind1="1" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Descartes, René</subfield><subfield code="d">1596-1650</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)118524844</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Cartesianismus</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4147364-4</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Philosophie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4045791-6</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="650" ind1="0" ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Kosmologie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4114294-9</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="651" ind1=" " ind2="7"><subfield code="a">Frankreich</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4018145-5</subfield><subfield code="2">gnd</subfield><subfield code="9">rswk-swf</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Cosmology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Cosmology</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Kosmologie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4114294-9</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Descartes, René</subfield><subfield code="d">1596-1650</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)118524844</subfield><subfield code="D">p</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Kosmologie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4114294-9</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="2" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">Frankreich</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4018145-5</subfield><subfield code="D">g</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="2" ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Philosophie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4045791-6</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="2" ind2="2"><subfield code="a">Kosmologie</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4114294-9</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="2" ind2="3"><subfield code="a">Cartesianismus</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)4147364-4</subfield><subfield code="D">s</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="689" ind1="2" ind2=" "><subfield code="5">DE-604</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB München 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=033011277&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Inhaltsverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="2"><subfield code="m">Digitalisierung BSB München 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment</subfield><subfield code="q">application/pdf</subfield><subfield code="u">http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=033011277&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA</subfield><subfield code="3">Literaturverzeichnis</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="n">oe</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="940" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="q">BSB_NED_20230202</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033011277</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">001.09</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">0905</subfield><subfield code="g">498</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">001.09</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">09032</subfield><subfield code="g">44</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">001.09</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="f">0904</subfield><subfield code="g">498</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="942" ind1="1" ind2="1"><subfield code="c">001.09</subfield><subfield code="e">22/bsb</subfield><subfield code="g">181</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
| geographic | Frankreich (DE-588)4018145-5 gnd |
| geographic_facet | Frankreich |
| id | DE-604.BV047626786 |
| illustrated | Illustrated |
| index_date | 2024-07-03T18:44:30Z |
| indexdate | 2024-07-10T09:17:35Z |
| institution | BVB |
| isbn | 9786061612284 6061612281 |
| language | Romanian |
| oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-033011277 |
| oclc_num | 1369551105 |
| open_access_boolean | |
| owner | DE-12 |
| owner_facet | DE-12 |
| physical | 147 Seiten Illustrationen |
| psigel | BSB_NED_20230202 |
| publishDate | 2021 |
| publishDateSearch | 2021 |
| publishDateSort | 2021 |
| publisher | Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti |
| record_format | marc |
| series2 | Colecţia LCI - Limbi, culturi, identităţi |
| spelling | Dobre, Mihnea Verfasser (DE-588)1045056901 aut Cosmologia carteziană Mihnea Dobre Bucureşti Editura Universităţii din Bucureşti 2021 147 Seiten Illustrationen txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier Colecţia LCI - Limbi, culturi, identităţi Descartes, René 1596-1650 (DE-588)118524844 gnd rswk-swf Cartesianismus (DE-588)4147364-4 gnd rswk-swf Philosophie (DE-588)4045791-6 gnd rswk-swf Kosmologie (DE-588)4114294-9 gnd rswk-swf Frankreich (DE-588)4018145-5 gnd rswk-swf Cosmology Kosmologie (DE-588)4114294-9 s DE-604 Descartes, René 1596-1650 (DE-588)118524844 p Frankreich (DE-588)4018145-5 g Philosophie (DE-588)4045791-6 s Cartesianismus (DE-588)4147364-4 s Digitalisierung BSB München 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=033011277&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Inhaltsverzeichnis Digitalisierung BSB München 19 - ADAM Catalogue Enrichment application/pdf http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=033011277&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA Literaturverzeichnis |
| spellingShingle | Dobre, Mihnea Cosmologia carteziană Descartes, René 1596-1650 (DE-588)118524844 gnd Cartesianismus (DE-588)4147364-4 gnd Philosophie (DE-588)4045791-6 gnd Kosmologie (DE-588)4114294-9 gnd |
| subject_GND | (DE-588)118524844 (DE-588)4147364-4 (DE-588)4045791-6 (DE-588)4114294-9 (DE-588)4018145-5 |
| title | Cosmologia carteziană |
| title_auth | Cosmologia carteziană |
| title_exact_search | Cosmologia carteziană |
| title_exact_search_txtP | Cosmologia carteziană |
| title_full | Cosmologia carteziană Mihnea Dobre |
| title_fullStr | Cosmologia carteziană Mihnea Dobre |
| title_full_unstemmed | Cosmologia carteziană Mihnea Dobre |
| title_short | Cosmologia carteziană |
| title_sort | cosmologia carteziana |
| topic | Descartes, René 1596-1650 (DE-588)118524844 gnd Cartesianismus (DE-588)4147364-4 gnd Philosophie (DE-588)4045791-6 gnd Kosmologie (DE-588)4114294-9 gnd |
| topic_facet | Descartes, René 1596-1650 Cartesianismus Philosophie Kosmologie Frankreich |
| url | http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=033011277&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=033011277&sequence=000003&line_number=0002&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT dobremihnea cosmologiacarteziana |