A matter of obscenity: the politics of censorship in modern England
"A popular story about the 1960s and 1970s holds that this was when Britain shook off the vestiges of an oppressive Victorian moralism. Many of those campaigning against censorship saw it this way. But this was also a struggle that pitted Victorian liberalism against supposedly Victorian morals...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Buch |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Princeton
Princeton University Press
[2021]
|
Zusammenfassung: | "A popular story about the 1960s and 1970s holds that this was when Britain shook off the vestiges of an oppressive Victorian moralism. Many of those campaigning against censorship saw it this way. But this was also a struggle that pitted Victorian liberalism against supposedly Victorian morals. John Stuart Mill's ideas provided a way of thinking about freedom, personal autonomy, and the social contract for people who otherwise had little in common with Victorian liberals. This book by Chris Hilliard of the University of Syndey will show how readers and editors, lawyers and law enforcement, politicians and philosophers grappled with questions of freedom, authority and order as a famously deferential society became increasingly pluralist. It was in the aftermath of the publication of affordable English language editions of the works of Emile Zola, in the late 19th century, that this essentially Victorian conflict first materialised in recognisable form. It was in 1960, when Penguin were tried for obscenity after the publication, in English, of the first unedited edtion, that this conflict reached both a crescendo and then a settlement. The book is divided into four parts, each tracing the story of a different phase in the history of obscenity law in Britain. There are also three "interludes" examining areas of law that came into tension with the social changes of the modern period-libel, sedition, and blasphemy. The interludes place struggles over obscenity in a larger cultural context and deepen the legal analysis by exploring the conceptual and policy challenges thrown up by other common-law misdemeanors and tort law"-- |
Beschreibung: | 320 Seiten |
ISBN: | 9780691197982 0691197989 |
Internformat
MARC
LEADER | 00000nam a2200000 c 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BV047483566 | ||
003 | DE-604 | ||
005 | 20211027 | ||
007 | t | ||
008 | 210924s2021 |||| 00||| eng d | ||
020 | |a 9780691197982 |9 9780691197982 | ||
020 | |a 0691197989 |9 0691197989 | ||
035 | |a (OCoLC)1284795511 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BVBBV047483566 | ||
040 | |a DE-604 |b ger |e rda | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng | |
049 | |a DE-11 | ||
084 | |a HM 3255 |0 (DE-625)50983:11852 |2 rvk | ||
084 | |a HM 1025 |0 (DE-625)50769: |2 rvk | ||
084 | |a HN 1025 |0 (DE-625)51103: |2 rvk | ||
100 | 1 | |a Hilliard, Christopher |d 1972- |e Verfasser |0 (DE-588)1123974306 |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a A matter of obscenity |b the politics of censorship in modern England |c Christopher Hilliard |
264 | 1 | |a Princeton |b Princeton University Press |c [2021] | |
264 | 4 | |c © 2021 | |
300 | |a 320 Seiten | ||
336 | |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | 3 | |a "A popular story about the 1960s and 1970s holds that this was when Britain shook off the vestiges of an oppressive Victorian moralism. Many of those campaigning against censorship saw it this way. But this was also a struggle that pitted Victorian liberalism against supposedly Victorian morals. John Stuart Mill's ideas provided a way of thinking about freedom, personal autonomy, and the social contract for people who otherwise had little in common with Victorian liberals. This book by Chris Hilliard of the University of Syndey will show how readers and editors, lawyers and law enforcement, politicians and philosophers grappled with questions of freedom, authority and order as a famously deferential society became increasingly pluralist. It was in the aftermath of the publication of affordable English language editions of the works of Emile Zola, in the late 19th century, that this essentially Victorian conflict first materialised in recognisable form. It was in 1960, when Penguin were tried for obscenity after the publication, in English, of the first unedited edtion, that this conflict reached both a crescendo and then a settlement. The book is divided into four parts, each tracing the story of a different phase in the history of obscenity law in Britain. There are also three "interludes" examining areas of law that came into tension with the social changes of the modern period-libel, sedition, and blasphemy. The interludes place struggles over obscenity in a larger cultural context and deepen the legal analysis by exploring the conceptual and policy challenges thrown up by other common-law misdemeanors and tort law"-- | |
776 | 0 | 8 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Online-Ausgabe |z 978-0-691-22611-8 |
999 | |a oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032885002 |
Datensatz im Suchindex
_version_ | 1804182803788595200 |
---|---|
adam_txt | |
any_adam_object | |
any_adam_object_boolean | |
author | Hilliard, Christopher 1972- |
author_GND | (DE-588)1123974306 |
author_facet | Hilliard, Christopher 1972- |
author_role | aut |
author_sort | Hilliard, Christopher 1972- |
author_variant | c h ch |
building | Verbundindex |
bvnumber | BV047483566 |
classification_rvk | HM 3255 HM 1025 HN 1025 |
ctrlnum | (OCoLC)1284795511 (DE-599)BVBBV047483566 |
discipline | Anglistik / Amerikanistik |
discipline_str_mv | Anglistik / Amerikanistik |
format | Book |
fullrecord | <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim"><record><leader>02720nam a2200337 c 4500</leader><controlfield tag="001">BV047483566</controlfield><controlfield tag="003">DE-604</controlfield><controlfield tag="005">20211027 </controlfield><controlfield tag="007">t</controlfield><controlfield tag="008">210924s2021 |||| 00||| eng d</controlfield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">9780691197982</subfield><subfield code="9">9780691197982</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">0691197989</subfield><subfield code="9">0691197989</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(OCoLC)1284795511</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">(DE-599)BVBBV047483566</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-604</subfield><subfield code="b">ger</subfield><subfield code="e">rda</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="041" ind1="0" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">eng</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="049" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">DE-11</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">HM 3255</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)50983:11852</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">HM 1025</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)50769:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">HN 1025</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-625)51103:</subfield><subfield code="2">rvk</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">Hilliard, Christopher</subfield><subfield code="d">1972-</subfield><subfield code="e">Verfasser</subfield><subfield code="0">(DE-588)1123974306</subfield><subfield code="4">aut</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0"><subfield code="a">A matter of obscenity</subfield><subfield code="b">the politics of censorship in modern England</subfield><subfield code="c">Christopher Hilliard</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1"><subfield code="a">Princeton</subfield><subfield code="b">Princeton University Press</subfield><subfield code="c">[2021]</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="4"><subfield code="c">© 2021</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">320 Seiten</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">txt</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">n</subfield><subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="b">nc</subfield><subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" "><subfield code="a">"A popular story about the 1960s and 1970s holds that this was when Britain shook off the vestiges of an oppressive Victorian moralism. Many of those campaigning against censorship saw it this way. But this was also a struggle that pitted Victorian liberalism against supposedly Victorian morals. John Stuart Mill's ideas provided a way of thinking about freedom, personal autonomy, and the social contract for people who otherwise had little in common with Victorian liberals. This book by Chris Hilliard of the University of Syndey will show how readers and editors, lawyers and law enforcement, politicians and philosophers grappled with questions of freedom, authority and order as a famously deferential society became increasingly pluralist. It was in the aftermath of the publication of affordable English language editions of the works of Emile Zola, in the late 19th century, that this essentially Victorian conflict first materialised in recognisable form. It was in 1960, when Penguin were tried for obscenity after the publication, in English, of the first unedited edtion, that this conflict reached both a crescendo and then a settlement. The book is divided into four parts, each tracing the story of a different phase in the history of obscenity law in Britain. There are also three "interludes" examining areas of law that came into tension with the social changes of the modern period-libel, sedition, and blasphemy. The interludes place struggles over obscenity in a larger cultural context and deepen the legal analysis by exploring the conceptual and policy challenges thrown up by other common-law misdemeanors and tort law"--</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8"><subfield code="i">Erscheint auch als</subfield><subfield code="n">Online-Ausgabe</subfield><subfield code="z">978-0-691-22611-8</subfield></datafield><datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" "><subfield code="a">oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032885002</subfield></datafield></record></collection> |
id | DE-604.BV047483566 |
illustrated | Not Illustrated |
index_date | 2024-07-03T18:13:26Z |
indexdate | 2024-07-10T09:13:22Z |
institution | BVB |
isbn | 9780691197982 0691197989 |
language | English |
oai_aleph_id | oai:aleph.bib-bvb.de:BVB01-032885002 |
oclc_num | 1284795511 |
open_access_boolean | |
owner | DE-11 |
owner_facet | DE-11 |
physical | 320 Seiten |
publishDate | 2021 |
publishDateSearch | 2021 |
publishDateSort | 2021 |
publisher | Princeton University Press |
record_format | marc |
spelling | Hilliard, Christopher 1972- Verfasser (DE-588)1123974306 aut A matter of obscenity the politics of censorship in modern England Christopher Hilliard Princeton Princeton University Press [2021] © 2021 320 Seiten txt rdacontent n rdamedia nc rdacarrier "A popular story about the 1960s and 1970s holds that this was when Britain shook off the vestiges of an oppressive Victorian moralism. Many of those campaigning against censorship saw it this way. But this was also a struggle that pitted Victorian liberalism against supposedly Victorian morals. John Stuart Mill's ideas provided a way of thinking about freedom, personal autonomy, and the social contract for people who otherwise had little in common with Victorian liberals. This book by Chris Hilliard of the University of Syndey will show how readers and editors, lawyers and law enforcement, politicians and philosophers grappled with questions of freedom, authority and order as a famously deferential society became increasingly pluralist. It was in the aftermath of the publication of affordable English language editions of the works of Emile Zola, in the late 19th century, that this essentially Victorian conflict first materialised in recognisable form. It was in 1960, when Penguin were tried for obscenity after the publication, in English, of the first unedited edtion, that this conflict reached both a crescendo and then a settlement. The book is divided into four parts, each tracing the story of a different phase in the history of obscenity law in Britain. There are also three "interludes" examining areas of law that came into tension with the social changes of the modern period-libel, sedition, and blasphemy. The interludes place struggles over obscenity in a larger cultural context and deepen the legal analysis by exploring the conceptual and policy challenges thrown up by other common-law misdemeanors and tort law"-- Erscheint auch als Online-Ausgabe 978-0-691-22611-8 |
spellingShingle | Hilliard, Christopher 1972- A matter of obscenity the politics of censorship in modern England |
title | A matter of obscenity the politics of censorship in modern England |
title_auth | A matter of obscenity the politics of censorship in modern England |
title_exact_search | A matter of obscenity the politics of censorship in modern England |
title_exact_search_txtP | A matter of obscenity the politics of censorship in modern England |
title_full | A matter of obscenity the politics of censorship in modern England Christopher Hilliard |
title_fullStr | A matter of obscenity the politics of censorship in modern England Christopher Hilliard |
title_full_unstemmed | A matter of obscenity the politics of censorship in modern England Christopher Hilliard |
title_short | A matter of obscenity |
title_sort | a matter of obscenity the politics of censorship in modern england |
title_sub | the politics of censorship in modern England |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hilliardchristopher amatterofobscenitythepoliticsofcensorshipinmodernengland |